organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

N-(2-Bromo­phen­yl)acetamide

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen, Meston Walk, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, Scotland
*Correspondence e-mail: w.harrison@abdn.ac.uk

(Received 30 August 2005; accepted 1 September 2005; online 7 September 2005)

The title compound, C8H8BrNO, posseses normal geometrical parameters. The crystal packing is influenced by an inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond.

Comment

The title compound, C8H8BrNO, (I)[link], (Fig. 1[link]) was prepared as an inter­mediate in a natural product synthesis.

[Scheme 1]

The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the benzene ring (atoms C1–C6) and the N1/O1/C7/C8 side-chain grouping in (I)[link] is 42.75 (14)°. This is inter­mediate between the situation in acetanilide [i.e. (I)[link] without the Br atom], C8H9NO (Brown, 1966[Brown, C. J. (1966). Acta Cryst. 21, 442-445.]; Wasserman et al., 1985[Wasserman, H. J., Ryan, R. R. & Layne, S. P. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 783-785.]), where the aromatic ring and side chain are twisted by 17.6°, and N-methyl­acetanilide, C9H11NO (Pederson, 1967[Pederson, B. F. (1967). Acta Chem. Scand. 21, 1415-1424.]), where the two corresponding groups of atoms are constrained by symmetry to be perpendicular. The Car—N (ar = aromatic) bond distances are almost identical in (I)[link] and acetanilide (Brown, 1966[Brown, C. J. (1966). Acta Cryst. 21, 442-445.]), being 1.418 (4) and 1.417 (2) Å respectively, as are the Cc—N (c = carbonyl) distances, at 1.358 (4) and 1.355 (2) Å, respectively. The equivalent distances in N-methyl­acetanilide (Pederson, 1967[Pederson, B. F. (1967). Acta Chem. Scand. 21, 1415-1424.]), where any electronic conjugation between the benzene ring and amide group is presumably impossible because of their perpendicular orientation, are distinctly different, with Car—N much longer at 1.474 Å and Cc—N significantly shorter at 1.325 Å.

The bond angle sum about N1 in (I)[link] is 360.0°, suggesting that this atom is essentially sp2-hybridized. All the other geometrical parameters for (I)[link] lie within their expected ranges (Allen et al., 1995[Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1995). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. C, pp. 685-706. Dordrecht: Kluwer.]).

The crystal packing in (I)[link] is influenced by an N—H⋯O hydrogen bond (Table 1[link] and Fig. 2[link]) that links the mol­ecules into chains propagating along [100]. There are no ππ stacking inter­actions in (I)[link]. The packing is shown in Fig. 3[link].

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
View of (I)[link] (50% probability displacement ellipsoids; H atoms are drawn as small spheres of arbitrary radii).
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Detail of (I)[link] showing how the N—H⋯O hydrogen bond (dashed lines) links mol­ecules into a chain. The view direction is perpendicular to the mean plane of the benzene ring of the central mol­ecule, showing that no ππ stacking occurs. All H atoms except atom H1 and its symmetry equivalents have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: (i) x − 1, y, z; (ii) x + 1, y, z.]
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
The packing in (I)[link], viewed down [100], with all H atoms except H1 omitted for clarity.

Experimental

2-Bromo­aniline (3.44 g, 20.0 mmol) was added to a solution of acetyl chloride (1.88 g, 24.0 mmol) and DIPEA (N,N-diisopropyl­ethyl­amine) (3.12 g, 24.0 mmol) in dry tetra­hydro­furan (20 ml) at 273 K. On completion (as monitored by thin-layer chromatography), the reaction mixture was diluted with water (20 ml) and the product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 ml). The organic phase was then washed with water (2 × 20 ml) and brine (20 ml), then dried (MgSO4) and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product, which was recrystallized from CH2Cl2 to give (I)[link] (yield 97%, 4.13 g) as clear needles; one of these was cut to a block for data collection; m.p. 363–364 K; RF = 0.12 [hexane/EtOAc (5:1)]. IR (KBr disc, cm−1): νmax 3272 (NH), 3159 (Ar—H), 1647 (C=O), 1518 (Ar C=C); 1H NMR (250 MHz; CDCl3): δH 2.21 (3H, s, CH3), 6.97 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H), 7.29 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar—H), 7.61 (1H, bs, NH), 8.31 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δC 24.9 (–COCH3), 113.2 (Ar C—Br), 122.0, 125.2, 128.4, 132.2 (4 × Ar C), 135.7 (–CO—NH—C–), 168.3 (–C=O). Mass spectrum: [M+H]+ 212.979, C8H8BrNO requires 212.979.

Crystal data
  • C8H8BrNO

  • Mr = 214.06

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /n

  • a = 4.7790 (1) Å

  • b = 11.9257 (4) Å

  • c = 14.6703 (3) Å

  • β = 96.8173 (16)°

  • V = 830.19 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Dx = 1.713 Mg m−3

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • Cell parameters from 1977 reflections

  • θ = 2.9–27.5°

  • μ = 4.89 mm−1

  • T = 120 (2) K

  • Block, colourless

  • 0.24 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm

Data collection
  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • ω and φ scans

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.])Tmin = 0.387, Tmax = 0.726

  • 9212 measured reflections

  • 1905 independent reflections

  • 1750 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.037

  • θmax = 27.5°

  • h = −6 → 5

  • k = −15 → 15

  • l = −18 → 19

Refinement
  • Refinement on F2

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032

  • wR(F2) = 0.074

  • S = 1.26

  • 1905 reflections

  • 106 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + 1.9011P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

  • (Δ/σ)max = 0.001

  • Δρmax = 0.76 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.38 e Å−3

  • Extinction correction: SHELXL97

  • Extinction coefficient: 0.0163 (11)

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1i 0.83 (4) 2.10 (4) 2.896 (3) 161 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x-1, y, z.

All the C-bound H atoms were placed in idealized positions (C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å) and refined as riding on their carriers with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier) or Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(methyl carrier) applied. The methyl group was allowed to rotate about the C7—C8 bond as a rigid group. The N-bound H atom was located in a difference map and its position was freely refined with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N).

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998[Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]); data reduction: SCALEPACK, DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995[Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-38.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

The title compound, C8H8BrNO, (I), (Fig. 1) was prepared as an intermediate in a natural product synthesis.

The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the benzene ring (atoms C1–C6) and the N1/O1/C7/C8 side-chain grouping in (I) is 42.75 (14)°. This is intermediate between the situation in acetanilide [i.e. (I) without the Br atom], C8H9NO (Brown, 1966; Wasserman et al., 1985), where the aromatic ring and side chain are twisted by 17.6°, and N-methylacetanilide, C9H11NO (Pederson, 1967), where the two equivalent groups of atoms are constrained by symmetry to be perpendicular. The Car—N (ar = aromatic) bond distances are almost identical in (I) and acetanilide (Brown, 1966), being 1.418 (4) and 1.417 (2) Å respectively, as are the Cc—N (c = carbonyl) distances, at 1.358 (4) and 1.355 (2) Å, respectively. The equivalent distances in N-methylacetanilide (Pederson, 1967), where any electronic conjugation between the benzene ring and amine group is presumably impossible because of their perpendicular orientation, are distinctly different, with Car—N much longer at 1.474 Å and Cc—N significantly shorter at 1.325 Å.

The bond angle sum about N1 in (I) is 360.0°, suggesting that this atom is more or less sp2-hybridized. All the other geometrical parameters for (I) lie within their expected ranges (Allen et al., 1995).

The crystal packing in (I) is influenced by an N—H···O hydrogen bond (Table 1 and Fig. 2) that links the molecules into chains propagating in [100]. There are no ππ stacking interactions in (I). The unit-cell packing is shown in Fig. 3.

Experimental top

2-Bromoaniline (3.44 g, 20.0 mmol) was added to a solution of acetyl chloride (1.88 g, 24.0 mmol) and DIPEA (N,N-diisopropylethylamine) (3.12 g, 24.0 mmol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (20 ml) at 273 K. On completion (as monitored by thin-layer chromatography), the reaction mixture was diluted with water (20 ml) and the product was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 ml). The organic phase was then washed with water (2 × 20 ml) and brine (20 ml), then dried (MgSO4) and evaporated under reduced pressure to yield the crude product, which was recrystallized from CH2Cl2 to give (I) (yield 97%, 4.13 g) as clear needles; one of these was cut to a block for data collection; m.p. 363–364 K; RF = 0.12 [hexane/EtOAc (5:1)]. IR (KBr disc, cm−1): νmax 3272 (NH), 3159 (Ar—H), 1647 (CO), 1518 (Ar CC); 1H NMR (250 MHz; CDCl3): δH 2.21 (3H, s, CH3), 6.97 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H), 7.29 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, Ar—H), 7.61 (1H, bs, NH), 8.31 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, Ar—H); 13C NMR (CDCl3): δC 24.9 (–COCH3), 113.2 (Ar C—Br), 122.0, 125.2, 128.4, 132.2 (4 × Ar C), 135.7 (–CO—NH—C–), 168.3 (–CO). Mass spectrum: [M+H]+ 212.979, C8H8BrNO requires 212.979.

Refinement top

All the C-bound hydrogen atoms were placed in idealized positions (C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å) and refined as riding on their carriers with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(carrier) or Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(methyl carrier) applied. The methyl moiety was allowed to rotate about the C7—C8 bond as a rigid group. The N-bound H atom was located in a difference map and its position was freely refned with the constraint Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N).

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: SCALEPACK, DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. View of (I) (50% probability displacement ellipsoids; H atoms are drawn as small spheres of arbitrary radii).
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Detail of (I) showing how the N—H···O hydrogen bond (dashed lines) links molecules into a chain. The view direction is perpendicular to the mean plane of the benzene ring of the central molecule, showing that no ππ stacking occurs. All H atoms except atom H1 have been omitted for clarity. [Symmetry codes: (i) x − 1, y, z; (ii) x + 1, y, z.]
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Unit cell packing in (I), viewed down [010], with all H atoms except H1 omitted for clarity.
N-(2-Bromophenyl)acetamide top
Crystal data top
C8H8BrNOF(000) = 424
Mr = 214.06Dx = 1.713 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1977 reflections
a = 4.7790 (1) Åθ = 2.9–27.5°
b = 11.9257 (4) ŵ = 4.89 mm1
c = 14.6703 (3) ÅT = 120 K
β = 96.8173 (16)°Block, colourless
V = 830.19 (4) Å30.24 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1905 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1750 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.037
ω and ϕ scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
h = 65
Tmin = 0.387, Tmax = 0.726k = 1515
9212 measured reflectionsl = 1819
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difmap (N-H) and geom (others)
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.074 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + 1.9011P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.26(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1905 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.76 e Å3
106 parametersΔρmin = 0.38 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0163 (11)
Crystal data top
C8H8BrNOV = 830.19 (4) Å3
Mr = 214.06Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 4.7790 (1) ŵ = 4.89 mm1
b = 11.9257 (4) ÅT = 120 K
c = 14.6703 (3) Å0.24 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm
β = 96.8173 (16)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
1905 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
1750 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.387, Tmax = 0.726Rint = 0.037
9212 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0320 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.074H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.26Δρmax = 0.76 e Å3
1905 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.38 e Å3
106 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.4653 (6)0.4807 (2)0.7214 (2)0.0159 (6)
C20.5507 (7)0.5852 (3)0.7562 (2)0.0203 (6)
H20.48600.61230.81090.024*
C30.7304 (7)0.6492 (3)0.7106 (2)0.0219 (7)
H30.79150.72030.73430.026*
C40.8223 (7)0.6099 (3)0.6300 (2)0.0205 (6)
H40.94790.65380.59920.025*
C50.7307 (6)0.5067 (3)0.5946 (2)0.0167 (6)
H50.79180.48070.53900.020*
C60.5493 (6)0.4406 (2)0.63992 (19)0.0140 (6)
C70.6102 (6)0.2594 (2)0.56501 (19)0.0153 (6)
C80.4592 (7)0.1544 (3)0.5295 (2)0.0209 (7)
H8A0.25750.17020.51510.031*
H8B0.48630.09570.57650.031*
H8C0.53550.12910.47390.031*
N10.4490 (5)0.3362 (2)0.60299 (16)0.0135 (5)
H10.280 (8)0.322 (3)0.604 (2)0.017 (9)*
O10.8634 (4)0.27188 (19)0.56131 (16)0.0229 (5)
Br10.23224 (6)0.39129 (3)0.78845 (2)0.02046 (13)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0132 (13)0.0170 (14)0.0177 (14)0.0019 (11)0.0025 (11)0.0014 (11)
C20.0200 (15)0.0194 (15)0.0214 (15)0.0018 (12)0.0023 (12)0.0045 (12)
C30.0218 (16)0.0149 (15)0.0281 (17)0.0019 (12)0.0007 (13)0.0035 (13)
C40.0187 (15)0.0175 (14)0.0249 (16)0.0034 (12)0.0012 (12)0.0037 (13)
C50.0158 (14)0.0193 (15)0.0154 (14)0.0002 (11)0.0029 (11)0.0023 (12)
C60.0122 (13)0.0136 (13)0.0159 (13)0.0021 (11)0.0006 (10)0.0013 (11)
C70.0157 (14)0.0161 (14)0.0143 (13)0.0000 (11)0.0029 (11)0.0017 (11)
C80.0191 (15)0.0181 (15)0.0264 (16)0.0023 (12)0.0059 (12)0.0065 (13)
N10.0107 (12)0.0141 (12)0.0164 (12)0.0016 (9)0.0048 (9)0.0018 (10)
O10.0129 (10)0.0239 (12)0.0330 (13)0.0014 (9)0.0069 (9)0.0054 (10)
Br10.02191 (19)0.02130 (19)0.01987 (19)0.00046 (12)0.00956 (12)0.00033 (12)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.390 (4)C5—H50.9500
C1—C61.390 (4)C6—N11.418 (4)
C1—Br11.899 (3)C7—O11.227 (4)
C2—C31.380 (5)C7—N11.358 (4)
C2—H20.9500C7—C81.507 (4)
C3—C41.390 (4)C8—H8A0.9800
C3—H30.9500C8—H8B0.9800
C4—C51.387 (4)C8—H8C0.9800
C4—H40.9500N1—H10.83 (4)
C5—C61.397 (4)
C2—C1—C6121.6 (3)C1—C6—C5118.3 (3)
C2—C1—Br1118.5 (2)C1—C6—N1120.8 (3)
C6—C1—Br1119.9 (2)C5—C6—N1121.0 (3)
C3—C2—C1119.3 (3)O1—C7—N1123.2 (3)
C3—C2—H2120.3O1—C7—C8121.3 (3)
C1—C2—H2120.3N1—C7—C8115.5 (3)
C2—C3—C4120.3 (3)C7—C8—H8A109.5
C2—C3—H3119.9C7—C8—H8B109.5
C4—C3—H3119.9H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C5—C4—C3120.0 (3)C7—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—H4120.0H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C3—C4—H4120.0H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C4—C5—C6120.6 (3)C7—N1—C6124.5 (2)
C4—C5—H5119.7C7—N1—H1118 (2)
C6—C5—H5119.7C6—N1—H1118 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C32.1 (5)Br1—C1—C6—N13.9 (4)
Br1—C1—C2—C3177.1 (2)C4—C5—C6—C10.4 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C40.7 (5)C4—C5—C6—N1178.4 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C50.8 (5)O1—C7—N1—C62.2 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C60.9 (5)C8—C7—N1—C6179.6 (3)
C2—C1—C6—C52.0 (4)C1—C6—N1—C7138.6 (3)
Br1—C1—C6—C5177.3 (2)C5—C6—N1—C742.6 (4)
C2—C1—C6—N1176.9 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.83 (4)2.10 (4)2.896 (3)161 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H8BrNO
Mr214.06
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)120
a, b, c (Å)4.7790 (1), 11.9257 (4), 14.6703 (3)
β (°) 96.8173 (16)
V3)830.19 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)4.89
Crystal size (mm)0.24 × 0.10 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2003)
Tmin, Tmax0.387, 0.726
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
9212, 1905, 1750
Rint0.037
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.032, 0.074, 1.26
No. of reflections1905
No. of parameters106
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.76, 0.38

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SCALEPACK, DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.83 (4)2.10 (4)2.896 (3)161 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

We thank the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service (University of Swansea) and the EPSRC National Crystallography Service (University of Southampton) for data collections.

References

First citationAllen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1995). International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. C, pp. 685–706. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  Google Scholar
First citationBlessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBrown, C. J. (1966). Acta Cryst. 21, 442–445.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2003). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationPederson, B. F. (1967). Acta Chem. Scand. 21, 1415–1424.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationWasserman, H. J., Ryan, R. R. & Layne, S. P. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 783–785.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds