![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](cf6238contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, o435-o437 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536803004896 ]
Online 14 March 2003
No syntax errors found ADDSYM reports no extra symmetry General Notes
FORMU_01 There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:C20 H26 N2 O6 Atom count from the _atom_site data: C20 H24 N2 O6 CELLZ_01 From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 4 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum C20 H26 N2 O6 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff C 80.00 80.00 0.00 H 104.00 96.00 8.00 N 8.00 8.00 0.00 O 24.00 24.00 0.00 Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional?
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster