![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](na6026contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m39-m40 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536800020122 ]
(C-C) = 0.005 ÅNo syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level B:
PLAT_732 Alert B Angle Calc 64.70(2), Rep 64.70(10) .... 5.00 s.u-Ratio S1 -SB1 -S2 1.555 1.555 1.555
| Author response: I have rounded up the last decimal place. |
PLAT_732 Alert B Angle Calc 150.27(2), Rep 150.30(10) .... 5.00 s.u-Ratio
S1 -SB1 -S2 2.665 1.555 1.555
| Author response: I have rounded up the last decimal place. |
PLAT_732 Alert B Angle Calc 82.34(2), Rep 82.30(10) .... 5.00 s.u-Ratio
S1 -SB1 -S2 3.565 1.555 1.555
| Author response: I have rounded up the last decimal place. |
Alert Level C:
PLAT_702 Alert C Angle Calc 87.14(2), Rep 87.10(10), Dev. 2.00 Sigma S1 -SB1 -S1 1.555 1.555 2.665 PLAT_702 Alert C Angle Calc 87.14(2), Rep 87.10(10), Dev. 2.00 Sigma S1 -SB1 -S1 1.555 1.555 3.565 PLAT_702 Alert C Angle Calc 87.14(2), Rep 87.10(10), Dev. 2.00 Sigma S1 -SB1 -S1 2.665 1.555 3.565 PLAT_702 Alert C Angle Calc 150.27(2), Rep 150.30(10), Dev. 1.50 Sigma S1 -SB1 -S2 2.665 1.555 1.555 PLAT_702 Alert C Angle Calc 82.34(2), Rep 82.30(10), Dev. 2.00 Sigma S1 -SB1 -S2 3.565 1.555 1.555 General Notes
FORMU_01 There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: C24 H42 N3 S6 Sb1 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:C24 H42 N3 S6 REFLT_03 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 33.18 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 3970 Count of symmetry unique reflns 2133 Completeness (_total/calc) 186.12% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 1837 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.861 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF.
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
3 Alert Level B = Potential problem
5 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster