Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The structure of the title compound, (C10H10N2)[Cu2Cl6], previously determined by Bukowska-Strzyzewska & Tosik [Pol. J. Chem. (1979), 53, 2423–2428], has been reinvestigated. Our structure determination is of a significantly higher precision and, in contrast to the previous investigation, H atoms could be clearly found. Thus, it can be shown that the chains of alternating bipyridyl­ium cations and Cu2Cl62− anions are stabilized by bifurcated hydrogen bonds. The cation and anion both lie on inversion centres.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801001283/cf6040sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801001283/cf6040Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 159711

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.004 Å
  • R factor = 0.028
  • wR factor = 0.068
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 24.0

checkCIF results

No syntax errors found

ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry




Comment top

The structure determination of the title compound, (I), was undertaken within a project on the preparation and structural investigation of new coordination polymers based on copper(I) halides and aromatic bases. Our results are of a significantly higher precision than the previously determined structure (Bukowska-Strzyzewska & Tosik, 1979) and we have been able to locate all H atoms.

The title compound crystallizes in parallel sheets which are composed of rows of alternating bipyridyl cations and Cu2Cl62- anions. These rows run approximately along the [145] vector and are stabilized by bifurcated N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds (Fig. 1). The cation and anion are located on crystallographic centres of inversion and, as a consequence of that, the pyridyl rings are coplanar. Bond lengths and angles are in the usual ranges compared with structures retrieved from the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.20 of October 2000; Allen & Kennard, 1993). The bonds between the terminal Cl atoms and the Cu atoms are significantly shorter than the bridging Cu—Cl bonds.

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by the reaction of Cu2I2–4,4'-bipyridine [freshly prepared by the reaction of 4,4'-bipyridine and copper(I) iodide] with an excess of diluted hydrochloric acid. After one day standing at room temperature, light orange needles had formed in 60% yield. The homogeneity was checked by X-ray powder diffraction.

Refinement top

All H atoms were located by difference Fourier synthesis and refined with fixed individual displacement parameters [U(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or U(H) = 1.2Ueq(N)] using a riding model with aromatic C—H = 0.93 Å or N—H = 0.86 Å.

Computing details top

Data collection: DIF4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992); cell refinement: DIF4; data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Siemens, 1991); software used to prepare material for publication: CIFTAB in SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A perspective view of the title compound with the atom-numbering scheme. Atoms labelled A are centrosymmetrically related to the others. Displacement ellipsoids are at the 50% probability level.
(I) top
Crystal data top
(C10H10N2)[Cu2Cl6]Z = 1
Mr = 497.98F(000) = 244
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.190 Mg m3
a = 3.9158 (8) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 10.021 (2) ÅCell parameters from 70 reflections
c = 10.698 (2) Åθ = 11–19°
α = 113.92 (3)°µ = 3.86 mm1
β = 95.16 (3)°T = 293 K
γ = 96.06 (3)°Needle, light orange
V = 377.51 (13) Å30.15 × 0.07 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
Phillips PW-1100 four-circle
diffractometer
1716 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.018
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.7°
ω/θ scansh = 05
Absorption correction: numerical
X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1998)
k = 1414
Tmin = 0.549, Tmax = 0.599l = 1414
2500 measured reflections4 standard reflections every 120 min
2205 independent reflections intensity decay: none
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.068 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.023P)2 + 0.415P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2205 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.53 e Å3
92 parametersΔρmin = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0084 (12)
Crystal data top
(C10H10N2)[Cu2Cl6]γ = 96.06 (3)°
Mr = 497.98V = 377.51 (13) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 1
a = 3.9158 (8) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 10.021 (2) ŵ = 3.86 mm1
c = 10.698 (2) ÅT = 293 K
α = 113.92 (3)°0.15 × 0.07 × 0.07 mm
β = 95.16 (3)°
Data collection top
Phillips PW-1100 four-circle
diffractometer
1716 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: numerical
X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1998)
Rint = 0.018
Tmin = 0.549, Tmax = 0.5994 standard reflections every 120 min
2500 measured reflections intensity decay: none
2205 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0280 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.068H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.53 e Å3
2205 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.46 e Å3
92 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.33110 (8)0.90348 (3)0.08873 (3)0.02544 (10)
Cl10.25990 (16)0.89121 (6)0.13317 (6)0.02760 (14)
Cl20.10035 (18)0.71109 (7)0.02790 (6)0.03439 (16)
Cl30.40337 (16)0.94513 (7)0.31191 (6)0.02755 (13)
N10.8566 (6)0.6889 (2)0.3197 (2)0.0296 (5)
H1N0.94590.73530.27520.036*
C10.5769 (6)0.5406 (2)0.4613 (2)0.0210 (4)
C20.7537 (7)0.6839 (3)0.5304 (3)0.0307 (5)
H20.77670.73110.62630.037*
C30.8957 (7)0.7566 (3)0.4573 (3)0.0317 (6)
H31.01760.85210.50370.038*
C40.6850 (8)0.5523 (3)0.2483 (3)0.0352 (6)
H40.66190.50900.15230.042*
C50.5414 (8)0.4751 (3)0.3175 (3)0.0313 (6)
H50.42130.37970.26820.038*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.02994 (17)0.02633 (16)0.01819 (15)0.00603 (11)0.00114 (11)0.01042 (12)
Cl10.0324 (3)0.0278 (3)0.0196 (3)0.0069 (2)0.0009 (2)0.0107 (2)
Cl20.0403 (4)0.0325 (3)0.0249 (3)0.0130 (3)0.0015 (2)0.0117 (2)
Cl30.0310 (3)0.0318 (3)0.0196 (3)0.0013 (2)0.0025 (2)0.0123 (2)
N10.0340 (12)0.0306 (11)0.0311 (11)0.0032 (9)0.0093 (9)0.0193 (9)
C10.0215 (11)0.0215 (10)0.0206 (10)0.0024 (8)0.0026 (8)0.0097 (9)
C20.0408 (15)0.0237 (11)0.0216 (11)0.0059 (10)0.0010 (10)0.0068 (9)
C30.0359 (14)0.0249 (11)0.0316 (13)0.0036 (10)0.0040 (11)0.0114 (10)
C40.0478 (17)0.0338 (13)0.0219 (12)0.0008 (12)0.0080 (11)0.0107 (10)
C50.0429 (15)0.0250 (11)0.0227 (12)0.0026 (11)0.0065 (11)0.0080 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—Cl32.2361 (8)C1—C51.393 (3)
Cu1—Cl22.2566 (11)C1—C1ii1.498 (4)
Cu1—Cl12.3163 (8)C2—C31.381 (3)
Cu1—Cl1i2.3234 (11)C2—H20.930
Cl1—Cu1i2.3234 (11)C3—H30.930
N1—C41.332 (3)C4—C51.381 (4)
N1—C31.334 (3)C4—H40.930
N1—H1N0.860C5—H50.930
C1—C21.388 (3)
Cl3—Cu1—Cl293.96 (4)C3—C2—C1120.2 (2)
Cl3—Cu1—Cl1173.01 (3)C3—C2—H2119.9
Cl2—Cu1—Cl191.00 (4)C1—C2—H2119.9
Cl3—Cu1—Cl1i91.25 (4)N1—C3—C2119.5 (2)
Cl2—Cu1—Cl1i173.43 (3)N1—C3—H3120.3
Cl1—Cu1—Cl1i83.48 (4)C2—C3—H3120.3
Cu1—Cl1—Cu1i96.52 (4)N1—C4—C5119.7 (2)
C4—N1—C3122.6 (2)N1—C4—H4120.1
C4—N1—H1N118.7C5—C4—H4120.1
C3—N1—H1N118.7C4—C5—C1119.8 (2)
C2—C1—C5118.1 (2)C4—C5—H5120.1
C2—C1—C1ii121.0 (3)C1—C5—H5120.1
C5—C1—C1ii120.9 (3)
Cl2—Cu1—Cl1—Cu1i176.44 (3)C3—N1—C4—C50.4 (4)
C5—C1—C2—C31.5 (4)N1—C4—C5—C10.0 (4)
C1ii—C1—C2—C3179.6 (3)C2—C1—C5—C40.9 (4)
C4—N1—C3—C20.1 (4)C1ii—C1—C5—C4179.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3—N11.1 (4)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+2, z; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···Cl2iii0.862.543.236 (2)138
N1—H1N···Cl3iii0.862.493.198 (2)140
Symmetry code: (iii) x+1, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula(C10H10N2)[Cu2Cl6]
Mr497.98
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)3.9158 (8), 10.021 (2), 10.698 (2)
α, β, γ (°)113.92 (3), 95.16 (3), 96.06 (3)
V3)377.51 (13)
Z1
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)3.86
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.07 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerPhillips PW-1100 four-circle
diffractometer
Absorption correctionNumerical
X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1998)
Tmin, Tmax0.549, 0.599
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
2500, 2205, 1716
Rint0.018
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.703
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.068, 1.03
No. of reflections2205
No. of parameters92
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.53, 0.46

Computer programs: DIF4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992), DIF4, REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1992), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Siemens, 1991), CIFTAB in SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···Cl2i0.862.543.236 (2)138.1
N1—H1N···Cl3i0.862.493.198 (2)140.3
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds