![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](cv6110contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, m363-m365 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802010838 ]
2P,P']rhenium(I) perrhenateOnline 29 June 2002
No syntax errors foundGLOBAL _publ field problems
Alert Level A:
PUBL_003 Alert A The contact author's name is missing, _publ_contact_author_name. ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level A:
ABSTM_02 Alert A The ratio of Tmax/Tmin expected RT(exp) is > 1.30 An absorption correction should be applied. Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.325 0.457 RT(exp) = 1.406
| Author response: We measured psi scans for this crystal and found them to be flat so no correction was applied. |
THETM_01 Alert A The value of sine(theta_max)/wavelength is less than 0.550
Calculated sin(theta_max)/wavelength = 0.4813
| Author response: The crystal was weakly diffracting. We have refined the structure so as to maintain a high data to parameter ratio. The structure is quite reasonable and refines will with acceptable residuals. Part of the weakness of the data can be attributed to the disorder that is observed. |
General Notes
REFLT_03 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 20.00 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 5937 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_limit_ max hkl 0. 36. 16. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_limit_ min hkl -17. 0. 0. TEST1: Expected hkl limits for theta max Calculated maximum hkl 17. 36. 18. Calculated minimum hkl -17. -36. -18. ALERT: Expected hkl max differ from CIF values
3 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
0 Alert Level B = Potential problem
0 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster