![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, i41-i43 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802008243 ]
Online 17 May 2002
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level C:
ABSTM_02 Alert C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR) is > 1.10 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.232 0.547 Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.183 0.503 RR = 1.167 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. PLAT_420 Alert C D-H Without Acceptor P(2) - H(2) ? PLAT_420 Alert C D-H Without Acceptor P(3) - H(3) ? General Notes
FORMU_01 There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: H11 N1 O11 P3 Zn2.5 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:H88 N20 O4 ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.919 Tmax scaled 0.503 Tmin scaled 0.213
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
0 Alert Level B = Potential problem
3 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster