![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](lh6349contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o500-o502 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536805002114 ]
3,6-Di-4-pyridylpyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione
Online 29 January 2005
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 93 K
- Mean
(C-C) = 0.010 Å
- R factor = 0.241
- wR factor = 0.565
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 10.9
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level A
ABSTM02_ALERT_3_A The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.50
Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.009 0.982
Tmin' and Tmax expected: 0.825 0.982
RR' = 0.011
Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
| Author Response: The single crystal used for measurements was extremely small and
thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3).
|
RFACG01_ALERT_3_A The value of the R factor is > 0.20
R factor given 0.241
| Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and
and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and
the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which
we could do.
|
RFACR01_ALERT_3_A The value of the weighted R factor is > 0.45
Weighted R factor given 0.565
| Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and
and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and
the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which
we could do.
|
RINTA01_ALERT_3_A The value of Rint is greater than 0.20
Rint given 0.246
| Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and
and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and
the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which
we could do.
|
PLAT020_ALERT_3_A The value of Rint is greater than 0.10 ......... 0.25
| Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and
and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and
the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which
we could do.
|
PLAT061_ALERT_3_A Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large ............. 0.01
| Author Response: The single crystal used for measurements was extremely small and
thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3).
|
PLAT082_ALERT_2_A High R1 Value .................................. 0.24
| Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and
and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and
the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which
we could do.
|
PLAT084_ALERT_2_A High R2 Value .................................. 0.56
| Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and
and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and
the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which
we could do.
|
Alert level B
DIFMN02_ALERT_2_B The minimum difference density is < -0.1*ZMAX*1.00
_refine_diff_density_min given = -1.400
Test value = -0.800
DIFMX01_ALERT_2_B The maximum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*1.00
_refine_diff_density_max given = 1.600
Test value = 0.800
PLAT029_ALERT_3_B _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.96
PLAT097_ALERT_2_B Maximum (Positive) Residual Density ............ 1.60 e/A 3
PLAT098_ALERT_2_B Minimum (Negative) Residual Density ............ -1.40 e/A 3
Alert level C
DIFMN03_ALERT_1_C The minimum difference density is < -0.1*ZMAX*0.75
The relevant atom site should be identified.
DIFMX02_ALERT_1_C The minimum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*0.75
The relevant atom site should be identified.
RADNW01_ALERT_1_C The radiation wavelength lies outside the expected range
for the supplied radiation type. Expected range 1.54175-1.54180
Wavelength given = 1.54190
PLAT150_ALERT_1_C Volume as Calculated Differs from that Given ... 616.00 Ang-3
PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.85
PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 10
8 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem
5 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem
6 ALERT level C = Check and explain
0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check
4 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data
7 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient
8 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low
0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster