[Journal logo]

Volume 62 
Part 6 
Pages 960-965  
December 2006  

Received 21 March 2006
Accepted 22 September 2006

Structure of strontium barium niobate SrxBa1 - xNb2O6 (SBN) in the composition range 0.32 [less-than or equal to] x [less-than or equal to] 0.82

aFachbereich Physik, Universität Osnabrück, D-49069 Osnabrück, Germany,bRuhr-Universität Bochum, D-44801 Bochum, Germany, and cLudwig-Maximilians-Universität, D-80333 München, Germany
Correspondence e-mail: klaus.betzler@uos.de

The structure of strontium barium niobate crystals SrxBa1 - xNb2O6 is comprehensively studied in the whole range of the tetragonal tungsten bronze phase (x = 0.32-0.82) using both powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements. Unit-cell parameters, density, site-occupancy factors and interionic distances show an explicit composition dependence which can be consistently explained using simple model calculations. The temperature dependence of the unit-cell parameters exhibits a remarkable anisotropy in a broad temperature region below the phase transition temperature. This proves that the electrostrictive contribution to the thermal expansion plays an important role in strontium barium niobate.

1. Introduction

Strontium barium niobate, SrxBa1-xNb2O6 (SBN), is an extensively studied ferroelectric material for electrooptic and photorefractive applications owing to its high electrooptic (r33 = 420 pm V-1 for x = 0.61) and piezoelectric coefficients (Neurgaonkar et al., 1984[Neurgaonkar, R. R., Oliver, J. R. & Cross, L. E. (1984). Ferroelectrics, 56, 31-36.]). Utilizing the high four-wave coupling coefficient [\Gamma] in Ce-doped SBN, holographic applications of doped SBN (Volk et al., 1997[Volk, T., Woike, T., Dörfler, U., Pankrath, R., Ivleva, L. & Wöhlecke, M. (1997). Ferroelectrics, 203, 457-470.]) were also investigated. Most investigations were restricted to the congruently melting composition with x = 0.61, because for this composition crystals of high optical quality are available. The motivation to study SBN crystals with other strontium concentrations is the strong compositional dependence of the phase transition temperature. It changes from 503 K for x = 0.32 to ca 283 K for x = 0.82 (David et al., 2004[David, C., Granzow, T., Tunyagi, A., Wöhlecke, M., Woike, T., Betzler, K., Ulex, M., Imlau, M. & Pankrath, R. (2004). Phys. Status Solidi A Appl. Res. 201, R49-R52.]). Taking advantage of this dependence, the electrooptic coefficients for room temperature can be optimized using appropriate Sr concentrations (r33 = 1400 for x = 0.75; Neurgaonkar et al., 1984[Neurgaonkar, R. R., Oliver, J. R. & Cross, L. E. (1984). Ferroelectrics, 56, 31-36.]).

SBN belongs to the group of relaxor ferroelectrics. A typical phenomenon for this class is a broadened phase transition which is probably caused by the wide variation of the non-equivalent crystallographic positions in its structure. A first structural characterization was made in 1969 (Jamieson et al., 1968[Jamieson, P. B., Abrahams, S. C. & Bernstein, J. L. (1968). J. Chem. Phys. 48, 5048.]) for the composition x = 0.75. The ferroelectric relaxor SBN belongs to the structure type of tetragonal tungsten bronze (TTB) with the space group P4bm at room temperature (see Fig. 1[link]). Sr and Ba occupy the A1 and A2 positions; while the smaller 12-fold coordinated A1 site is occupied only by Sr, both Sr and Ba are found in the larger 15-fold coordinated A2 site. This cation distribution was recently confirmed for SBN crystals with x = 0.61 (Chernaya et al., 1997[Chernaya, T. S., Maksimov, B. A., Verin, I. V., Ivleva, L. I. & Simonov, V. I. (1997). Crystallogr. Rep. 42, 375-380.]) and 0.75 (Chernaya et al., 2000[Chernaya, T. S., Maksimov, B. A., Volk, T. R., Ivleva, L. I. & Simonov, V. I. (2000). Phys. Solid State, 42, 1716-1721.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Crystal structure of the tetragonal tungsten bronze.

The compositional range of the ferroelectric TTB phase has usually been defined as x = 0.25-0.75. The existence range of tetragonal SBN was recently corrected to be x = 0.32-0.82 (Ulex et al., 2004[Ulex, M., Pankrath, R. & Betzler, K. (2004). J. Cryst. Growth, 271, 128-133.]). The aim of this work is a structure determination for the whole compositional range of SBN by means of X-ray diffraction measurements for both single-crystal and powder samples, with special attention on the cation distribution and the parameters of the Nb coordination polyhedron in the unit cell.

2. Experimental

2.1. Crystals

Single crystals of SBN (x = 0.32-0.82) were grown by the Czochralski technique using resistance heating. The detailed description of growth procedures can be found elsewhere (Ulex et al., 2004[Ulex, M., Pankrath, R. & Betzler, K. (2004). J. Cryst. Growth, 271, 128-133.]). The crystals were grown along the [001] direction; they exhibit a slight yellow colouration and show the form of prisms with 16 natural facets. The crystal diameter is between 5 and 7 mm. For the single-crystal X-ray measurements, as-grown (unpoled) single crystals were ground in an agate mortar followed by grinding in a ball mill. These operations produced single-crystalline spherical particles with diameters between 50 and 100[\mu]m. The samples for the powder X-ray diffractometry were also produced by grinding grown crystals.

2.2. X-ray diffraction measurements

X-ray powder diffraction measurements were performed on crystal powder samples consisting of 40 mg SBN and 12 mg F-phlogopite as standard, using Cu K[\alpha] radiation. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out on a four-circle kappa diffractometer (Xcalibur from Oxford Diffraction) equipped with a Sapphire2 CCD area detector. Graphite-monochromatized Mo K[\alpha] radiation was used. The sample-to-detector distance was 44.4 mm. With one and four scans, 93.2% of reciprocal space was covered which corresponds to 100% completeness under Laue group 4/m mm at a resolution of 0.8 Å. Data reduction and numerical absorption correction were carried out with the program CrysAlisRED (Oxford Diffraction, 2002[Oxford Diffraction (2002). CrysAlisRED, Version 1.69. Oxford Diffraction, UK.]). The crystal structure was refined with the program SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]).

All measurements (except those for the temperature dependence of the unit-cell parameters) were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Unit-cell parameters

Powder X-ray measurements were performed throughout the compositional range x(Sr) from 0.32 to 0.82 with composition steps of ca 0.03. From these measurements, the unit-cell parameters a and c could be derived with an accuracy of approximately 3×10-5.

The a parameter lies between 1248.5 and 1241.1 pm and the c parameter varies from 397.4 to 389.9 pm. Both a and c unit-cell parameters decrease with increasing Sr concentration. The dependence of the unit-cell parameters on the Sr concentration is shown in Fig. 2[link]. The unit-cell parameters for the composition x = 0.61 are in good agreement with previously reported data (Chernaya et al., 1997[Chernaya, T. S., Maksimov, B. A., Verin, I. V., Ivleva, L. I. & Simonov, V. I. (1997). Crystallogr. Rep. 42, 375-380.]). For comparison, the unit-cell parameters resulting from the single-crystal measurements (see below) are also plotted.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Unit-cell parameters of strontium barium niobate SrxBa1-xNb2O6 as a function of the strontium content x derived from powder (circles and squares) and single-crystal (filled triangles) X-ray measurements. Lines denote fits to the powder data.

The composition dependence of the unit-cell parameters can be described using second-order polynomial fits to the powder data

[a = 1249.2+4.75x-17.6x^2 \eqno(1) ]

[c = 401.55-11.70x-2.41x^2 \eqno(2) ]

plotted as lines in Fig. 2[link]. A quadratic term is included in both (1)[link] and (2)[link] to account for the slight deviations from Vegard's rule visible in the data. From Vegard's rule, a strictly linear dependence would be expected.

The overall variation of the unit-cell volume is approximately 3%. This can be fully ascribed to the variation of the effective average radii reff of the cations occupying the A1 and A2 sites (reff = 142-134 pm for rBa = 147 pm and rSr = 131 pm (Shannon & Prewitt, 1969[Shannon, R. D. & Prewitt, C. T. (1969). Acta Cryst. B25, 925-946.], 1970[Shannon, R. D. & Prewitt, C. T. (1970). Acta Cryst. B26, 1046-1048.]), if one takes into account that approximately 15% of the unit-cell volume belongs to the A1 and A2 sites.

In Fig. 3[link] the measured unit-cell values are compared with the data for other ferroelectrics with the TTB structure. The Sr-rich compositions of SBN show rather small unit-cell parameters. This could be one of the reasons for the high values of the spontaneous polarization Ps and in turn the electrooptic coefficient rij in SBN.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
SBN unit-cell parameters compared with other ferroelectrics from the TTB family (after Neurgaonkar & Cory, 1986[Neurgaonkar, R. R. & Cory, W. K. (1986). J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 3, 274.]).

3.2. Density

The density of the crystals was measured by hydrostatic technique on SBN samples with a typical volume of some cubic centimeters using distilled water as the immersion liquid. Thus, a good accuracy was achieved. The results are plotted in Fig. 4[link] together with the calculated X-ray density. For the calculation, the composition-dependent unit-cell parameters as given in (1)[link] and (2)[link] are used. A second-order polynomial fit to the X-ray density yields

[\rho = 0.16x^2-0.53x+5.55. \eqno(3) ]

Again the quadratic term is included to account for deviations from Vegard's rule.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Density of SBN as a function of the Sr content. Squares denote measured data (Archimedes principle); the line shows the X-ray density calculated using the unit-cell parameters.

3.3. Site-occupancy factors

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were performed on SrxBa1-xNb2O6 crystals with x equal to 0.342, 0.477, 0.613 and 0.822. For all these compositions the structure refinement led to the tetragonal structure type with the space group P4bm.

The site-occupancy factors (s.o.f.) for the cation sites A1 and A2, derived from the measurement, are shown in Fig. 5[link]. Site-occupancy factors are defined as

[{\rm s.o.f.}_i = M_iN/Z, \eqno(4) ]

where Mi is the number of atoms per formula unit on site i, N the number of formula units per unit cell and Z the number of symmetry-equivalent sites in the unit cell. For SBN, N = 5, Z = 8, and the sum of the Mi for the A1 and A2 sites is 1. The 12-fold coordinated A1 sites are occupied by Sr cations only, the site-occupancy factor s.o.f.(Sr-A1) depends only slightly on the composition and varies between 0.16 and 0.18 corresponding to a relative occupancy between 66 and 72%. The 15-fold coordinated A2 sites are occupied by both Sr and Ba cations with an approximately linear composition dependence of the respective s.o.f. values. The total relative occupancy for the A2 sites is ca 90%.

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Site-occupancy factors for A1 and A2 sites in SBN. Dots indicate measured data: [\circ] - this work; [white up-pointing small triangle] - Jamieson et al. (1968[Jamieson, P. B., Abrahams, S. C. & Bernstein, J. L. (1968). J. Chem. Phys. 48, 5048.]); [white square] - Chernaya et al. (1997[Chernaya, T. S., Maksimov, B. A., Verin, I. V., Ivleva, L. I. & Simonov, V. I. (1997). Crystallogr. Rep. 42, 375-380.]); [down-pointing triangle] - Woike et al. (2003[Woike, T., Petricek, V., Dusek, M., Hansen, N. K., Fertey, P., Lecomte, C., Arakcheeva, A., Chapuis, G., Imlau, M. & Pankrath, R. (2003). Acta Cryst. B59, 28.]). The lines represent the results of a model calculation (see text).

The site-occupancy factors and their compositional dependence can be described by a simple statistical model. Assuming that Ba occupies only A2 sites and Sr randomly occupies A1 and the remaining A2 sites with different preferences yields the respective s.o.f. values as a function of the strontium fraction x

[{\rm s.o.f.}({\rm Ba-}A2) = {N\over Z} (1-x) = {5\over 8}(1-x)\eqno(5) ]

[{\rm s.o.f.}({\rm Sr-}A1) = {5x\over 8+4K(5x-1)}\eqno(6) ]

[{\rm s.o.f.}({\rm Sr-}A2) = {5\over 8}x-{5x\over 8+4K(5x-1)}.\eqno(7) ]

K is a factor denoting the preference of Sr for the A2 site compared with A1, with K = 1 for equal preferences. The results of the model calculation for K = 1.1, i.e. a slight preference for A2, are sketched as gray lines in Fig. 5[link]. A satisfactory agreement with the experimental data was found.

3.4. Nb-O bond lengths

The Nb-O bond lengths for all the compositions studied lie between 180 and 214 pm. The mean bond length which characterizes the NbO6 octahedron size decreases monotonically with increasing Sr concentration and reaches 195.8 pm for the x(Sr) = 0.82, which is only slightly larger than the value of 195.2 pm calculated for the `ideal' oxygen (ion radius 138 pm) octahedron. The maximal difference between Nb-O bond lengths describes the asymmetry of the Nb position within the octahedron and also becomes smaller for the Sr-richer crystals. The measured unit-cell parameters, site-occupancy factors and Nb-O distances are shown in Table 1[link]. All experimental data are given in Table 2[link].1

Table 1
Results of the X-ray diffraction measurements on SrxBa1 - xNb2O6 single crystals of different strontium fraction x

Crystal   SBN-34 SBN-48 SBN-61 SBN-82
Strontium fraction x 0.342 0.477 0.613 0.822
Cell parameters a (pm) 1248.40 (4) 1248.52 (6) 1245.9 (1) 1241.1 (5)
  c (pm) 397.42 (3) 395.66 (5) 393.6 (1) 389.9 (2)
Site occupancy Sr-A1 0.1659 (3) 0.1777 (3) 0.1796 (3) 0.1758 (5)
  Ba-A2 0.4150 (4) 0.3300 (4) 0.2438 (4) 0.0942 (6)
  Sr-A2 0.0444 (4) 0.1170 (4) 0.2019 (4) 0.3550 (6)
Nb-O distance Nb1 (pm) 197.10 197.01 196.66 195.78
[\Delta] Nb-O Nb1 (pm) 30.1 28.3 33.4 16.1
Nb-O distance Nb2 (pm) 198.16 197.83 197.19 196.57
[\Delta] Nb-O Nb2 (pm) 30.2 28.2 23.9 7.7

Table 2
Experimental details

  k2shape sr477 shape137 sbn159k3
Crystal data
Chemical formula Ba0.67Nb2O6Sr0.33 Ba0.52Nb2O6Sr0.48 Ba0.39Nb2O6Sr0.61 Ba0.14Nb2O6Sr0.86
Mr 402.26 395.44 388.68 378.29
Cell setting, space group Tetragonal, P4bm Tetragonal, P4bm Tetragonal, P4bm Tetragonal, P4bm
Temperature (K) 298 (2) 298 (2) 298 (2) 298 (2)
a, c (Å) 12.4840 (4), 3.9742 (3) 12.4844 (5), 3.9572 (3) 12.4575 (7), 3.9382 (3) 12.4179 (9), 3.9074 (5)
V3) 619.38 (5) 616.77 (6) 611.17 (7) 602.54 (10)
Z 5 5 5 5
Dx (Mg m-3) 5.392 5.323 5.282 5.216
Radiation type Mo K[alpha] Mo K[alpha] Mo K[alpha] Mo K[alpha]
[mu] (mm-1) 13.33 13.78 14.31 15.13
Crystal form, colour Sphere, colourless Sphere, colourless Sphere, colourless Sphere, colourless
Crystal size (mm) 0.26 × 0.22 × 0.19 0.18 × 0.17 × 0.16 0.20 × 0.19 × 0.13 0.17 × 0.17 × 0.12
         
Data collection
Diffractometer Xcalibur CCD Xcalibur CCD Xcalibur CCD Xcalibur CCD
Data collection method [omega] and [varphi] [omega] and [varphi] [omega] and [varphi] [omega] and [varphi]
Absorption correction Numerical Numerical Numerical Numerical
Tmin 0.097 0.159 0.130 0.099
Tmax 0.177 0.221 0.267 0.169
No. of measured, independent and observed reflections 11 682, 2077, 1852 11 771, 2157, 1635 11 458, 2096, 1740 11 273, 2153, 1365
Criterion for observed reflections I > 2[sigma](I) I > 2[sigma](I) I> 2[sigma](I) I > 2[sigma](I)
Rint 0.034 0.038 0.039 0.060
[theta]max (°) 40.3 41.3 39.5 43.3
         
Refinement
Refinement on F2 F2 F2 F2
R[F2 > 2[sigma](F2)], wR(F2), S 0.027, 0.065, 1.12 0.030, 0.055, 1.00 0.033, 0.076, 1.14 0.045, 0.091, 0.96
No. of reflections 2077 2157 2096 2153
No. of parameters 65 65 65 65
Weighting scheme w = 1/[[sigma]2(Fo2) + (0.0303P)2 + 1.1155P], where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 w = 1/[[sigma]2(Fo2) + (0.021P)2], where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 w = 1/[[sigma]2(Fo2) + (0.0334P)2 + 0.3182P], where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 w = 1/[[sigma]2(Fo2) + (0.0383P)2], where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
([Delta]/[sigma])max 0.009 0.005 0.001 0.010
[Delta][rho]max, [Delta][rho]min (e Å-3) 2.18, -2.79 2.12, -2.80 2.54, -3.17 3.63, -3.54
Extinction method SHELXL SHELXL SHELXL SHELXL
Extinction coefficient 0.0137 (3) 0.00421 (12) 0.0108 (3) 0.0118 (4)
Absolute structure Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881]), 807 Friedel pairs Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881]), 877 Friedel pairs Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881]), 866 Friedel pairs Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881]), 891 Friedel pairs
Computer programs used: CrysAlisCCD Oxford Diffraction, 2002[Oxford Diffraction (2002). CrysAlisRED, Version 1.69. Oxford Diffraction, UK.]), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999[Farrugia, L. J. (1999). WinGX, Version 1.61. University of Glasgow, Scotland.]).

3.5. Temperature dependence of the unit-cell parameters

Usually the unit-cell parameters of crystals increase monotonically with increasing temperature owing to the amplitudes of the ionic oscillations, increasing with increasing temperature. Thermal expansion measurements of SBN with x = 0.5 (Shorrocks et al., 1982[Shorrocks, N. M., Whatmore, R. W. & Liu, S. T. (1982). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 15, 2469-2481.]) and x = 0.6 (Bhalla et al., 1987[Bhalla, A. S., Guo, R., Cross, L. E., Burns, G., Dacol, F. H. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1987). Phys. Rev. B, 36, 2030-2035.]), however, show a negative temperature coefficient for the unit-cell parameter c at low temperatures and a positive one at higher temperatures with a minimum value of c near the phase-transition temperature. In contrast to this, the unit-cell parameter a always strictly increases with increasing temperature. Dilatometric measurements, however, are problematic in ferroelectric crystals owing to domain effects. Recent X-ray measurements (Qadri et al., 2005[Qadri, S. B., Bellotti, J. A., Garzarella, A. & Wu, D. H. (2005). Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 251914.]) for SBN with x = 0.75 confirm this anisotropic behavior - with a negative temperature coefficient for c, a positive one for a - throughout the temperature range investigated. To clarify the behavior, we extended the measurements of Quadri et al. (2005[Qadri, S. B., Bellotti, J. A., Garzarella, A. & Wu, D. H. (2005). Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 251914.]) up to higher temperatures on SBN with x = 0.822. The results are plotted in Fig. 6[link].

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Temperature dependence of the unit-cell parameters a and c of SBN with an Sr content of 0.822 (black dots with error bars). For lower temperatures, the results taken from Quadri et al. (2005[Qadri, S. B., Bellotti, J. A., Garzarella, A. & Wu, D. H. (2005). Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 251914.]) were plotted (squares) and converted to different compositions (0.75 versus 0.822). The gray arrows denote the piezoelectric contributions to the thermal expansion (see text).

Our measurements show that X-ray measurements exhibit a similar behavior as found by thermal expansion measurements for other compositions: the a parameter strictly increases with temperature, whereas c decreases at low temperatures and increases at higher ones. An analog behavior has just been shown by neutron scattering measurements (Schefer et al., 2006[Schefer, J., Schaniel, D., Pomjakushin, V., Stuhr, U., Petricek, V., Woike, Th., Wöhlecke, M. & Imlau, M. (2006). Phys. Rev. B, 74, 134103.]).

The explanation for this behavior had already been given by Cross et al. (1980[Cross, L. E., Shrout, T. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1980). Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 59, 832.]) and Shrout et al. (1981a[Shrout, T. R., Cross, L. E., Moses, P., McKinstry, H. A. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1981a). Ferroelectrics, 38, 881.],b[Shrout, T. R., Cross, L. E., Moses, P., McKinstry, H. A. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1981b). IEEE Trans. Son. Ultrason. 28, 397.]), who derived an additional electrostrictive contribution to the thermal expansion of ferroelectrics from energetic considerations using the Landau-Ginsburg-Devonshire phenomenological theory. These contributions, Q31P2 for the unit-cell parameter a and Q33P2 for the unit-cell parameter c, are plotted as gray arrows in Fig. 6[link]. For the calculation, the electrostriction constants Qik given by Cross et al. (1980[Cross, L. E., Shrout, T. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1980). Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 59, 832.]) and a typical saturation polarization P = 0.3 C m-2 were used.

4. Conclusion

Structural properties of strontium barium niobate crystals, SrxBa1-xNb2O6, in the whole range of the tetragonal tungsten bronze phase (x = 0.32-0.82) have been comprehensively studied using powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. It has been shown that both unit-cell parameters a and c decrease with increasing x, i.e. with increasing strontium fraction. This effect can be fully attributed to the composition-dependent fraction of strontium and barium cations on the A1 and A2 sites, which results in a corresponding dependence of the average effective radii of the cations. Both unit-cell parameters are small compared with those of other TTB-type ferroelectrics. This may be one factor responsible for the high spontaneous polarization and the high electrooptic coefficients of the material.

Using the unit-cell parameters, the X-ray densities were calculated which were in excellent agreement with the macroscopic densities measured. Densities decrease with increasing strontium fraction.

From single-crystal X-ray measurements the site-occupancy factors for the A1 and A2 sites were derived; they showed a total occupancy of ca 70% for the A1 sites and ca 90% for the A2 sites. Absolute values and composition dependence can be consistently described by a simple statistical model.

The Nb-O distances varied only slightly with composition, whereas the off-center displacements of the Nb atoms showed a pronounced composition dependence owing to the fact that the phase-transition temperature was near room temperature at higher strontium fractions.

Temperature-dependent measurements of the unit-cell parameters for a composition of x = 0.822 confirmed earlier results found for SBN with other compositions. The a parameter strictly increases with increasing temperature, whereas the c parameter shows a more complicated behavior. At low temperatures c decreases, at high temperatures it increases with rising temperature, exhibiting a broad minimum in the region of the phase transition temperature. The effect can be well explained by an electrostrictive contribution to the thermal expansion.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Graduate College 695 `Nonlinearities of Optical Materials' financed by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Federal State of Niedersachsen.

References

Bhalla, A. S., Guo, R., Cross, L. E., Burns, G., Dacol, F. H. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1987). Phys. Rev. B, 36, 2030-2035. [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Chernaya, T. S., Maksimov, B. A., Verin, I. V., Ivleva, L. I. & Simonov, V. I. (1997). Crystallogr. Rep. 42, 375-380.
Chernaya, T. S., Maksimov, B. A., Volk, T. R., Ivleva, L. I. & Simonov, V. I. (2000). Phys. Solid State, 42, 1716-1721. [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Cross, L. E., Shrout, T. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1980). Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 59, 832.
David, C., Granzow, T., Tunyagi, A., Wöhlecke, M., Woike, T., Betzler, K., Ulex, M., Imlau, M. & Pankrath, R. (2004). Phys. Status Solidi A Appl. Res. 201, R49-R52. [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). WinGX, Version 1.61. University of Glasgow, Scotland.
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881 [CrossRef] [details]
Jamieson, P. B., Abrahams, S. C. & Bernstein, J. L. (1968). J. Chem. Phys. 48, 5048.
Neurgaonkar, R. R. & Cory, W. K. (1986). J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 3, 274.
Neurgaonkar, R. R., Oliver, J. R. & Cross, L. E. (1984). Ferroelectrics, 56, 31-36.
Oxford Diffraction (2002). CrysAlisRED, Version 1.69. Oxford Diffraction, UK.
Qadri, S. B., Bellotti, J. A., Garzarella, A. & Wu, D. H. (2005). Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 251914.
Schefer, J., Schaniel, D., Pomjakushin, V., Stuhr, U., Petricek, V., Woike, Th., Wöhlecke, M. & Imlau, M. (2006). Phys. Rev. B, 74, 134103.
Shannon, R. D. & Prewitt, C. T. (1969). Acta Cryst. B25, 925-946. [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [details] [ISI]
Shannon, R. D. & Prewitt, C. T. (1970). Acta Cryst. B26, 1046-1048. [CrossRef] [details]
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Shorrocks, N. M., Whatmore, R. W. & Liu, S. T. (1982). J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 15, 2469-2481. [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Shrout, T. R., Cross, L. E., Moses, P., McKinstry, H. A. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1981a). Ferroelectrics, 38, 881.
Shrout, T. R., Cross, L. E., Moses, P., McKinstry, H. A. & Neurgaonkar, R. R. (1981b). IEEE Trans. Son. Ultrason. 28, 397.
Ulex, M., Pankrath, R. & Betzler, K. (2004). J. Cryst. Growth, 271, 128-133. [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Volk, T., Woike, T., Dörfler, U., Pankrath, R., Ivleva, L. & Wöhlecke, M. (1997). Ferroelectrics, 203, 457-470. [ChemPort]
Woike, T., Petricek, V., Dusek, M., Hansen, N. K., Fertey, P., Lecomte, C., Arakcheeva, A., Chapuis, G., Imlau, M. & Pankrath, R. (2003). Acta Cryst. B59, 28. [CrossRef] [details]


Acta Cryst (2006). B62, 960-965   [ doi:10.1107/S0108768106038869 ]