Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The conformation of the N—H bond in the structure of the title compound (2MPMSA), C8H11NO2S, is syn to the ortho-methyl substituent, in contrast with the anti conformation observed for the meta-methyl-substituted compound (3MPMSA). The ortho substitution of the methyl group in N-phenyl­methane­sulfonamde (PMSA) changes its space group from monoclinic P21/c to triclinic P\overline{1}, compared with the change from monoclinic P21/c to ortho­rhom­bic Pccn on meta-substitution. The bond parameters in PMSA, 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA are similar, except for the torsion angles involving the S—N bond. The N—H H atom alone lies on one side of the plane of the phenyl group, while the whole methane­sulfonyl group is on the opposite side of the plane, similar to what was observed in PMSA and 3MPMSA. Thus, the amide H atom is available to a receptor mol­ecule during biological activity. The mol­ecules of the title compound form centrosymmetric dimers via an N—H...O(sulfon­yl) hydrogen bond.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807016273/lw2008sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807016273/lw2008Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 614627

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 299 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.004 Å
  • R factor = 0.039
  • wR factor = 0.098
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 11.2

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.95 PLAT154_ALERT_1_C The su's on the Cell Angles are Equal (x 10000) 1000 Deg. PLAT180_ALERT_3_C Check Cell Rounding: # of Values Ending with 0 = 5 PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for S2
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The biological activity of alkyl sulfonanilides is thought to be due to the H atom of the phenyl N—H portion of the sulfonanilide molecule, as it can align itself in relation to a receptor site. Therefore, the structural studies of sulfonanilides are of interest. In the present work, the structure of N-(2-methylphenyl)methanesulfonamde (2MPMSA), (I), has been determined to explore the substituent effects on the solid-state structures of anilides and sulfonanilides (Gowda et al., 2007a,b,c,d; Gowda, Kozisek et al., 2007; Gowda et al., 2000).

The conformation of the N—H bond in the structure of 2MPMSA is syn to the ortho-methyl substituent (Fig. 1), in contrast with the anti conformation observed for the meta-methyl-substituted compound (3MPMSA) (Gowda et al., 2007c). The ortho-substitution of the methyl group in N-(phenyl)methanesulfonamde (PMSA) changes its space group from monoclinic P21/c (Klug, 1968) to triclinic P1, compared with the change from monoclinic P21/c to orthorhombic Pccn on meta-methyl substitution (Gowda et al., 2007c).

The bond parameters in PMSA (Klug, 1968), 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA (Gowda et al., 2007c) are similar except for the torsion angles C1—S2—N5—C6, S2—N5—C6—C7, S2—N5—C6—C11, which have the following values: 62.2 (2), 75.5 (2) and -106.6 (2)°, respectively, in PMSA; -64.5 (2), 117.1 (2) and -65.3 (3)°, respectively, in 2MPMSA; 57.9 (3), 68.1 (4) and -114.3 (3)°, respectively, in 3MPMSA. The data included for PMSA are the values determined under the present conditions as the literature values were determined in [Meaning not clear. Text missing?] (Klug, 1968).

The N—H H atom lies alone on one side of the plane of the phenyl group, while

the whole methanesulfonyl group is on the opposite side of the plane, similar to what was observed in PMSA and 3MPMSA. Thus, the amide H atom is available to

a receptor molecule during biological activity.

The molecules in the title compound form centrosymmetric dimers via an N5—H5N···O3(1 - x,-y, 1 - z) hydrogen bond (Table 1 and Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Gowda et al. (2007a,b,c,d); Gowda, Kozisek et al. (2007); Gowda et al. (2000); Jayalakshmi & Gowda (2004); Klug (1968).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared according to the literature method of Jayalakshmi & Gowda (2004). The purity of the compound was checked by determining its melting point. It was characterized by recording its IR and NMR

spectra (Jayalakshmi & Gowda, 2004). Single crystals of the title compound were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethanolic solution and used for X-ray diffraction studied at room temperature.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C and N atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding, with C—H = 0.93 Å (CH aromatic) or 0.96 Å (CH3) and N—H = 0.86 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N) or 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H. [This does not match the data in the CIF, where coordinates have been refined - please provide correct text]

Structure description top

The biological activity of alkyl sulfonanilides is thought to be due to the H atom of the phenyl N—H portion of the sulfonanilide molecule, as it can align itself in relation to a receptor site. Therefore, the structural studies of sulfonanilides are of interest. In the present work, the structure of N-(2-methylphenyl)methanesulfonamde (2MPMSA), (I), has been determined to explore the substituent effects on the solid-state structures of anilides and sulfonanilides (Gowda et al., 2007a,b,c,d; Gowda, Kozisek et al., 2007; Gowda et al., 2000).

The conformation of the N—H bond in the structure of 2MPMSA is syn to the ortho-methyl substituent (Fig. 1), in contrast with the anti conformation observed for the meta-methyl-substituted compound (3MPMSA) (Gowda et al., 2007c). The ortho-substitution of the methyl group in N-(phenyl)methanesulfonamde (PMSA) changes its space group from monoclinic P21/c (Klug, 1968) to triclinic P1, compared with the change from monoclinic P21/c to orthorhombic Pccn on meta-methyl substitution (Gowda et al., 2007c).

The bond parameters in PMSA (Klug, 1968), 2MPMSA and 3MPMSA (Gowda et al., 2007c) are similar except for the torsion angles C1—S2—N5—C6, S2—N5—C6—C7, S2—N5—C6—C11, which have the following values: 62.2 (2), 75.5 (2) and -106.6 (2)°, respectively, in PMSA; -64.5 (2), 117.1 (2) and -65.3 (3)°, respectively, in 2MPMSA; 57.9 (3), 68.1 (4) and -114.3 (3)°, respectively, in 3MPMSA. The data included for PMSA are the values determined under the present conditions as the literature values were determined in [Meaning not clear. Text missing?] (Klug, 1968).

The N—H H atom lies alone on one side of the plane of the phenyl group, while

the whole methanesulfonyl group is on the opposite side of the plane, similar to what was observed in PMSA and 3MPMSA. Thus, the amide H atom is available to

a receptor molecule during biological activity.

The molecules in the title compound form centrosymmetric dimers via an N5—H5N···O3(1 - x,-y, 1 - z) hydrogen bond (Table 1 and Fig. 2).

For related literature, see: Gowda et al. (2007a,b,c,d); Gowda, Kozisek et al. (2007); Gowda et al. (2000); Jayalakshmi & Gowda (2004); Klug (1968).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996); cell refinement: CAD-4-PC; data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The hydrogen bonding in the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
N-(2-Methylphenyl)methanesulfonamide top
Crystal data top
C8H11NO2SZ = 2
Mr = 185.24F(000) = 196
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.361 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54180 Å
a = 5.719 (1) ÅCell parameters from 25 reflections
b = 9.041 (1) Åθ = 7.7–23.7°
c = 9.225 (2) ŵ = 2.87 mm1
α = 79.53 (1)°T = 299 K
β = 87.36 (1)°Block, grey
γ = 74.44 (1)°0.13 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm
V = 451.85 (14) Å3
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1259 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.036
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 66.9°, θmin = 4.9°
ω/2θ scansh = 66
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
k = 1010
Tmin = 0.731, Tmax = 0.789l = 010
1713 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
1606 independent reflections intensity decay: 1.8%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039Only H-atom coordinates refined
wR(F2) = 0.098 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0411P)2 + 0.0954P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1606 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
143 parametersΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
1 restraintExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0117 (14)
Crystal data top
C8H11NO2Sγ = 74.44 (1)°
Mr = 185.24V = 451.85 (14) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 5.719 (1) ÅCu Kα radiation
b = 9.041 (1) ŵ = 2.87 mm1
c = 9.225 (2) ÅT = 299 K
α = 79.53 (1)°0.13 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm
β = 87.36 (1)°
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1259 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.036
Tmin = 0.731, Tmax = 0.7893 standard reflections every 120 min
1713 measured reflections intensity decay: 1.8%
1606 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0391 restraint
wR(F2) = 0.098Only H-atom coordinates refined
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.17 e Å3
1606 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
143 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2073 (7)0.0168 (4)0.1937 (4)0.0679 (9)
H1A0.265 (6)0.052 (4)0.124 (4)0.081*
H1B0.142 (6)0.028 (4)0.276 (4)0.081*
H1C0.094 (6)0.114 (4)0.145 (4)0.081*
C60.1994 (4)0.3574 (3)0.2840 (3)0.0404 (5)
C70.2887 (5)0.4558 (3)0.1760 (3)0.0511 (7)
H70.447 (5)0.424 (3)0.142 (3)0.061*
C80.1438 (6)0.6009 (3)0.1180 (3)0.0623 (8)
H80.207 (5)0.668 (4)0.042 (3)0.075*
C90.0875 (6)0.6489 (4)0.1688 (3)0.0648 (8)
H90.194 (6)0.749 (4)0.136 (3)0.078*
C100.1738 (5)0.5531 (4)0.2789 (3)0.0589 (7)
H100.331 (6)0.586 (4)0.316 (3)0.071*
C110.0351 (4)0.4046 (3)0.3388 (3)0.0445 (6)
C120.1334 (6)0.3018 (4)0.4577 (4)0.0625 (8)
H12A0.128 (6)0.210 (4)0.430 (4)0.075*
H12B0.042 (6)0.279 (4)0.546 (4)0.075*
H12C0.289 (6)0.348 (4)0.476 (3)0.075*
N50.3555 (4)0.2077 (2)0.3434 (2)0.0468 (5)
H5N0.348 (5)0.164 (3)0.4324 (15)0.056*
O30.6064 (4)0.0557 (2)0.3450 (2)0.0789 (7)
O40.5642 (4)0.1338 (2)0.1154 (2)0.0607 (5)
S20.45723 (12)0.07166 (7)0.24662 (7)0.0469 (2)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.081 (2)0.066 (2)0.067 (2)0.0319 (18)0.0114 (18)0.0207 (17)
C60.0437 (13)0.0398 (12)0.0373 (12)0.0079 (10)0.0027 (10)0.0098 (10)
C70.0554 (16)0.0479 (14)0.0484 (15)0.0124 (12)0.0083 (13)0.0083 (12)
C80.083 (2)0.0462 (15)0.0524 (17)0.0124 (15)0.0093 (15)0.0053 (13)
C90.079 (2)0.0470 (16)0.0564 (17)0.0033 (15)0.0053 (16)0.0070 (14)
C100.0462 (16)0.0626 (18)0.0629 (18)0.0006 (13)0.0016 (13)0.0190 (15)
C110.0422 (14)0.0506 (14)0.0420 (13)0.0117 (11)0.0021 (10)0.0123 (11)
C120.0543 (18)0.073 (2)0.0635 (19)0.0230 (16)0.0117 (15)0.0131 (17)
N50.0536 (13)0.0458 (12)0.0336 (11)0.0021 (10)0.0019 (9)0.0041 (9)
O30.0951 (16)0.0603 (12)0.0507 (12)0.0292 (11)0.0059 (11)0.0045 (10)
O40.0651 (12)0.0637 (12)0.0509 (11)0.0162 (10)0.0203 (9)0.0105 (9)
S20.0516 (4)0.0431 (4)0.0376 (3)0.0008 (3)0.0031 (2)0.0037 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—S21.749 (4)C9—H90.95 (3)
C1—H1A0.96 (3)C10—C111.392 (4)
C1—H1B0.91 (3)C10—H100.94 (3)
C1—H1C0.99 (3)C11—C121.495 (4)
C6—C71.386 (3)C12—H12A0.90 (3)
C6—C111.395 (3)C12—H12B0.95 (3)
C6—N51.434 (3)C12—H12C0.90 (3)
C7—C81.377 (4)N5—S21.617 (2)
C7—H70.93 (3)N5—H5N0.848 (10)
C8—C91.366 (4)O3—S21.4286 (19)
C8—H80.96 (3)O4—S21.4225 (19)
C9—C101.374 (4)
S2—C1—H1A107 (2)C11—C10—H10117.6 (19)
S2—C1—H1B108 (2)C10—C11—C6116.9 (2)
H1A—C1—H1B114 (3)C10—C11—C12121.2 (3)
S2—C1—H1C106 (2)C6—C11—C12121.9 (2)
H1A—C1—H1C110 (3)C11—C12—H12A111 (2)
H1B—C1—H1C112 (3)C11—C12—H12B112 (2)
C7—C6—C11120.9 (2)H12A—C12—H12B107 (3)
C7—C6—N5118.9 (2)C11—C12—H12C110 (2)
C11—C6—N5120.1 (2)H12A—C12—H12C108 (3)
C8—C7—C6120.2 (3)H12B—C12—H12C109 (3)
C8—C7—H7119.5 (18)C6—N5—S2123.02 (16)
C6—C7—H7120.3 (18)C6—N5—H5N122.6 (19)
C9—C8—C7119.9 (3)S2—N5—H5N108 (2)
C9—C8—H8120.6 (19)O4—S2—O3118.19 (13)
C7—C8—H8119.5 (19)O4—S2—N5109.11 (12)
C8—C9—C10119.9 (3)O3—S2—N5105.40 (12)
C8—C9—H9123.7 (19)O4—S2—C1107.17 (15)
C10—C9—H9116 (2)O3—S2—C1109.20 (17)
C9—C10—C11122.1 (3)N5—S2—C1107.33 (15)
C9—C10—H10120.3 (19)
C11—C6—C7—C81.8 (4)N5—C6—C11—C10178.2 (2)
N5—C6—C7—C8179.3 (2)C7—C6—C11—C12178.6 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C91.0 (5)N5—C6—C11—C121.1 (4)
C7—C8—C9—C100.9 (5)C7—C6—N5—S265.4 (3)
C8—C9—C10—C112.0 (5)C11—C6—N5—S2117.1 (2)
C9—C10—C11—C61.2 (4)C6—N5—S2—O451.3 (2)
C9—C10—C11—C12179.5 (3)C6—N5—S2—O3179.2 (2)
C7—C6—C11—C100.7 (4)C6—N5—S2—C164.5 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5N···O3i0.85 (1)2.10 (1)2.943 (3)170 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H11NO2S
Mr185.24
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)299
a, b, c (Å)5.719 (1), 9.041 (1), 9.225 (2)
α, β, γ (°)79.53 (1), 87.36 (1), 74.44 (1)
V3)451.85 (14)
Z2
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)2.87
Crystal size (mm)0.13 × 0.13 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius CAD-4
Absorption correctionψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.731, 0.789
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1713, 1606, 1259
Rint0.036
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.597
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.039, 0.098, 1.08
No. of reflections1606
No. of parameters143
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentOnly H-atom coordinates refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.17, 0.26

Computer programs: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996), CAD-4-PC, REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), PLATON (Spek, 2003), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5N···O3i0.848 (10)2.104 (12)2.943 (3)170 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+1.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds