![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, i35-i37 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536805005180 ]
Online 26 February 2005
No syntax errors found
Alert level A PLAT306_ALERT_2_A Isolated Oxygen Atom (H-atoms Missing ?) ....... O5
| Author Response: see _publ_section_exptl_refinement |
PLAT306_ALERT_2_A Isolated Oxygen Atom (H-atoms Missing ?) ....... O6
| Author Response: see _publ_section_exptl_refinement |
Alert level B PLAT430_ALERT_2_B Short Inter D...A Contact O4 .. O5 .. 2.70 Ang.
Alert level C STRVA01_ALERT_4_C Flack test results are ambiguous. From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack 0.430 From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack_su 0.060 PLAT033_ALERT_2_C Flack Parameter Value Deviates from Zero ....... 0.43 PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. SumFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT066_ALERT_1_C Predicted and Reported Transmissions Identical . ? PLAT068_ALERT_1_C Reported F000 Differs from Calcd (or Missing)... ? PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for O3 PLAT301_ALERT_3_C Main Residue Disorder ......................... 21.00 Perc. PLAT302_ALERT_4_C Anion/Solvent Disorder ......................... 12.00 Perc. PLAT779_ALERT_2_C Suspect or Irrelevant (Bond) Angle in CIF ...... 0.00 Deg. TI1 -O1 -W1 11.566 1.555 11.566 PLAT779_ALERT_2_C Suspect or Irrelevant (Bond) Angle in CIF ...... 0.00 Deg. TI1 -O2 -W1 9.555 1.555 9.555 PLAT779_ALERT_2_C Suspect or Irrelevant (Bond) Angle in CIF ...... 0.00 Deg. W1 -O2 -TI1 5.555 1.555 5.555 PLAT779_ALERT_2_C Suspect or Irrelevant (Bond) Angle in CIF ...... 0.00 Deg. TI1 -O4 -W1 9.555 1.555 9.555
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_2_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:H28 Co1 K6 O53 Ti1 W11 Atom count from the _atom_site data: Co1 K6 O53 Ti1.004959 W11.0049 CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional? From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 1 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum Co H28 K6 O53 Ti W11 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff Co 1.00 1.00 0.00 H 28.00 0.00 28.00 K 6.00 6.00 0.00 O 53.00 53.00 0.00 Ti 1.00 1.00 0.00 W 11.00 11.00 0.00 REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 30.44 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 730 Count of symmetry unique reflns 429 Completeness (_total/calc) 170.16% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 301 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.702 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes
2 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 13 ALERT level C = Check and explain 4 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 6 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 10 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 3 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster