Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680201214X/ob6148sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680201214X/ob6148Isup2.hkl | |
Text file https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680201214X/ob6148sup3.txt | |
Text file https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680201214X/ob6148295Ksup4.txt |
CCDC reference: 193708
Key indicators
- Single-crystal synchrotron study
- T = 343 K
- Mean (N-C) = 0.028 Å
- H-atom completeness 11%
- R factor = 0.051
- wR factor = 0.079
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.5
checkCIF results
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry
Alert Level B:
THETM_01 Alert B The value of sine(theta_max)/wavelength is less than 0.575 Calculated sin(theta_max)/wavelength = 0.5600
Author response: A rapid loss of the scattered intensities at intermediate and high scattering angles upon raising the temperature from 295 towards 350 K is observed. Only about 55% from the unique reflection are observed, however that a very low threshold is used. |
Alert Level C:
ABSTM_02 Alert C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.90 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.474 0.695 Tmin' and Tmax expected: 0.396 0.508 RR' = 0.874 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. GOODF_01 Alert C The least squares goodness of fit parameter lies outside the range 0.80 <> 2.00 Goodness of fit given = 2.300 PLAT_321 Alert C Check Hybridisation of C(1A) in solvent/ion ? PLAT_321 Alert C Check Hybridisation of C(11A) in solvent/ion ? PLAT_321 Alert C Check Hybridisation of C(12A) in solvent/ion ? PLAT_321 Alert C Check Hybridisation of C(4A) in solvent/ion ? PLAT_321 Alert C Check Hybridisation of C(41A) in solvent/ion ? PLAT_321 Alert C Check Hybridisation of C(42A) in solvent/ion ? PLAT_745 Alert C D-H Calc 0.966(16), Rep 0.97000 .... Missing s.u. N1A -H1A 1.555 1.555 PLAT_745 Alert C D-H Calc 0.966(16), Rep 0.97000 .... Missing s.u. N1A -H1A 1.555 1.555 PLAT_745 Alert C D-H Calc 0.966(16), Rep 0.97000 .... Missing s.u. N1A -H1A 1.555 1.555 PLAT_745 Alert C D-H Calc 0.99(3), Rep 1.00000 .... Missing s.u. N2A -H2A 1.555 1.555 PLAT_745 Alert C D-H Calc 0.99(3), Rep 1.00000 .... Missing s.u. N2A -H2A 1.555 1.555 PLAT_746 Alert C H...A Calc 2.482(12), Rep 2.48000 .... Missing s.u. H1A -CL1 1.555 3.666 PLAT_746 Alert C H...A Calc 3.087(19), Rep 3.09000 .... Missing s.u. H1A -CL2 1.555 3.656 PLAT_746 Alert C H...A Calc 3.119(19), Rep 3.12000 .... Missing s.u. H1A -CL3 1.555 3.656 PLAT_746 Alert C H...A Calc 2.26(2), Rep 2.26000 .... Missing s.u. H2A -CL1 1.555 4.656 PLAT_746 Alert C H...A Calc 3.369(19), Rep 3.37000 .... Missing s.u. H2A -CL4 1.555 4.666 General Notes
FORMU_01 There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:C6 H20 Cl4 Hg1 N2 Atom count from the _atom_site data: C6 H2 Cl4 Hg1 N2 ABSMU_01 Radiation type not identified. Calculation of _exptl_absorpt_correction_mu not performed. ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.730 Tmax scaled 0.508 Tmin scaled 0.346 CELLZ_01 From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 4 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum C6 H20 Cl4 Hg N2 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff C 24.00 24.00 0.00 H 80.00 8.00 72.00 Cl 16.00 16.00 0.00 Hg 4.00 4.00 0.00 N 8.00 8.00 0.00 Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional? CHEMW_03 From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 4 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_weight 462.63 TEST: Calculate formula weight from _atom_site_* atom mass num sum C 12.01 6.00 72.07 H 1.01 2.00 2.02 CL 35.45 4.00 141.81 Hg 200.59 1.00 200.59 N 14.01 2.00 28.01 Calculated formula weight 444.50 The ratio of given/expected molecular weight as calculated from the _atom_site* data lies outside the range 0.99 <> 1.01
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
18 Alert Level C = Please check
Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: MACH3 in CAD-4 UNIX Software (Enraf-Nonius, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Siemens, 1996); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: JANA2000 (Petricek & Dusek, 2000); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999) and ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: JANA2000.
(C3H10N)2[HgCl4] | F(000) = 872 |
Mr = 462.63 | Dx = 1.991 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P1121/n | Synchrotron radiation, λ = 0.50000 Å |
a = 18.741 (2) Å | Cell parameters from 25 reflections |
b = 6.302 (2) Å | θ = 27.3–8.8° |
c = 13.069 (3) Å | µ = 5.79 mm−1 |
β = 90° | T = 343 K |
V = 1542.8 (6) Å3 | Polyhedron, colorless |
Z = 4 | 0.16 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm |
Huber four-circle Kappa diffractometer with Siemens SMART CCD area detector | 2174 independent reflections |
Si (111) monochromator | 1191 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Detector resolution: number of pixels: 1024 x 1024 (512 x 512 in binning mode), pixel size: 60 µm x 60 µm pixels mm-1 | Rint = 0.044 |
Rotation image scans | θmax = 16.3°, θmin = 1.3° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −19→20 |
Tmin = 0.474, Tmax = 0.695 | k = −7→7 |
6993 measured reflections | l = −14→14 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F > 3σ(F)] = 0.051 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F) = 0.079 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0876P)2 + 1.1621P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 2.30 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1191 reflections | Δρmax = 1.90 e Å−3 |
77 parameters | Δρmin = −0.96 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: B-C type 1 Gaussian isotropic (Becker & Coppens, 1974) |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.24 (5) |
Experimental. During the crystal test on the F1 beamline (HASYLAB) we noticed that there is no single spot in the area corresponding to a theta higher than 20 degree, for different setting of diffractometer angles. The scans were made at theta equal 20 degree. This behavior is characteristic of this family of compounds. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. 700–900 data frames were collected by 0.01° steps in ω-scans with a crystal-to-detector distance of 30 mm. Preliminary orientation matrices were obtained from the first 100 frames using SMART (Siemens, 1995). The collected frames were integrated using the respective preliminary orientation matrix, which was updated every 100 frames. The data were empirically corrected for absorption and other effects (absorption by air, glue material and glass capillary) using SADABS (Sheldrick, 1996). The cell constants were obtained from setting angles of 25 reflections with 8.89 < θ <27.70°(graphite-monochromator Mo—Kα radiation). The systematic extinctions were in accordance with the space group P21/n for the room temperature and 343 K data. Structure refinement were performed by full-matrix least squares on F2 data using SHELXL97(Sheldrick, 1997). The non H-atoms were refined anisotropically, whereas H atoms were treated isotropically using appropriate rinding models. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Hg | 0.34318 (2) | 0.27039 (8) | 0.24946 (14) | 0.0722 (3) | |
CL1 | 0.3436 (2) | 0.6832 (6) | 0.2588 (7) | 0.0709 (14) | |
CL2 | 0.4084 (5) | 0.1961 (13) | 0.0923 (7) | 0.111 (3) | |
CL3 | 0.4135 (4) | 0.1849 (10) | 0.3993 (6) | 0.087 (2) | |
CL4 | 0.2175 (2) | 0.1760 (8) | 0.2535 (11) | 0.105 (2) | |
N1a | 0.4869 (6) | 0.1856 (18) | 0.7570 (17) | 0.086 (4) | |
H1a | 0.5362 (6) | 0.1457 (18) | 0.7609 (17) | 0.0513* | |
C1a | 0.4778 (11) | 0.280 (2) | 0.652 (2) | 0.123 (8) | |
C1/1a | 0.4770 (11) | 0.343 (3) | 0.8415 (19) | 0.123 (8) | |
C1/2a | 0.4435 (11) | −0.016 (3) | 0.7721 (19) | 0.123 (8) | |
N2a | 0.7727 (9) | 0.272 (2) | 0.0289 (15) | 0.100 (5) | |
H2a | 0.7924 (9) | 0.307 (2) | 0.0977 (15) | 0.038* | |
C4a | 0.7387 (12) | 0.458 (4) | 0.001 (3) | 0.228 (16) | |
C4/1a | 0.7269 (13) | 0.098 (3) | 0.048 (3) | 0.228 (16) | |
C4/2a | 0.8333 (13) | 0.228 (3) | −0.028 (3) | 0.228 (15) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Hg | 0.0576 (5) | 0.0872 (5) | 0.0721 (5) | 0.0009 (8) | 0.0033 (8) | 0.0074 (3) |
CL1 | 0.072 (2) | 0.0708 (19) | 0.070 (3) | −0.008 (3) | 0.012 (3) | 0.0033 (14) |
CL2 | 0.113 (6) | 0.133 (6) | 0.087 (5) | −0.017 (5) | 0.020 (5) | 0.035 (5) |
CL3 | 0.092 (5) | 0.098 (4) | 0.070 (4) | 0.003 (3) | −0.025 (4) | −0.001 (3) |
CL4 | 0.053 (2) | 0.117 (3) | 0.145 (5) | 0.035 (6) | 0.007 (6) | 0.000 (2) |
N1a | 0.037 (5) | 0.1080 (18) | 0.113 (10) | 0.001 (4) | −0.0042 (17) | 0.0243 (15) |
C1a | 0.108 (10) | 0.140 (18) | 0.122 (12) | 0.020 (11) | 0.005 (7) | 0.034 (10) |
C1/1a | 0.092 (10) | 0.147 (14) | 0.130 (18) | −0.026 (11) | 0.006 (9) | 0.011 (8) |
C1/2a | 0.092 (10) | 0.116 (13) | 0.160 (18) | 0.008 (11) | −0.018 (9) | 0.000 (8) |
N2a | 0.105 (3) | 0.107 (12) | 0.088 (10) | −0.005 (3) | −0.008 (4) | 0.001 (5) |
C4a | 0.11 (2) | 0.43 (4) | 0.152 (19) | −0.15 (2) | 0.022 (15) | 0.02 (2) |
C4/1a | 0.11 (2) | 0.43 (4) | 0.152 (19) | −0.15 (2) | 0.022 (15) | 0.02 (2) |
C4/2a | 0.11 (2) | 0.43 (4) | 0.152 (19) | −0.15 (2) | 0.022 (15) | 0.02 (2) |
Hg—CL1 | 2.604 (4) | Cl1—H2aii | 2.26 (2) |
Hg—CL2 | 2.442 (10) | N1a—H1a | 0.967 (16) |
Hg—CL3 | 2.430 (7) | N1a—C1a | 1.50 (3) |
Hg—CL4 | 2.414 (4) | N2a—H2a | 0.99 (3) |
Cl1—H1ai | 2.482 (12) | N2a—C4a | 1.40 (3) |
CL1—Hg—CL2 | 104.1 (3) | C1a—N1a—C1/2a | 112.9 (16) |
CL1—Hg—CL3 | 101.4 (2) | C1/1a—N1a—C1/2a | 112.9 (17) |
CL1—Hg—CL4 | 102.68 (15) | H2a—N2a—C4a | 103 (2) |
CL2—Hg—CL3 | 110.9 (3) | H2a—N2a—C4/1a | 103 (2) |
CL2—Hg—CL4 | 117.5 (4) | H2a—N2a—C4/2a | 103 (2) |
CL3—Hg—CL4 | 117.3 (4) | C4a—N2a—C4/1a | 114.9 (18) |
H1a—N1a—C1a | 106 (2) | C4a—N2a—C4/2a | 115 (2) |
H1a—N1a—C1/1a | 106 (2) | C4/1a—N2a—C4/2a | 114.9 (18) |
H1a—N1a—C1/2a | 105.7 (14) | CL1iii—H2a—N2a | 146.7 (15) |
C1a—N1a—C1/1a | 112.9 (13) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1a—H1a···CL1i | 0.97 | 2.48 | 3.272 (12) | 138 |
N1a—H1a···CL2iv | 0.97 | 3.09 | 3.699 (18) | 124 |
N1a—H1a···CL3iv | 0.97 | 3.12 | 3.656 (17) | 117 |
N2a—H2a···CL1iii | 1.00 | 2.26 | 3.13 (2) | 147 |
N2a—H2a···CL4v | 1.00 | 3.37 | 3.97 (2) | 121 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (v) x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2. |