[Journal logo]

Volume 60 
Part 11 
Pages i142-i144  
November 2004  

Received 5 October 2004
Accepted 14 October 2004
Online 30 October 2004

Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T = 120 K
Mean [sigma](S-O) = 0.002 Å
R = 0.019
wR = 0.054
Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.4
Details

Dieuropium(III) trisulfate octahydrate: a redetermination at 120  K

Thanjavur Ramabhadran Sarangarajan,a Krishnaswamy Panchanatheswaran,b* John N. Lowc+ and Christopher Glidewelld

aSchool of Chemical and Biotechnology, Shanmuga Arts, Science, Technology and Research Academy (SASTRA), Tirumalaisamudram, Thanjavur 613 402, India,bDepartment of Chemistry, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu 620 024, India,cDepartment of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Old Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland, and dSchool of Chemistry, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, Scotland
Correspondence e-mail: panch_45@yahoo.co.in

The title compound, Eu2(SO4)3·8H2O, crystallizes in space group C2/c, with one of the anions lying on a twofold rotation axis and the other in a general position, and is best formulated as [Eu(H2O)4/1(SO4)3/3(SO4)1/2]2, where one of the anions lies across a twofold axis. The coordination environment of EuIII consists of four water molecules and four sulfate ions. All the water molecules and sulfate ions are involved in hydrogen-bonding interactions. The structure is similar to that previously determined at 293  K [Wei & Zheng (2003[Wei, D.-Y. & Zheng, Y.-Q. (2003). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 218, 277-278.]). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 218, 277-278], but the cell parameters and the interatomic distances are more precise in the present determination.

Comment

Hydrated lanthanide(III) sulfates can adopt a number of different compositions, namely M2(SO4)3·9H2O, M2(SO4)3·8H2O, M2(SO4)3·5H2O and M2(SO4)3·4H2O, and the octahydrated sulfates of lanthanides LnIII exist as coordination polymers in which sulfate ions act as bridging bidentate and tridentate ligands; the presence of four coordinated water molecules leads to a coordination number of eight for the lanthanide ion (Wickleder, 2002[Wickleder, M. S. (2002). Chem. Rev. 102, 2011-2087.]). The unit-cell dimensions for hydrated europium(III) sulfate were reported many years ago (Geller, 1957[Geller, S. (1957). Acta Cryst. 10, 713.]), and the crystal structure, in space group C2/c, has recently been reported using data collected at 293  K (Wei & Zheng, 2003[Wei, D.-Y. & Zheng, Y.-Q. (2003). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 218, 277-278.]).

[Scheme 1]

We report here the structure at 120  K. The similarity of the unit-cell dimensions and atomic coordinates at 293 and 120  K indicates that the same phase has been utilized in all of these studies. The aims of the present investigation are the determination of more precise metrical parameters and the determination of the extent of hydration. The structure (Table 1[link] and Fig. 1[link]) indicates the presence of octacoordinate europium, with distorted square antiprismatic coordination by four water molecules, one O atom from a sulfate ion in the [mu]2 bonding mode and three O atoms from three different anions in the [mu]3 bonding mode. The triply bridging anions lie in general positions, while the doubly bridging anions lie on twofold rotation axes.

Compound (I[link]) is, in fact, isostructural not only with yttrium(III) sulfate octahydrate (Held & Wickleder, 2003[Held, P. & Wickleder, M. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, i98-i100.]) but also with the analogous lanthanide sulfates Ln2(SO4)3·8H2O, where Ln is Ce (Junk et al., 1999[Junk, P. C., Kepert, C. J., Skelton, B. W. & White, A. H. (1999). Aust. J. Chem. 52, 601-605.]), Pr (Ahmed Farag et al., 1981[Ahmed Farag, I. S., El-Kordy, M. A. & Ahmed, N. A. (1981). Z. Kristallogr. 155, 165-171.]), Nd (Bartl & Rodek, 1983[Bartl, H. & Rodek, E. (1983). Z. Kristallogr. 162, 13-15.]), Sm (Podberezskaya & Borisov, 1976[Podberezskaya, N. V. & Borisov, S. (1976). Zh. Strukt. Khim. 17. 186-188.]), Dy (Junk et al., 1999[Junk, P. C., Kepert, C. J., Skelton, B. W. & White, A. H. (1999). Aust. J. Chem. 52, 601-605.]), Er (Wickleder, 1999[Wickleder, M. S. (1999). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 625, 1548-1555.]), Yb (Hiltunen & Niinistö, 1976[Hiltunen, L. & Niinistö, L. (1976). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 6, 561.]) or Lu (Junk et al., 1999[Junk, P. C., Kepert, C. J., Skelton, B. W. & White, A. H. (1999). Aust. J. Chem. 52, 601-605.]). The coordination polymer in this structure is most readily envisaged as inversion-related pairs of chains comprising alternating cations and triply bridging anions, themselves generated by translation along the [010] direction, which are then linked into sheets by the doubly bridging anions. The coordination-polymer sheets are linked by hydrogen bonds (Table 2[link]) into a continuous three-dimensional framework structure. As noted for the yttrium analogue (Held & Wickleder, 2003[Held, P. & Wickleder, M. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, i98-i100.]), one of the S-O bonds in the triply bridging anion is significantly longer than the others (Table 1[link]).

Some of the lanthanides, such as europium, can also exhibit lower oxidation states in sulfate salts. Thus, for example, europium(II) sulfate has been shown to be anhydrous and to crystallize in space group Pnma (Mayer et al., 1964[Mayer, I., Levy, E. & Glasner, A. (1964). Acta Cryst. 17, 1071-1072.]). Accordingly, the oxidation state of europium in (I[link]) was further confirmed by bond valence sum calculations (Brown, 1992[Brown, I. D. (1992). Acta Cryst. B48, 553-572.], 2002[Brown, I. D. (2002). In The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry. Oxford University Press.]). A total valence of 3.016 for europium was obtained using the observed Eu-O bond lengths (Table 1[link]) and a bond valence parameter of 2.036  Å for europium (Trzesowska et al., 2004[Trzesowska, A., Kruszynski, R. & Bartczak, T. J. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 174-178.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
ORTEP diagram of (I[link]), showing the coordination geometry around europium, with 50% probability ellipsoids. [Symmetry codes: (a) -x, y, ½  -  z; (b) ½  -  x, ½  -  y, 1  -  z; (c) ½  -  x, [3 \over 2]  -  y, 1  -  z.]
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal structure of (I[link]), showing the sulfate coordination.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Packing diagram of (I[link]), viewed along the c axis.

Experimental

The title compound was obtained during the attempted preparation of a complex between 2,5-diketopiperazine and europium sulfate, in which 2,5-diketopiperazine (0.228  g, 2  mmol) was heated with europium sulfate (0.736  g, 1  mmol) in water (30  ml). The latter was obtained by the action of sulfuric acid on europium oxide. The crystallization of europium sulfate from solution is facilitated in the presence of other ligands (Held & Wickleder, 2003[Held, P. & Wickleder, M. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, i98-i100.]; Wei & Zheng, 2003[Wei, D.-Y. & Zheng, Y.-Q. (2003). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 218, 277-278.]).

Crystal data
  • Eu2(SO4)3·8H2O

  • Mr = 736.26

  • Monoclinic, C2/c

  • a = 13.5029  (3)  Å

  • b = 6.7601  (1)  Å

  • c = 18.2628  (3)  Å

  • [beta] = 102.2610  (13)°

  • V = 1629.02  (5)  Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Dx = 3.002  Mg  m-3

  • Mo K[alpha] radiation

  • Cell parameters from 1869 reflections

  • [theta] = 3.1-27.5°

  • [mu] = 8.12  mm-1

  • T = 120  (2)  K

  • Block, colourless

  • 0.10 × 0.08 × 0.06  mm

Data collection
  • Bruker-Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer with FR591 rotating anode

  • [varphi] and [omega] scans

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003[Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. Version 2.10. University of Göttingen, Germany.]) Tmin = 0.477, Tmax = 0.616

  • 11  784 measured reflections

  • 1869 independent reflections

  • 1805 reflections with I > 2[sigma](I)

  • Rint = 0.037

  • [theta]max = 27.5°

  • h = -17 --> 17

  • k = -8 --> 8

  • l = -22 --> 23

Refinement
  • Refinement on F2

  • R[F2 > 2[sigma](F2)] = 0.019

  • wR(F2) = 0.054

  • S = 1.26

  • 1869 reflections

  • 114 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • w = 1/[[sigma]2(Fo2) + (0.0218P)2 + 6.1179P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

  • ([Delta]/[sigma])max = 0.002

  • [Delta][rho]max = 0.71  e  Å-3

  • [Delta][rho]min = -1.32  e  Å-3

Table 1
Selected interatomic distances(Å)

Eu1-O1 2.450  (3)
Eu1-O2 2.390  (2)
Eu1-O3 2.505  (2)
Eu1-O4 2.350  (3)
Eu1-O11 2.384  (2)
Eu1-O13 2.461  (2)
Eu1-O14 2.336  (2)
Eu1-O21 2.339  (2)
S1-O11i 1.473  (2)
S1-O12 1.459  (3)
S1-O13 1.499  (2)
S1-O14ii 1.463  (2)
S2-O21 1.470  (2)
S2-O22 1.478  (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) [{\script{1\over 2}}-x,{\script{3\over 2}}-y,1-z]; (ii) [{\script{1\over 2}}-x,{\script{1\over 2}}-y,1-z].

Table 2
Hydrogen-bonding geometry (Å, °)

D-H...A D-H H...A D...A D-H...A
O1-H11...O3i 0.84 2.08 2.910  (3) 170
O1-H12...O13ii 0.84 2.06 2.771  (3) 143
O2-H21...O12iii 0.84 1.87 2.704  (4) 171
O2-H22...O22iv 0.84 1.99 2.814  (3) 169
O3-H31...O22 0.84 1.96 2.759  (3) 159
O3-H32...O13iii 0.84 2.16 2.994  (3) 170
O4-H41...O12v 0.84 1.93 2.748  (4) 163
O4-H42...O22vi 0.84 1.97 2.788  (4) 165
Symmetry codes: (i) [{\script{1\over 2}}-x,{\script{1\over 2}}-y,1-z]; (ii) [{\script{1\over 2}}-x,{\script{3\over 2}}-y,1-z]; (iii) -x,1-y,1-z; (iv) x,1+y,z; (v) [x,1-y,z-{\script{1\over 2}}]; (vi) [{\script{1\over 2}}+x,{\script{1\over 2}}+y,z].

All H atoms were located in difference maps and then allowed to ride on their parent atoms, with O-H distances of 0.84  Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(O).

Data collection: COLLECT (Hooft, 1999[Hooft, R. W. W. (1999). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) and COLLECT; data reduction: DENZO and COLLECT; program(s) used to solve structure: OSCAIL (McArdle, 2003[McArdle, P. (2003). OSCAIL for Windows. Version 10. Crystallography Centre, Chemistry Department, NUI Galway, Ireland.]) and SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); program(s) used to refine structure: OSCAIL and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003[Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7-13.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PRPKAPPA (Ferguson, 1999[Ferguson, G. (1999). PRPKAPPA. University of Guelph, Canada.]).

Acknowledgements

X-ray data were collected at the EPSRC X-ray Crystallographic Service, University of Southampton, England; the authors thank the staff for all their help and advice. JNL thanks NCR Self-Service, Dundee, for grants which have provided computing facilities for this work.

References

Ahmed Farag, I. S., El-Kordy, M. A. & Ahmed, N. A. (1981). Z. Kristallogr. 155, 165-171. [ChemPort]
Bartl, H. & Rodek, E. (1983). Z. Kristallogr. 162, 13-15.
Brown, I. D. (1992). Acta Cryst. B48, 553-572. [details]
Brown, I. D. (2002). In The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry. Oxford University Press.
Ferguson, G. (1999). PRPKAPPA. University of Guelph, Canada.
Geller, S. (1957). Acta Cryst. 10, 713. [details] [ChemPort]
Held, P. & Wickleder, M. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, i98-i100. [details]
Hiltunen, L. & Niinistö, L. (1976). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 6, 561.
Hooft, R. W. W. (1999). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
Junk, P. C., Kepert, C. J., Skelton, B. W. & White, A. H. (1999). Aust. J. Chem. 52, 601-605. [ChemPort]
McArdle, P. (2003). OSCAIL for Windows. Version 10. Crystallography Centre, Chemistry Department, NUI Galway, Ireland.
Mayer, I., Levy, E. & Glasner, A. (1964). Acta Cryst. 17, 1071-1072. [details] [ChemPort]
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press. [ChemPort]
Podberezskaya, N. V. & Borisov, S. (1976). Zh. Strukt. Khim. 17. 186-188. [ChemPort]
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. Version 2.10. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7-13. [details] [ChemPort]
Trzesowska, A., Kruszynski, R. & Bartczak, T. J. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 174-178. [details]
Wei, D.-Y. & Zheng, Y.-Q. (2003). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 218, 277-278. [ChemPort]
Wickleder, M. S. (1999). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 625, 1548-1555. [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Wickleder, M. S. (2002). Chem. Rev. 102, 2011-2087. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [ChemPort]


Acta Cryst (2004). E60, i142-i144   [ doi:10.1107/S160053680402608X ]