[Journal logo]

Volume 62 
Part 7 
Pages o2976-o2978  
July 2006  

Received 14 June 2006
Accepted 16 June 2006
Online 23 June 2006

Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T = 293 K
Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
R = 0.043
wR = 0.127
Data-to-parameter ratio = 16.1
Details

Hydrogen-bonding patterns in 2-amino-4,6-dimethoxypyrimidine-4-aminobenzoic acid (1/1)

aSchool of Chemistry, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli 620 024, Tamil Nadu, India, and bFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, England
Correspondence e-mail: tommtrichy@yahoo.co.in

In the title cocrystal, C6H9N3O2·C7H7NO2, the 2-amino-4,6-dimethoxypyrimidine molecule interacts with the carboxyl group of the 4-aminobenzoic acid molecule through N-H...O and O-H...N hydrogen bonds, forming a cyclic hydrogen-bonded motif [R22(8)]. This motif further self-organizes through N-H...O hydrogen bonds to generate an array of six hydrogen bonds with the rings having the graph-set notation R23(6), R22(8), R42(8), R22(8) and R23(6). The 4-aminobenzoic acid molecules self-assemble via N-H...O hydrogen bonds to form a supramolecular chain along the c axis.

Comment

Pyrimidine and aminopyrimidine derivatives are biologically important compounds as they occur in nature as components of nucleic acids. Some aminopyrimidine derivatives are used as antifolate drugs (Hunt et al., 1980[Hunt, W. E., Schwalbe, C. H., Bird, K. & Mallinson, P. D. (1980). Biochem. J. 187, 533-536.]; Baker & Santi, 1965[Baker, B. R. & Santi, D. V. (1965). J. Pharm. Sci. 54, 1252-1257.]). The adducts of carboxylic acids with 2-aminoheterocylic ring systems form a graph-set motif of R22(8) (Lynch & Jones, 2004[Lynch, D. E. & Jones, G. D. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 748-754.]). The crystal structure of 2-amino-4,6-dimethoxy pyrimidine has also been reported (Low et al., 2002[Low, J. N., Quesada, A., Marchal, A., Melguizo, M., Nogueras, M. & Glidewell, C. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o289-o294.]). The crystal structure of 4-aminobenzoic acid (Lai & Marsh, 1967[Lai, T. F. & Marsh, R. E. (1967). Acta Cryst. 22, 885-893.]) is known. The interplay of strong N-H...O and O-H...N hydrogen bonds, and weak C-H...O interactions, forms supramolecular motifs, involved in the molecular packing of organic solids. (Taylor & Kennard, 1982[Taylor, R. & Kennard, O. (1982). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 5063-5070.]). In the present study, the hydrogen-bonding patterns in the 2-amino-4,6-dimethoxypyrimidine-4-aminobenzoic acid (1/1) cocrystal, (I)[link], are investigated.

[Scheme 1]

The asymmetric unit (Fig. 1[link]) contains one 2-amino-4,6-dimethoxypyrimidine molecule and one 4-aminobenzoic acid molecule, which are linked by N2-H2B...O3 and O4-H4...N1 hydrogen bonds (Table 1[link]), forming an eight-membered ring of graph-set notation R22(8) (Etter, 1990[Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120-126.]; Bernstein et al., 1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573.]). This type of pairing has been observed in the crystal structure of 2-aminopyrimidine-fumaric acid (Goswami et al., 1999[Goswami, S., Mahapatra, A. K., Nigam, G. D., Chinnakali, K., Fun, H.-K. & Razak, I. A. (1999). Acta Cryst. C55, 583-585.]) and 2-aminopyrimidine-(+)-camphoric acid (Goswami et al., 2000[Goswami, S., Mukherjee, R., Ghosh, K., Razak, I. A., Shanmuga Sundara Raj, S. & Fun, H.-K. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 477-478.]). This motif further self organizes through N-H...O hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2[link]) to generate an array of six hydrogen bonds with the rings having the graph-set notations R23(6), R22(8), R42(8), R22(8) and R23(6). The 4-aminobenzoic acid molecules self-assemble via N-H...O hydrogen bonds to form a supramolecular chain along the c axis, with the graph-set notation C(9); this is shown in Fig. 3[link]. The pyrimidine ring is centrosymmetrically linked through a pair of C-H...O hydrogen bonds involving a methyl group (C7) and methoxy atom O2. A [pi]-[pi] stacking interaction between two aminopyrimidine groups (at x, y, z and -x, 1 - y, -z), with a perpendicular separation of 3.306 Å, a centroid-centroid distance of 3.4129 (8) Å and a slip angle (the angle between the centroid vector and the normal to the plane) of 14.39° has also been observed. These are typical aromatic stacking values (Hunter, 1994[Hunter, C. A. (1994). Chem. Soc. Res. 23, 101-109.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
A view of the asymmetric unit of (I)[link], showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Hydrogen-bonding (dashed lines) patterns in compound (I)[link].
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Hydrogen-bonding (dashed lines) patterns in the supramolecular chain in compound (I)[link] [symmetry code: (ii) 1 - x, [{1\over 2}] + y, [{1\over 2}] - z].

Experimental

A hot methanol solution (20 ml) of 2-amino-4,6-dimethoxy pyrimidine (38 mg, Aldrich) and 4-aminobenzoic acid (34 mg, Loba Chemie) was warmed for half an hour over a water bath. The mixture was cooled slowly and kept at room temperature; after a few days, colourless plate-like crystals were obtained.

Crystal data
  • C6H9N3O2·C7H7NO2

  • Mr = 292.30

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 6.6358 (4) Å

  • b = 7.5560 (5) Å

  • c = 27.4226 (16) Å

  • [beta] = 94.418 (2)°

  • V = 1370.89 (15) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Dx = 1.416 Mg m-3

  • Mo K[alpha] radiation

  • [mu] = 0.11 mm-1

  • T = 293 K

  • Plate, colourless

  • 0.44 × 0.32 × 0.08 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker-Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer

  • [varphi] and [omega] scans

  • Absorption correction: none

  • 14577 measured reflections

  • 3130 independent reflections

  • 2469 reflections with I > 2[sigma](I)

  • Rint = 0.032

  • [theta]max = 27.5°

Refinement
  • Refinement on F2

  • R[F2 > 2[sigma](F2)] = 0.043

  • wR(F2) = 0.127

  • S = 1.03

  • 3130 reflections

  • 194 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • w = 1/[[sigma]2(Fo2) + (0.0746P)2 + 0.4081P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

  • ([Delta]/[sigma])max < 0.001

  • [Delta][rho]max = 0.45 e Å-3

  • [Delta][rho]min = -0.30 e Å-3

  • Extinction correction: SHELXL97

  • Extinction coefficient: 0.016 (4)

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D-H...A D-H H...A D...A D-H...A
N2-H2A...O3i 0.86 2.07 2.8546 (17) 152
N2-H2B...O3 0.86 1.96 2.8180 (17) 172
O4-H4...N1 0.82 1.83 2.6426 (16) 171
N4-H4A...O2ii 0.86 2.47 3.0621 (18) 127
N4-H4A...O4ii 0.86 2.45 3.1566 (18) 140
C7-H7C...O2iii 0.96 2.60 3.4578 (18) 150
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y+2, -z; (ii) [-x+1, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (iii) -x, -y+1, -z.

All H atoms were positioned geometrically and were refined using a riding model. The C-H, O-H and N-H bond lengths are 0.93-0.96, 0.82 and 0.86 Å, respectively [Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(parent atom)].

Data collection: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) and COLLECT (Hooft, 1998[Hooft, R. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: DENZO and COLLECT; data reduction: DENZO and COLLECT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997[Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.]); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976[Johnson, C. K. (1976). ORTEPII. Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.]); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2003[Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7-13.]).

Acknowledgements

DL thanks the EPSRC National Crystallography Service (Southampton, England) for the X-ray data collection.

References

Baker, B. R. & Santi, D. V. (1965). J. Pharm. Sci. 54, 1252-1257. [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [PubMed] [ISI]
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573. [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [ISI]
Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120-126. [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [ISI]
Goswami, S., Mahapatra, A. K., Nigam, G. D., Chinnakali, K., Fun, H.-K. & Razak, I. A. (1999). Acta Cryst. C55, 583-585. [CrossRef] [details]
Goswami, S., Mukherjee, R., Ghosh, K., Razak, I. A., Shanmuga Sundara Raj, S. & Fun, H.-K. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 477-478. [CrossRef] [details]
Hooft, R. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
Hunter, C. A. (1994). Chem. Soc. Res. 23, 101-109. [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Hunt, W. E., Schwalbe, C. H., Bird, K. & Mallinson, P. D. (1980). Biochem. J. 187, 533-536. [ChemPort] [PubMed]
Johnson, C. K. (1976). ORTEPII. Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
Lai, T. F. & Marsh, R. E. (1967). Acta Cryst. 22, 885-893. [CrossRef] [details]
Low, J. N., Quesada, A., Marchal, A., Melguizo, M., Nogueras, M. & Glidewell, C. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o289-o294. [CSD] [CrossRef] [details]
Lynch, D. E. & Jones, G. D. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 748-754. [ISI] [CrossRef] [details]
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7-13. [ISI] [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [details]
Taylor, R. & Kennard, O. (1982). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 5063-5070. [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [ISI]


Acta Cryst (2006). E62, o2976-o2978   [ doi:10.1107/S1600536806023130 ]