supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, m1569    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807021186 ]

A lead-halide ladder complex: catena-poly[bis(2,3-dimethylquinoxalinium) [[di-[mu]2-bromido-bis[dibromoplumbate(II)]]-di-[mu]2-bromido]]

B. F. Ali, R. Al-Far and S. Haddad

Abstract top

In the title compound, {(C10H12N2)2[Pb2Br8]}n, the asymmetric unit consists of half a cation and one-quarter of a doubly-bridged dinuclear anionic unit. The planar cations lies on a twofold axis that runs lengthwise through both rings. The Pb and one Br atoms are located on twofold axes, whereas the second Br atom is located on a mirror plane and the third lies on a general position. The polymeric anion forms an infinite ladder structure running along the c axis with rungs consisting of Pb and bridging Br atoms, with two octahedra sharing edges as the rungs of the ladder and sharing vertices as the rails. There are N-H...Br hydrogen-bonding interactions, ca 3.21 Å, linking the PbBr ladders to the cations.

Comment top

Research in the field of organic inorganic hybrid compounds is of great interest. This is because of the their special magnetic, electronic and optoelectronic properties (Cui et al., 2000; Lacroix et al.,1994; Chakravarthy & Guloy, 1997). Haloplumbates, have demonstrated a structural diversity in lead-halide based organic inorganic hybrids (Billing & Lemerrer, 2005) in particular, in terms of the nets formed by the inorganic components, which show many distinct topologies. Examples are layers of corner sharing octahedra, linear chains of face sharing octahedra as well as a number of mixed intermediates (Billing & Lemerrer, 2005). In the crystal structure of the title complex, (I). The use of 2,3-dimethylquinoxaline (henceforth dmqxH2) and its protonation were expected to create many important centers of interaction with the bromo-lead anion, e.g. NH···Br, CH···Br and possibly Br···aryl and aryl···aryl interactions.

In the title compound, (I), {C10H12Br4N2Pb}n, the asymmetric unit consists of half of the repeated extended structure of both cation and anion. The planar cations [C10H12N2]2+ with both nitrogen atoms protonated, lies on a 2-fold axis that runs lengthwise between the two halves (Fig. 1). The dinuclear unit [Pb2Br10]6- consists of two distorted octahedra bridged by Br3 and its symmetry related Br3i [Symmetry code: (iii) -x + 1, -y, -z + 1). These dinuclear units are further interconnected through bridging Br2 to form a polymeric chain structure developping parallel to the c axis (Fig. 2). This anion chain demonstrates a novel structural arrangement in metal halide extended anion networking.

The Pb—Br distances are similar, 3.0242 (6)–3.0448 (16) Å and fall within the range of Pb—Br distances reported previously for compounds containing lead-bromides (Reynolds et al., 2003; Cui et al., 2000; Klapotke et al., 1999). The bond angles for linear Br—Pb—Br are in the range 170.87 (9)– 174.84 (4)°, while those for perpendicular Br—Pb—Br are in the range 83.85 (5)–94.95 (6)°. In the dmqxH2 cation, the bond distances and angles are the same as those reported previously, within experimental error (Willett & Twamley, 2001).

The extra supramolecularity in the structure is represented by H-bonding (Table 1) leading to a layer arrangement in ac plane.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Billing & Lemerrer (2005); Chakravarthy & Guloy (1997); Cui et al. (2000); Klapotke et al. (1999); Lacroix et al. (1994); Reynolds et al. (2003); Willett & Twamley (2001).

Experimental top

A solution of PbCl2 (1.0 mmol), in absolute ethanol (10 ml), was added to a stirred hot solution of 2,3-dimethylquinoxaline (1 mmol) in absolute ethanol (10 ml) containing 60% HBr (3 ml) and liquid Br2 (2 ml). After heating to reflux for ca 3 h, the mixture was filtered and the filtrate allowed to stand undisturbed at room temperature. Complex (I) crystallized out over 2 days as red blocks. Crystals were filtered off, washed with diethyl ether and dried under vacuum.

Refinement top

All H atoms were initially located in a difference Fourier map and were subsequently refined using a riding model, with C—H distances of 0.96 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5eq(C) for methyl H atoms; C—H = 0.96 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2eq(C) for aromatic H atoms, and N—H = 0.86 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2eq(N).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2000); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Displacement ellpisoid (30%) plot of (I), showing the atom-numbering scheme. The complete coordination about Pb1 and cation have been included. [Symmetry codes: (i) 1 - x, -y, 1 - z; (ii) x, y, 1 + z; (iii) 1 - x, - y, 1 - z; (iv) x, 1 - y, z; (v) 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z; (vi) 2 - x, y, -z].
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of unit cell approximately down a axis showing H-bonding between Br1 and N3.
catena-poly[bis(2,3-dimethylquinoxalinium) [[di-µ2-bromido-bis[dibromoplumbate(II)]]-di-µ2-bromido]] top
Crystal data top
(C10H12N2)2[Pb2Br8]F(000) = 1232
Mr = 1374.04Dx = 2.918 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yCell parameters from 3034 reflections
a = 9.4180 (19) Åθ = 1.5–27.9°
b = 28.141 (6) ŵ = 20.99 mm1
c = 6.0290 (12) ÅT = 295 K
β = 101.83 (3)°Block, red
V = 1563.9 (6) Å30.20 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury CCD
diffractometer
1419 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube875 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.092
Detector resolution: 14.6306 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.2°, θmin = 3.1°
dtintegrate.ref scansh = 1111
Absorption correction: numerical
(SHAPE Tracing Software; Rigaku, 2000)
k = 3333
Tmin = 0.102, Tmax = 0.228l = 76
7780 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.123H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.73 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0005P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1419 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
81 parametersΔρmax = 2.30 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 1.46 e Å3
Crystal data top
(C10H12N2)2[Pb2Br8]V = 1563.9 (6) Å3
Mr = 1374.04Z = 2
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation
a = 9.4180 (19) ŵ = 20.99 mm1
b = 28.141 (6) ÅT = 295 K
c = 6.0290 (12) Å0.20 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm
β = 101.83 (3)°
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury CCD
diffractometer
1419 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
(SHAPE Tracing Software; Rigaku, 2000)
875 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.102, Tmax = 0.228Rint = 0.092
7780 measured reflectionsθmax = 25.2°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.123Δρmax = 2.30 e Å3
S = 0.73Δρmin = 1.46 e Å3
1419 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
81 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Pb10.50000.57831 (3)0.50000.0288 (3)
Br10.73667 (15)0.65358 (6)0.5497 (2)0.0386 (5)
Br20.50000.58691 (8)0.00000.0475 (7)
Br30.2733 (2)0.50000.4132 (4)0.0358 (6)
C10.9022 (16)0.5680 (5)0.167 (3)0.038 (4)
H1A0.97850.55510.28170.057*
H1B0.87620.54550.04610.057*
H1C0.81920.57460.23160.057*
C20.9527 (13)0.6126 (5)0.078 (2)0.027 (3)
C40.9533 (12)0.6952 (5)0.076 (2)0.027 (3)
C50.9127 (14)0.7363 (5)0.169 (2)0.034 (4)
H50.85980.73620.28290.040*
C60.9558 (15)0.7782 (6)0.080 (2)0.045 (4)
H60.92490.80710.12830.054*
N30.9122 (11)0.6516 (4)0.1469 (17)0.022 (2)
H3A0.85610.65100.24290.026*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Pb10.0225 (4)0.0360 (6)0.0290 (5)0.0000.0080 (3)0.000
Br10.0285 (8)0.0535 (12)0.0373 (9)0.0104 (7)0.0145 (7)0.0096 (7)
Br20.0521 (15)0.0652 (18)0.0253 (13)0.0000.0083 (11)0.000
Br30.0244 (11)0.0332 (14)0.0494 (14)0.0000.0066 (9)0.000
C10.042 (9)0.042 (10)0.036 (9)0.002 (8)0.021 (8)0.004 (8)
C20.023 (7)0.033 (9)0.024 (8)0.001 (7)0.001 (6)0.001 (7)
C40.015 (6)0.040 (10)0.024 (8)0.003 (7)0.003 (5)0.002 (7)
C50.037 (8)0.036 (10)0.032 (9)0.002 (8)0.016 (7)0.003 (8)
C60.045 (10)0.055 (12)0.037 (10)0.011 (8)0.013 (7)0.012 (8)
N30.023 (6)0.018 (7)0.025 (6)0.000 (5)0.010 (5)0.003 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Pb1—Br23.0242 (6)C4—C51.372 (18)
Pb1—Br33.0380 (14)C4—N31.381 (16)
Pb1—Br13.0448 (16)C4—C4i1.40 (2)
C1—C21.481 (18)C5—C61.389 (19)
C1—H1A0.9600C5—H50.9300
C1—H1B0.9600C6—C6i1.40 (3)
C1—H1C0.9600C6—H60.9300
C2—N31.262 (15)N3—H3A0.8600
C2—C2i1.42 (2)
Br2ii—Pb1—Br2170.81 (9)H1B—C1—H1C109.5
Br2ii—Pb1—Br394.95 (6)N3—C2—C2i119.4 (8)
Br2—Pb1—Br391.71 (6)N3—C2—C1118.4 (12)
Br3—Pb1—Br3iii87.00 (6)C2i—C2—C1122.2 (8)
Br2ii—Pb1—Br189.76 (5)C5—C4—N3120.4 (12)
Br2—Pb1—Br183.85 (5)N3—C4—C4i117.2 (7)
Br3—Pb1—Br1174.84 (4)C4—C5—C6115.6 (13)
Br3iii—Pb1—Br190.76 (4)C4—C5—H5122.2
Br1—Pb1—Br1iv91.84 (6)C6—C5—H5122.2
Pb1—Br3—Pb1iii93.00 (6)C5—C6—C6i121.9 (8)
C2—C1—H1A109.5C5—C6—H6119.1
C2—C1—H1B109.5C2—N3—C4123.3 (12)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C2—N3—H3A118.3
C2—C1—H1C109.5C4—N3—H3A118.3
H1A—C1—H1C109.5
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, y, −z; (ii) x, y, z+1; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) −x+1, y, −z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3A···Br10.862.353.206 (10)171
C1—H1C···Br20.963.063.752 (14)130
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3A···Br10.862.353.206 (10)171
C1—H1C···Br20.963.063.752 (14)130
Acknowledgements top

This research was supported by Al al-Bayt University and Al-Balqa'a Applied University.

references
References top

Billing, D. G. & Lemerrer, A. (2005). Acta Cryst. A61, C357–?.

Bruker (1999). SHELXTL. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Chakravarthy, V. & Guloy, A. M. (1997). Chem. Commun. pp. 697–698.

Cui, Y., Ren, J., Chen, G., Yu, W.-C. & Qian, Y. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, e552–e553.

Klapotke, T. M., Knizek, J., Noth, H. & Krumm, B. (1999). Polyhedron, 18, 839–844.

Lacroix, P. G., Clement, R., Nakatani, K., Zyss, J. & Ledoux, I. (1994). Science, 263, 658–660.

Reynolds, K., Willett, R. D. & Twamley, B. (2003). Acta Cryst. E59, m402–m404.

Rigaku (2000). CrystalClear (Version 1.3) and SHAPE Tracing Software. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Willett, R. D. & Twamley, B. (2001). Acta Cryst. C57, 706–708.