![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, i99-i102 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536806008397 ]
Online 22 March 2006
No syntax errors found
Alert level A REFLT03_ALERT_3_A Reflection count < 85% complete (theta max?) From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 29.07 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_full 29.07 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1189 TEST2: Reflns within _diffrn_reflns_theta_max Count of symmetry unique reflns 1425 Completeness (_total/calc) 83.44%
| Author Response: We planned two runs, one at phi=0 deg and one at pohi=90 deg. Unfortunately, the crystal mysteriously disappeared after the first run. |
PLAT029_ALERT_3_A _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.83
| Author Response: same answer as above! |
Alert level C PLAT155_ALERT_4_C The Triclinic Unitcell is NOT Reduced .......... ?
2 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster