![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](om6111contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2002). E58, m609-m610 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536802017798 ]
2N,N')iron(III) nitrate dihydrateOnline 5 October 2002
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetryAlert Level B:
REFLT_03 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 28.30 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 5174 TEST2: Reflns within _diffrn_reflns_theta_max Count of symmetry unique reflns 5777 Completeness (_total/calc) 89.56% Alert B: < 90% complete (theta max?)
| Author response: Data on several crystals were attempted since many diffracted poorly. Other labs were given crystals and one data set was collected on a supercell and refined to only 20%... the reason turned out to be possible twinning (horrible E2-1 stats). Needless to say, we tried to get higher resolution and stopped barely below 90.00 (Its 89.56%! Please round up! |
General Notes
ABSTM_02 When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.925 Tmax scaled 0.925 Tmin scaled 0.831
0 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
0 Alert Level C = Please check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster