![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[CIF check Report]](/e/graphics/checkcifborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](om6147contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2003). E59, m427-m428 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536803011577 ]
Abstract: Refinement of the structure of the Pccn polymorph of the title compound, [RuCl2(C2H6OS)4], using low-temperature data, has led to an increase in precision by a factor of 2-3 over the previous room-temperature results [Attia & Calligaris (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 1426-1427] and those for the P21/n polymorph [Mercer & Trotter (1975). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 2480-2483; Alessio et al. (1988) Inorg. Chem. 27, 4099-4106]. The chloro ligands are cis, with Ru-Cl distances of 2.4165 (8) and 2.4352 (8) Å, and the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligands trans to them are S-bonded, with Ru-S distances of 2.2717 (8) and 2.2734 (9) Å. One of the two mutually trans DMSO ligands is O-bonded, and the Ru-S distance trans to it is shortened, at 2.2480 (9) Å.
Online 10 June 2003
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster