[HTML version][PDF version][Article Abstract][CIF][3d view][Structure Factors][Issue contents]  [Buy article online]

[Contents scheme]

Acta Cryst. (2006). E62, m2908-m2909  [ doi:10.1107/S1600536806040682 ]

catena-Poly[[[mu]-chloro-dicopper(I)]-[mu]3-5-(2-pyridyl)-1H-tetrazolato-copper(II)-[mu]2-5-(2-pyridyl)-1H-tetrazolato]

C. Zhang, H.-Q. Ai and S. W. Ng

Online 13 October 2006


Key indicators

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level A ABSTM02_ALERT_3_A The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.50 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.192 0.492 Tmin(prime) and Tmax expected: 0.391 0.437 RR(prime) = 0.437 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate.
Author Response: The ratio is given by the absorption correction program; the large difference is a reflection of the quality of the less-than-optimum quality of the crystal. Indeed, the final difference Fourier map shows a large peak.
 A statement on this is added to the refinement.

PLAT061_ALERT_3_A Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large .............       0.41      
Author Response: See above.

Alert level C DIFMX01_ALERT_2_C The maximum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*0.75 _refine_diff_density_max given = 2.460 Test value = 2.175 DIFMX02_ALERT_1_C The maximum difference density is > 0.1*ZMAX*0.75 The relevant atom site should be identified. PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.89 PLAT094_ALERT_2_C Ratio of Maximum / Minimum Residual Density .... 3.97 PLAT097_ALERT_2_C Maximum (Positive) Residual Density ............ 2.46 e/A    PLAT150_ALERT_1_C Volume as Calculated Differs from that Given ... 1666.00 Ang-3 PLAT152_ALERT_1_C Supplied and Calc Volume s.u. Inconsistent ..... ? PLAT341_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 7
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.888 Tmax scaled 0.437 Tmin scaled 0.171
Author Response: The ratio is given by the absorption correction program; the large difference is a reflection of the quality of the less-than-optimum quality of the crystal. Indeed, the final difference Fourier map shows a large peak.
 A statement on this is added to the refinement.


2 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 8 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 3 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 3 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 4 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster