Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The crystal structure of ethyl 2-amino­oxazole-5-carboxyl­ate, C6H8N2O3, consists of planar sheets internally connected by intermolecular hydrogen bonding running parallel to the (120) plane. Interactions between the sheets are limited to dipole-dipole interactions between antiparallel carbonyl groups.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801013058/om6045sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536801013058/om6045Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 172204

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 150 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.050
  • wR factor = 0.126
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.9

checkCIF results

No syntax errors found

ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry


Yellow Alert Alert Level C:
WEIGH_01 Alert C Extra text has been found in the _refine_ls_weighting_scheme field. This should be in the _refine_ls_weighting_details field. Weighting scheme given as calc w = 1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0599P)^2^+0.040 Weighting scheme identified as calc
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
0 Alert Level B = Potential problem
1 Alert Level C = Please check

Comment top

Ethyl 2-aminooxazole-5-carboxylate, (I), was prepared as part of an ongoing investigation of anticancer antibiotic drugs such as distamycin and netropsin (lexitropsins; see Khalaf et al., 2000). Since these drugs exhibit biological activity by binding to specific (A/T)4 sequences in the minor groove of DNA, several analogues with subtly differing binding sites were prepared and tested for activity (Fishleigh et al., 2000). The antiviral activity of (I) was tested in vitro by inhibition of plaque formation in cell cultures infected with several RNA and DNA viruses, including Newcastle-Disease and Psuedorabiesvirus (Ulbricht, 1987).

The molecular structure of (I) is essentially planar with only the atoms of the ethyl tail showing any significant deviation from the plane defined by the atoms of the five-membered ring [C5 0.163 (6) Å and C6 0.326 (8) Å]. Sheets of coplanar molecules lie parallel to the (120) plane. These sheets are held together internally by in-plane intermolecular hydrogen bonding involving the amine H atoms and all other available acceptor atoms [N2—H2···N1i 2.09 (3), N2—H1···O2ii 2.14 (3) and N2—H1···O1ii 2.63 (3) Å for the H···A distances; symmetry codes: (i) -x, -y, -z + 2; (ii) -x, -y, -z + 1]. There are dipole–dipole interactions along the b direction and thus between these sheets involving the carbonyl group [O2···C4iii 3.545 (3) Å; symmetry code: (iii) -x + 1, -y, -z + 1], but no short π interactions involving the ring atoms.

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Allen & Kennard, 1993) found no primary amine analogues to (I) but did find a series of secondary and tertiary amines which had been synthesized as aldose reductase inhibitors (Shibata et al., 1982; Ishida et al., 1991). (I) shows several differences in intra-ring bond distances as compared to these compounds. Most notable is the considerable lengthening of the C1—N1 bond [1.316 (3) Å ca a range of 1.263–1.294 Å for the five related fragments found] and a shortening of the C2—N1 bond [1.378 (3) Å ca 1.385–1.410 Å]. The bond lengths appear to show that the N2 amine lone pair is considerably conjugated through the ring.

Experimental top

Sodium ethoxide (2.44 g, 0.33 mol) was added to diethyl ether (500 ml) and cooled to 273 K with stirring. Ethyl chloroacetate (40.5 g, 0.33 mole) and ethyl formate (24.3 g, 0.33 mol) were added to the reaction mixture over 2 h. The stirring continued overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with ice/water (500 ml) until the sodium salt dissolved. The diethyl ether layer was separated and the water layer was acidified with concentrated HCl and cooled. The precipitated ester was filtered off. After work up, 43.70 g of crude product was distilled at 5 m mH g (333–338 K). The product, ethyl 2-chloro-3-oxopropanoate C5H7ClO3, recrystallized on standing (22.44 g, 45%) as white needles (m.p. 288–293 K). To the above starting material, urea (8.95 g, 0.149 mol) was added followed by 100 ml of ethanol. This mixture was refluxed for 2 h. Ethanol was removed under reduced pressure and then a sodium bicarbonate solution (10%) was added until effervescence ceased. Diethyl ether was added and 20.98 g of ethyl (2Z)-3-[(aminocarbonyl)amino]-2-chloro-2-propenoate, C6H9ClN2O3, was removed by filtration (m.p. 484–487 K). The diethyl ether layer was dried over Na2SO4 and then the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to leave a green oil. Purification by flash silica-gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate/n-hexane (1:2, Rf = 1/5) afforded crystalline (I) (1.72 g, 7.4% yield), m.p. 425–428 K (literature m.p. 428 K; Dornow et al., 1953). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 1.35–1.36 (3H, t, CH3); 4.31–4.36 (2H, q, CH2); 5.33 (2H, s, NH2); 7.48 (1H, oxazole); IR (KBr): 3387, 3119, 1715, 1676, 1568, 1408, 1376, 1325, 1261, 1178, 1146 cm-1.

Refinement top

The H1 and H2 atoms of the amine group were placed as found in difference syntheses and refined isotropically. All other H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined in riding modes.

Computing details top

Data collection: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1988); cell refinement: DENZO and COLLECT; data reduction: DENZO and COLLECT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976) view of (I) with non-H atoms as 50% ellipsoids and H atoms as small spheres of arbitary size.
(I) top
Crystal data top
C6H8N2O3Z = 2
Mr = 156.14F(000) = 164
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.422 Mg m3
a = 6.1295 (6) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.8227 (6) ÅCell parameters from 1086 reflections
c = 8.3961 (8) Åθ = 1.0–26.0°
α = 113.592 (7)°µ = 0.12 mm1
β = 93.831 (4)°T = 150 K
γ = 95.557 (4)°Cut needle, colourless
V = 364.74 (6) Å30.20 × 0.15 × 0.08 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
905 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.064
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 25.3°, θmin = 2.7°
ϕ and ω scans to fill Ewald sphereh = 77
3501 measured reflectionsk = 99
1300 independent reflectionsl = 109
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.126H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06Calculated w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0599P)2 + 0.0404P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1300 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
Crystal data top
C6H8N2O3γ = 95.557 (4)°
Mr = 156.14V = 364.74 (6) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 6.1295 (6) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 7.8227 (6) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 8.3961 (8) ÅT = 150 K
α = 113.592 (7)°0.20 × 0.15 × 0.08 mm
β = 93.831 (4)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
905 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
3501 measured reflectionsRint = 0.064
1300 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0500 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.126H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.21 e Å3
1300 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
109 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.1957 (2)0.0855 (2)0.6651 (2)0.0328 (5)
O20.4822 (3)0.2378 (2)0.4979 (2)0.0421 (5)
O30.7277 (2)0.3524 (2)0.7411 (2)0.0375 (5)
N10.2431 (3)0.0900 (3)0.9343 (3)0.0367 (6)
N20.0923 (3)0.0567 (3)0.7513 (3)0.0379 (6)
H10.177 (4)0.081 (3)0.650 (4)0.044 (7)*
H20.154 (4)0.078 (4)0.833 (4)0.053 (9)*
C10.1110 (4)0.0373 (3)0.7880 (3)0.0318 (6)
C20.4295 (4)0.1815 (3)0.9050 (3)0.0350 (6)
H30.55760.23740.98700.042*
C30.4056 (4)0.1810 (3)0.7453 (3)0.0321 (6)
C40.5378 (4)0.2567 (3)0.6467 (3)0.0330 (6)
C50.8751 (4)0.4369 (3)0.6566 (3)0.0372 (6)
H40.79900.52140.61710.045*
H50.92370.33800.55350.045*
C61.0705 (4)0.5467 (3)0.7889 (3)0.0383 (7)
H61.02130.64830.88740.057*
H71.17740.60050.73410.057*
H81.14000.46270.83130.057*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0256 (9)0.0362 (10)0.0330 (10)0.0055 (7)0.0047 (7)0.0138 (8)
O20.0380 (10)0.0526 (12)0.0329 (11)0.0065 (8)0.0061 (8)0.0188 (9)
O30.0302 (9)0.0463 (11)0.0328 (10)0.0108 (8)0.0054 (8)0.0180 (9)
N10.0269 (11)0.0463 (13)0.0331 (12)0.0052 (10)0.0066 (9)0.0162 (11)
N20.0296 (13)0.0458 (14)0.0365 (14)0.0070 (10)0.0060 (11)0.0193 (12)
C10.0280 (13)0.0317 (14)0.0365 (14)0.0001 (11)0.0001 (11)0.0165 (12)
C20.0242 (13)0.0412 (15)0.0349 (15)0.0055 (11)0.0074 (11)0.0146 (13)
C30.0251 (13)0.0326 (14)0.0337 (14)0.0025 (11)0.0042 (10)0.0113 (12)
C40.0264 (13)0.0305 (14)0.0364 (15)0.0021 (11)0.0063 (11)0.0108 (12)
C50.0313 (14)0.0420 (15)0.0353 (14)0.0078 (12)0.0016 (11)0.0164 (12)
C60.0344 (14)0.0387 (15)0.0402 (15)0.0001 (12)0.0002 (12)0.0164 (13)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.350 (3)C2—C31.337 (3)
O1—C31.401 (3)C2—H30.9500
O2—C41.218 (3)C3—C41.443 (3)
O3—C41.333 (3)C5—C61.505 (3)
O3—C51.449 (3)C5—H40.9900
N1—C11.316 (3)C5—H50.9900
N1—C21.378 (3)C6—H60.9800
N2—C11.334 (3)C6—H70.9800
N2—H10.90 (3)C6—H80.9800
N2—H20.87 (3)
C1—O1—C3103.55 (16)O2—C4—O3124.5 (2)
C4—O3—C5116.24 (17)O2—C4—C3124.6 (2)
C1—N1—C2103.52 (18)O3—C4—C3110.9 (2)
C1—N2—H1121.7 (16)O3—C5—C6107.33 (19)
C1—N2—H2119.1 (18)O3—C5—H4110.2
H1—N2—H2118 (2)C6—C5—H4110.2
N1—C1—N2126.9 (2)O3—C5—H5110.2
N1—C1—O1114.76 (19)C6—C5—H5110.2
N2—C1—O1118.4 (2)H4—C5—H5108.5
C3—C2—N1110.8 (2)C5—C6—H6109.5
C3—C2—H3124.6C5—C6—H7109.5
N1—C2—H3124.6H6—C6—H7109.5
C2—C3—O1107.37 (19)C5—C6—H8109.5
C2—C3—C4135.6 (2)H6—C6—H8109.5
O1—C3—C4117.01 (19)H7—C6—H8109.5
C2—N1—C1—N2179.7 (2)C1—O1—C3—C4178.2 (2)
C2—N1—C1—O10.4 (3)C5—O3—C4—O20.5 (3)
C3—O1—C1—N10.5 (3)C5—O3—C4—C3179.6 (2)
C3—O1—C1—N2179.6 (2)C2—C3—C4—O2179.6 (3)
C1—N1—C2—C30.2 (3)O1—C3—C4—O22.5 (4)
N1—C2—C3—O10.1 (3)C2—C3—C4—O31.3 (4)
N1—C2—C3—C4178.0 (3)O1—C3—C4—O3176.64 (18)
C1—O1—C3—C20.3 (2)C4—O3—C5—C6176.58 (19)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H8N2O3
Mr156.14
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)6.1295 (6), 7.8227 (6), 8.3961 (8)
α, β, γ (°)113.592 (7), 93.831 (4), 95.557 (4)
V3)364.74 (6)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.12
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.15 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3501, 1300, 905
Rint0.064
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.602
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.050, 0.126, 1.06
No. of reflections1300
No. of parameters109
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.21, 0.20

Computer programs: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1988), DENZO and COLLECT, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976), SHELXL97.

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds