crystallization papers\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoBIOLOGICAL
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1399-0047

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of pseudo-merohedrally twinned crystals of the full-length β2 subunit of the Kv1 K+ channel from Rattus norvegicus

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDivision of Biomedical Sciences, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, England, and bDepartment of Biological Sciences, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, England
*Correspondence e-mail: s.iwata@ic.ac.uk

(Received 15 December 2003; accepted 25 February 2004)

The eukaryotic Kv1 voltage-gated K+ channel is composed of four α subunits and four β subunits. The full-length β2 subunit from Rattus norvegicus has been expressed in Esherichia coli, purified and then crystallized. A careful molecular-replacement study using the structure of the truncated β2 subunit reveals that the crystals are perfectly pseudo-merohedrally twinned. While the apparent space group of the crystals was P4212, the real space group was shown to be P21212, with unit-cell parameters a = 222.6, b = 222.6, c = 82.3 Å. An asymmetric unit of the crystal contains two β2 tetramers (MW = 340 kDa). A data set was collected from a crystal to 2.0 Å resolution, with 266 659 independent observations (93.0% complete) and Rmerge = 0.06. Although the crystals are perfectly twinned, they are still suitable for structural determination by molecular replacement using the truncated β2-subunit structure.

1. Introduction

Voltage-gated K+ channels are involved in a variety of functions including control of neural excitability, shaping of the action potentials, determining the inter-spike interval and in­directly regulating transmitter release (Jan & Jan, 1997[Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. (1997). Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 91-123.]). They control the electric potential across cell membranes by mediating the rapid selective diffusion of K+ down their electrochemical gradient. The Kv1 family of eukary­otic voltage-gated K+ channels are composed of four α subunits and four β subunits (Parcej et al., 1992[Parcej, D. N., Scott, V. E. & Dolly, J. O. (1992). Biochemistry, 31, 11084-11088.]; Orlova et al., 2003[Orlova, E. V., Papakosta, M., Booy, F. P., van Heel, M. & Dolly, J. O. (2003). J. Mol. Biol. 326, 1005-1012.]). Four α subunits form the transmembrane channel for K+ conduction and voltage-dependent gating. Four soluble β subunits are attached to the cytoplasmic face of the α tetramer. The detailed roles of the β subunits remain unknown, although β1 accelerates inactivation of the channel (Rettig et al., 1994[Rettig, J., Heinemann, S. H., Wunder, F., Lorra, C., Parcej, D. N., Dolly, J. O. & Pongs, O. (1994). Nature (London), 369, 289-294.]). The β subunits have a conserved core related in amino-acid sequence to aldo–keto reductases, although the specific substrate has not been detected. Moreover, the β subunits have a mobile N-terminal extension that has been revealed to be involved in the inactivation of the channel (Zhou et al., 2001[Zhou, M., Morais-Cabral, J. H., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2001). Nature (London), 411, 657-661.]). The extent of inactivation differs depending on the subtype of the β-subunit family. The inactivation of the K+ channel shapes the electrical signalling properties of many types of nerve, muscle and other cells. Of the β-subunit family, only the structure of the β2 subunit, a subtype of the β subunit, has been solved so far; however, the β2 subunit was expressed as a truncated form without the crucial N-terminal extension in order to prevent protein aggregation and facilitate crystallization (Gulbis et al., 1999[Gulbis, J. M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (1999). Cell, 97, 943-952.], 2000[Gulbis, J. M., Zhou, M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2000). Science, 289, 123-127.]). In order to understand the inactivation mechanism of the K+ channel controlled by the β subunit, the X-ray structure of the full-length β subunit is indispensable.

Here, we report the crystallization of the full-length β2 subunit from Rattus norvegicus, which diffracted to 2.0 Å resolution.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Expression

The gene coding for the full-length β2 subunit from R. norvegicus was cloned into the pET20b vector (Novagen, Germany) and overexpressed under control of the T7 promoter in Escherichia coli. E. coli BL21 (DE3) harbouring the expression plasmid was cultivated in LB medium containing 50 µg ml−1 ampicillin and 34 µg ml−1 chloram­phenicol at 310 K. When the OD600 reached 0.6, expression of the full-length β2 subunit was induced with 0.8 mM IPTG for 4 h at 310 K. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and stored at 193 K.

2.2. Purification

The cell pellet was thawed and resuspended in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5 mM imidazole (buffer A) and the resultant slurry sonicated. After removal of the cell debris by centrifugation, the supernatant was applied onto an Ni–NTA superflow column (Qiagen, Germany) equilibrated with buffer A. The column was subsequently washed with five column volumes of buffer B (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 50 mM imidazole) before the bound protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0–100% buffer C (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 0.5 M NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 500 mM imidazole). The purity of the protein was assessed by SDS–PAGE. Fractions containing the β2 subunit were pooled and concentrated using a 10 kDa cutoff filter (Vivaspin, Germany). The protein was finally concentrated to 10 mg ml−1 and then used for crystallization trials.

2.3. Initial crystallization

Crystals were grown by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method. The protein sample was mixed with reservoir solution in a 1:1 ratio and left to equilibrate at 277 K. Initial crystals were obtained using several conditions from Crystal Screen 1 and 2 (Hampton Research, USA) containing polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400), jeffamine M-600 or 2-propanol as precipitants. Among these conditions, No. 12 [0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.2 M MgCl2, 30%(v/v) 2-­propanol] and No. 27 [0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.2 M trisodium citrate, 20%(v/v) 2-­propanol] from Crystal Screen 1 produced good-looking crystals. Using these conditions, crystals appeared after a few days and stopped growing within two weeks.

2.4. Optimization of crystallization conditions

Crystals obtained from conditions Nos. 12 and 27 of Crystal Screen 1 diffracted to 3.5 Å. The low-resolution limit could be a consequence of the unsuitable freezing conditions caused by the evaporation of 2-­propanol during crystal handling. Screening of the non-volatile organic alcohol used as a precipitant and optimization of the concentration improved the freezing conditions and the subsequent diffraction quality of the crystals. The final optimized crystallization condition after iterative optimization cycles was 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 55% 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD), 5 mM NaCl. Crystals appeared after one week and reached maximum dimensions of 0.05 × 0.05 × 0.2 mm within two weeks.

2.5. Data collection and crystallographic analysis

Crystals were mounted in nylon loops (Hampton Research) and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Data collection from frozen crystals was performed at 100 K. Diffraction data to 2.0 Å were collected on beamline ID29 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) using an ADSC Quantum 4 CCD detector. A wavelength of 0.9773 Å and a crystal-to-detector distance of 240 mm were used. The beam size, oscillation range and exposure time were 100 × 100 µm, 0.3°and 15 s per frame, respectively. Data integration was performed with DENZO and scaling was performed with SCALEPACK; both programs are from the HKL program package (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326.]). All data better than −3.0σ(I) were used for scaling. Data statistics are given in Table 1[link]. A self-rotation function was calculated with the program POLARRFN (Kabasch, unpublished work; Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994[Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760-763.]) using a radius of integration of 29 Å and data in the resolution range 5–12 Å. Molecular-replacement trials were per­formed with the program AMoRe (Navaza, 2001[Navaza, J. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 1367-1372.]) using the N-terminal truncated β2 subunit structure (PDB entry 1exb ; Gulbis et al., 2000[Gulbis, J. M., Zhou, M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2000). Science, 289, 123-127.]) as a search model.

Table 1
Data statistics

Statistics for the last shell (2.1–2.0 Å) are given in parentheses.

Space group P21212
Resolution (Å) 2.0
Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = 222.6, b = 222.6, c = 82.3
Total observations 614510
Unique observations 266659
Completeness (%) 93.0 (80.0)
Rmerge (%) 6.0 (38.2)
Average I/σ(I) 15.1 (2.3)

3. Results and discussion

Whereas the N-terminally truncated β2 subunit used for the previous structure determination was expressed in Sf9 cells (Gulbis et al., 1999[Gulbis, J. M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (1999). Cell, 97, 943-952.], 2000[Gulbis, J. M., Zhou, M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2000). Science, 289, 123-127.]), large amounts of the full-length rat β2 subunit were expressed in E. coli cells using the pET20b vector. The expressed recombinant β2 subunit was confirmed to exist in the soluble fraction by SDS–PAGE of the supernatant after sonication of the cells and removal of the debris. After optimization of the concentration of MPD and the type of salt, small but well diffracting crystals were obtained from the condition mentioned above (Fig. 1[link]). The crystals diffracted to 2.0 Å, which is better than that found with the crystals of the N-­terminally truncated β2 subunit (Gulbis et al., 2000[Gulbis, J. M., Zhou, M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2000). Science, 289, 123-127.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Crystal of the full-length β2 subunit of the voltage-gated K+ channel from R. norvegicus. The crystal has approximate dimensions of 0.05 × 0.05 × 0.2 mm.

It was possible to collect a complete data set from one of the largest crystals. The crystals apparently belong to the tetragonal space group P4212, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 222.6, c = 82.3 Å. Assuming the crystallographic asymmetric unit to contain a tetramer, the Matthews coefficient (VM; Matthews, 1968[Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491-497.]) and solvent content of the crystals are 3.0 Å3 Da−1 and 59.4%, respectively.

Molecular replacement was performed using the structure of the truncated β2-monomer structure (PDB entry 1exb : Gulbis et al., 2000[Gulbis, J. M., Zhou, M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2000). Science, 289, 123-127.]), which contained 90% of the amino-acid residues of the full-length β2 subunit; however, it was not possible to find a clear solution. In order to solve this problem, we took advantage of the molecular fourfold axis of the β2-subunit tetramer. The structure factors were extended to cover the P1 cell and the molecular-replacement search was repeated using the tetramer as a model. This yielded a clear solution with eight tetramers in the unit cell. In the solution, two tetramers form a face-to-face octamer with 422 point symmetry. A similar arrangement is observed in the truncated β2-subunit crystals (Gulbis et al., 1999[Gulbis, J. M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (1999). Cell, 97, 943-952.]). The packing clearly showed the real space group of the crystals to be P21212, with unit-cell parameters a = 222.6, b = 222.6, c = 82.3 Å. The molecular-replacement search using the data extended to P21212 gave a unique solution with a correlation factor of 68.0% and an R factor of 39.9% (Fig. 2[link]). The crystallographic asymmetric unit contains one octamer of the β2 subunit. The apparent space group P4212 was initially assigned owing to the perfect hemihedral twinning with twinning operator (−khl). This is possible because the a and b axes of the original orthorhombic cell are the same length. Perfect twinning is also supported by the fact that the Rmerge for the data set scaled as P4212 (6.6%) is only slightly higher than that for P21212 (6.0%).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal packing of the molecular-replacement solution. The box indicates the unit cell of the crystal.

The self-rotation function analysis of the data supports the obtained molecular-replacement solution (Fig. 3[link]). In the κ = 180° section, in addition to the crystallographic twofold axes (ω = 0, φ = 0° and ω = 90, φ = 0, 90, 180, 270°), the apparent twofold axes derived from the twinning operator are clearly observed (ω = 90, φ = 45, 135, 225, 315°). The rest of the peaks on the ω = 90° circle are from non-crystallographic twofold axes derived from the observed octamer with 422 point symmetry.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Self-rotation function map of a crystal calculated in the resolution range 12–5 Å and plotted for κ = 180° section.

Because a structure for the truncated β2 subunit is available and the resolution of the data for the full-length β2 subunit is reasonably high, it is possible to refine the structure in spite of the twinning problems using programs such as CNS (Brünger et al., 1998[Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T. & Warren, G. L. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 905-921.]) or SHELX97 (Sheldrick & Schneider, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. & Schneider, T. R. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 277, 319-343.]). Structure refinement is in progress.

References

First citationBrünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T. & Warren, G. L. (1998). Acta Cryst. D54, 905–921.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationCollaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGulbis, J. M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (1999). Cell, 97, 943–952.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationGulbis, J. M., Zhou, M., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2000). Science, 289, 123–127.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationJan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. (1997). Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 91–123.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMatthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationNavaza, J. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 1367–1372.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationOrlova, E. V., Papakosta, M., Booy, F. P., van Heel, M. & Dolly, J. O. (2003). J. Mol. Biol. 326, 1005–1012.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationParcej, D. N., Scott, V. E. & Dolly, J. O. (1992). Biochemistry, 31, 11084–11088.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationRettig, J., Heinemann, S. H., Wunder, F., Lorra, C., Parcej, D. N., Dolly, J. O. & Pongs, O. (1994). Nature (London), 369, 289–294.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. & Schneider, T. R. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 277, 319–343.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationZhou, M., Morais-Cabral, J. H., Mann, S. & MacKinnon, R. (2001). Nature (London), 411, 657–661.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoBIOLOGICAL
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1399-0047
Follow Acta Cryst. D
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds