Notes for authors 2012
Keywords: Notes for authors.
Acta Crystallographica Section C: Crystal Structure Communications publishes articles that provide a detailed discussion of crystal structures determined by diffraction methods. It specializes in the rapid dissemination of high-quality studies of novel and challenging crystal and molecular structures of interest in the fields of chemistry, biochemistry, mineralogy, pharmacology, physics and materials science. The unique checking, editing and publishing facilities of the journal ensure the highest standards of structural reliability and presentation, while providing for reports on studies involving special techniques or difficult crystalline materials. Articles are expected to contain a discussion that goes beyond reporting just the principal numerical and geometrical data. Such value-added material might include: a meaningful discussion of multiple related structures reported in the same article; non-routine structure determinations discussed in detail; placing the structure in an interesting scientific, physical or chemical context; or the discussion of interesting physical properties or modes of association. The journal accepts reports of difficult or challenging structures not meeting all validation criteria, provided the presented structures are correct and unambiguous, and the difficulties and strategies used to treat them are scientifically discussed and properly documented. Such structures might display properties such as twinning, severe disorder, or diffuse solvent regions.
All articles must be submitted in Crystallographic Information File (CIF) ASCII format (MIME or other encoded formats should be avoided if possible). Details about CIFs are given in Hall, Allen & Brown [Acta Cryst. (1991), A47, 655–685] . Guidelines for the preparation and editing of a CIF, the data items required therein, standard data codes and keywords, CIF templates, example CIFs, and data-validation criteria and procedures are available via the online author help page (see §7). A CIF editor for authors, publCIF, may be obtained from http://publcif.iucr.org and a general CIF editor (enCIFer) may be obtained from http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/products/encifer/index.html ; both editors are available free of charge. The Section Editor, Co-editors and Editorial Office staff are also available to assist any author with any technical CIF problems. Please note that this help does not include rewriting articles which do not reach the standards specified in §1.10.
Before submission, authors are required to check their CIF and associated structure factors using the checkCIF service at http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checking/checkfull.html . All validation alerts returned by checkcif should be considered carefully and corrected as far as possible. Sometimes these alerts relate to simple omissions or errors in the CIF. If the report contains validation alerts about the consistency, adequacy or quality of the data or the refined model, these will need to be addressed, or, if the authors consider there are specific valid or unavoidable reasons for these alerts, the validation response form (VRF) supplied by checkCIF must be completed and included in the submitted CIF, preferably with the addition of appropriate explanatory text in the published experimental section of the CIF.
The text and tables of an article may be previewed by sending the CIF (after completing the pre-check) to the printCIF service at http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/printcif.html or by using publCIF.
Section C publishes two categories of articles. The requested category must be specified in the submitted CIF as _publ_requested_category, using one of the codes listed below.
(a) Full articles describe one or more structure determinations. These submissions are validated (see §3) and peer reviewed. The accepted article is published in the journal and is accessible electronically, together with the CIF and structure factors, from the Crystallography Journals Online service at http://journals.iucr.org (see §7). The category codes used to identify these articles are FI for inorganic , FM for metal–organic , and FO for organic compounds.
(b) Addenda and Errata are short articles describing additions to, comments on, or errata to existing Section C publications and are not intended for interim reports of work in progress. The text should not exceed 1000 words. Addenda and Errata are peer reviewed. The category code for these articles is AD.
Full details of the submission procedure can be found at http://journals.iucr.org/c/services/helpsubmit.html. CIFs must be submitted via the web at http://journals.iucr.org/c/services/submitbdy.html . All submitted CIFs must have been pre-checked using the facilities described in §1.1.
During the submission procedure, authors will be required to submit additional electronic files; these include the chemical scheme (see §2.10), crystallographic diagrams (see §2.11) and structure factors (see §2.14) or powder diffraction data (see §2.13). Authors will also be asked to agree to transfer the copyright of their article to the IUCr (see §1.11).
On completion of the submission procedure, each article will be assigned an Editorial Office refcode. The refcode has two letters and four digits (e.g. ln3127), with the two letters identifying the assigned Co-editor; the refcode should be used in all subsequent communications with the Editorial Office and Co-editor.
Each submitted CIF is automatically validated for completeness and data integrity, and checked for duplication. If incomplete or inadequate it will be returned to the contact author for correction. Some of the specific data standards are summarized in §3, while full details of the required data items and the data-validation criteria are available via the online CIF help page (see §7). For articles unable to meet these criteria, a completed validation response form (VRF) giving reasons for the failure must be included in the CIF. The Co-editor will assess the validity of the explanation as part of the review process. A copy of the final refinement instructions file should be inserted in the CIF as described in §2.5.
The Co-editor is responsible for the review steps and future communications with the authors up to the acceptance stage. All communications to authors will normally be sent electronically to the e-mail address provided in the CIF. Authors who anticipate or become aware of difficulties with their e-mail service should alert the Co-editor as soon as they are aware that there is a problem. If, after review, no revisions are necessary, the article will be prepared for immediate electronic publication. If the review reveals that revision is required, the authors will be contacted directly and asked to revise the article. Further revisions may be requested before acceptance of the submission if unresolved issues remain. Failure to respond to a communication from either a Co-editor or the Editorial Office staff within one month will result in the automatic withdrawal of the article. If major revisions are made to the submission, the journal reserves the right to reset the date of receipt of the article to the date of resubmission. If a manuscript is not acceptable after two revisions it will not be considered further. An article that has been rejected must not be resubmitted to any IUCr journal unless the reasons given for the rejection have been fully addressed in the revised version.
Once an article is accepted, it is the responsibility of the Managing Editor to prepare the article for publication and to correspond with the authors and/or the Co-editor to resolve publication ambiguities or inadequacies. The date of acceptance that will appear on the published article will be the date on which the Managing Editor receives the last item needed. The Section Editor reviews all accepted articles and reserves the right to request or make appropriate changes to ensure conformity with Section C standards; in the unlikely event of significant changes being required at this stage, the authors will be contacted promptly.
After initial submission, any revised or new files should be uploaded via the web interface only in response to a specific request from a Co-editor; these files should be uploaded at the web address provided by the Co-editor.
The submission of an article is taken as an implicit guarantee that the work is original, that it is the author(s) own work, that all authors are aware of and concur with the submission, that all workers involved in the study are listed as authors or given proper credit in the acknowledgements, that the manuscript has not already been published (in any language or medium), and that it is not being considered and will not be offered elsewhere while under consideration for an IUCr journal. The inclusion of material in an informal publication, e.g. a preprint server or a newsletter, does not preclude publication in an IUCr journal.
The co-authors of an article should be all those persons, and only those persons, who have made significant scientific contributions to the work reported, including the ideas and their execution, and who share responsibility and accountability for the results. Other contributions should be indicated in the acknowledgements. An administrative relationship to the investigation does not of itself qualify a person for co-authorship (but it may be appropriate to acknowledge major administrative assistance). Changes to the list of authors will normally require the agreement of the editor and all authors.
Important considerations related to publication have been given in the ethical guidelines published in Acc. Chem. Res. (2002), 35, 74–76 and Graf et al. [Int. J. Clin. Pract. (2007), 61(Suppl. 152), 1–26 ]. Authors are expected to comply with these guidelines.
Authors studying a series of closely related structures are strongly encouraged to submit these for publication as a single article. The CIF approach is well suited to multi-structure submissions. The journal reserves the right to require that two or more articles on closely related materials be merged.
If a structure has been redetermined correctly and the discussion adds significantly to the information already in the public domain then the article can be considered for publication. Crystallographically interesting structures previously published in a journal not specializing in crystallography, and under circumstances that did not allow the crystallographic details to be described fully, may be considered. In such cases, the manuscript must properly cite the original article and primarily describe new information that was not presented in the original publication.
Articles should be clearly written and grammatically correct. If the Co-editor concludes that language problems would place an undue burden on the referee(s), the manuscript may be returned to the authors without review. Details of language-editing services can be found at http://journals.iucr.org/services/languageservices.html .
Except as required otherwise by national laws, an author will be required to agree to the transfer of copyright before a manuscript can be accepted. Details of author rights can be found at http://journals.iucr.org/services/authorrights.html . See §7.4 for information on the licensing of open-access articles.
An author who believes that an article has been unjustifiably treated by the Co-editor may appeal initially to the Section Editor for a new review and, finally, to the Editor-in-chief of IUCr journals if the author is still aggrieved by the decision. The initial appeal must be made within 3 months of rejection of the article. The decision of the Editor-in-chief is final. Any resubmission after an appeal will be forwarded to the Section Editor.
The publication requirements for the text, tabular and graphical material are described in this section. The standards for numerical and codified data are summarized in §3, and a list of all data items required for submission is available via the online CIF help page (see §7).
The Title should be short and informative; in many cases just the name(s) of the compound(s) studied will be perfectly adequate. Avoid complicated IUPAC names and redundant phrases such as `Crystal structure of…'. However, if the article describes special techniques, such as powder, neutron or synchrotron diffraction studies, this could be alluded to in the title. The full first name of each author is preferred. The e-mail address of the contact author should be included in the CIF using the data item _publ_contact_author_email. This is the e-mail address which will be used for all subsequent communications with the authors, including despatch of electronic proofs. If the e-mail address of the submitting author is different from that of the contact author, only that of the contact author will appear in the published version of the article. Note that the data items _publ_section_title_footnote and _publ_author_footnote are available, if required, for inserting footnotes to the title and to individual authors. If the article describes the redetermination of a previously reported structure, this should be indicated in the Title.
The synopsis should be one or two sentences (less than 40 words) in length, summarizing the main crystallographic results; it should be given in _publ_section_synopsis. There is no need to give formulae in the synopsis.
The Abstract must be written in English, be informative and should summarize the most important aspects and results of the study. It should be capable of being understood on its own without access to the text or figures. It should not contain the crystal data or, usually, the space group. The systematic IUPAC name and the chemical formula should be given here, if they are not included in the Title. The Abstract should include mention of any crystallographically imposed symmetry or the presence of more than one molecule (or formula unit) in the asymmetric unit of the structure. Principal structural geometry results can be given here. Literature references should be avoided if possible; if required, they must be given in full, e.g. [Bond, A. D., Davies, J. E. & Kirby, A. J. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, o1242–o1244].
The Comment is the descriptive section of a submission. For publication in Acta Crystallographica Section C, the study must warrant significant discussion (i.e. provide substantial added value to the numerical data freely available in the CIF). To this end, authors are encouraged to present and discuss multiple related structures in the same article. The Comment is expected to be an informative but concise discussion of the novel aspects of the study, and include the following key aspects:
(a) The reasons for the study.
(b) The origin of the material studied, including background information. [Note that details of the chemical extraction, synthesis and crystallization processes should be given in the Experimental section (see §2.5).]
(c) Any information available supporting the reported structure(s) based on other chemical or physical techniques, or discussing the structure in an interesting scientific, physical or chemical context.
(d) Interesting or unusual aspects of the coordination, geometry, modes of association, extended connectivity, conformation, crystal packing, hydrogen bonding, etc. A discussion of geometry values that agree with established values (see International Tables for Crystallography, Volume C, §§9.4–9.6) is not warranted.
(e) A discussion of intermolecular interactions, if warranted, should describe the motifs and networks generated, but over-analysing weak interactions should be avoided. A useful commentary on hydrogen bonds is available at the online CIF help page (see §7).
(f) Where a difficult or challenging structure is reported, there should be a thorough discussion of the challenges togetherwith full documentation, possibly in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section, of the experimental and refinement strategies used to treat them, as well as details about the outcomes of these strategies.
The Comment should not be just a list of observations about the structure (for example, just stating, without description, that hydrogen-bonding or other weak interactions exist), but should include an analysis and discussion of how these observations help the understanding of the chemical, physical or structural properties of the compound and further the aims of the study stated in the opening paragraph, plus a detailed comparison with any closely related published structures, where such exist. Numerical values reported in Tables should generally not be repeated in the text.
Principal experimental data are extracted from the CIF and are tabulated under the sub-headings Crystal data, Data collection and Refinement. Some numerical items may be formatted with a revised number of decimal places to conform to a consistent style for the journal. The descriptive text item _publ_section_exptl_prep should give sufficient information on the compound isolation or synthesis, crystal preparation (method, solvents and their ratios), and identification (e.g. melting points and densities), to reproduce the experiment. Previously reported syntheses, isolation procedures or spectroscopic data need only be cited. Additional details [e.g. lengthy synthesis descriptions and long lists of spectroscopic (NMR, IR, etc.) data] supporting the crystallographic study should be placed in the _exptl_special_details section of the CIF, which is available from Crystallography Journals Online . Spectroscopic data should be reported in the _publ_section_exptl_prep section only when assignments are given. The item _publ_section_exptl_refinement should be used to provide details of how H atoms were treated, including the ranges of X—H dimensions and how the values of Uiso(H) were defined. Any non-routine or unusual aspects of the data collection, space-group identification, data processing, structure determination and refinement (including any restraints used and the treatment of disorder or twinning) should be fully documented here in sufficient detail to allow the authors' refinement to be repeated. Routine material should be placed in the _refine_special_details section and will be available from Crystallography Journals Online (see §7). Authors should place a copy of their refinement instructions file(s), where available, in the _iucr_refine_instructions_details section for each refinement and publCIF may be used for this purpose. This will facilitate the review of the manuscript, particularly when special refinement strategies, such as the use of restraints, have been employed. Co-editors may request any additional experimental data or material they feel necessary to complete a full review of the article.
Acknowledgement should be given for any assistance provided to the study (see §1.6). If the diffraction data collection was not carried out by one of the authors, or in the laboratory of one of the authors, details of who collected the data and where the data collection was carried out should be provided.
References to published work must be cited in the format detailed in §6. If reference is made to unpublished work, prior consent must be first obtained from the authors of that work. Identification of individual structures in the article by use of database reference (identification) codes should be accompanied by a full citation of the original literature in the reference list.
The _atom_site_ coordinate and atomic displacement parameters (as Uij) must be supplied with standard uncertainty values (see §5.1 and §2.15). Any parameter constraints and restraints applied during refinement should be documented (see also §3, _refine_ls_number_restraints). Note that only U or Uij values are acceptable for atomic displacement parameters. The atom numbering should follow some recognised scheme (see §5.1) and the atom list should be in some sensible (not random) order. H-atom labels should be directly related to the atom to which they are bonded.
All symmetry-unique bond lengths and angles, including those involving H atoms, should be provided in the CIF, but only values that are of special interest should be flagged for publication in a table by setting the _geom_..._flag value to yes. The inclusion of torsion angles in the CIF is encouraged, but should not normally include those involving H atoms; those in which three of the atoms are nearly collinear should be removed. The data to be published will be reviewed by the Co-editor and Section Editor. All submitted geometry data should be in some sensible order and are available to readers from Crystallography Journals Online (see §7).
A chemical structure diagram (typical examples are shown below) must be included for all but inorganic materials. Authors are required to submit such diagrams electronically in one of the formats listed in §4. The diagram should be complete, showing all species present in the structure, including counter-ions and solvent molecules in their correct proportions. Any relative or absolute stereochemistry must be shown and should be consistent with the crystallographic diagram (§2.11), and the data reported in the Abstract (§2.3), Comment (§2.4) and Title (§2.1). Hydrogen bonding should not normally be indicated in the diagram.
Authors are also encouraged to submit chemical connectivity (MOL, CML, CHM, SMI) files of reported structures with their articles. These files will be made available as part of the supplementary materials for each article and will be used to provide InChI (International Chemical Identifier) keys for the article, making the structures easier to find in the chemical literature.
Diagram requirements are given in §4. A labelled displacement ellipsoid diagram is normally required for each species either for publication or to be used in the review process. Authors are also welcome to supply additional figures, e.g. packing diagrams, provided that they display features of interest, the information content is high, they are legible and contribute to the discussion in the Comment section. Figures submitted in colour will be printed in greyscale but will usually appear in colour in Crystallography Journals Online (see §7).
The Table of Contents of the journal will list the title and author(s) of all articles. Each entry will be accompanied by either a chemical structure diagram (see §2.10) for molecular compounds or a written synopsis for compounds that cannot be shown in such a diagram.
Authors of powder diffraction articles should consult the notes provided at http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/powder.html . For articles that present the results of powder diffraction profile fitting or refinement (Rietveld) methods, the primary diffraction data, i.e. the numerical intensity of each measured point on the profile as a function of scattering angle, should be deposited. Articles reporting Rietveld refinements should include a figure showing the diffraction profile and the difference between the measured and calculated profiles.
The reflection data h, k, l, Ymeas, σYmeas, Ycalc (where Y is I, F2 or F), must be supplied as an electronic file in CIF format during the submission process. All unique reflections should be included. Note that in the case of structures determined from twinned crystals, the reflection data file used as input to the refinement program (e.g. the HKLF5 format file used by SHELXL) may be requested.
The standard uncertainty (abbreviated s.u. and replacing the traditional term estimated standard deviation) should be expressed as a number in parentheses following the numerical result and should be on the scale of the least significant digits of the result. The s.u. value should be in the range 2–19 in the text and the tables. Note that s.u. values should not be appended to parameters which are fixed by symmetry, geometry or other constraints.
A list of all data required for submission is available from the online CIF help page (see §7). If the submitted data are incomplete, inadequate or incorrect the author will be informed promptly. Authors are required to pre-check each CIF (see §1.1) prior to submission. A more complete description of the data-validation checks applied to submitted CIFs is available from the online CIF help page (see §7).
The most important data requirements are summarized below.
The chemical formula must be consistent with the atomic content specified by the _atom_site_ information, and match the _chemical_formula_weight. If atoms are missing from the atomic model, the moiety and sum formulae should state the assumed overall formula.
The space group must encompass the highest symmetry permitted by the diffraction intensities and be consistent with the _cell_length_ and _cell_angle_ values.
Authors are encouraged to use crystals no larger than the incident X-ray beam diameter, particularly when heavy or strongly absorbing elements are present in the material. For best results, the crystal should be uniformly bathed in the X-ray beam. The size of the beam at the crystal is normally determined by inter alia the nature of the X-ray source and the beam optics. Note that with fine-focus sealed X-ray tubes, the use of a collimator larger than the filament diameter does not automatically increase the size of the uniform part of the incident beam.
Permitted absorption-type codes are listed in the online CIF help page (see §7). A type code must be accompanied by a reference to the method or the software used; this should be given in the field _exptl_absorpt_process_details. The need for absorption corrections, and the appropriate type of correction, is dependent on the μ value, _exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu, and the crystal size values, _exptl_crystal_size_min, _mid and _max. If x is the medial size _mid, the product μx provides an indication of the type of correction needed. Analytical or numerical corrections may be beneficial if μx exceeds 1.0 and are strongly recommended if μx is above 3.0. However, corrections based on analyses of equivalent and redundant reflections (multi-scan methods) are acceptable. Corrections are usually unnecessary if μx is below 0.1. Refined absorption methods are discouraged except in special circumstances. The experimentally determined transmission-factor limits _exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min and _max should be consistent with those expected for the crystal shape and size, and μ. Whenever a multi-scan type absorption correction is being employed (e.g. by using SADABS), authors are also encouraged to measure a multiplicity of observations (measurement of symmetry equivalents or the same reflection at different crystal orientations) of at least 4. The algorithms used in such programs work best and produce the highest quality data only when the multiplicity of observations or coverage of the full sphere of reflections is high.
These items should refer to the complete set of measured data before any merging of symmetry-equivalent reflections, and not only to the unique set of data.
The number of symmetry-independent reflections excludes the systematically extinct intensities. Authors are encouraged to use all symmetry-independent reflections in the refinement of the structure parameters.
This threshold, which is based on multiples of σI, σF2 or σF, serves to identify the significantly intense reflections, the number of which is given by _reflns_number_gt. These reflections are used in the calculation of _refine_ls_R_factor_gt. The multiplier in the threshold expression should be as small as possible, typically 2 or less.
The θmax of measured reflections should be such that sin θmax/λ exceeds 0.6 Å−1 (i.e. θmax > 25° for Mo Kα; θmax > 67° for Cu Kα). It is expected that all possible unique reflections out to at least the specified minimum θ limits are measured. This provides the minimum number of reflections recommended for an average structural study. If intensities are consistently weak at the recommended θmax, low-temperature measurements may be needed unless a study at a specific temperature (or pressure) is being reported.
This is the fraction of unique (symmetry-independent) reflections measured out to _diffrn_reflns_theta_max. Ideally, this should be as close to 1.0 as possible.
When _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_max is less than 1.0 because of some missing high-angle reflections, θfull is the diffractometer angle at which the measured reflection count is close to complete. The fraction of unique reflections measured out to this angle is given by _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full.
Sufficient symmetry-equivalent reflections must be measured to provide a good estimate of the intensity reproducibility. This is particularly important when absorption corrections are applied (this value is calculated after the corrections are applied to the intensities). See also _exptl_absorpt_correction_type.
Note that this value is not intended as a reliable gauge of structure precision which is better determined from the standard uncertainties of the parameters (these depend on the number and reliability of the measured structure factors used in the refinement process).
The number of reflections used in the refinement should be as large as possible, and should, if possible, be greater than the number of refined parameters _refine_ls_number_parameters by at least a factor of 10 if the structure is centrosymmetric, or by a factor of 8 if it is not. Omission of outlier reflections should be avoided unless there is good reason and, in such cases, details of the omitted reflections and the reasons for doing so should be included in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section.
This is the number of coordinate, atomic displacement, scale, occupancy, restraint, extinction and other parameters refined independently in the least-squares process. It is possible, and sometimes desirable, to reduce this number by the appropriate application of geometric constraints.
This gives the number of applied restraints. Concise details of what these restraints were, including any target values applied and the effective standard deviation of the restraint, should be included in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the CIF.
The codes which identify the treatment of H-atom parameters are listed in the online CIF help page (see §7). Detailed text about the treatment of H-atom sites should be placed in _publ_section_exptl_refinement. Authors should note the advice on H-atom treatment given in the SHELXL97 manual , §4.6: `For most purposes it is preferable to calculate the hydrogen positions according to well-established geometrical criteria and then adopt a refinement procedure which ensures that a sensible geometry is retained'. Authors should note that H-atom sites which have been fixed or constrained by geometry (e.g. riding) will not have s.u. values associated with them.
Weighting schemes for refinements should be based on the standard uncertainties in the measured reflection data.
This is the largest ratio of the parameter shift to standard uncertainty after the final round of refinement and is typically within ±0.01 if sufficient least-squares refinement cycles have been employed. A value above ±0.05 is considered unusual and values beyond ±0.1 are a sign of incomplete refinement, unaccounted-for disorder or high correlation between parameters that should be constrained. Authors should explain the reasons for a high value in _publ_section_exptl_refinement.
These values are expected to be small, especially for light-atom structures. If their magnitudes are such that a validation alert is generated, the label and the distance of the closest atom site should be reported in _publ_section_exptl_refinement.
All geometry values must originate from the submitted _atom_site_fract_ values. Only geometry values of significance to the structure will be published. These must be identified with a _geom_..._flag value of yes in the submitted CIF. Note that dimensions involving H-atom sites which have been fixed or constrained by geometry will not have s.u. values associated with them. Details of all bond lengths and angles involving H atoms must be included in the CIF, even if they have been constrained.
Atomic coordinates for molecular and nonmolecular species should be supplied as connected sets. Whenever structure geometry permits, it is normally expected that the set of connected coordinates which specify the asymmetric unit will lie within the basic unit cell. Values of _atom_site_occupancy should be 1.0 except for disordered or non-stoichiometric atom sites. Atom sites constrained to model disorder must be indicated by _atom_site_disorder_group. The overall packing in the structure will be checked for significant vacant regions (i.e. voids) indicating omitted solvent molecules. Note that s.u. values should not be appended to parameters which are fixed by symmetry, geometry or other constraints. In systems with hydrogen-bonded networks, it is expected that the asymmetric unit will be chosen so that the minimum number of symmetry operators is required to specify the hydrogen-bond network.
Checks will be made for non-positive-definite anisotropic atomic displacement parameters. The ratio of maximum to minimum eigenvalues should not, except in special circumstances (e.g. disorder), exceed 5.
This item should describe the method applied, with a literature citation if necessary, and the number of Friedel pairs used in the determination of the absolute structure parameter (e.g. _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack). If the structure is noncentrosymmetric, an absolute structure parameter is expected. The reliability of this parameter increases with the number of Friedel-related intensities, and the use of a large fraction of the complete set of Friedel pairs in the refinement is strongly recommended. Even if the atomic composition and the choice of X-ray wavelength mean that the f′′ terms of the atomic scattering factor expressions are very small, and the value of the absolute structure parameter is inconclusive because of its large s.u. value, it is not necessary to merge Friedel-pair reflections. If authors do merge Friedel-pair reflections before final refinement, they should mention that fact in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section and not report a value for the Flack parameter in the CIF. Authors are strongly advised to consult articles by Flack & Bernardinelli [Acta Cryst. (1999), A55, 908–915 ; J. Appl. Cryst. (2000), 33, 1143–1148 ] and Flack, Sadki, Thompson & Watkin [Acta Cryst. (2011), A67, 21–34 ] which discuss the use, meaning and significance of the Flack parameter and its s.u. value. For pertinent comments on the determination of absolute structure, authors are also referred to the articles by Jones [Acta Cryst. (1986), A42, 57 ] and Hooft et al. [J. Appl. Cryst. (2008), 41, 96–103 ; J. Appl. Cryst. (2010), 43, 665–668 ].
A set of guidelines for preparing figures is available from http://journals.iucr.org/c/services/help/artwork/guide.html . Figures and chemical structure diagrams (see §2.10 for a typical example) should be prepared in HPGL, PostScript, encapsulated PostScript or TIFF format. The resolution of bitmap graphics should be a minimum of 600 d.p.i.
For articles reporting molecular structures a labelled displacement ellipsoid molecular diagram is required for each independent species; for polymeric materials the displacement ellipsoid plot should show at least the chemically unique fragment; for other structures, a packing or polyhedron diagram is required. All non-H unique atom sites should be identified with labels consistent with those for the supplied atomic coordinates. Distances and angles should not be shown in the crystallographic diagram. A chemical structure diagram or scheme must be supplied for molecular compounds (see §2.10 for a typical example). Authors should consider having the orientation of crystallographic figures and chemical schemes correspond as closely as possible.
Additional crystallographic diagrams, such as packing diagrams showing extended structures or intermolecular interactions, are welcome, but should be constructed carefully to show clearly the desired features and to maximise information content. Where features depicted in two diagrams could be combined, the authors may be asked to provide a single figure. Packing diagrams should normally exclude H-atom sites, unless these are involved in hydrogen bonding or other interactions.
Figures showing no significant features and not described in the text (e.g. packing diagrams without special intermolecular interactions), or which are illegible because of crowding will not be published.
Electronic files in the formats listed above are essential for high quality reproduction. For molecular compounds, a clear, well-presented ellipsoid plot will show the stereochemistry and any unusual atomic displacements or disorder.
Diagrams will normally be sized by the Editorial Office staff so that the greatest width including lettering is less than the width of a column in the journal (8.8 cm).
Fine-scale details and lettering must be large enough to be clearly legible (ideally 1.5–3 mm in height) after the whole diagram has been reduced to one column width. Atom site labels in crystallographic diagrams should not contain parentheses and should match labels used in the atom site lists and text. The labels should not overlap or touch ellipsoids or bonds. Descriptive matter should be placed in the caption. Packing diagrams should show the unit-cell outline, with the cell-axis directions (labelled a, b, c) and the cell origin (labelled O) marked thereon or given in a legend at the side.
Diagrams should be numbered in a single series in the order in which they are referred to in the text. A list of the figure captions should be included in _publ_section_figure_captions. Captions of labelled displacement ellipsoid plots must state the probability limit used. If H atoms are shown by small spheres of an arbitrary size, this need not be stated in the caption. Symmetry-related atoms should be marked by additional symbols or letters and the figure caption should indicate to what symmetry operations these additional items in the atom labels refer (see also §5.1).
An online tool for authors to prepare standard and corresponding three-dimensional interactive structural diagrams is available from http://submission.iucr.org/jtkt .
Authors should follow the general recommendations produced by the IUCr Commision on Crystallographic Nomenclature (see reports at http://www.iucr.org/iucr/commissions/cnom.html).
Atom sites not related by space-group symmetry should be identified by unique labels composed of a number appended to the IUPAC chemical symbol (e.g. C5, C7 etc.). Label numbers should not be placed in parentheses. Chemical and crystallographic numbering should be in agreement wherever possible. Crystallographically equivalent atoms in different asymmetric units should be identified in the text with lower-case Roman numeral superscripts appended to the original atom labels and the symmetry operators defined [e.g. C5i; symmetry code: (i) −x + , y − , −z + ]. In diagrams, Roman numeral superscripts are preferred, but symmetry-related atoms may be marked by additional symbols or letters, with these defined in the caption. Atom labels should be as concise as possible and not contain superfluous characters, e.g. leading zeroes are unnecessary so that C01, C02 should appear as C1, C2, etc. H-atom numbers should correspond with that of their parent atom label, e.g. a phenyl H on atom C1 should appear as H1, not H1A, and methylene H atoms on C1 should appear as H1A and H1B or H11 and H12, unless this leads to naming ambiguities. Chemically ambiguous labels such as HO1a (signifying an H atom attached to an O atom) should be avoided. If there are figures with packing plots in an article, the atom labels with no symmetry code in these plots must correspond exactly with the asymmetric unit coordinates.
Space groups should be designated by the Hermann–Mauguin symbols. In triclinic systems, the reduced cell must be used, and for other crystal systems, the standard cell settings, as listed in Volume A of International Tables for Crystallography , should be used unless objective reasons to the contrary are stated. A list of equivalent positions should also be supplied. Hermann–Mauguin symbols should be used for designating point groups and crystallographically-imposed molecular symmetry. If there is a choice of origin, this should be stated in _publ_section_exptl_refinement. The choice of axes should normally follow the recommendations of the Commission on Crystallographic Data [Kennard et al. (1967). Acta Cryst. 22, 445–449 ].
Names of chemical compounds and minerals should conform to the nomenclature rules of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC ), the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB ), the International Mineralogical Association (IMA ) and other appropriate bodies. Any accepted trivial or non-systematic name may be retained, but the corresponding systematic (IUPAC) name should also be given.
For crystal structures containing chiral molecules, authors should make it clear whether the crystal structure is a racemate or enantiopure, and if enantiopure whether or not the assignment of the absolute configuration is justified. A corresponding CIF code should be entered into the data item _chemical_absolute_configuration . The title, compound name, chemical diagrams, atomic coordinates and space group must correspond to the enantio-composition and the selected configuration. It is also most helpful to indicate the crystallographic and non-crystallographic symmetry of each molecule in the asymmetric unit.
Authors may find nomenclature programs such as AutoNom (http://www.mimas.ac.uk/crossfire/autonom.html ) and ACDLABS (http://www.acdlabs.com/products/name_lab ) to be useful resources when naming compounds.
The International System of Units (SI) is used except that the ångström (symbol Å, defined as 10–10 m) is generally preferred to the nanometre (nm) or picometre (pm) as the appropriate unit of length. Recommended prefixes of decimal multiples should be used rather than `×10n'.
References to published work must be indicated by giving the authors' names followed immediately by the year of publication, e.g. Neder & Schulz (1999) or (Neder & Schulz, 1999). Where there are three or more authors the reference in the text should be indicated in the form Smith et al. (1989) or (Smith et al., 1989) etc., unless more authors need to be given to make the citation unambiguous. Thus, for the following two references:
Smith, A. B., Jones, C. D., Wolf, E. F., Baird, M. N. & Hunt, G. H. (1994). Organometallics, 13, 123–128.
Smith, A. B., Jones, C. D., Lyle, R. S., Hunt, G. H. & Baird, M. N. (1994). Chem. Rev. 94, 345–380.
the reference in the text should be distinguished as follows: Smith, Jones, Wolf et al. (1994) and Smith, Jones, Lyle et al. (1994).
In the reference list (_publ_section_references), the ordering of references should be:
(1) First, alphabetically by surname of first author, then second author etc.
(2) Second, numerically by year for the same set of authors.
For references with identical lists of authors and the same year of publication, the a, b etc. notation is used, e.g.
Drew, M. G., Hall, R. S. & Long, F. I. (2004a). Organometallics, 23, 456–459.
Drew, M. G., Hall, R. S. & Long, F. I. (2004b). J. Med. Chem. 47, 579–586.
Lehmler, H. J., Robertson, L. W. & Parkin, S. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3025–o3026.
Lehmler, H. J., Robertson, L. W., Parkin, S. & Brock, C. P. (2002). Acta Cryst. E61, o123–o124.
Entries for journals should be abbreviated in the style of Chemical Abstracts (the abbreviations Acta Cryst., J. Appl. Cryst. and J. Synchrotron Rad. are exceptions), and the reference list should conform with the following style:
Albada, G. A. van, Mutikainen, I., Turpeinen, U. & Reedijk, J. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, m421–m423.
Back, S., Rheinwald, G., del Rio, I., van Koten, G. & Lang, H. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, m444–m445.
Bond, A. D. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, o1992–o1993.
Bond, A. D., Clayden, J. & Wheatley, A. E. H. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, o292–o294.
Bond, A. D. & Davies, J. E. (2002). Acta Cryst. E58, o5–o7.
Bond, A. D., Davies, J. E. & Kirby, A. J. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, o1242–o1244.
Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Bürgi, H.-B. (1989). Acta Cryst. B45, 383–390.
Filgueiras, C. A. L., Horn, A. Jr, Howie, R. A., Skakle, J. M. S. & Wardell, J. L. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, o338–o340.
Hervieu, M. & Raveau, B. (1983a). Chem. Scr. 22, 117–122.
Hervieu, M. & Raveau, B. (1983b). Chem. Scr. 22, 123–128.
Hummel, W., Hauser, J. & Bürgi, H.-B. (2012). In preparation.
International Union of Crystallography (2001). (IUCr) Structure Reports Online, http://journals.iucr.org/e/journalhomepage.html
Jones, P. T. (2012). Personal communication.
Kiser, P. D., Lodowski, D. T. & Palczewski, K. (2012). Acta Cryst. F68, doi:10.1107/S1744309107020295.
Kooijman, H. & Spek, A. L. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, e295–e296.
McCrone, W. C. (1965). Physics and Chemistry of the Organic Solid State, Vol. 2, edited by D. Fox, M. M. Labes & A. Weissberger, pp. 725–767. New York: Interscience.
Meyer, M. B., Zella, L. A., Nerenz, R. D. & Pike, J. W. (2008). J. Biol. Chem. doi:10.1074/jbc.M703475200.
Nonius (1997). KappaCCD Server Software. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
Perkins, P. (2002). PhD thesis, University of London, England.
Robinson, P. D. (2012). Acta Cryst. C68. In the press. [Article reference ln3127].
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.
Smith, J. V. (1988). Chem. Rev. 88, 149–182.
Smith, J. (2000). Private communication (refcode: PYMTLI01). CCDC, Cambridge, England.
Smith, J. V. & Bennett, J. M. (1981). Am. Mineral. 66, 777–788.
Vogel, A. (1978). Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry, 4th ed. London: Longman.
Note that all authors and inclusive page numbers must be given, except when the cited article has only one page, and that all computer programs given in the relevant _computing_..._ entries must be referenced and included in the reference list. Note that version numbers should not be given for computer programs. Identification of individual structures in the article by use of database reference (identification) codes should be accompanied by a full citation of the original literature in the reference list. The CIF editor, publCIF (see §1.1), allows the consistency of references and citations to be checked. Citations in supplementary material should also appear in the main body of the article.
Full details of guidelines for the preparation and editing of a CIF, the data items required therein, standard data codes and keywords, CIF templates, example CIFs, and data-validation criteria and procedures can be found via the online CIF help page at http://journals.iucr.org/c/services/cifinfo.html .
A number of tools are available to help with the preparation of articles.
The checkCIF/PLATON service at http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/checking/checkfull.html allows CIFs and structure factors to be checked.
CIFs can be edited using publCIF, available from http://publcif.iucr.org , or enCIFer, available from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/products/encifer/index.html ).
A toolkit for preparing enhanced figures is available at http://submission.iucr.org/jkit .
A preview of an article may be printed using the printCIF service at http://journals.iucr.org/services/cif/printcif.html .
Authors may obtain information about the current status of their article at http://journals.iucr.org/services/status.html .
Proofs will be provided electronically in portable document format (pdf). The contact author will be notified by e-mail when the proofs are ready for downloading. Proofs will have been checked by the Section Editor, who reserves the right to make minor changes for consistency and conformity to Section C standards; any remaining problems will be referred back to the authors.
At the proof stage, authors will be given the opportunity to make their articles `open access' on Crystallography Journals Online . Authors of open-access articles will not be required to transfer copyright to the IUCr, but will instead be asked to agree to an open-access licence. This licence is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution Licence .
After publication, the contact author will be able to download the electronic reprint of the published article, free of charge. Authors will also be able to order printed reprints at the proof stage.