[Journal logo]

Volume 62 
Part 8 
Pages o3503-o3505  
August 2006  

Received 4 July 2006
Accepted 19 July 2006
Online 26 July 2006

Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T = 120 K
Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
R = 0.044
wR = 0.130
Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.6
Details

Dicyclohexylamine hydrogen peroxide hemisolvate

aN. S. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, 31 Leninskii Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation, and bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Durham, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England
Correspondence e-mail: churakov@igic.ras.ru

The molecules of the title complex, C12H23N·0.5H2O2, are linked together by O-H...N and N-H...O hydrogen bonds to give ten-membered rings, which form flat ribbons parallel to the a axis. Centrosymmetric H2O2 molecules, as well as amino groups, act as both donors and acceptors of hydrogen bonds.

Comment

Hydrogen peroxide solvates are widely used as environmentally friendly bleaching compounds (Pritchard & Islam, 2003[Pritchard, R. G. & Islam, E. (2003). Acta Cryst. B59, 596-605.]; Cosgrove & Jones, 1998[Cosgrove, S. D. & Jones, W. (1998). J. Mater. Chem. 8, 419-424.]) and oxidation agents in organic synthesis (McKillop & Sanderson, 2000[McKillop, A. & Sanderson, W. R. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, pp. 471-476.]). Hydrogen bonding plays the main role in forming crystals of peroxosolvates. It was supposed that it might be possible to design stable hydrogen peroxide carriers by maximizing the number of hydrogen bonds in the structure (Adams & Ramdas, 1978[Adams, J. M. & Ramdas, V. (1978). Acta Cryst. B34, 2150-2156.]). However, due to their low stability, very few organic peroxosolvates have been structurally characterized to date - there are 19 entries in Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.27, January 2006; Allen, 2002[Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380-388.]). Here, we report the structure of the title new peroxosolvate molecular complex of dicyclohexylamine with hydrogen peroxide, (I)[link].

[Scheme 1]

In the structure of (I)[link], the dicyclohexylamine molecule exhibits the expected molecular geometry and both cyclohexyl rings adopt a chair conformation, with the amine group occupying equatorial positions (Fig. 1[link]).

The H2O2 molecule has an anti-periplanar conformation, with the H-O-O-H torsion angle equal to 180° as a consequence of the crystallographically imposed centre of symmetry. This feature was previously found in hydrogen peroxide solvates of guanidinium oxalate (Adams & Pritchard, 1976[Adams, J. M. & Pritchard, R. G. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 2438-2440.]), guanidinium pyromellitate (Adams & Ramdas, 1979[Adams, J. M. & Ramdas, V. (1979). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 34, L225-L227.]) and tetraphenylarsonium chloride (Churakov et al., 2005[Churakov, A. V., Prikhodchenko, P. V. & Howard, J. A. K. (2005). CrystEngComm, 7, 664-669.]). The O-O bond length [1.4748 (15) Å] is somewhat longer than that observed for crystalline hydrogen peroxide [1.461 (3) Å; Savariault & Lehmann, 1980[Savariault, J.-M. & Lehmann, M. S. (1980). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 1298-1303.]] and is comparable with the value found for guanidinium oxalate peroxosolvate dihydrate [1.468 (9) Å; Adams & Pritchard, 1976[Adams, J. M. & Pritchard, R. G. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 2438-2440.]].

Both components of complex (I)[link] are linked together by a system of hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2). Atom N1 acts as both a donor and an acceptor of hydrogen bonds for adjacent H2O2 molecules. The amine group of dicyclohexylamine also forms two hydrogen bonds with cocrystallized molecules in the structures of crystalline complexes with 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (Komissarova et al., 2003[Komissarova, N. L., Vol'eva, V. B., Belostotskaya, I. S., Kurkovskaya, L. N. & Starikova, Z. A. (2003). Russ. J. Org. Chem. 39, 686-688.]) and cyclohexanone oxime (Chetina et al., 2006[Chetina, O. V., Yufit, D. S. & Howard, J. A. K. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2053-o2055.]). The H2O2 molecule of (I)[link] is involved in four hydrogen bonds with adjacent dicyclohexylamine molecules, forming two donor and two acceptor interactions. Thus, all `active' H atoms (both amino and peroxo) are engaged in hydrogen bonding in (I)[link].

Two dicyclohexylamine molecules and two H2O2 molecules are linked by hydrogen bonds into a ten-membered ring. Peroxide molecules fuse these rings together, forming flat ribbons or tapes parallel to the a axis.

During the preparation of this manuscript, the latest update of the CSD has been released (May 2006), which contains the structure of compound (I)[link] as a private communication (refcode VAYGUY; Hursthouse et al., 2006[Hursthouse, M. B., Page, P. C. B. & Mazid, M. A. (2006). Private communication to the Cambridge Structural Database (refcode VAYGUY).]). The reported structure was determined at a different temperature to the present work, but the main structural features are similar to those we have found in (I)[link].

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The structure of (I)[link], showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. The dashed line indicates a hydrogen bond. [Symmetry code: (i) -x, 1 - y, 1 - z.]
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The hydrogen-bonded (dashed lines) chains in (I)[link], parallel to the a axis. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonds have been omitted.

Experimental

Dicyclohexylamine (99%) and 50% hydrogen peroxide were purchased from Aldrich. Hydrogen peroxide (50%, 0.2 ml; [rho] = 1.18 Mg m-3) was placed in a sample bottle (9 mm diameter) and covered with a 1:2 mixture of dichloromethane and benzene (approximately 1 ml; [rho] [asymptotically equal to] 1.0 Mg m-3). Finally, the organic layer was carefully covered with dicyclohexylamine (0.1 ml; [rho] = 0.91 Mg m-3). After a few hours, several crystals (up to 5 mm in length) were observed on the wall of the sample bottle. Crystals of (I)[link] decompose slowly in air.

Crystal data
  • C12H23N·0.5H2O2

  • Mr = 198.32

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 5.2113 (2) Å

  • b = 10.2567 (4) Å

  • c = 11.4044 (5) Å

  • [alpha] = 84.034 (1)°

  • [beta] = 80.011 (1)°

  • [gamma] = 79.400 (1)°

  • V = 588.45 (4) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Dx = 1.119 Mg m-3

  • Mo K[alpha] radiation

  • [mu] = 0.07 mm-1

  • T = 120 (2) K

  • Block, colourless

  • 0.32 × 0.24 × 0.18 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD 6000 area-detector diffractometer

  • [omega] scans

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SADABS, SAINT, SHELXTL and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.978, Tmax = 0.988

  • 4519 measured reflections

  • 2802 independent reflections

  • 2199 reflections with I > 2[sigma](I)

  • Rint = 0.017

  • [theta]max = 28.0°

Refinement
  • Refinement on F2

  • R[F2 > 2[sigma](F2)] = 0.044

  • wR(F2) = 0.130

  • S = 1.08

  • 2802 reflections

  • 223 parameters

  • All H-atom parameters refined

  • w = 1/[[sigma]2(Fo2) + (0.0709P)2 + 0.0609P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3

  • ([Delta]/[sigma])max < 0.001

  • [Delta][rho]max = 0.36 e Å-3

  • [Delta][rho]min = -0.19 e Å-3

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)

O1-O1i 1.4748 (15)
O1-H1 0.91 (2)
N1-C11 1.4791 (14)
N1-C21 1.4808 (13)
N1-H2 0.870 (16)
O1i-O1-H1 99.4 (11)
C11-N1-C21 116.48 (8)
C11-N1-H2 106.7 (10)
C21-N1-H2 106.6 (9)
Symmetry code: (i) -x, -y+1, -z+1.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D-H...A D-H H...A D...A D-H...A
O1-H1...N1 0.91 (2) 1.87 (2) 2.7733 (12) 175.8 (16)
N1-H2...O1ii 0.870 (16) 2.391 (16) 3.2388 (13) 164.9 (13)
Symmetry code: (ii) x+1, y, z.

All H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically. In the final stages of the refinement, no residual peaks with intensity greater than 0.13 e A-3 were found in the hydrogen peroxide region, indicating the complete occupancy of this site by H2O2 molecules and the absence of partial peroxide/water substitution (Churakov et al., 2005[Churakov, A. V., Prikhodchenko, P. V. & Howard, J. A. K. (2005). CrystEngComm, 7, 664-669.]).

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SADABS, SAINT, SHELXTL and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SADABS, SAINT, SHELXTL and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SADABS, SAINT, SHELXTL and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Acknowledgements

AVC is grateful to the Russian Science Support Foundation.

References

Adams, J. M. & Pritchard, R. G. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 2438-2440. [CrossRef] [details]
Adams, J. M. & Ramdas, V. (1978). Acta Cryst. B34, 2150-2156. [CrossRef] [details] [ISI]
Adams, J. M. & Ramdas, V. (1979). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 34, L225-L227. [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [ISI]
Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380-388. [ISI] [CrossRef] [details]
Bruker (2003). SADABS, SAINT, SHELXTL and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Chetina, O. V., Yufit, D. S. & Howard, J. A. K. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2053-o2055. [CrossRef] [details]
Churakov, A. V., Prikhodchenko, P. V. & Howard, J. A. K. (2005). CrystEngComm, 7, 664-669. [ISI] [CSD] [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Cosgrove, S. D. & Jones, W. (1998). J. Mater. Chem. 8, 419-424.
Hursthouse, M. B., Page, P. C. B. & Mazid, M. A. (2006). Private communication to the Cambridge Structural Database (refcode VAYGUY).
Komissarova, N. L., Vol'eva, V. B., Belostotskaya, I. S., Kurkovskaya, L. N. & Starikova, Z. A. (2003). Russ. J. Org. Chem. 39, 686-688.
McKillop, A. & Sanderson, W. R. (2000). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, pp. 471-476. [CrossRef]
Pritchard, R. G. & Islam, E. (2003). Acta Cryst. B59, 596-605. [CrossRef] [details]
Savariault, J.-M. & Lehmann, M. S. (1980). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 1298-1303. [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [ISI]


Acta Cryst (2006). E62, o3503-o3505   [ doi:10.1107/S1600536806028030 ]