[HTML version][PDF version][Article Abstract][CIF][3d view][Structure Factors][Issue contents]  [Buy article online]

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, i129-i130  [ doi:10.1107/S1600536806016102 ]

Redetermination of Na3Hg2

A. V. Tkachuk and A. Mar

Online 10 May 2006


Key indicators

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found




Alert level C PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. SumFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT045_ALERT_1_C Calculated and Reported Z Differ by ............ 0.50 Ratio
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR) is > 2.00 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.003 0.068 Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.000 0.010 RR = 4.088 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion

Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster