organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Malonamide: a tetra­gonal polymorph

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aSchool of Natural Sciences (Chemistry), Bedson Building, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, England
*Correspondence e-mail: w.clegg@ncl.ac.uk

(Received 21 September 2005; accepted 23 September 2005; online 28 September 2005)

A tetra­gonal polymorph of malonamide, C3H6N2O2, is reported. The unit-cell dimensions, crystallographic symmetry and some aspects of the mol­ecular geometry are significantly different from those of the known monoclinic form [Chieh et al. (1970[Chieh, P. C., Subramanian, E. & Trotter, J. (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179-184.]). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179–184]. An R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motif links molecules together into a three-dimensional network.

Comment

Crystals of malonamide, (I)[link], were obtained from a reaction between 4,6-dihydroxy­pyrimidine and Na2CO3 in water. Data collected at 150 K showed that it had crystallized in space group P43212 with Z′ = 0.5 and Z = 4. It was only some time after structure solution that, by carrying out a search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.26; Allen, 2002[Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380-388.]), we realised a crystal structure of malonamide had previously been reported (Chieh et al., 1970[Chieh, P. C., Subramanian, E. & Trotter, J. (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179-184.]) in space group P21/c with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit and a final R = 0.05. This indicates either that the structure undergoes a phase transition above 150 K or that we had identified a second polymorph. However, by the time this was realized the original crystalline sample had been lost, although the original aqueous solution remained. In an attempt to answer this question we crystallized more of the product, with the intention of carrying out unit-cell determinations at 150 K and room temperature in order to show any phase transition. What we actually determined was a further, ortho­rhom­bic, polymorph of (I)[link], described in the following paper (Nichol & Clegg, 2005[Nichol, G. S. & Clegg, W. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3427-o3429.]). This third polymorph did not undergo a phase transition between room temperature and 150 K and, based on this observation, we are satisfied that the structure presented here is probably a genuine polymorph and not the consequence of a phase transition from the previously reported form as a result of cooling.

[Scheme 1]

The mol­ecular structure of (I)[link] is shown in Fig. 1[link]. The asymmetric unit consists of one half of the mol­ecule, and the complete mol­ecule is generated from the asymmetric unit by a twofold axis which passes through C2. Bond lengths and angles are in good agreement with the mean values reported by Chieh et al. (1970[Chieh, P. C., Subramanian, E. & Trotter, J. (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179-184.]); however, the torsion angle about the C1—C2 bond is significantly different. Fig. 2[link] shows a wireframe diagram of (I)[link] with two mean planes fitted through O, N, C1 and C2 and through the respective symmetry equivalents. Both planes inter­sect at C2 and the angle between the two planes is 58.68 (4)°. This value is over 27° less than the angles reported by Chieh et al. (1970[Chieh, P. C., Subramanian, E. & Trotter, J. (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179-184.]) for both independent mol­ecules (84.8 and 85.3°).

Fig. 3[link] shows a packing diagram viewed along the b axis. What initially looks like a complicated network is actually the result of just two independent N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (one for each of the amino H atoms), with the O atom acting as a bifurcated acceptor. The result of this is a three-dimensional network of R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motifs, illustrated in Fig. 4[link] (Etter, 1990[Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120-126.]; Bernstein et al., 1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of (I)[link], with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms as small spheres. The labelled atoms indicate the asymmetric unit; the mol­ecule is generated by a twofold rotation axis (y, x, −z) which passes through C2.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Two mean planes, one drawn through N, O, C1 and C2 and the other through their symmetry equivalents, and the dihedral angle between the two planes.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
A packing diagram, viewed along the b axis. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by orange dashed lines.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
The R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motif. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by orange dashed lines and C-bound H atoms are omitted.

Experimental

Equimolar amounts of 4,6-dihydroxy­pyrimidine and Na2CO3 were dissolved in 20 ml of hot distilled water, forming a pale-yellow solution. Large plate-shaped crystals of (I)[link] were grown by slow evaporation of the cold solution on a watch glass over a period of approximately 5 d.

Crystal data
  • C3H6N2O2

  • Mr = 102.10

  • Tetragonal, P 43 21 2

  • a = 5.3140 (3) Å

  • c = 15.5360 (12) Å

  • V = 438.71 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Dx = 1.546 Mg m−3

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • Cell parameters from 54 reflections

  • θ = 2.5–27.5°

  • μ = 0.13 mm−1

  • T = 150 (2) K

  • Plate, light yellow

  • 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.02 mm

Data collection
  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • φ and ω scans

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003[Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.])Tmin = 0.902, Tmax = 0.997

  • 6874 measured reflections

  • 340 independent reflections

  • 324 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.018

  • θmax = 27.5°

  • h = −6 → 6

  • k = −5 → 6

  • l = −20 → 20

Refinement
  • Refinement on F2

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032

  • wR(F2) = 0.082

  • S = 1.23

  • 340 reflections

  • 43 parameters

  • Only H-atom coordinates refined

  • w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0509P)2 + 0.0691P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

  • (Δ/σ)max < 0.001

  • Δρmax = 0.19 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3

  • Extinction correction: SHELXL97

  • Extinction coefficient: 0.12 (3)

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)[link]

O—C1 1.2382 (17)
N—C1 1.3251 (19)
C1—C2 1.5176 (17)
O—C1—C2—C1i −36.66 (9)
N—C1—C2—C1i 145.23 (12)
Symmetry code: (i) y, x, -z.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N—H1N⋯Oii 0.87 (2) 2.05 (2) 2.9195 (16) 171 (2)
N—H2N⋯Oiii 0.79 (2) 2.36 (2) 3.1112 (17) 158 (2)
Symmetry codes: (ii) [x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 4}}]; (iii) y-1, x, -z.

All H atoms were located in a difference map and their coordinates were refined freely, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N,C). The C—H bond length refined to 0.986 (19) Å and the two N—H bond lengths refined to 0.87 (2) and 0.79 (2) Å. Friedel pairs were merged during the final refinement cycles due to the lack of significant anomalous dispersion; the choice of chiral space group P43212 rather than P41212 is arbitrary.

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998[Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992[Duisenberg, A. J. M. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 92-96.]); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003[Duisenberg, A. J. M., Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J. & Schreurs, A. M. M. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 220-229.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003[Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. J. (2003). Appl. Cryst. 36, 1103.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001[Sheldrick, G. M. (2001). SHELXTL. Version 6. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); molecular graphics: DIAMOND3 (Brandenburg & Putz, 2004[Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2004). DIAMOND3. University of Bonn, Germany.]) and MERCURY (Version 1.3; Bruno et al., 2002[Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389-397.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and local programs.

Supporting information


Comment top

Crystals of malonamide, (I), were obtained from a reaction between 4,6-dihydroxypyrimidine and Na2CO3 in water. Data collected at 150 K showed that it had crystallized in space group P43212 with Z' = 0.5 and Z = 4. It was only some time after structure solution that, by carrying out a search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.26; Allen, 2002), we realised a crystal structure of malonamide had previously been reported (Chieh et al., 1970) in space group P21/c with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit and a final R = 0.05. This indicates either that the structure undergoes a phase transition above 150 K or that we had identified a second polymorph. However, by the time this was realised the original crystalline sample had been lost, although the original aqueous solution remained. In an attempt to answer this question we crystallized more of the product, with the intention of carrying out unit-cell determinations at 150 K and room temperature in order to show any phase transition. What we actually determined was a further, orthorhombic, polymorph of (I), described in the following paper (Nichol & Clegg, 2005). This third polymorph did not undergo a phase transition between room temperature and 150 K and, based on this observation, we are satisfied that the structure presented here is probably a genuine polymorph and not the consequence of a phase transition from the previously reported form as a result of cooling.

The molecular structure of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit consists of one half of the molecule, and the complete molecule is generated from the asymmetric unit by a twofold axis which passes through C2. Bond lengths and angles are in good agreement with the mean values reported by Chieh et al. (1970); however, the torsion angle about the C1—C2 bond is significantly different. Fig. 2 shows a wireframe diagram of (I) with two mean planes fitted through O, N, C1 and C2 and through the respective symmetry equivalents. Both planes intersect at C2 and the angle between the two planes is 58.68 (4)°. This value is over 27° less than the angles reported by Chieh et al. (1970) for both independent molecules (84.8 and 85.3°).

Fig. 3 shows a packing diagram viewed along the b axis. What initially looks like a complicated network is actually the result of just two independent N—H···O hydrogen bonds (one for each of the amino H atoms), with the O atom acting as a bifurcated acceptor. The result of this is a three-dimensional network of R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motifs, illustrated in Fig. 4 (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995).

Experimental top

Equimolar amounts of 4,6-dihydroxypyrimidine and Na2CO3 were dissolved in 20 ml of hot distilled water, forming a pale-yellow solution. Large plate-shaped crystals of (I) were grown by slow evaporation of the cold solution on a watch glass over a period of approximately 5 d.

Refinement top

All H atoms were located in a difference map and their coordinates were refined freely, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(N,C). The C—H bond length refined to 0.986 (19) Å and the two N—H bond lengths refined to 0.87 (2) and 0.79 (2) Å. Friedel pairs were merged during the final refinement cycles due to the lack of significant anomalous dispersion.

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992); data reduction: EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001); molecular graphics: DIAMOND3 (Brandenburg & Putz, 2004) and Mercury (Version 1.3; Bruno et al., 2002); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and local programs.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms as small spheres. The labelled atoms indicate the asymmetric unit; the molecule is generated by a twofold rotation axis (y, x, −z) which passes through C2.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Two mean planes, one drawn through N, O, C1 and C2 and the other through their symmetry equivalents, and the dihedral angle between the two planes.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. A packing diagram, viewed along the b axis. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by orange dashed lines.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. The R33(12) hydrogen-bonding motif. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by orange dashed lines and C-bound H atoms are omitted.
Malonamide top
Crystal data top
C3H6N2O2Dx = 1.546 Mg m3
Mr = 102.10Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, P43212Cell parameters from 54 reflections
Hall symbol: P 4nw 2abwθ = 2.5–27.5°
a = 5.3140 (3) ŵ = 0.13 mm1
c = 15.5360 (12) ÅT = 150 K
V = 438.71 (5) Å3Block, light yellow
Z = 40.50 × 0.50 × 0.02 mm
F(000) = 216
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
340 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube324 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.018
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 5.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
h = 66
Tmin = 0.902, Tmax = 0.997k = 56
6874 measured reflectionsl = 2020
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Only H-atom coordinates refined
wR(F2) = 0.082 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0509P)2 + 0.0691P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.23(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
340 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
43 parametersΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.12 (3)
Crystal data top
C3H6N2O2Z = 4
Mr = 102.10Mo Kα radiation
Tetragonal, P43212µ = 0.13 mm1
a = 5.3140 (3) ÅT = 150 K
c = 15.5360 (12) Å0.50 × 0.50 × 0.02 mm
V = 438.71 (5) Å3
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
340 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
324 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.902, Tmax = 0.997Rint = 0.018
6874 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0320 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.082Only H-atom coordinates refined
S = 1.23Δρmax = 0.19 e Å3
340 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
43 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O0.35135 (18)0.5410 (2)0.08252 (5)0.0193 (4)
N0.0616 (2)0.5402 (3)0.04955 (8)0.0182 (4)
H1N0.095 (4)0.675 (4)0.0800 (11)0.022*
H2N0.177 (4)0.469 (4)0.0277 (12)0.022*
C10.1676 (3)0.4422 (3)0.04704 (8)0.0134 (4)
C20.1932 (2)0.1932 (2)0.00000.0147 (4)
H20.166 (3)0.064 (4)0.0448 (10)0.018*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O0.0154 (6)0.0201 (6)0.0222 (5)0.0024 (4)0.0014 (4)0.0069 (4)
N0.0137 (7)0.0158 (7)0.0252 (7)0.0002 (5)0.0013 (5)0.0063 (5)
C10.0148 (7)0.0133 (7)0.0121 (5)0.0017 (5)0.0015 (5)0.0008 (5)
C20.0130 (6)0.0130 (6)0.0180 (8)0.0020 (7)0.0020 (5)0.0020 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O—C11.2382 (17)N—C11.3251 (19)
N—H1N0.87 (2)C1—C21.5176 (17)
N—H2N0.79 (2)C2—H20.986 (19)
H1N—N—H2N117 (2)N—C1—C2116.07 (11)
H1N—N—C1121.7 (13)C1—C2—C1i112.84 (16)
H2N—N—C1120.5 (15)C1—C2—H2104.6 (10)
O—C1—N123.02 (13)C1i—C2—H2113.9 (11)
O—C1—C2120.88 (12)
O—C1—C2—C1i36.66 (9)N—C1—C2—C1i145.23 (12)
Symmetry code: (i) y, x, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N—H1N···Oii0.87 (2)2.05 (2)2.9195 (16)170.8 (16)
N—H2N···Oiii0.79 (2)2.36 (2)3.1112 (17)157.6 (19)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1/4; (iii) y1, x, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC3H6N2O2
Mr102.10
Crystal system, space groupTetragonal, P43212
Temperature (K)150
a, c (Å)5.3140 (3), 15.5360 (12)
V3)438.71 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.13
Crystal size (mm)0.50 × 0.50 × 0.02
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003)
Tmin, Tmax0.902, 0.997
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6874, 340, 324
Rint0.018
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.032, 0.082, 1.23
No. of reflections340
No. of parameters43
H-atom treatmentOnly H-atom coordinates refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.19, 0.20

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), DIRAX (Duisenberg, 1992), EVALCCD (Duisenberg et al., 2003), SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2003), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2001), DIAMOND3 (Brandenburg & Putz, 2004) and Mercury (Version 1.3; Bruno et al., 2002), SHELXTL and local programs.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O—C11.2382 (17)C1—C21.5176 (17)
N—C11.3251 (19)
O—C1—C2—C1i36.66 (9)N—C1—C2—C1i145.23 (12)
Symmetry code: (i) y, x, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N—H1N···Oii0.87 (2)2.05 (2)2.9195 (16)170.8 (16)
N—H2N···Oiii0.79 (2)2.36 (2)3.1112 (17)157.6 (19)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1/4; (iii) y1, x, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the EPSRC for funding.

References

First citationAllen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBrandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2004). DIAMOND3. University of Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationBruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBurla, M. C., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. J. (2003). Appl. Cryst. 36, 1103.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationChieh, P. C., Subramanian, E. & Trotter, J. (1970). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 179–184.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationDuisenberg, A. J. M. (1992). J. Appl. Cryst. 25, 92–96.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationDuisenberg, A. J. M., Kroon-Batenburg, L. M. J. & Schreurs, A. M. M. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 220–229.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationEtter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationNichol, G. S. & Clegg, W. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3427–o3429.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2001). SHELXTL. Version 6. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar

© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds