![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, i201-i203 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536806034362 ]
Online 6 September 2006
No syntax errors found
Alert level C ABSTM02_ALERT_3_C The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR) is > 1.10 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.174 0.295 Tmin and Tmax expected: 0.089 0.199 RR = 1.319 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. STRVA01_ALERT_4_C Flack test results are ambiguous. From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack 0.610 From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack_su 0.030 PLAT033_ALERT_2_C Flack Parameter Value Deviates from Zero ....... 0.61 PLAT041_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. SumFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT045_ALERT_1_C Calculated and Reported Z Differ by ............ 0.33 Ratio PLAT060_ALERT_3_C Ratio Tmax/Tmin (Exp-to-Rep) (too) Large ....... 1.35 PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.67 PLAT068_ALERT_1_C Reported F000 Differs from Calcd (or Missing)... ? PLAT076_ALERT_1_C Occupancy 0.50 less than 1.0 for Sp.pos . O3W PLAT127_ALERT_1_C Implicit Hall Symbol Inconsistent with Explicit P62 2c PLAT213_ALERT_2_C Atom W2 has ADP max/min Ratio ............. 3.80 oblat PLAT302_ALERT_4_C Anion/Solvent Disorder ......................... 12.00 Perc. PLAT430_ALERT_2_C Short Inter D...A Contact O1 .. O3W .. 2.88 Ang. PLAT602_ALERT_4_C VERY LARGE Solvent Accessible VOID(S) in Structure ! PLAT720_ALERT_4_C Number of Unusual/Non-Standard Label(s) ........ 2 PLAT731_ALERT_1_C Bond Calc 0.88(17), Rep 0.87(5) ...... 3.40 su-Ra O1W -H1WA 1.555 1.555 PLAT731_ALERT_1_C Bond Calc 0.87(15), Rep 0.87(5) ...... 3.00 su-Ra O1W -H1WB 1.555 1.555 PLAT752_ALERT_4_C Angle Calc 178.00, Rep 178(10) ...... Senseless su K1 -O1W -H1WA 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT752_ALERT_4_C Angle Calc 75.00, Rep 75(10) ...... Senseless su H1WA -O1W -H1WB 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT779_ALERT_2_C Suspect or Irrelevant (Bond) Angle in CIF ...... 15.00 Deg. NA1 -O1W -H1WB 1.555 1.555 1.555 PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 1 Ge O40 W12 PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 2 H2 O PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 3 O3 PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 4 O PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 5 K PLAT790_ALERT_4_C Centre of Gravity not Within Unit Cell: Resd. # 6 Na
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_2_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and the formula from the _atom_site* data. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum:H15 Ge1 K2 Na1 O47 W12 Atom count from the _atom_site data: H8 Ge1 K2 Na1 O47 W12 ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.674 Tmax scaled 0.199 Tmin scaled 0.117 CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G Difference between formula and atom_site contents detected. CELLZ01_ALERT_1_G WARNING: H atoms missing from atom site list. Is this intentional? From the CIF: _cell_formula_units_Z 3 From the CIF: _chemical_formula_sum Ge H15 K2 Na1 O47 W12 TEST: Compare cell contents of formula and atom_site data atom Z*formula cif sites diff Ge 3.00 3.00 0.00 H 45.00 24.00 21.00 K 6.00 6.00 0.00 Na 3.00 3.00 0.00 O 141.00 141.00 0.00 W 36.00 36.00 0.00 REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 25.05 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 2318 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1405 Completeness (_total/calc) 164.98% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 913 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.650 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 26 ALERT level C = Check and explain 7 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 11 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 5 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 14 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster