Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805027522/fl6184sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536805027522/fl6184Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 287556
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 293 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.002 Å
- R factor = 0.045
- wR factor = 0.112
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 34.8
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level A DIFF020_ALERT_1_A _diffrn_standards_interval_count and _diffrn_standards_interval_time are missing. Number of measurements between standards or time (min) between standards.
Alert level B PLAT021_ALERT_1_B Ratio Unique / Expected Reflections too High ... 1.60
Alert level C PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.99 PLAT199_ALERT_1_C Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_C Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K PLAT230_ALERT_2_C Hirshfeld Test Diff for C6 - C7 .. 6.54 su
1 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 4 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Equal molar amounts of thiophen-2-ylglyoxal and 1,2-phenylenediamine were refluxed in 95% ethanol for 2 h. The resulting mixture was filtered and washed with ice-cold ethanol. The precipitate was recrystallized from a boiling ethanol–toluene mixture and crystals were grown from slowly evaporated solutions of ethanol. A light-brown plate that displayed homogeneous birefringence was mounted for diffraction studies. 1H NMR and UV–vis spectroscopies, as well as melting points of the title compound, agree with literature values (Peter et al., 2004 or?? 1995).
H atoms were found in difference maps and their positional parameters were refined. The Uiso(H) values were set at 0.05 Å2
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Bruno et al., 2002); software used to prepare material for publication: CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003).
C12H8N2S | F(000) = 440 |
Mr = 212.27 | Dx = 1.359 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Melting point: 383 K |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 5.5062 (13) Å | Cell parameters from 1179 reflections |
b = 16.119 (3) Å | θ = 3.8–29.7° |
c = 11.939 (3) Å | µ = 0.28 mm−1 |
β = 101.77 (2)° | T = 293 K |
V = 1037.4 (4) Å3 | Plate, light brown |
Z = 4 | 0.32 × 0.16 × 0.09 mm |
Sapphire3 diffractometer | 2529 reflections with I > 3σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.032 |
ω scans | θmax = 29.7°, θmin = 4.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) | h = −6→7 |
Tmin = 0.891, Tmax = 0.989 | k = −22→22 |
8510 measured reflections | l = −16→12 |
4739 independent reflections |
Refinement on F | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
wR(F2) = 0.112 | Weighting scheme: Prince modified Chebychev oplynomial (Watkin, 1994,
Prince, 1982) [weight] = 1.0/[3.05T0(x) + 3.88T1(x) + 0.969T3(x)],
where x = F /Fmax |
S = 1.00 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
4739 reflections | Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 |
136 parameters | Δρmin = −0.80 e Å−3 |
0 restraints |
C12H8N2S | V = 1037.4 (4) Å3 |
Mr = 212.27 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 5.5062 (13) Å | µ = 0.28 mm−1 |
b = 16.119 (3) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 11.939 (3) Å | 0.32 × 0.16 × 0.09 mm |
β = 101.77 (2)° |
Sapphire3 diffractometer | 4739 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) | 2529 reflections with I > 3σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.891, Tmax = 0.989 | Rint = 0.032 |
8510 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.112 | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
S = 1.00 | Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3 |
4739 reflections | Δρmin = −0.80 e Å−3 |
136 parameters |
Refinement. The refinement was carried out against F and used a Chebychev polynomial where [weight] = 1.0/[A0*T0(x)+A1*T1(x) ··· +An-1]*Tn-1(x)], where Ai are the Chebychev coefficients (3.05, 3.88, 0.969, respectively), and where x= Fcalc/Fmax (Watkin, 1994, Prince, 1982). >>From Watkin's CRYSTAL manual: 7.34: Chebychev weighting schemes 10, 11 A[i] are the coefficients of a Chebyshev series (Rollett, 1965) in t[i]'(x), where x = Fo/Fo(max). For this weighting scheme, the coefficients a[i] are calculated by the program using a least squares procedure which minimizes sum[(Fo - Fc)**4] over all the reflections. The resulting coefficients are stored in a new LIST 4 as weighting scheme type 11 (see below), and then used to calculate the weights for each of the reflections. It is recommended that several different values of NP are used (e.g 3 to 5), so that series of various orders are tested to see which gives the best fit. If negative or very small reciprocal weights are computed (i.e. the computed curve fall close to or crosses the ordinate axis), the parameter MAXIMUM can be used to restrict the maximum weight. For data on 'ordinary' scales, this will require a value of about 100. (This is best seen by computing an agreement analysis once the new weights have been calculated). The parameters P(i) need not be given, because they are to be computed. When the Chebyshev coefficients have been determined, p(1) is overwritten by the value determined for a[1]. (Carruthers & Watkin, 1979). Scheme 10 generates the parameters needed for a scheme 11. Rollett, J. S. (1965). Editor. Computing Methods in Crystallography, p. 40. Pergamon. Carruthers, J. R. & Watkin, D. J. (1979). Acta Cryst. A35, 698–699. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.8214 (3) | 0.77923 (9) | 0.72525 (11) | 0.0460 | |
N1 | 0.7427 (2) | 0.80309 (8) | 0.81895 (10) | 0.0475 | |
C2 | 0.7110 (3) | 0.81315 (11) | 0.61546 (13) | 0.0569 | |
H2 | 0.7724 | 0.7950 | 0.5521 | 0.0500* | |
N2 | 0.5313 (3) | 0.86703 (9) | 0.59986 (11) | 0.0614 | |
C3 | 0.4454 (3) | 0.89129 (9) | 0.69575 (13) | 0.0528 | |
C4 | 0.2444 (3) | 0.94720 (11) | 0.68515 (16) | 0.0670 | |
H4 | 0.1707 | 0.9674 | 0.6136 | 0.0500* | |
C5 | 0.1597 (3) | 0.97125 (11) | 0.7795 (2) | 0.0721 | |
H5 | 0.0274 | 1.0088 | 0.7722 | 0.0500* | |
C6 | 0.2661 (4) | 0.94083 (12) | 0.88845 (17) | 0.0726 | |
H6 | 0.2045 | 0.9583 | 0.9516 | 0.0500* | |
C7 | 0.4608 (3) | 0.88612 (11) | 0.90199 (14) | 0.0618 | |
H7 | 0.5318 | 0.8668 | 0.9748 | 0.0500* | |
C8 | 0.5529 (3) | 0.85915 (9) | 0.80479 (12) | 0.0485 | |
S1 | 1.14778 (8) | 0.68121 (3) | 0.87275 (3) | 0.0565 | |
C9 | 1.0221 (3) | 0.71880 (10) | 0.73836 (11) | 0.0461 | |
C10 | 1.1429 (3) | 0.68560 (10) | 0.65719 (13) | 0.0545 | |
H10 | 1.1027 | 0.6991 | 0.5797 | 0.0500* | |
C11 | 1.3345 (3) | 0.63111 (11) | 0.70525 (14) | 0.0594 | |
H11 | 1.4341 | 0.6028 | 0.6628 | 0.0500* | |
C12 | 1.3589 (3) | 0.62286 (10) | 0.82045 (14) | 0.0570 | |
H12 | 1.4772 | 0.5887 | 0.8659 | 0.0500* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0507 (9) | 0.0459 (9) | 0.0402 (7) | −0.0120 (7) | 0.0063 (6) | −0.0015 (6) |
N1 | 0.0534 (7) | 0.0489 (8) | 0.0398 (6) | −0.0034 (6) | 0.0086 (5) | −0.0017 (5) |
C2 | 0.0666 (11) | 0.0640 (11) | 0.0392 (8) | −0.0067 (9) | 0.0085 (7) | 0.0011 (7) |
N2 | 0.0675 (9) | 0.0651 (10) | 0.0463 (7) | −0.0033 (7) | −0.0010 (6) | 0.0067 (6) |
C3 | 0.0554 (9) | 0.0441 (9) | 0.0553 (9) | −0.0099 (7) | 0.0026 (7) | 0.0007 (7) |
C4 | 0.0606 (10) | 0.0580 (11) | 0.0746 (12) | −0.0033 (9) | −0.0046 (9) | 0.0085 (9) |
C5 | 0.0577 (11) | 0.0539 (11) | 0.1013 (16) | 0.0075 (8) | 0.0080 (10) | −0.0017 (10) |
C6 | 0.0784 (13) | 0.0656 (12) | 0.0770 (12) | 0.0032 (10) | 0.0237 (11) | −0.010 (1) |
C7 | 0.0721 (11) | 0.0593 (11) | 0.0548 (9) | 0.0083 (9) | 0.0147 (8) | −0.0020 (8) |
C8 | 0.0522 (9) | 0.0436 (8) | 0.0486 (8) | −0.0062 (7) | 0.0077 (7) | −0.0016 (6) |
S1 | 0.0677 (3) | 0.0635 (3) | 0.03713 (19) | 0.0085 (2) | 0.00795 (17) | −0.00498 (17) |
C9 | 0.0535 (9) | 0.0473 (9) | 0.0375 (7) | −0.0081 (7) | 0.0095 (6) | −0.0017 (6) |
C10 | 0.0667 (10) | 0.0565 (10) | 0.0443 (8) | −0.0035 (8) | 0.0208 (7) | 0.0018 (7) |
C11 | 0.0660 (10) | 0.0625 (11) | 0.0560 (10) | −0.0015 (8) | 0.0271 (8) | −0.0071 (8) |
C12 | 0.0588 (9) | 0.0570 (10) | 0.0536 (9) | 0.0014 (8) | 0.0076 (7) | −0.0073 (7) |
C1—N1 | 1.3361 (17) | C6—H6 | 0.931 |
C1—C2 | 1.436 (2) | C6—C7 | 1.372 (3) |
C1—C9 | 1.457 (2) | C7—H7 | 0.931 |
N1—C8 | 1.3658 (19) | C7—C8 | 1.426 (2) |
C2—H2 | 0.936 | S1—C9 | 1.7226 (15) |
C2—N2 | 1.301 (2) | S1—C12 | 1.7091 (16) |
N2—C3 | 1.381 (2) | C9—C10 | 1.3893 (19) |
C3—C4 | 1.413 (2) | C10—H10 | 0.933 |
C3—C8 | 1.414 (2) | C10—C11 | 1.403 (2) |
C4—H4 | 0.927 | C11—H11 | 0.937 |
C4—C5 | 1.361 (3) | C11—C12 | 1.361 (2) |
C5—H5 | 0.938 | C12—H12 | 0.937 |
C5—C6 | 1.401 (3) | ||
N1—C1—C2 | 120.36 (14) | C6—C7—H7 | 119.673 |
N1—C1—C9 | 118.09 (13) | C6—C7—C8 | 119.95 (16) |
C2—C1—C9 | 121.55 (12) | H7—C7—C8 | 120.381 |
C1—N1—C8 | 117.23 (13) | C7—C8—C3 | 119.08 (15) |
C1—C2—H2 | 117.630 | C7—C8—N1 | 119.43 (14) |
C1—C2—N2 | 123.57 (14) | C3—C8—N1 | 121.50 (13) |
H2—C2—N2 | 118.795 | C9—S1—C12 | 91.56 (8) |
C2—N2—C3 | 116.69 (14) | C1—C9—S1 | 119.14 (9) |
N2—C3—C4 | 120.04 (15) | C1—C9—C10 | 129.99 (13) |
N2—C3—C8 | 120.63 (15) | S1—C9—C10 | 110.84 (12) |
C4—C3—C8 | 119.30 (15) | C9—C10—H10 | 123.513 |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.650 | C9—C10—C11 | 112.52 (14) |
C3—C4—C5 | 120.13 (17) | H10—C10—C11 | 123.955 |
H4—C4—C5 | 120.216 | C10—C11—H11 | 123.901 |
C4—C5—H5 | 119.852 | C10—C11—C12 | 112.66 (14) |
C4—C5—C6 | 121.30 (17) | H11—C11—C12 | 123.430 |
H5—C5—C6 | 118.845 | S1—C12—C11 | 112.42 (13) |
C5—C6—H6 | 119.560 | S1—C12—H12 | 123.807 |
C5—C6—C7 | 120.21 (16) | C11—C12—H12 | 123.772 |
H6—C6—C7 | 120.233 |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C12H8N2S |
Mr | 212.27 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 293 |
a, b, c (Å) | 5.5062 (13), 16.119 (3), 11.939 (3) |
β (°) | 101.77 (2) |
V (Å3) | 1037.4 (4) |
Z | 4 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.28 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.32 × 0.16 × 0.09 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Sapphire3 diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.891, 0.989 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 3σ(I)] reflections | 8510, 4739, 2529 |
Rint | 0.032 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.698 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.045, 0.112, 1.00 |
No. of reflections | 4739 |
No. of parameters | 136 |
H-atom treatment | Only H-atom coordinates refined |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.58, −0.80 |
Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2005), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2005), CrysAlis RED, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Bruno et al., 2002).
C1—N1 | 1.3361 (17) | C5—C6 | 1.401 (3) |
C1—C2 | 1.436 (2) | C6—C7 | 1.372 (3) |
C1—C9 | 1.457 (2) | C7—C8 | 1.426 (2) |
N1—C8 | 1.3658 (19) | S1—C9 | 1.7226 (15) |
C2—N2 | 1.301 (2) | S1—C12 | 1.7091 (16) |
N2—C3 | 1.381 (2) | C9—C10 | 1.3893 (19) |
C3—C4 | 1.413 (2) | C10—C11 | 1.403 (2) |
C3—C8 | 1.414 (2) | C11—C12 | 1.361 (2) |
C4—C5 | 1.361 (3) | ||
N1—C1—C2 | 120.36 (14) | C6—C7—C8 | 119.95 (16) |
N1—C1—C9 | 118.09 (13) | C7—C8—C3 | 119.08 (15) |
C2—C1—C9 | 121.55 (12) | C7—C8—N1 | 119.43 (14) |
C1—N1—C8 | 117.23 (13) | C3—C8—N1 | 121.50 (13) |
C1—C2—N2 | 123.57 (14) | C9—S1—C12 | 91.56 (8) |
C2—N2—C3 | 116.69 (14) | C1—C9—S1 | 119.14 (9) |
N2—C3—C4 | 120.04 (15) | C1—C9—C10 | 129.99 (13) |
N2—C3—C8 | 120.63 (15) | S1—C9—C10 | 110.84 (12) |
C4—C3—C8 | 119.30 (15) | C9—C10—C11 | 112.52 (14) |
C3—C4—C5 | 120.13 (17) | C10—C11—C12 | 112.66 (14) |
C4—C5—C6 | 121.30 (17) | S1—C12—C11 | 112.42 (13) |
C5—C6—C7 | 120.21 (16) |
We have previously investigated the crystal structures of 2,3-dithienylquinoxalines (Crundwell, Sayers et al., 2003) and bromo-substituted 2,3-dithienylquinoxalines (Crundwell et al., 2004). Quinoxalines, in general, have shown versatility in binding a wide variety of metals. We have now expanded our studies to the monosubstituted thienylquinoxalines.
The title compound, (I), sits on a general position. All bond lengths and angles are in agreement with those of other published quinoxalines and thienyl-containing compounds. Thienyl ring geometries and difference maps show no evidence of thienyl ring flip disorders, which are common in molecules with unsubstituted thienyl rings (Crundwell, Sullivan et al., 2003). Like 2-phenylquinoxaline (Qingchuan & Yili, 1989) and 2-(2'-pyridyl)quinoxaline (Kasselouri et al., 1994), the molecule is planar and packs in a herringbone motif. The interplanar spacing for layers in (I) is 3.537 Å, whereas the interplanar spacings for 2-phenyl and 2-(2'-pyridiyl)quinoxalines are 3.428 and 3.490 Å, respectively.