Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The structure of the title compound, LiCl·H2O, has already been determined three times. Interestingly, the different authors found different cell parameters and space groups. We present here an orthorhombic modification.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803001594/br6079sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536803001594/br6079Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 173 K
  • Mean [sigma](Please check) = 0.000 Å
  • R factor = 0.019
  • wR factor = 0.047
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.0

checkCIF results

No syntax errors found

ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry


Red Alert Alert Level A:
DIFF_019 Alert A _diffrn_standards_number is missing Number of standards used in measurement.
Author response: The data were measured on an area-detector.
DIFF_020  Alert A _diffrn_standards_interval_count and
          _diffrn_standards_interval_time are missing. Number of measurements
          between standards or time (min) between standards.
Author response: The data were measured on an area-detector.
DIFF_022  Alert A _diffrn_standards_decay_% is missing
          Percentage decrease in standards intensity.
Author response: The data were measured on an area-detector.

Amber Alert Alert Level B:
CHEMS_01 Alert B The sum formula contains elements in the wrong order. H precedes Cl Sequence must be C, H, then alphabetical.
Author response: The elements are in alphabetical order. There is no C in the formula.

3 Alert Level A = Potentially serious problem
1 Alert Level B = Potential problem
0 Alert Level C = Please check

Comment top

The structure of the title compound, LiCl·H2O, has already been determined three times: Ott (1926) determined the structure by powder diffraction and stated a cubic cell with a = 3.830 Å and V = 56.2 Å3 in Pm3 m; Datt et al. (1971) investigated LiCl·D2O and found similar cell parameters (a = b = 3.810 Å, c = 3.880 Å and V = 56.3 Å3) but the tetragonal space group P4/m; Weiss et al. (1969) employed powder diffraction and ended up with a bigger cell (a = b = 7.669 Å, c = 7.742 Å and V = 455.3 Å3) and a different tetragonal space group (P42/nmc). We report here an orthorhombic modification of LiCl·H2O (Fig. 1) with the space group Cmcm.

The asymmetric unit comprises half a Cl anion on a mirror plane perpendicular to the c axis, half an O atom on a mirror plane perpendicular to the a axis, one H atom on a general position and two Li cations with s.o.f. = 0.25 on 2/m.. [please verify the two dots] (Li1) and m2m (Li2). The Cl anion is approximately octahedrally coordinated with Li2 and its symmetry equivalent in axial positions and Li1 and H1 and their symmetry equivalents in the equatorial plane. The Li cations are also octahedrally coordinated with Cl anions in the equatorial plane and two water molecules in axial positions. Apart from coordinating to Li the water molecules link two Cl anions by hydrogen bonds.

Unfortunately, Ott (1926) has not given the coordinates of the Li atom and Weiss et al. (1969) stated that the Li atom is disordered over three sites. Therefore, these two structures cannot be compared directly with the one we have determined. The fact that the cell parameters of Weiss et al. are so similar to those we have determined let us assume that the structure of Weiss et al. is wrong. The cell parameter of Ott is approximately half as long as what we determined for the three axes. Since the structure determination of Ott has also been done by powder diffraction, we assume that this structure is also wrong. The third determination, by Datt et al. (1971), gives a dubious position for the D atom leading to an Li···D distance of just 1.570 Å. Whereas the coordination of their Li atom is similar to the one we found (the Li atom is hexacoordinated by four Cl atoms and two water molecules), their Cl atom is coordinated by eight Li atoms (Cl···Li = 2.708 Å) and eight water molecules (Cl···O = 3.317 Å). For the same reasons which we have stated for the structure of Ott, we assume that the structure of Datt et al. is also incorrect.

Experimental top

X-ray quality crystals of the title compound were obtained after recrystallization from water at ambient temperature.

Refinement top

The H atom was located by difference Fourier synthesis and was refined isotropically.

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 1991).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Perspective view of the title compound with the atom numbering; displacement ellipsoids are at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) x, −y + 1/2, z.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Perspective view of the title compound, showing the octahedral coordination of the Cl and Li ions. Colour scheme: Li pink, Cl green, O red, and H gray.
(I) top
Crystal data top
LiCl·H2OF(000) = 240
Mr = 60.41Dx = 1.782 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, CmcmMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2c 2Cell parameters from 11303 reflections
a = 7.6259 (13) Åθ = 3.1–29.4°
b = 7.7107 (16) ŵ = 1.27 mm1
c = 7.6592 (13) ÅT = 173 K
V = 450.37 (14) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.25 × 0.23 × 0.21 mm
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-II two-circle
diffractometer
349 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube325 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.049
ω scansθmax = 29.2°, θmin = 4.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(MULABS; Spek, 1990; Blessing, 1995)
h = 1010
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 0.777k = 1010
3852 measured reflectionsl = 1010
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.019Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.047All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.13 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0329P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
349 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
25 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
Crystal data top
LiCl·H2OV = 450.37 (14) Å3
Mr = 60.41Z = 8
Orthorhombic, CmcmMo Kα radiation
a = 7.6259 (13) ŵ = 1.27 mm1
b = 7.7107 (16) ÅT = 173 K
c = 7.6592 (13) Å0.25 × 0.23 × 0.21 mm
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-II two-circle
diffractometer
349 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(MULABS; Spek, 1990; Blessing, 1995)
325 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 0.777Rint = 0.049
3852 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0190 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.047All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.13Δρmax = 0.19 e Å3
349 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
25 parameters
Special details top

Experimental.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.00000.23543 (9)0.00561 (8)0.0159 (2)
H10.0868 (16)0.1994 (15)0.0598 (18)0.040 (3)*
Cl10.26205 (3)0.02380 (4)0.25000.01605 (15)
Li10.50000.00000.00000.0270 (7)
Li20.50000.3138 (4)0.25000.0308 (6)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0156 (5)0.0205 (4)0.0117 (5)0.0000.0000.0022 (3)
Cl10.01580 (19)0.0200 (2)0.01235 (18)0.00075 (7)0.0000.000
Li10.0357 (19)0.0168 (10)0.0284 (15)0.0000.0000.0040 (10)
Li20.0454 (18)0.0332 (13)0.0138 (12)0.0000.0000.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—Li2i1.9943 (9)Li1—Cl1vii2.6444 (4)
O1—Li1ii2.0405 (8)Li1—Cl1viii2.6444 (4)
O1—H10.829 (13)Li1—Li2viii3.086 (2)
Cl1—Li2iii2.572 (2)Li1—Li23.086 (2)
Cl1—Li1iv2.6444 (4)Li2—O1i1.9943 (9)
Cl1—Li12.6444 (4)Li2—O1ix1.9943 (9)
Cl1—Li22.880 (2)Li2—Cl1x2.572 (2)
Li1—O1i2.0404 (8)Li2—Cl1xi2.572 (2)
Li1—O1v2.0404 (8)Li2—Cl1vi2.880 (2)
Li1—Cl1vi2.6444 (4)Li2—Li1iv3.086 (2)
Li2i—O1—Li1ii99.77 (9)Cl1vi—Li1—Li259.75 (2)
Li2i—O1—H1115.3 (9)Cl1vii—Li1—Li2120.25 (2)
Li1ii—O1—H1110.2 (8)Cl1viii—Li1—Li2120.25 (2)
Li2iii—Cl1—Li1iv119.31 (3)Li2viii—Li1—Li2180.00 (7)
Li2iii—Cl1—Li1119.31 (3)O1i—Li2—O1ix158.04 (17)
Li1iv—Cl1—Li192.789 (16)O1i—Li2—Cl1x96.89 (5)
Li2iii—Cl1—Li2168.07 (9)O1ix—Li2—Cl1x96.89 (5)
Li1iv—Cl1—Li267.76 (3)O1i—Li2—Cl1xi96.89 (5)
Li1—Cl1—Li267.76 (3)O1ix—Li2—Cl1xi96.89 (5)
O1i—Li1—O1v180.0Cl1x—Li2—Cl1xi101.97 (11)
O1i—Li1—Cl186.897 (14)O1i—Li2—Cl1vi81.49 (7)
O1v—Li1—Cl193.103 (14)O1ix—Li2—Cl1vi81.49 (7)
O1i—Li1—Cl1vi86.896 (14)Cl1x—Li2—Cl1vi89.96 (2)
O1v—Li1—Cl1vi93.104 (14)Cl1xi—Li2—Cl1vi168.07 (9)
Cl1—Li1—Cl1vi86.659 (16)O1i—Li2—Cl181.49 (7)
O1i—Li1—Cl1vii93.104 (14)O1ix—Li2—Cl181.49 (7)
O1v—Li1—Cl1vii86.896 (14)Cl1x—Li2—Cl1168.07 (9)
Cl1—Li1—Cl1vii93.341 (15)Cl1xi—Li2—Cl189.96 (2)
Cl1vi—Li1—Cl1vii180.0Cl1vi—Li2—Cl178.11 (8)
O1i—Li1—Cl1viii93.104 (14)O1i—Li2—Li140.67 (5)
O1v—Li1—Cl1viii86.896 (14)O1ix—Li2—Li1117.37 (12)
Cl1—Li1—Cl1viii180.0Cl1x—Li2—Li1119.58 (2)
Cl1vi—Li1—Cl1viii93.341 (16)Cl1xi—Li2—Li1119.58 (2)
Cl1vii—Li1—Cl1viii86.659 (16)Cl1vi—Li2—Li152.49 (5)
O1i—Li1—Li2viii140.44 (4)Cl1—Li2—Li152.49 (5)
O1v—Li1—Li2viii39.56 (4)O1i—Li2—Li1iv117.37 (12)
Cl1—Li1—Li2viii120.25 (2)O1ix—Li2—Li1iv40.67 (5)
Cl1vi—Li1—Li2viii120.25 (2)Cl1x—Li2—Li1iv119.58 (2)
Cl1vii—Li1—Li2viii59.75 (2)Cl1xi—Li2—Li1iv119.58 (2)
Cl1viii—Li1—Li2viii59.75 (2)Cl1vi—Li2—Li1iv52.49 (5)
O1i—Li1—Li239.56 (4)Cl1—Li2—Li1iv52.49 (5)
O1v—Li1—Li2140.44 (4)Li1—Li2—Li1iv76.71 (7)
Cl1—Li1—Li259.75 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z; (iii) x1/2, y1/2, z; (iv) x+1, y, z+1/2; (v) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (vi) x+1, y, z; (vii) x, y, z; (viii) x+1, y, z; (ix) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2; (x) x+1/2, y+1/2, z; (xi) x+1/2, y+1/2, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···Cl10.829 (13)2.396 (14)3.1875 (7)159.9 (12)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaLiCl·H2O
Mr60.41
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Cmcm
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)7.6259 (13), 7.7107 (16), 7.6592 (13)
V3)450.37 (14)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.27
Crystal size (mm)0.25 × 0.23 × 0.21
Data collection
DiffractometerStoe IPDS-II two-circle
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(MULABS; Spek, 1990; Blessing, 1995)
Tmin, Tmax0.742, 0.777
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3852, 349, 325
Rint0.049
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.686
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.019, 0.047, 1.13
No. of reflections349
No. of parameters25
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.19, 0.43

Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001), X-AREA, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1990), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 1991).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—Li2i1.9943 (9)Cl1—Li1iv2.6444 (4)
O1—Li1ii2.0405 (8)Cl1—Li12.6444 (4)
Cl1—Li2iii2.572 (2)Cl1—Li22.880 (2)
Li2iii—Cl1—Li2168.07 (9)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z; (iii) x1/2, y1/2, z; (iv) x+1, y, z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···Cl10.829 (13)2.396 (14)3.1875 (7)159.9 (12)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds