![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Open access]](/e/graphics/free.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](hb6029contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2004). E60, m563-m565 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536804008098 ]
No syntax errors found
Alert level C DIFMX01_ALERT_2_C The maximum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*0.75 _refine_diff_density_max given = 6.235 Test value = 5.925 DIFMX02_ALERT_1_C The minimum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*0.75 The relevant atom site should be identified. PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. SumFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT045_ALERT_1_C Calculated and Reported Z Differ by ............ 0.50 Ratio PLAT097_ALERT_2_C Maximum (Positive) Residual Density ............ 6.24 e/A 3 PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.52 PLAT764_ALERT_4_C Overcomplete CIF Bond List Detected (Rep/Expd) . 1.30 Ratio PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 1 C8 H22 Au B2 N4
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_1_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: C4 H11 Au1 B1 I1 N2 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:C8 H22 Au2 B2 I2 N4
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 8 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 4 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 3 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster