view article

Figure 5
(a), (b) Visualizations of the central part of the reconstructed complex probe fields of data set 1 and data set 2, respectively. (c) Intensity of a horizontal slice through the probe at the sample [dashed white line in (a)]. (d) Intensity of a vertical slice through the probe at the sample [dash-dotted white line in (a)]. Gaussian fits (red lines) yield FWHM values of 673 nm × 564 nm (h × v). (e) Intensity of a horizontal slice through the probe at the sample [dashed white line in (b)]. (f) Intensity of a vertical slice through the probe at the sample [dash-dotted white line in (b)]. Gaussian fits (red lines) yield FWHM values of 580 nm × 566 nm (h × v). (g), (h) Intensity of numerically propagated probe fields as a slice through the optical axis and the horizontal axis [indicated as a dashed white line in (a), (b)] of the focus (at [z\,\,\gtrsim\,\,]2 mm) of data sets 1 and 2, respectively. Dashed white lines, dashed black lines and dash-dotted white lines indicate the plane of the pinhole, position of the sample and position of the focal plane, respectively. Scale bars denote 0.5 µm in (a) and (b).

Journal logoFOUNDATIONS
ADVANCES
ISSN: 2053-2733
Follow Acta Cryst. A
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds