Download citation
Download citation
link to html
(1R,2S,5R,6S,9S,10R)-Hexabromo­cyclo­dodecane (C12H18Br6, δ-HBCD) was crystallized from acetonitrile. The C—Br distances range from 1.962 (8) to 1.982 (8) Å and inter­molecular Br...Br contacts contribute to the formation of layers.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807026396/bt2387sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807026396/bt2387Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 654876

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 294 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.013 Å
  • R factor = 0.045
  • wR factor = 0.107
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 24.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT341_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 13 PLAT410_ALERT_2_C Short Intra H...H Contact H7A .. H10 .. 1.99 Ang.
Alert level G PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C1 = ... R PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C2 = ... S PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C5 = ... R PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C6 = ... S PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C9 = ... S PLAT793_ALERT_1_G Check the Absolute Configuration of C10 = ... R
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 6 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 6 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

1,2,5,6,9,10-Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) is a widely used brominated flame retardant with a complex stereochemistry (Heeb et al., 2005; Law et al., 2005). The commercial HBCD mixture consists largely of a mixture of three diastereomeric pairs of enantiomers, termed (±) α, β, and γ-HBCD with the γ-isomers as main component (Groweiss et al., 1991; Becher, 2005). Recently the presence of small amounts of δ- and ε-HBCD diastereomers in both technical mixture and environmental samples has been reported (Heeb et al., 2005; Dodder et al., 2006). HBCD has been subject of intensitive studies (i.e. Heeb et al., 2007) as a result of its persistence in the environment, its potential bioactivity and increasing levels in the biosphere (Vos et al., 2003; Covaci et al., 2006; BSEF, 2007). After elucidation of the crystal structure of the six main stereoisomers of the technical mixture (Koeppen et al., 2007,), we directed our attention to the two minor diastereomers. Recently both minor diastereomers were characterized by NMR and their order of elution on a C18 stationary phase was determined (Arsenault et al., 2007). Furthermore, no attempt was made to confirm absolute configurations of δ- and ε-HBCD using single-crystal X-ray crystallography. The knowledge of the three-dimensional structures of all HBCD diastereomers occurring in the environment is necessary for the understanding of the bioaccumulation and the potentially bioisomerization of HBCD. The average C—Br distance in the title compound (Fig. 1) [1.972 (8) Å] is in good agreement with those in the other stereoisomeres (dav(C—Br)=1.962 (10) -1.974 (13) Å, Koeppen et al., 2007). The average C—C distance of 1.520 (12) Å is also in good agreement with the distances observed in the other HBCD compounds.

The packing of the molecules is mainly influenced by Br···Br interactions. The observed Br···Br contacts range from 3.611 (3) to 3.664 (3) Å and can be classified both as type I (Br5···Br10, d=3.611 (3) Å, θ1=136.69°, θ2=154.01°) and II (Br2···Br9, d=3.664 (3) Å, θ1=83.75°, θ2=162.48°) contacts, whereas the latter is polarization-induced and contributes actively to crystal structure stabilization (Pedireddi et al., 1994). These contacts lead to the formation of layers parallel to the b-c plane, stacked along the a direction (Fig. 2). The shortest centroid to centroid distances between two HBCD molecules of different layers amount to 5.864 (8) and 5.985 (9) Å, respectively.

Related literature top

The corresponding α,-β,- and γ-stereoisomers of HBCD form comparable Br···Br contacts (Koeppen et al., 2007).

For related literature, see: Arsenault et al. (2007); BSEF (2007); Becher (2005); Covaci et al. (2006); Dodder et al. (2006); Groweiss et al. (1991); Heeb et al. (2005, 2007); Law et al. (2005); Pedireddi et al. (1994); Vos et al. (2003).

Experimental top

1R,2S,5R,6S,9S,10R-Hexabromocyclododecane (δ-HBCD) was obtained by bromination of trans,trans,trans-cyclododeca-1,5,9-triene (t,t,t-CDT), as illustrated in the reaction scheme (Fig. 3). δ-HBCD was isolated from the reaction mixture by preparative HPLC (C-18 column). For single-crystal x-ray crystallography colourless crystals of δ-HBCD were grown by solvent evaporation from acetonitrile at ambient temperature. LC—MS/MS-experiments ([M—H]-(m/z 640.6) [Br]-(m/z 79.0)) using a combination of a Zorbax XBD-C18 (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and a chiral NUCLEODEX β-PM (Macherey- Nagel GmbH & Co, Düren, Germany) analytical column shows that δ-HBCD elute between (-)α- and (+)α-HBCD. This corresponds to the results reported in literature (i. e. Arsenault et al., 2007). Spectroscopic Analysis, IR (microscope, cm-1): 2960, 2937, 2924, 2890, 2862, 2848, 1736, 1459, 1441, 1421, 1373, 1335, 1297, 1278, 1260, 1239, 1157, 1105, 1056, 1037, 1021, 1003, 985, 907, 863, 787, 751, 742, 735, 672, 645, 602.

Refinement top

All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The hydrogen atoms were located in difference maps but positioned with idealized geometry and refined using the riding model, with C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(parent atom).

Structure description top

1,2,5,6,9,10-Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) is a widely used brominated flame retardant with a complex stereochemistry (Heeb et al., 2005; Law et al., 2005). The commercial HBCD mixture consists largely of a mixture of three diastereomeric pairs of enantiomers, termed (±) α, β, and γ-HBCD with the γ-isomers as main component (Groweiss et al., 1991; Becher, 2005). Recently the presence of small amounts of δ- and ε-HBCD diastereomers in both technical mixture and environmental samples has been reported (Heeb et al., 2005; Dodder et al., 2006). HBCD has been subject of intensitive studies (i.e. Heeb et al., 2007) as a result of its persistence in the environment, its potential bioactivity and increasing levels in the biosphere (Vos et al., 2003; Covaci et al., 2006; BSEF, 2007). After elucidation of the crystal structure of the six main stereoisomers of the technical mixture (Koeppen et al., 2007,), we directed our attention to the two minor diastereomers. Recently both minor diastereomers were characterized by NMR and their order of elution on a C18 stationary phase was determined (Arsenault et al., 2007). Furthermore, no attempt was made to confirm absolute configurations of δ- and ε-HBCD using single-crystal X-ray crystallography. The knowledge of the three-dimensional structures of all HBCD diastereomers occurring in the environment is necessary for the understanding of the bioaccumulation and the potentially bioisomerization of HBCD. The average C—Br distance in the title compound (Fig. 1) [1.972 (8) Å] is in good agreement with those in the other stereoisomeres (dav(C—Br)=1.962 (10) -1.974 (13) Å, Koeppen et al., 2007). The average C—C distance of 1.520 (12) Å is also in good agreement with the distances observed in the other HBCD compounds.

The packing of the molecules is mainly influenced by Br···Br interactions. The observed Br···Br contacts range from 3.611 (3) to 3.664 (3) Å and can be classified both as type I (Br5···Br10, d=3.611 (3) Å, θ1=136.69°, θ2=154.01°) and II (Br2···Br9, d=3.664 (3) Å, θ1=83.75°, θ2=162.48°) contacts, whereas the latter is polarization-induced and contributes actively to crystal structure stabilization (Pedireddi et al., 1994). These contacts lead to the formation of layers parallel to the b-c plane, stacked along the a direction (Fig. 2). The shortest centroid to centroid distances between two HBCD molecules of different layers amount to 5.864 (8) and 5.985 (9) Å, respectively.

The corresponding α,-β,- and γ-stereoisomers of HBCD form comparable Br···Br contacts (Koeppen et al., 2007).

For related literature, see: Arsenault et al. (2007); BSEF (2007); Becher (2005); Covaci et al. (2006); Dodder et al. (2006); Groweiss et al. (1991); Heeb et al. (2005, 2007); Law et al. (2005); Pedireddi et al. (1994); Vos et al. (2003).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of HBCD with labelling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing, showing the layers of HBCD molecules parallel to the b-c plane, connected by Br···Br contacts (green lines).
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. General reaction scheme of synthesis of δ- and ε-HBCD.
(1R,2S,5R,6S,9S,10R)-Hexabromocyclododecane top
Crystal data top
C12H18Br6Z = 2
Mr = 641.72F(000) = 600
Triclinic, P1Dx = 2.407 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.218 (6) ÅCell parameters from 102 reflections
b = 10.664 (7) Åθ = 3.5–28°
c = 10.807 (7) ŵ = 13.58 mm1
α = 116.807 (8)°T = 294 K
β = 96.310 (9)°Block, colourless
γ = 104.703 (9)°0.12 × 0.11 × 0.1 mm
V = 885.6 (10) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
4046 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2183 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.060
ω scansθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(SAINT; Bruker, 2001)
h = 119
Tmin = 0.194, Tmax = 0.257k = 1013
6072 measured reflectionsl = 1314
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.107H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.87 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0366P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4046 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.007
165 parametersΔρmax = 0.66 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.79 e Å3
Crystal data top
C12H18Br6γ = 104.703 (9)°
Mr = 641.72V = 885.6 (10) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 9.218 (6) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 10.664 (7) ŵ = 13.58 mm1
c = 10.807 (7) ÅT = 294 K
α = 116.807 (8)°0.12 × 0.11 × 0.1 mm
β = 96.310 (9)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
4046 independent reflections
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(SAINT; Bruker, 2001)
2183 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.194, Tmax = 0.257Rint = 0.060
6072 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0450 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.107H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.87Δρmax = 0.66 e Å3
4046 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.79 e Å3
165 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.15295 (11)0.27503 (12)0.38667 (10)0.0522 (3)
Br20.42537 (11)0.58963 (12)0.68589 (11)0.0527 (3)
Br50.29225 (11)0.57767 (11)1.09885 (10)0.0509 (3)
Br60.01545 (11)0.26237 (13)1.05275 (11)0.0550 (3)
Br90.56301 (10)0.01812 (12)0.77553 (10)0.0475 (3)
Br100.25800 (11)0.22121 (11)0.46069 (10)0.0530 (3)
C10.2920 (9)0.2702 (10)0.5343 (8)0.040 (2)
H10.39290.27940.51170.048*
C20.3175 (9)0.4033 (9)0.6823 (9)0.035 (2)
H20.38910.39460.74960.043*
C30.1755 (10)0.4198 (10)0.7442 (9)0.042 (2)
H3A0.19910.52510.81160.051*
H3B0.08890.39120.66590.051*
C40.1214 (9)0.3341 (10)0.8186 (8)0.038 (2)
H4A0.08920.22830.74920.045*
H4B0.03030.35430.84790.045*
C50.2374 (9)0.3656 (10)0.9492 (8)0.036 (2)
H50.33210.35350.91990.043*
C60.1904 (9)0.2662 (10)1.0140 (9)0.036 (2)
H60.26650.31001.10590.044*
C70.1842 (9)0.1070 (10)0.9223 (9)0.039 (2)
H7A0.11710.06520.82750.047*
H7B0.13870.04800.96420.047*
C80.3428 (9)0.0945 (10)0.9078 (8)0.042 (2)
H8A0.38920.08600.98740.050*
H8B0.40830.18640.91630.050*
C90.3434 (9)0.0364 (10)0.7682 (9)0.037 (2)
H90.28940.12990.76560.044*
C100.2658 (9)0.0404 (9)0.6350 (8)0.034 (2)
H100.15810.04820.63800.041*
C110.3370 (9)0.0978 (9)0.6213 (8)0.034 (2)
H11A0.36920.18600.71570.041*
H11B0.42930.09070.58710.041*
C120.2291 (9)0.1175 (10)0.5215 (8)0.037 (2)
H12A0.12890.10500.54330.044*
H12B0.21390.04070.42330.044*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0463 (6)0.0689 (8)0.0452 (6)0.0099 (5)0.0026 (4)0.0388 (6)
Br20.0551 (7)0.0439 (7)0.0621 (7)0.0064 (5)0.0154 (5)0.0341 (6)
Br50.0488 (6)0.0401 (7)0.0510 (6)0.0162 (5)0.0066 (5)0.0134 (5)
Br60.0478 (6)0.0791 (9)0.0723 (7)0.0349 (5)0.0385 (5)0.0532 (7)
Br90.0394 (6)0.0548 (7)0.0606 (6)0.0240 (5)0.0189 (5)0.0333 (6)
Br100.0492 (6)0.0407 (7)0.0491 (6)0.0092 (5)0.0144 (5)0.0092 (5)
C10.033 (5)0.049 (7)0.033 (5)0.007 (4)0.009 (4)0.021 (5)
C20.031 (5)0.038 (6)0.040 (5)0.007 (4)0.008 (4)0.024 (5)
C30.045 (6)0.043 (6)0.050 (6)0.019 (5)0.023 (5)0.028 (5)
C40.029 (5)0.053 (7)0.033 (5)0.011 (4)0.009 (4)0.025 (5)
C50.033 (5)0.042 (6)0.023 (5)0.009 (4)0.006 (4)0.010 (4)
C60.038 (5)0.032 (6)0.033 (5)0.009 (4)0.014 (4)0.012 (5)
C70.044 (6)0.033 (6)0.045 (6)0.016 (4)0.020 (4)0.019 (5)
C80.035 (6)0.048 (7)0.037 (5)0.019 (4)0.009 (4)0.015 (5)
C90.032 (5)0.039 (6)0.054 (6)0.014 (4)0.019 (4)0.032 (5)
C100.032 (5)0.035 (6)0.032 (5)0.013 (4)0.009 (4)0.014 (4)
C110.027 (5)0.030 (6)0.035 (5)0.008 (4)0.006 (4)0.008 (4)
C120.036 (5)0.043 (6)0.027 (5)0.009 (4)0.003 (4)0.017 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—C11.962 (8)C5—H50.9800
Br2—C21.964 (8)C6—C71.512 (11)
Br5—C51.981 (8)C6—H60.9800
Br6—C61.982 (8)C7—C81.520 (10)
Br9—C91.973 (8)C7—H7A0.9700
Br10—C101.973 (8)C7—H7B0.9700
C1—C121.518 (12)C8—C91.526 (11)
C1—C21.526 (11)C8—H8A0.9700
C1—H10.9800C8—H8B0.9700
C2—C31.548 (10)C9—C101.513 (10)
C2—H20.9800C9—H90.9800
C3—C41.501 (11)C10—C111.534 (11)
C3—H3A0.9700C10—H100.9800
C3—H3B0.9700C11—C121.508 (11)
C4—C51.519 (10)C11—H11A0.9700
C4—H4A0.9700C11—H11B0.9700
C4—H4B0.9700C12—H12A0.9700
C5—C61.518 (12)C12—H12B0.9700
C12—C1—C2115.5 (7)C6—C7—C8113.2 (7)
C12—C1—Br1108.2 (5)C6—C7—H7A108.9
C2—C1—Br1110.9 (6)C8—C7—H7A108.9
C12—C1—H1107.3C6—C7—H7B108.9
C2—C1—H1107.3C8—C7—H7B108.9
Br1—C1—H1107.3H7A—C7—H7B107.8
C1—C2—C3118.6 (7)C7—C8—C9115.6 (6)
C1—C2—Br2109.7 (5)C7—C8—H8A108.4
C3—C2—Br2108.8 (6)C9—C8—H8A108.4
C1—C2—H2106.4C7—C8—H8B108.4
C3—C2—H2106.4C9—C8—H8B108.4
Br2—C2—H2106.4H8A—C8—H8B107.4
C4—C3—C2118.6 (8)C10—C9—C8113.5 (7)
C4—C3—H3A107.7C10—C9—Br9110.7 (5)
C2—C3—H3A107.7C8—C9—Br9106.5 (5)
C4—C3—H3B107.7C10—C9—H9108.7
C2—C3—H3B107.7C8—C9—H9108.7
H3A—C3—H3B107.1Br9—C9—H9108.7
C3—C4—C5116.8 (7)C9—C10—C11115.6 (7)
C3—C4—H4A108.1C9—C10—Br10110.5 (6)
C5—C4—H4A108.1C11—C10—Br10109.4 (5)
C3—C4—H4B108.1C9—C10—H10107.0
C5—C4—H4B108.1C11—C10—H10107.0
H4A—C4—H4B107.3Br10—C10—H10107.0
C6—C5—C4117.0 (7)C12—C11—C10114.2 (6)
C6—C5—Br5109.5 (5)C12—C11—H11A108.7
C4—C5—Br5108.9 (6)C10—C11—H11A108.7
C6—C5—H5107.0C12—C11—H11B108.7
C4—C5—H5107.0C10—C11—H11B108.7
Br5—C5—H5107.0H11A—C11—H11B107.6
C7—C6—C5114.4 (7)C11—C12—C1112.1 (6)
C7—C6—Br6108.6 (5)C11—C12—H12A109.2
C5—C6—Br6109.9 (6)C1—C12—H12A109.2
C7—C6—H6107.9C11—C12—H12B109.2
C5—C6—H6107.9C1—C12—H12B109.2
Br6—C6—H6107.9H12A—C12—H12B107.9

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H18Br6
Mr641.72
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)294
a, b, c (Å)9.218 (6), 10.664 (7), 10.807 (7)
α, β, γ (°)116.807 (8), 96.310 (9), 104.703 (9)
V3)885.6 (10)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)13.58
Crystal size (mm)0.12 × 0.11 × 0.1
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEX CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionψ scan
(SAINT; Bruker, 2001)
Tmin, Tmax0.194, 0.257
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6072, 4046, 2183
Rint0.060
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.651
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.045, 0.107, 0.87
No. of reflections4046
No. of parameters165
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.66, 0.79

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2001), SMART, SAINT (Bruker, 2001), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2001).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds