![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](mg6010contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, m319-m321 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802009546 ]
Online 8 June 2002
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level C:
REFLT_03 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 30.21 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 6021 TEST2: Reflns within _diffrn_reflns_theta_max Count of symmetry unique reflns 6669 Completeness (_total/calc) 90.28% Alert C: < 95% complete General Notes
FORMU_01 There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: C6 H25 As3 N2 O19 V2 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:C12 H50 As6 N4 O38 V4 ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.530 Tmax scaled 0.119 Tmin scaled 0.093
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
0 Alert Level B = Potential problem
1 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster