![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](ya6131contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, m554-m556 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802016288 ]
No syntax errors foundAlert Level B:
PLAT_112 Alert B ADDSYM Detects Additional (Pseudo) Symm. Elem. I
| Author response: Although it seems that the present cell can be transformed to
orthorhombic C or monoclinic C-lattices, the R factors for
equivalent reflections averaged are too large, R(int) = 0.667
for the former and 0.697 for the later. The structure was solved
at the present cell, monoclinic P-lattice, and no higher symmtry
was found.
The output of program XPREP for searching higher symmetry is
inclosed as following.
SEARCH FOR HIGHER METRIC SYMMETRY
Option A: FOM = 0.323 deg. ORTHORHOMBIC C-lattice R(int) = 0.667 [ 2746] Cell: 16.064 34.005 10.674 90.00 90.00 90.32 Volume: 5830.61 Matrix: 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 2.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 Option B: FOM = 0.000 deg. MONOCLINIC P-lattice R(int) = 0.044 [ 204] Cell: 16.064 10.674 18.763 90.00 115.02 90.00 Volume: 2915.31 Matrix: 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 Option C: FOM = 0.323 deg. MONOCLINIC C-lattice R(int) = 0.697 [ 305] Cell: 34.005 16.064 10.674 90.00 90.00 89.68 Volume: 5830.61 Matrix:-2.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 Option D: FOM = 0.323 deg. MONOCLINIC C-lattice R(int) = 0.667 [ 2746] Cell: 16.064 34.005 10.674 90.00 90.00 90.32 Volume: 5830.61 Matrix: 0.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 -2.0000 0.0000 -1.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.0000 Option B selected |
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
0 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster