Volume 62 Received 27 September 2006 | Ammonium scandium tetrafluorideaSchool of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, Scotland The title compound, NH4ScF4, is an addition to the AMF4 family of layered perovskite-like structures. The structure consists of a two-dimensional array of corner-sharing ScF6 octahedra, which produces anionic sheets of stoichiometry [ScF4]- stacked along the c axis. The layers are separated by charge-balancing ammonium cations, which hydrogen bond to the apical F atoms of adjacent layers. This structure may be viewed as a `single-layer' fluoride analogue of the Dion-Jacobson family of oxides. |
The title compound, NH4ScF4, (I), was produced during our exploratory studies in the hydrothermal chemistry of organically templated scandium fluorides (Stephens et al., 2004
; Stephens & Lightfoot, 2006
). This compound arises from an in situ breakdown of the organic template (see Experimental
). It is related to several other layered fluorides of stoichiometry AMF4 and may also be regarded as an n = 1 Dion-Jacobson phase (Dion et al., 1981
).
The asymmetric unit (Fig. 1
) contains one unique Sc site on a general position, having quite regular octahedral symmetry (Table 1
). There are five crystallographically independent F sites and two N sites, both on mirror planes.
Fig. 2
shows that (I) is built from puckered layers of vertex-sharing octahedra, typical of layered perovskites. The layers are eclipsed relative to each other with respect to the a axis, but staggered by b/4 along b. Extensive hydrogen bonding occurs between adjacent layers, mediated by the ammonium cations (Table 2
). The only N-H
F hydrogen bonds are those between ammonium cations and the `apical' F atoms that project into the interlayer space. This hydrogen bonding fulfills bond-valence requirements around the apical F atoms F2 and F3, as shown in Table 3
.
Both the raw diffraction data and the derived model display a significant degree of pseudosymmetry (e.g. the bond lengths involving F1/F4 and F2/F3). An alternative model in space group Amma, with b' = b/2, was also considered. However, our refinements confirm that the chosen model is correct; refinements in the higher-symmetry model lead to anomalously elongated ellipsoids for the `in-plane' F atoms, transverse to the Sc-F-Sc linkages. In fact, the pseudosymmetry is due to `octahedral tilting', and the difference between the two models is clarified in Fig. 3
. In addition to the tilting relative to the b axis, shown in Fig. 2
(b), there is a second tilt mode around the c axis, which is allowed in the correct Pmcn model but forbidden in the approximate Amma model. The two models are analogous to those in KFeF4 (Lapasset et al., 1986
), which undergoes a structural phase transition from KFeF4(III) to KFeF4(II) at 368 K, corresponding to Pmcn to Amma. We have not explored the possibility of such a phase transition in the present case.
In comparison with other compositionally related AMF4 compounds, (I) is isotypic with KGaF4 (Courbion et al., 1989
). Interestingly, however, more precisely similar compositions have different structure types; for example, NH4FeF4 (Leblanc et al., 1985
) has the same type of layer as (I), but the [ScF4]- sheets are eclipsed along both a and b, whereas KScF4, has a unique `corrugated sheet' structure containing both cis- and trans-vertex-sharing octahedra (Champarnaud-Mesjard & Frit, 1992
).
| Figure 1 The asymmetric unit of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level [symmetry code: (i) -x, y + |
| Figure 2 (a) A projection along [100], showing staggered octahedra. (b) A projection along [010], showing eclipsed octahedra. |
| Figure 3 A view of a single layer along [001], showing (a) the Pmcn model with the additional c axis tilt mode and (b) the Amma model, with b' = b/2. |
Scandium oxide (0.138 g), water (5 ml) and a 40% aqueous solution of HF (0.5 ml) were heated in a Teflon-lined steel autoclave for 1 h at 463 K. To this, ethylene glycol (5 ml) and 1,3-diaminopropane (0.4 ml) were added, and the resulting mixture was heated at the same temperature for four days. The product was filtered off, washed with water and allowed to dry at room temperature overnight. Powder X-ray diffraction revealed predominantly (I) as the product, together with a small amount of ScF3. Compound (I) was heated to 1073 K at a rate of 5 K min-1 under N2 gas. Thermogravimmetric analysis shows a single-step weight loss of 19.6% from 573 to 698 K (20% calculated). Powder X-ray diffraction of the residue shows that this decomposition product is ScF3.
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Systematic absences were consistent with space groups Pmcn (62) or P21cn (33). Successful refinement of the structure in centrosymmetric Pmcn, together with the lack of any contradictory physical property measurements, meant that this was preferred over P21cn. Pmcn [a non-standard setting of Pnma (62)] was chosen as this defines the perovskite-like layers to lie perpendicular to c, which is the convention in perovskite chemistry. H atoms were located from a difference Fourier map and were refined freely; the Uiso(H) values were fixed at 0.018 Å2.
Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku/MSC, 2005
); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997
); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997
); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001
); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supplementary data for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BC3020 ). Services for accessing these data are described at the back of the journal.
We thank Professor Alex Slawin for X-ray data collection and the University of St Andrews for funding.
Brandenburg, K. (2001). DIAMOND. Version 2.1. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
Brese, N. E. & O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192-197. ![[details]](../../../../../../b/graphics/details.gif)
Bruker (1999). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Champarnaud-Mesjard, J. C. & Frit, B. (1992). Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 29, 161-170. ![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Courbion, G., Randrianohavy, J. V. & Rousseau, J. J. (1989). J. Solid State Chem. 81, 285-292.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Dion, M., Ganne, M. & Tournoux, M. (1981). Mater. Res. Bull. 16, 1429-1435.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Lapasset, J., Sciau, P., Moret, J. & Gros, N. (1986). Acta Cryst. B42, 258-262. ![[details]](../../../../../../b/graphics/details.gif)
Leblanc, M., Ferey, G., De Pape, R. & Teillet, J. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 657-660. ![[details]](../../../../../../c/graphics/details.gif)
Rigaku/MSC (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku/MSC Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. Release 97-2. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Stephens, N. F. & Lightfoot, P. (2006). Solid State Sci. 8, 197-202.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Stephens, N. F., Slawin, A. M. Z. & Lightfoot, P. (2004). Chem. Commun. pp. 614-615.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)