Volume 59 Received 20 November 2002 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, England
Correspondence e-mail: jk18@cam.ac.uk
The title compound, [Co(C10H8N2)2(H2O)4](C12H6O4)·2H2O (where C10H8N2 is 4,4'-bipyridine, BPY, and C12H6O4 is 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate, NDC2-), (CUmof-6), was synthesized under mild hydrothermal conditions. The structure contains [Co(BPY)2(H2O)4]2+ complex cations, which stack along the a axis through close face-to-face contacts. Uncoordinated NDC2- anions are strongly hydrogen bonded to the complex cations. The Co2+ cation and the centre of gravity of NDC2- are located on crystallographic centres of symmetry.
The construction of inorganic-organic hybrid frameworks containing d-block transition metal ions and ligands with 4-pyridyl donor groups has developed significantly in recent years (see, for example, Batten & Robson, 1998
; Moulton & Zaworotko, 2001
). We are interested in the synthesis of novel hybrid compounds which contain not only 4-pyridyl but also carboxylate groups in the crystal structure (Almeida Paz, Khimyak et al., 2002
). Recently, we also reported a novel one-dimensional Co2+ coordination polymer containing 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (BPE), CUmof-4 (Almeida Paz, Bond et al., 2002
).![[link]](../../../../../../logos/links/arrow.gif)
Just as for CUmof-4, the title compound, [Co(BPY)2(H2O)4](NDC).2H2O, CUmof-6, (I
), was synthesized under mild hydrothermal conditions and contains only one crystallographically unique Co2+ centre, occupying a centre of symmetry in P
. The metal ion shows an almost regular octahedral chemical environment, composed of four water molecules (forming the equatorial plane) and two trans-coordinated 4-pyridyl N atoms (from BPY) at the apical positions (Table 1
and Fig. 1
). Individual [Co(BPY)2(H2O)4]2+ complex cations stack in an offset manner along the a direction through close BPY contacts. The average distance between adjacent aromatic rings is ca 3.5 Å (Fig. 2
). Interestingly, and unlike the situation in CUmof-4, the NDC2- ions do not participate in these interactions. This is explained by the fact that the metal-to-metal distance imposed by a BPY spacer is not sufficient to accommodate the NDC2- anions. This may also account for the presence of extra water of crystallization. Compound (I
) can be further described by the alternation along the b direction of layers of the complex cations with layers of NDC2- (Fig. 2
). O-H
O- and O-H
N hydrogen bonds between the NDC2- ions and the uncoordinated 4-pyridyl group with the water molecules give rise to a three-dimensional network (Table 2
and Fig. 3
).
| Figure 1 The asymmetric unit of (I ), CUmof-6, represented with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level and showing the labelling scheme for non-H atoms. Unlabelled ball-and-stick atoms were generated by symmetry [Symmetry codes: (for BPY) -x, -y, -z and (for NDC2-) -x, 1 - y, 1 - z]. |
| Figure 2 Perspective view of CUmof-6 along the a direction. Co2+ centres are represented as octahedra, BPY ligands with hollow bonds, NDC2- with filled bonds, and water of crystallization in blue. |
| Figure 3 Perspective view of CUmof-6 along the c direction, showing the hydrogen-bonding network (dashed lines). H atoms have been omitted for clarity. |
All chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and were used as received. To a solution of Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.243 g, Aldrich) in distilled water (6.41 g), 4,4'-bipyridyl (BPY, 0.164 g, Aldrich), 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (H2NDC, 0.218 g, Aldrich) and triethylamine (TEA, 0208 g, Avocado) were added and the mixture was stirred thoroughly for 1 h at ambient temperature. The suspension, with a H2NDC:Co2+:BPY:TEA:H2O composition ratio of 1.00:1.01:1.04:2.04:353, was placed inside a Parr stainless steel Teflon-lined reaction vessel (8 ml, 70% full). The reaction was performed under autogeneous pressure and static conditions in a pre-heated oven at 418 K for 3 h. The vessel was then cooled slowly inside the oven to 298 K at a rate of 5 K h-1 before opening. The crystalline product was collected by vacuum filtration and crystals of (I
) were manually separated and preserved in a portion of the reaction vessel solution.
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Water H atoms were located in difference Fourier maps and refined with a single isotropic displacement parameter common to all H atoms. O-H and H
H distances were restrained to ensure a reasonable geometry for the water molecules. H atoms bound to carbon were placed in calculated positions and allowed to ride during subsequent refinement, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998
); cell refinement: HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997
); data reduction: HKL DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997
) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994
); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001
); molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
We thank Dr Andrew D. Bond for collecting the crystal data and solving the crystal structure. We are also grateful to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) for financial support through the PhD scholarship No. SFRH/BD/3024/2000 (to FAAP), and to the Cambridge Oppenheimer Fund for a research fellowship (to YZK).
Almeida Paz, F. A., Bond, A. D., Khimyak, Y. Z. & Klinowski, J. (2002). Acta Cryst. E58, m691-m693.
![[details]](../../../../../../e/graphics/details.gif)
Almeida Paz, F. A., Khimyak, Y. Z., Bond, A. D., Rocha, J. & Klinowski, J. (2002). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 2823-2828. ![[CrossRef]](../../../../../../logos/crossrefborder.gif)
Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 435.
![[details]](../../../../../../j/graphics/details.gif)
Batten, S. R. & Robson, R. (1998). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 1461-1494.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-58.
![[details]](../../../../../../a/graphics/details.gif)
Bruker (2001). SHELXTL. Version 6.12. Bruker AXS Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Moulton, B. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2001). Chem. Rev. 101, 1629-1658.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr and R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.