The structure of the title compound, LiCl·H2O, has already been determined three times. Interestingly, the different authors found different cell parameters and space groups. We present here an orthorhombic modification.
Supporting information
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 173 K
- Mean (Please check) = 0.000 Å
- R factor = 0.019
- wR factor = 0.047
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.0
checkCIF results
No syntax errors found
ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry
Alert Level A:
DIFF_019 Alert A _diffrn_standards_number is missing
Number of standards used in measurement.
| Author response: The data were measured on an area-detector.
|
DIFF_020 Alert A _diffrn_standards_interval_count and
_diffrn_standards_interval_time are missing. Number of measurements
between standards or time (min) between standards.
| Author response: The data were measured on an area-detector.
|
DIFF_022 Alert A _diffrn_standards_decay_% is missing
Percentage decrease in standards intensity.
| Author response: The data were measured on an area-detector.
|
Alert Level B:
CHEMS_01 Alert B The sum formula contains elements in the wrong order.
H precedes Cl
Sequence must be C, H, then alphabetical.
| Author response: The elements are in alphabetical order. There is no C in the
formula.
|
3 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
0 Alert Level C = Please check
X-ray quality crystals of the title compound were obtained after recrystallization from water at ambient temperature.
The H atom was located by difference Fourier synthesis and was refined isotropically.
Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 1991).
Crystal data top
LiCl·H2O | F(000) = 240 |
Mr = 60.41 | Dx = 1.782 Mg m−3 |
Orthorhombic, Cmcm | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -C 2c 2 | Cell parameters from 11303 reflections |
a = 7.6259 (13) Å | θ = 3.1–29.4° |
b = 7.7107 (16) Å | µ = 1.27 mm−1 |
c = 7.6592 (13) Å | T = 173 K |
V = 450.37 (14) Å3 | Block, colourless |
Z = 8 | 0.25 × 0.23 × 0.21 mm |
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-II two-circle diffractometer | 349 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 325 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.049 |
ω scans | θmax = 29.2°, θmin = 4.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (MULABS; Spek, 1990; Blessing, 1995) | h = −10→10 |
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 0.777 | k = −10→10 |
3852 measured reflections | l = −10→10 |
Refinement top
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
wR(F2) = 0.047 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.13 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0329P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
349 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
25 parameters | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
Crystal data top
LiCl·H2O | V = 450.37 (14) Å3 |
Mr = 60.41 | Z = 8 |
Orthorhombic, Cmcm | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.6259 (13) Å | µ = 1.27 mm−1 |
b = 7.7107 (16) Å | T = 173 K |
c = 7.6592 (13) Å | 0.25 × 0.23 × 0.21 mm |
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-II two-circle diffractometer | 349 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (MULABS; Spek, 1990; Blessing, 1995) | 325 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 0.777 | Rint = 0.049 |
3852 measured reflections | |
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.047 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.13 | Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3 |
349 reflections | Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 |
25 parameters | |
Special details top
Experimental. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
O1 | 0.0000 | 0.23543 (9) | 0.00561 (8) | 0.0159 (2) | |
H1 | 0.0868 (16) | 0.1994 (15) | 0.0598 (18) | 0.040 (3)* | |
Cl1 | 0.26205 (3) | 0.02380 (4) | 0.2500 | 0.01605 (15) | |
Li1 | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0270 (7) | |
Li2 | 0.5000 | 0.3138 (4) | 0.2500 | 0.0308 (6) | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
O1 | 0.0156 (5) | 0.0205 (4) | 0.0117 (5) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.0022 (3) |
Cl1 | 0.01580 (19) | 0.0200 (2) | 0.01235 (18) | 0.00075 (7) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Li1 | 0.0357 (19) | 0.0168 (10) | 0.0284 (15) | 0.000 | 0.000 | −0.0040 (10) |
Li2 | 0.0454 (18) | 0.0332 (13) | 0.0138 (12) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—Li2i | 1.9943 (9) | Li1—Cl1vii | 2.6444 (4) |
O1—Li1ii | 2.0405 (8) | Li1—Cl1viii | 2.6444 (4) |
O1—H1 | 0.829 (13) | Li1—Li2viii | 3.086 (2) |
Cl1—Li2iii | 2.572 (2) | Li1—Li2 | 3.086 (2) |
Cl1—Li1iv | 2.6444 (4) | Li2—O1i | 1.9943 (9) |
Cl1—Li1 | 2.6444 (4) | Li2—O1ix | 1.9943 (9) |
Cl1—Li2 | 2.880 (2) | Li2—Cl1x | 2.572 (2) |
Li1—O1i | 2.0404 (8) | Li2—Cl1xi | 2.572 (2) |
Li1—O1v | 2.0404 (8) | Li2—Cl1vi | 2.880 (2) |
Li1—Cl1vi | 2.6444 (4) | Li2—Li1iv | 3.086 (2) |
| | | |
Li2i—O1—Li1ii | 99.77 (9) | Cl1vi—Li1—Li2 | 59.75 (2) |
Li2i—O1—H1 | 115.3 (9) | Cl1vii—Li1—Li2 | 120.25 (2) |
Li1ii—O1—H1 | 110.2 (8) | Cl1viii—Li1—Li2 | 120.25 (2) |
Li2iii—Cl1—Li1iv | 119.31 (3) | Li2viii—Li1—Li2 | 180.00 (7) |
Li2iii—Cl1—Li1 | 119.31 (3) | O1i—Li2—O1ix | 158.04 (17) |
Li1iv—Cl1—Li1 | 92.789 (16) | O1i—Li2—Cl1x | 96.89 (5) |
Li2iii—Cl1—Li2 | 168.07 (9) | O1ix—Li2—Cl1x | 96.89 (5) |
Li1iv—Cl1—Li2 | 67.76 (3) | O1i—Li2—Cl1xi | 96.89 (5) |
Li1—Cl1—Li2 | 67.76 (3) | O1ix—Li2—Cl1xi | 96.89 (5) |
O1i—Li1—O1v | 180.0 | Cl1x—Li2—Cl1xi | 101.97 (11) |
O1i—Li1—Cl1 | 86.897 (14) | O1i—Li2—Cl1vi | 81.49 (7) |
O1v—Li1—Cl1 | 93.103 (14) | O1ix—Li2—Cl1vi | 81.49 (7) |
O1i—Li1—Cl1vi | 86.896 (14) | Cl1x—Li2—Cl1vi | 89.96 (2) |
O1v—Li1—Cl1vi | 93.104 (14) | Cl1xi—Li2—Cl1vi | 168.07 (9) |
Cl1—Li1—Cl1vi | 86.659 (16) | O1i—Li2—Cl1 | 81.49 (7) |
O1i—Li1—Cl1vii | 93.104 (14) | O1ix—Li2—Cl1 | 81.49 (7) |
O1v—Li1—Cl1vii | 86.896 (14) | Cl1x—Li2—Cl1 | 168.07 (9) |
Cl1—Li1—Cl1vii | 93.341 (15) | Cl1xi—Li2—Cl1 | 89.96 (2) |
Cl1vi—Li1—Cl1vii | 180.0 | Cl1vi—Li2—Cl1 | 78.11 (8) |
O1i—Li1—Cl1viii | 93.104 (14) | O1i—Li2—Li1 | 40.67 (5) |
O1v—Li1—Cl1viii | 86.896 (14) | O1ix—Li2—Li1 | 117.37 (12) |
Cl1—Li1—Cl1viii | 180.0 | Cl1x—Li2—Li1 | 119.58 (2) |
Cl1vi—Li1—Cl1viii | 93.341 (16) | Cl1xi—Li2—Li1 | 119.58 (2) |
Cl1vii—Li1—Cl1viii | 86.659 (16) | Cl1vi—Li2—Li1 | 52.49 (5) |
O1i—Li1—Li2viii | 140.44 (4) | Cl1—Li2—Li1 | 52.49 (5) |
O1v—Li1—Li2viii | 39.56 (4) | O1i—Li2—Li1iv | 117.37 (12) |
Cl1—Li1—Li2viii | 120.25 (2) | O1ix—Li2—Li1iv | 40.67 (5) |
Cl1vi—Li1—Li2viii | 120.25 (2) | Cl1x—Li2—Li1iv | 119.58 (2) |
Cl1vii—Li1—Li2viii | 59.75 (2) | Cl1xi—Li2—Li1iv | 119.58 (2) |
Cl1viii—Li1—Li2viii | 59.75 (2) | Cl1vi—Li2—Li1iv | 52.49 (5) |
O1i—Li1—Li2 | 39.56 (4) | Cl1—Li2—Li1iv | 52.49 (5) |
O1v—Li1—Li2 | 140.44 (4) | Li1—Li2—Li1iv | 76.71 (7) |
Cl1—Li1—Li2 | 59.75 (2) | | |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (ii) x−1/2, y+1/2, z; (iii) x−1/2, y−1/2, z; (iv) −x+1, −y, z+1/2; (v) x+1/2, y−1/2, z; (vi) −x+1, y, z; (vii) x, −y, −z; (viii) −x+1, −y, −z; (ix) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (x) x+1/2, y+1/2, z; (xi) −x+1/2, y+1/2, z. |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···Cl1 | 0.829 (13) | 2.396 (14) | 3.1875 (7) | 159.9 (12) |
Experimental details
Crystal data |
Chemical formula | LiCl·H2O |
Mr | 60.41 |
Crystal system, space group | Orthorhombic, Cmcm |
Temperature (K) | 173 |
a, b, c (Å) | 7.6259 (13), 7.7107 (16), 7.6592 (13) |
V (Å3) | 450.37 (14) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 1.27 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.25 × 0.23 × 0.21 |
|
Data collection |
Diffractometer | Stoe IPDS-II two-circle diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (MULABS; Spek, 1990; Blessing, 1995) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.742, 0.777 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 3852, 349, 325 |
Rint | 0.049 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.686 |
|
Refinement |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.019, 0.047, 1.13 |
No. of reflections | 349 |
No. of parameters | 25 |
H-atom treatment | All H-atom parameters refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.19, −0.43 |
Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) topO1—Li2i | 1.9943 (9) | Cl1—Li1iv | 2.6444 (4) |
O1—Li1ii | 2.0405 (8) | Cl1—Li1 | 2.6444 (4) |
Cl1—Li2iii | 2.572 (2) | Cl1—Li2 | 2.880 (2) |
| | | |
Li2iii—Cl1—Li2 | 168.07 (9) | | |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z; (ii) x−1/2, y+1/2, z; (iii) x−1/2, y−1/2, z; (iv) −x+1, −y, z+1/2. |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···Cl1 | 0.829 (13) | 2.396 (14) | 3.1875 (7) | 159.9 (12) |
The structure of the title compound, LiCl·H2O, has already been determined three times: Ott (1926) determined the structure by powder diffraction and stated a cubic cell with a = 3.830 Å and V = 56.2 Å3 in Pm3 m; Datt et al. (1971) investigated LiCl·D2O and found similar cell parameters (a = b = 3.810 Å, c = 3.880 Å and V = 56.3 Å3) but the tetragonal space group P4/m; Weiss et al. (1969) employed powder diffraction and ended up with a bigger cell (a = b = 7.669 Å, c = 7.742 Å and V = 455.3 Å3) and a different tetragonal space group (P42/nmc). We report here an orthorhombic modification of LiCl·H2O (Fig. 1) with the space group Cmcm.
The asymmetric unit comprises half a Cl anion on a mirror plane perpendicular to the c axis, half an O atom on a mirror plane perpendicular to the a axis, one H atom on a general position and two Li cations with s.o.f. = 0.25 on 2/m.. [please verify the two dots] (Li1) and m2m (Li2). The Cl anion is approximately octahedrally coordinated with Li2 and its symmetry equivalent in axial positions and Li1 and H1 and their symmetry equivalents in the equatorial plane. The Li cations are also octahedrally coordinated with Cl anions in the equatorial plane and two water molecules in axial positions. Apart from coordinating to Li the water molecules link two Cl anions by hydrogen bonds.
Unfortunately, Ott (1926) has not given the coordinates of the Li atom and Weiss et al. (1969) stated that the Li atom is disordered over three sites. Therefore, these two structures cannot be compared directly with the one we have determined. The fact that the cell parameters of Weiss et al. are so similar to those we have determined let us assume that the structure of Weiss et al. is wrong. The cell parameter of Ott is approximately half as long as what we determined for the three axes. Since the structure determination of Ott has also been done by powder diffraction, we assume that this structure is also wrong. The third determination, by Datt et al. (1971), gives a dubious position for the D atom leading to an Li···D distance of just 1.570 Å. Whereas the coordination of their Li atom is similar to the one we found (the Li atom is hexacoordinated by four Cl atoms and two water molecules), their Cl atom is coordinated by eight Li atoms (Cl···Li = 2.708 Å) and eight water molecules (Cl···O = 3.317 Å). For the same reasons which we have stated for the structure of Ott, we assume that the structure of Datt et al. is also incorrect.