![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](bt6152contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, o760-o762 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802010723 ]
Online 21 June 2002
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level A:
REFLT_03 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 25.20 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 4723 TEST2: Reflns within _diffrn_reflns_theta_max Count of symmetry unique reflns 5589 Completeness (_total/calc) 84.51% Alert A: < 85% complete (theta max?)Alert Level B:
CRYSS_02 Alert B The value of _exptl_crystal_size_min is > 0.6 Minimum crystal size given = 0.700
| Author response: Cutting the crystals degraded their quality and that of the resulting diffraction pattern. |
Alert Level C:
ABSTM_02 Alert C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.90 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.814 0.950 Tmin' and Tmax expected: 0.838 0.857 RR' = 0.876 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. General Notes
ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.902 Tmax scaled 0.857 Tmin scaled 0.734
1 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
1 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster