![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2005). E61, i89-i90 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536805012249 ]
Online 27 April 2005
No syntax errors found
Alert level C ABSTM02_ALERT_3_C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR) is > 1.10 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.080 0.226 Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.071 0.226 RR = 1.125 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. PLAT022_ALERT_3_C Ratio Unique / Expected Reflections too Low .... 0.94 PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. SumFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT045_ALERT_1_C Calculated and Reported Z Differ by ............ 0.25 Ratio PLAT060_ALERT_3_C Ratio Tmax/Tmin (Exp-to-Rep) (too) Large ....... 1.12 PLAT068_ALERT_1_C Reported F000 Differs from Calcd (or Missing)... ? PLAT077_ALERT_4_C Unitcell contains non-integer number of atoms .. ? PLAT213_ALERT_2_C Atom Cu4 has ADP max/min Ratio ............. 3.20 prolat PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.89 PLAT301_ALERT_3_C Main Residue Disorder ......................... 3.00 Perc.
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_1_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: Ce1 Cu4.82 In1.17 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:Ce1 Cu4.821100
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 11 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 5 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 4 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster