![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, i49-i51 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802009005 ]
Online 24 May 2002
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level B:
DIFMX_01 Alert B The maximum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*1.00 _refine_diff_density_max given = 6.370 Test value = 5.600
| Author response: Not great, but we assign this to a difficult shaped (needle) crystal and a less than perfect absorption correction. Attempts to model a split-site Ba species were unsuccessful. |
Alert Level C:
DIFMX_02 Alert C The minimum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*0.75 The relevant atom site should be identified. General Notes
ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 1.143 Tmax scaled 0.688 Tmin scaled 0.034
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
1 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster