[HTML version][PDF version][Article Abstract][CIF][3d view][Structure Factors][Issue contents]  [Buy article online]

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, i99-i102  [ doi:10.1107/S1600536806008397 ]

Reinvestigation of cadmium diphosphate

W. Bouchelaghem, M. R. Benloucif, M. Mayoufi, A. Benmoussa and K. J. Schenk

Online 22 March 2006


Key indicators

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level A REFLT03_ALERT_3_A Reflection count < 85% complete (theta max?) From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 29.07 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_full 29.07 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1189 TEST2: Reflns within _diffrn_reflns_theta_max Count of symmetry unique reflns 1425 Completeness (_total/calc) 83.44%
Author Response: We planned two runs, one at phi=0 deg and one at pohi=90 deg. Unfortunately, the crystal mysteriously disappeared after the first run.
PLAT029_ALERT_3_A _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low .......       0.83       
Author Response: same answer as above!

Alert level C PLAT155_ALERT_4_C The Triclinic Unitcell is NOT Reduced .......... ?
2 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion

Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster