![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](cf6065contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2001). E57, m390-m392 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536801010467 ]
Online 10 August 2001
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry General Notes
FORMU_01 There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:C8 H44 Cl2 Mo12 N4 O44 P1 Atom count from the _atom_site data: C8 H24 Cl2 Mo12 N4 O44 P1 ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.845 Tmax scaled 0.539 Tmin scaled 0.260 CELLZ_01 From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 4 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum C8 H44 Cl2 Mo12 N4 O44 P TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff C 32.00 32.00 0.00 H 176.00 96.00 80.00 Cl 8.00 8.00 0.00 Mo 48.00 48.00 0.00 N 16.00 16.00 0.00 O 176.00 176.00 0.00 P 4.00 4.00 0.00 Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional?
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster