organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
CHEMISTRY
ISSN: 2053-2296

A second polymorph of 2-amino­pyridinium di­hydrogenphosphate

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Kurupelit–Samsun, Turkey, and bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
*Correspondence e-mail: vtyilmaz@omu.edu.tr

(Received 11 July 2005; accepted 3 August 2005; online 31 August 2005)

In the title compound, β-C5H7N2+·H2PO4, the tetra­hedral dihydrogenphosphate moieties are linked into double chains by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, and the organic species cross­link the chains into sheets by way of N—H⋯O bonds. The resulting structure is quite different from that of the previously described α polymorph of this stoichiometry [Czapla, Dacko & Waskowska (2003[Czapla, Z., Dacko, S. & Waskowska, A. (2003). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 15, 3793-3803.]). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 15, 3793–3803].

Comment

Ammonium phosphates can function as inter­mediates or by-products in the formation of open-framework metal phosphates templated by organic amines (Oliver et al., 1998[Oliver, S., Lough, A. J. & Ozin, G. A. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 5021-5028.]; Neeraj et al., 1999[Neeraj, S., Natarajan, S. & Rao, C. N. R. (1999). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 3480-3483.]; Rao et al., 2000[Rao, C. N. R., Natarajan, S. & Neeraj, S. (2000). J. Solid State Chem. 152, 302-321.]). They show inter­esting crystal packing motifs, strongly influenced by the inter­play of N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Demir et al., 2002[Demir, S., Yilmaz, V. T., Andac, O. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o407-o408.]). We describe here the structure of the title compound, β-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4), (I)[link] (Fig. 1[link]), which was obtained accidentally in the hydro­thermal preparation of a 2-amino­pyridinium-templated zincophosphate at 443 K. Compound (I)[link] is a polymorph of a quite different structure of the same stoichiometry (Czapla et al., 2003[Czapla, Z., Dacko, S. & Waskowska, A. (2003). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 15, 3793-3803.]), hereafter denoted α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4).

[Scheme 1]

In the tetra­hedral dihydrogenphosphate group in (I)[link], the protonated P—O vertices (O1 and O2) show the expected lengthening (Table 1[link]) relative to the other P—O bonds (O3 and O4), which are of similar length as a result of delocalization of the negative charge between them. The pyridine ring is essentially planar (for atoms N1 and C1–C5 the r.m.s. deviation from the least-squares plane is 0.004 Å) and its bond distances and angles are normal.

The crystal packing in (I)[link] is shown in Figs. 2[link] and 3[link]. In addition to electrostatic forces, hydrogen bonds appear to be a key factor in establishing this structure. The dihydrogen­phos­phate anions are linked into double chains by way of P—O—H⋯O—P bonds (Table 2[link]), such that every anion acts as a donor for two hydrogen bonds and an acceptor for two hydrogen bonds. In graph-set notation (Bernstein et al., 1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573.]), an R33(12) loop arises for every triplet of connected tetra­hedra. The P1⋯P1i and P1⋯P1ii separations are 4.5260 (14) and 4.5357 (17) Å, respectively (see Table 2[link] for symmetry codes). The chains propagate along [010], generated by the 21 screw axis.

(Di)hydrogen­phos­phate chains can show a surprising variety of hydrogen-bonding motifs. In N-(2-hydroxy­ethyl)­ethyl­ene­di­ammonium hydrogen­phos­phate mono­hydrate (Demir et al., 2002[Demir, S., Yilmaz, V. T., Andac, O. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o407-o408.]), infinite chains of HPO42− groups are linked by single P—O—H⋯O—P connections, whilst in tri­ethanol­ammonium di­hydrogen­phos­phate (Demir et al., 2003[Demir, S., Yilmaz, V. T., Andac, O. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, o907-o909.]), the H2PO4 moieties are connected by alternating single and double P—O—H⋯O—P hydrogen-bond links. In 1,3-diam­inium hydrogenphosphate hydrate (Kamoun et al., 1991[Kamoun, S., Jouini, A. & Daoud, A. (1991). Acta Cryst. C47, 117-119.]), single phosphate/water chains occur, whereas 1,3-diaminium bis­(di­hydrogen­phosphate) (Kamoun et al., 1992[Kamoun, S., Jouini, A., Daoud, A., Durif, A. & Guitel, J. C. (1992). Acta Cryst. C48, 133-135.]; Marsh, 2004[Marsh, R. E. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 252-253.]) contains a double tetra­hedral chain different from that seen in (I)[link], in which the fundamental symmetry is that of inversion.

In (I)[link], the organic species inter­acts with the inorganic chains by way of three N—H⋯O bonds. Two of these bonds are to a single adjacent H2PO4 tetra­hedron, and the third is to a similar species displaced in the a direction. These inter­actions result in (001) sheets that inter­act with each other by van der Waals forces. In contrast to the distinctive ππ stacking inter­actions between closely associated pairs of 2-amino­pyridinium rings in the zincophosphate framework {(C5H7N2)[Zn(HPO4)(H2PO4)]·H2O}n, synthesized at room temperature (Yilmaz et al., 2005[Yilmaz, V. T., Demir, S., Kazak, C. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2005). Solid State Sci. In the press.]), there are no significant ππ stacking forces in (I)[link].

The structure of (I)[link] is quite different from that of α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) (Czapla et al., 2003[Czapla, Z., Dacko, S. & Waskowska, A. (2003). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 15, 3793-3803.]), which contains a three-dimensional supramolecular array of H2PO4 groups encapsulating the organic moieties in pseudo-channels in space group C2/c. In addition to one well defined P—O—H⋯O—P hydrogen bond, α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) contains two short [2.469 (2) and 2.471 (2) Å] inversion-symmetry-generated pairs of O atoms with which the other dihydrogen­phos­phate H atoms are associated. These could represent symmetric O⋯H⋯O bonds (i.e. the H atom occupying the inversion centre) or disordered O—H⋯O and O⋯H—O bonds (i.e. a double potential well with the H atom shifted away from the inversion centre). The H atoms associated with the short O⋯O pairs were not located in the X-ray study, but on the basis of the physical properties of α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4), Czapla et al. (2003[Czapla, Z., Dacko, S. & Waskowska, A. (2003). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 15, 3793-3803.]) suggested that a double potential well was more likely. α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) shows a ferroelectric to paraelectric phase transition at 104 K, which is probably associated with rearrangements of the H atoms. We are now investigating this system further to try to clarify this situation.

Although the connectivities of the dihydrogenphosphate tetra­hedra are completely different, the α and β forms of (C5H7N2)(H2PO4) both contain three similar N—H⋯O inter­actions [for the α form, mean H⋯O = 2.02 Å and mean N⋯O = 2.882 (2) Å; for the β form, mean H⋯O = 1.98 Å and mean N⋯O = 2.849 (6) Å]. The β form is slightly more dense than the α form (ρ = 1.580 and 1.557 Mg m−3, respectively), perhaps suggesting that it is the more stable form, even though a visual comparison of the structures suggests that van der Waals inter­actions are more prevalent in the β form.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
A view of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed bonds.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
A detail of (I) in a polyhedral representation, showing the connectivity of the dihydrogenphosphate units into [010] chains by way of O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (H⋯O portion shaded). Symmetry codes are as in Table 2[link].
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
A view down [010] of the unit-cell packing in (I). O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are shown with the H⋯O portion shaded.

Experimental

A 0.41 ml aliquot of H3PO4 (6 mmol, aqueous, 85 wt%) was mixed with an aqueous suspension (10 ml) of ZnO (0.163 g, 2 mmol) and a clear solution was obtained. An aqueous solution (10 ml) of 2-amino­pyridine (0.188 g, 2 mmol) was added to this solution dropwise. The resulting mixture was transferred to a 45 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel reaction vessel, heated at 443 K for 60 h and then cooled to room temperature. Colourless crystals of (I) were isolated by vacuum filtration, washed with a small amount of water and dried in air. All crystals obtained were of the β form (yield 38%). Direct reaction of phospho­ric acid and 2-amino­pyridine in the absence of ZnO yields the α polymorph, as reported by Czapla et al. (2003[Czapla, Z., Dacko, S. & Waskowska, A. (2003). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 15, 3793-3803.]).

Crystal data
  • C5H7N2+·H2PO4

  • Mr = 192.11

  • Monoclinic, P 21

  • a = 9.0502 (12) Å

  • b = 4.5260 (3) Å

  • c = 9.9697 (11) Å

  • β = 98.576 (4)°

  • V = 403.80 (7) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Dx = 1.580 Mg m−3

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • Cell parameters from 928 reflections

  • θ = 2.9–27.5°

  • μ = 0.32 mm−1

  • T = 120 (2) K

  • Rod, colourless

  • 0.32 × 0.08 × 0.06 mm

Data collection
  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • ω and φ scans

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.])Tmin = 0.905, Tmax = 0.978

  • 3961 measured reflections

  • 1719 independent reflections

  • 1206 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.090

  • θmax = 27.6°

  • h = −11 → 11

  • k = −5 → 5

  • l = −10 → 13

Refinement
  • Refinement on F2

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.060

  • wR(F2) = 0.137

  • S = 1.03

  • 1719 reflections

  • 116 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0472P)2 + 0.0857P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

  • (Δ/σ)max < 0.001

  • Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3

  • Extinction correction: SHELXL97

  • Extinction coefficient: 0.061 (11)

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881.]), 672 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: 0.3 (2)

Table 1
Selected interatomic distances (Å)[link]

P1—O3 1.514 (3)
P1—O4 1.521 (3)
P1—O1 1.552 (3)
P1—O2 1.560 (4)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O4i 0.80 (3) 1.83 (4) 2.544 (4) 149 (5)
O2—H2⋯O3ii 0.86 (3) 1.69 (3) 2.552 (5) 174 (5)
N1—H7⋯O3 0.88 1.82 2.676 (5) 165
N2—H8⋯O4 0.88 2.08 2.963 (5) 179
N2—H9⋯O4iii 0.88 2.05 2.908 (5) 166
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) [-x+1, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+1]; (iii) [-x, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+1].

The O-bound H atoms were found in difference maps and their positions were refined with the O—H distance restrained to 0.82 (4) Å. Other H atoms were placed in idealized locations (C—H = 0.95 Å and N—H = 0.88 Å) and refined as riding atoms. The constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier) was applied in all cases. The refined value of the Flack (1983[Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881.]) parameter was not definitive. A refinement of the opposite (inverted) absolute structure gave a value of 0.6 (2).

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998[Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]); data reduction: HKL DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]) and ATOMS (Shape Software, 2002[Shape Software (2002). ATOMS. Shape Software, 525 Hidden Valley Road, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

Ammonium phosphates can function as intermediates or by-products in the formation of open-framework metal phosphates templated by organic amines (Oliver et al., 1998; Neeraj et al., 1999; Rao et al., 2000). They show interesting crystal packing motifs, strongly influenced by the interplay of N—H···O and O—H···O hydrogen bonds (Demir et al., 2002). We describe here the structure of the title compound, β-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4), (I) (Fig. 1), which was obtained accidentally in the hydrothermal preparation of a 2-aminopyridinium-templated zincophosphate at 443 K. Compound (I) is a polymorph of a quite different structure of the same stoichiometry (Czapla et al., 2003), hereafter known as α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4).

In the tetrahedral dihydrogenphosphate group in (I), the protonated P—O vertices (O1 and O2) show the expected lengthening (Table 1) relative to the other P—O bonds (O3 and O4), which are of similar length as a result of delocalization of the negative charge between them. The pyridine ring is essentially planar (for atoms N1 and C1–C5, the r.m.s. deviation from the least-squares plane is 0.004 Å), and its bond distances and angles are normal.

The crystal packing in (I) is shown in Figs. 2 and 3. In addition to electrostatic forces, hydrogen bonds appear to be a key factor in establishing this structure. The dihydrogenphosphate anions are linked into double chains by way of P—O—H···O—P bonds (Table 2), such that every anion acts as a donor for two hydrogen bonds and an acceptor for two hydrogen bonds. In graph-set notation (Bernstein et al., 1995), an R33(12) loop arises for every triplet of connected tetrahedra. The P1···P1i (see Table 2 for symmetry code) and P1···P1ii separations are 4.5260 (14) and 4.5357 (17) Å, respectively. The chains propagate along [010], generated by the 21 screw axis.

(Di)hydrogenphosphate chains can show a surprising variety of hydrogen-bonding motifs. In N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediammonium hydrogenphosphate monohydrate (Demir et al., 2002), infinite chains of HPO42− groups are linked by single P—O—H···O—P connections, whilst in triethanolammonium dihydrogenphosphate (Demir et al., 2003), the H2PO4 moieties are connected by alternating single and double P—O—H···O—P hydrogen-bond links. In 1,3-diaminium hydrogenphosphate hydrate (Kamoun et al., 1991), single phosphate/water chains occur, whereas in 1,3-diaminium bis(dihydrogenphosphate) (Kamoun et al., 1992; Marsh, 2004), a different kind of double tetrahedral chain arises from the one seen in (I), in which the fundamental symmetry is that of inversion.

In (I), the organic species interacts with the inorganic chains by way of three N—H···O bonds. Two of these bonds are to a single adjacent H2PO4 tetrahedron, and the third is to a similar species displaced in the a direction. These interactions result in (001) sheets that interact with each other by van der Waals forces. In contrast to the distinctive ππ stacking interactions between closely associated pairs of 2-aminopyridinium rings in the zincophosphate framework {(C5H7N2)[Zn(HPO4)(H2PO4)].H2O}n, synthesized at room temperature (Yilmaz et al., 2005), there are no significant ππ stacking forces in (I).

The structure of (I) is quite different from that of α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) (Czapla et al., 2003), which contains a three-dimensional supramolecular array of H2PO4 groups encapsulating the organic moieties in pseudo-channels in space group C2/c. In addition to one well defined P—O—H···O—P hydrogen bond, α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) contains two short [2.469 (2) and 2.471 (2) Å] inversion-symmetry-generated pairs of O atoms with which the other dihydrogenphosphate H atoms are associated. These could represent symmetric O···H···O bonds (i.e. the H atom occupying the inversion centre), or disordered O—H···O and O···H—O bonds (i.e. a double potential well with the H atom shifted away from the inversion centre). The H atoms associated with the short O···O pairs were not located in the X-ray study, but on the basis of the physical properties of α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4), Czapla et al. (2003) suggested that a double potential well was more likely. α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) shows a ferroelectric to paraelectric phase transition at 104 K, which is probably associated with rearrangements of the H atoms. We are now investigating this system further to try to clarify this situation.

Although the connectivities of the dihydrogenphosphate tetrahedra are completely different, the α and β forms of (C5H7N2)(H2PO4) both contain three similar N—H···O interactions [for the α form, mean H···O = 2.02 Å and mean N···O = 2.882 (2) Å; for the β form, mean H···O = 1.98 Å and mean N···O = 2.849 (6) Å]. β-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) is slightly more dense than α-(C5H7N2)(H2PO4) (ρ = 1.580 and 1.557 Mg m−3, respectively), perhaps suggesting that it is the more stable form, even though a visual comparison of the structures suggests that van der Waals interactions are more prevalent in the β form.

Experimental top

A 0.41 ml aliquot of H3PO4 (6 mmol) (aqueous, 85 wt%) was mixed with an aqueous suspension (10 ml) of ZnO (0.163 g, 2 mmol) and a clear solution was obtained. An aqueous solution (10 ml) of 2-aminopyridine (0.188 g, 2 mmol) was added to this solution dropwise. The resulting mixture was transferred to a 45 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel reaction vessel, heated at 443 K for 60 h and then cooled to room temperature. Colorless crystals of (I) were isolated by vacuum filtration. They were washed with a small amount of water and dried in air. All crystals obtained were of the β form. Yield 38%. Direct reaction of phosphoric acid and 2-aminopyridine in the absence of ZnO yields the α polymorph, as reported by Czapla et al. (2003).

Refinement top

The O-bound H atoms were found in difference maps and their positions were refined with the O—H distance restrained to 0.82 (4) Å. Other H atoms were placed in idealized locations (C—H = 0.95 Å and N—H = 0.88 Å) and refined as riding atoms. The constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier) was applied in all cases. The refined value of the Flack (1983) parameter was not definitive. A refinement of the opposite (inverted) absolute structure gave a value of 0.6 (2).

Computing details top

Data collection: Collect (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997); data reduction: HKL DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor 1997) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and ATOMS (Shape Software, 2002); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of (I), showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A detail of (I) in a polyhedral representation, showing the connectivity of the dihydrogenphosphate units into [010] chains by way of O—H···O hydrogen bonds (H···O portion shaded). Symmetry codes as in Table 2.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. A view down [010] of the unit cell packing in (I). O—H···O and N—H···O hydrogen bonds are shown with the H···O portion shaded.
β-2-aminopyridinium dihydrogenphosphate top
Crystal data top
C5H7N2+·H2O4PF(000) = 200
Mr = 192.11Dx = 1.580 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 928 reflections
a = 9.0502 (12) Åθ = 2.9–27.5°
b = 4.5260 (3) ŵ = 0.32 mm1
c = 9.9697 (11) ÅT = 120 K
β = 98.576 (4)°Rod, colourless
V = 403.80 (7) Å30.32 × 0.08 × 0.06 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1719 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1206 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.090
ω and ϕ scansθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
h = 1111
Tmin = 0.905, Tmax = 0.978k = 55
3961 measured reflectionsl = 1013
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: difmap (O-H) and geom (others)
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.060 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0472P)2 + 0.0857P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.137(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.36 e Å3
1719 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.44 e Å3
116 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
3 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.061 (11)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 672 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.3 (2)
Crystal data top
C5H7N2+·H2O4PV = 403.80 (7) Å3
Mr = 192.11Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation
a = 9.0502 (12) ŵ = 0.32 mm1
b = 4.5260 (3) ÅT = 120 K
c = 9.9697 (11) Å0.32 × 0.08 × 0.06 mm
β = 98.576 (4)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1719 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
1206 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.905, Tmax = 0.978Rint = 0.090
3961 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.060H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.137Δρmax = 0.36 e Å3
S = 1.03Δρmin = 0.44 e Å3
1719 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 672 Friedel pairs
116 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.3 (2)
3 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
P10.30651 (14)0.5428 (2)0.38054 (11)0.0208 (3)
O10.2446 (4)0.7884 (6)0.2788 (3)0.0262 (9)
H10.197 (6)0.919 (9)0.305 (5)0.031*
O20.4496 (4)0.4371 (7)0.3245 (3)0.0267 (8)
H20.517 (5)0.350 (11)0.381 (5)0.032*
O30.3440 (4)0.6596 (7)0.5238 (3)0.0239 (8)
O40.1919 (4)0.2952 (6)0.3713 (3)0.0228 (8)
C10.3557 (6)0.4974 (12)0.8620 (5)0.0324 (13)
H30.43800.62490.85680.039*
C20.3210 (7)0.4233 (12)0.9850 (6)0.0359 (14)
H40.37690.49761.06620.043*
C30.1992 (6)0.2325 (11)0.9883 (5)0.0328 (14)
H50.17220.17721.07330.039*
C40.1186 (6)0.1248 (12)0.8716 (5)0.0362 (14)
H60.03660.00410.87550.043*
C50.1588 (6)0.2075 (9)0.7446 (5)0.0227 (11)
N10.2752 (5)0.3933 (8)0.7461 (4)0.0249 (10)
H70.30020.44980.66810.030*
N20.0882 (5)0.1089 (8)0.6266 (4)0.0288 (10)
H80.11770.16510.55030.035*
H90.01200.01260.62470.035*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
P10.0279 (7)0.0180 (5)0.0169 (6)0.0000 (6)0.0044 (5)0.0007 (5)
O10.041 (2)0.0169 (15)0.0199 (19)0.0072 (15)0.0026 (17)0.0010 (13)
O20.027 (2)0.0339 (17)0.0205 (19)0.0081 (14)0.0092 (16)0.0065 (14)
O30.028 (2)0.0269 (15)0.0169 (18)0.0057 (14)0.0026 (15)0.0006 (12)
O40.030 (2)0.0150 (14)0.025 (2)0.0006 (14)0.0092 (16)0.0023 (12)
C10.036 (3)0.035 (3)0.024 (3)0.002 (3)0.002 (2)0.003 (2)
C20.044 (4)0.043 (3)0.019 (3)0.010 (3)0.002 (3)0.003 (2)
C30.029 (3)0.048 (3)0.024 (3)0.014 (3)0.014 (3)0.012 (2)
C40.037 (4)0.041 (3)0.034 (3)0.005 (2)0.017 (3)0.012 (2)
C50.022 (3)0.021 (2)0.026 (3)0.002 (2)0.006 (2)0.0027 (18)
N10.029 (3)0.0294 (19)0.018 (2)0.0030 (19)0.0091 (19)0.0022 (17)
N20.031 (3)0.031 (2)0.026 (2)0.0086 (18)0.0082 (19)0.0025 (17)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
P1—O31.514 (3)C2—H40.9500
P1—O41.521 (3)C3—C41.367 (8)
P1—O11.552 (3)C3—H50.9500
P1—O21.560 (4)C4—C51.418 (7)
O1—H10.80 (3)C4—H60.9500
O2—H20.86 (3)C5—N21.329 (6)
C1—C21.352 (7)C5—N11.346 (6)
C1—N11.356 (6)N1—H70.8800
C1—H30.9500N2—H80.8800
C2—C31.405 (8)N2—H90.8800
O3—P1—O4111.69 (18)C4—C3—H5119.3
O3—P1—O1112.02 (18)C2—C3—H5119.3
O4—P1—O1108.15 (19)C3—C4—C5119.4 (5)
O3—P1—O2111.32 (19)C3—C4—H6120.3
O4—P1—O2110.34 (18)C5—C4—H6120.3
O1—P1—O2102.9 (2)N2—C5—N1119.4 (4)
P1—O1—H1119 (4)N2—C5—C4123.2 (5)
P1—O2—H2117 (4)N1—C5—C4117.3 (5)
C2—C1—N1121.3 (5)C5—N1—C1123.1 (4)
C2—C1—H3119.4C5—N1—H7118.4
N1—C1—H3119.4C1—N1—H7118.4
C1—C2—C3117.6 (5)C5—N2—H8120.0
C1—C2—H4121.2C5—N2—H9120.0
C3—C2—H4121.2H8—N2—H9120.0
C4—C3—C2121.3 (5)
N1—C1—C2—C30.5 (8)C3—C4—C5—N10.7 (7)
C1—C2—C3—C40.1 (8)N2—C5—N1—C1178.1 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C50.0 (8)C4—C5—N1—C11.3 (7)
C3—C4—C5—N2178.8 (5)C2—C1—N1—C51.3 (7)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.80 (3)1.83 (4)2.544 (4)149 (5)
O2—H2···O3ii0.86 (3)1.69 (3)2.552 (5)174 (5)
N1—H7···O30.881.822.676 (5)165
N2—H8···O40.882.082.963 (5)179
N2—H9···O4iii0.882.052.908 (5)166
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) x+1, y1/2, z+1; (iii) x, y1/2, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC5H7N2+·H2O4P
Mr192.11
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)9.0502 (12), 4.5260 (3), 9.9697 (11)
β (°) 98.576 (4)
V3)403.80 (7)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.32
Crystal size (mm)0.32 × 0.08 × 0.06
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
Tmin, Tmax0.905, 0.978
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3961, 1719, 1206
Rint0.090
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.652
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.060, 0.137, 1.03
No. of reflections1719
No. of parameters116
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.36, 0.44
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 672 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.3 (2)

Computer programs: Collect (Nonius, 1998), HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997), HKL DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor 1997) and SCALEPACK, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and ATOMS (Shape Software, 2002), SHELXL97.

Selected bond lengths (Å) top
P1—O31.514 (3)P1—O11.552 (3)
P1—O41.521 (3)P1—O21.560 (4)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.80 (3)1.83 (4)2.544 (4)149 (5)
O2—H2···O3ii0.86 (3)1.69 (3)2.552 (5)174 (5)
N1—H7···O30.881.822.676 (5)165
N2—H8···O40.882.082.963 (5)179
N2—H9···O4iii0.882.052.908 (5)166
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) x+1, y1/2, z+1; (iii) x, y1/2, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ondokuz Mayıs University for financial support and the EPSRC National Crystallography Service (University of Southampton, England) for the data collection.

References

First citationBernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2003). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCzapla, Z., Dacko, S. & Waskowska, A. (2003). J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 15, 3793–3803.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDemir, S., Yilmaz, V. T., Andac, O. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o407–o408.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationDemir, S., Yilmaz, V. T., Andac, O. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, o907–o909.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFlack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKamoun, S., Jouini, A. & Daoud, A. (1991). Acta Cryst. C47, 117–119.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKamoun, S., Jouini, A., Daoud, A., Durif, A. & Guitel, J. C. (1992). Acta Cryst. C48, 133–135.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMarsh, R. E. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 252–253.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNeeraj, S., Natarajan, S. & Rao, C. N. R. (1999). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 3480–3483.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationNonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationOliver, S., Lough, A. J. & Ozin, G. A. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 5021–5028.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationRao, C. N. R., Natarajan, S. & Neeraj, S. (2000). J. Solid State Chem. 152, 302–321.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationShape Software (2002). ATOMS. Shape Software, 525 Hidden Valley Road, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationYilmaz, V. T., Demir, S., Kazak, C. & Harrison, W. T. A. (2005). Solid State Sci. In the press.  Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL
CHEMISTRY
ISSN: 2053-2296
Follow Acta Cryst. C
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds