[HTML version][PDF version][Article Abstract][CIF][3d view][Structure Factors][Issue contents]  [Buy article online]

[Contents scheme]

Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, o500-o502  [ doi:10.1107/S1600536805002114 ]

3,6-Di-4-pyridylpyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4(2H,5H)-dione

J. Mizuguchi, T. Imoda and H. Takahashi

Online 29 January 2005


Key indicators

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level A ABSTM02_ALERT_3_A The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.50 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.009 0.982 Tmin' and Tmax expected: 0.825 0.982 RR' = 0.011 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
Author Response: The single crystal used for measurements was extremely small and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3).
RFACG01_ALERT_3_A  The value of the R factor is > 0.20
            R factor given   0.241
Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which we could do.
RFACR01_ALERT_3_A  The value of the weighted R factor is > 0.45
            Weighted R factor given   0.565
Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which we could do.
RINTA01_ALERT_3_A  The value of Rint is greater than 0.20
            Rint given   0.246
Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which we could do.
PLAT020_ALERT_3_A The value of Rint is greater than 0.10 .........       0.25       
Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which we could do.
PLAT061_ALERT_3_A Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large .............       0.01       
Author Response: The single crystal used for measurements was extremely small and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3).
PLAT082_ALERT_2_A High R1 Value ..................................       0.24       
Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which we could do.
PLAT084_ALERT_2_A High R2 Value ..................................       0.56       
Author Response: The single crystal used for the analysis was extremely small and and thin (0.2x0.1x0.02 mm^3). In addition, the crystal was slightly curved and the crystallinity was rather poor. Nevertheless, this was the maximum which we could do.

Alert level B DIFMN02_ALERT_2_B The minimum difference density is < -0.1*ZMAX*1.00 _refine_diff_density_min given = -1.400 Test value = -0.800 DIFMX01_ALERT_2_B The maximum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*1.00 _refine_diff_density_max given = 1.600 Test value = 0.800 PLAT029_ALERT_3_B _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.96 PLAT097_ALERT_2_B Maximum (Positive) Residual Density ............ 1.60 e/A   3 PLAT098_ALERT_2_B Minimum (Negative) Residual Density ............ -1.40 e/A   3
Alert level C DIFMN03_ALERT_1_C The minimum difference density is < -0.1*ZMAX*0.75 The relevant atom site should be identified. DIFMX02_ALERT_1_C The minimum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*0.75 The relevant atom site should be identified. RADNW01_ALERT_1_C The radiation wavelength lies outside the expected range for the supplied radiation type. Expected range 1.54175-1.54180 Wavelength given = 1.54190 PLAT150_ALERT_1_C Volume as Calculated Differs from that Given ... 616.00 Ang-3 PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.85 PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 10
8 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 5 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 6 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 4 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 7 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 8 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion

Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster