supplementary materials


ci2386 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, m1892    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807027444 ]

1,1'-(Ethane-1,2-diyl)dipyridinium dibromidodichloridomercurate(II)

Q.-L. Wang, C.-C. Yang, Y.-Y. Niu, X.-C. Liu and S. W. Ng

Abstract top

The Hg atom in the title compound, (C12H14N2)[HgBr2Cl2], is coordinated by four halogen atoms in a tetrahedral geometry. The cation lies on a centre of inversion and the anion about a mirror plane. The two halogen atoms on the mirror plane are disordered between Br and Cl in ratios of 0.921 (4):0.079 (4) and 0.795 (4):0.205 (4). The halogen atom in the general position is disordered between Br and Cl in a ratio of 0.142 (1):0.858 (1).

Comment top

The discrete tetrahedral tetrahalogenomercurate(II) dianion is characterized in a number of salts (Allen, 2002; CSD Version 5.28); examples of the ammonium salts include, for example, bis(tetramethylammonium) tetrachloromercurate (Amami et al., 2002), bis(tetramethylammonium) tetrabromomercurate (Kamenar & Nagl, 1976) and bis(tetramethylammonium) tetraiodomercurate (Pakhomov et al., 1991; Pickardt et al., 2006). The mercury atom in [C12H14N2][HgBr2Cl2] is coordinated by four halogen atoms in a tetrahedral geometry; the halogen atoms are disordered (Fig. 1). Selected bond distances are given in Table 1.

Related literature top

For ammonium salts of tetrahalogenomercurates(II), see: Allen (2002); Amami et al. (2002); Kamenar & Nagl (1976); Pakhomov et al. (1991); Pickardt et al. (2006). For the synthesis of the organic component, see: Xiao et al. (2006).

Experimental top

The salt was synthesized from the reaction of ethane-1,2-dipyridinium dibromide (0.035 g, 0.1 mmol) in methanol (5 ml) and mercuric chloride (0.054 g, 0.2 mmol) in DMF (10 ml). The mixture was set aside for the formation of colorless needle-shaped crystals in 40% yield after several days. A needle was cut to give a columnar specimen. The organic reactant was synthesized by using a literature method (Xiao et al., 2006).

Refinement top

Of the three halogens in the asymmetric unit, one lies in a general position and the other two on a mirror plane. Initial attempts to refine the structure with either three chlorines or three bromines gave unacceptably high R-indices and large peaks/deep holes. The three halogen atoms were then refined as three (Br+Cl) mixtures; one attempt allowed the mixtures to have the same displacement parameters as well as sharing the same site. Another attempt had the components having the same displacement parameters only. The second led to a formulation consisting of approximately two Br and two Cl atoms. The use of a restraint that fixed the number of Br and Cl atoms as exactly two each led to occupancies of 0.142 (1), 0.921 (4) and 0.795 (4), respectively, for Br1, Br2 and Br3, and 0.858 (1), 0.079 (4) and 0.205 (4), respectively, for Cl1, Cl2 and Cl3. The formulation is in fair agreement with CH&N elemental analysis.

Disorder also affected the cation; the pyridyl ring was refined as a rigid hexagon (C—C = C—N = 1.39 Å). The C(sp3)—C(sp3) distance was restrained to 1.50 (1) Å, and the N···C(sp3) distance to 2.45 (1) Å. The displacement parameters of atoms of the cation were restrained to be nearly isotropic. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C–H = 0.93 and 0.97 Å), and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

The final difference Fourier map had a large peak at 0.89 Å from N1, indicating a possible disorder in the cation. But no suitable disorder model was found for the cation.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2007).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of [C12H14N2][HgBr2Cl2], with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. The bromine and chlorine atoms are disordered; the figures depicts the anion as an [HgX4]2− species. The halogen atom in the general position is labelled X1 (and the symmetry-related X1i); those in the special position are labelled X2 and X3. Hydrogen atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radius. [Symmetry code (i): x, 3/2 – y, z.]. Unlabelled atoms in the cation are related to the labelled ones by the symmetry code (1 – x, 1 – y, 1 – z).
1,1'-(Ethane-1,2-diyl)dipyridinium dibromidodichloridomercurate(II) top
Crystal data top
(C12H14N2)[HgBr2Cl2]F000 = 1136
Mr = 617.56Dx = 2.382 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2nCell parameters from 2764 reflections
a = 17.952 (1) Åθ = 2.3–22.7º
b = 14.381 (1) ŵ = 13.88 mm1
c = 6.6707 (5) ÅT = 298 (2) K
V = 1722.1 (2) Å3Column, colourless
Z = 40.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEX area-detector
diffractometer
1573 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1395 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.038
T = 298(2) Kθmax = 25.0º
φ and ω scansθmin = 2.3º
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 21→20
Tmin = 0.168, Tmax = 0.338k = 16→17
9021 measured reflectionsl = 7→7
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.102  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0654P)2 + 2.4853P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1572 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.40 e Å3
92 parametersΔρmin = 1.17 e Å3
57 restraintsExtinction correction: none
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Crystal data top
(C12H14N2)[HgBr2Cl2]V = 1722.1 (2) Å3
Mr = 617.56Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα
a = 17.952 (1) ŵ = 13.88 mm1
b = 14.381 (1) ÅT = 298 (2) K
c = 6.6707 (5) Å0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEX area-detector
diffractometer
1573 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
1395 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.168, Tmax = 0.338Rint = 0.038
9021 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.03457 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.102H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05Δρmax = 1.40 e Å3
1572 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.17 e Å3
92 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Hg10.92942 (2)0.75000.65028 (6)0.0427 (2)
Br10.913 (4)0.606 (5)0.471 (9)0.058 (2)0.142 (1)
Cl10.9142 (14)0.6012 (19)0.441 (3)0.058 (2)0.858 (1)
Br20.8251 (2)0.75000.9091 (3)0.0849 (8)0.921 (4)
Cl20.821 (8)0.75000.853 (14)0.0849 (8)0.079 (4)
Br31.06769 (13)0.75000.7582 (4)0.0631 (7)0.795 (4)
Cl31.0543 (16)0.75000.818 (5)0.0631 (7)0.205 (4)
N10.59356 (19)0.5290 (3)0.4047 (7)0.066 (2)
C10.6519 (3)0.5275 (4)0.5418 (6)0.078 (3)
H10.64790.49240.65830.094*
C20.7161 (2)0.5786 (4)0.5046 (7)0.057 (2)
H20.75510.57760.59630.068*
C30.7221 (2)0.6311 (4)0.3304 (7)0.059 (2)
H30.76510.66530.30560.071*
C40.6638 (3)0.6325 (4)0.1933 (6)0.055 (2)
H40.66780.66770.07680.067*
C50.5995 (2)0.5815 (4)0.2305 (7)0.064 (2)
H50.56050.58240.13880.077*
C60.5273 (3)0.4739 (4)0.4394 (11)0.075 (3)
H6A0.54070.41700.50850.090*
H6B0.50500.45720.31180.090*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Hg10.0363 (3)0.0426 (3)0.0491 (3)0.0000.00310 (16)0.000
Br10.0424 (11)0.064 (3)0.067 (7)0.0014 (15)0.001 (4)0.031 (4)
Cl10.0424 (11)0.064 (3)0.067 (7)0.0014 (15)0.001 (4)0.031 (4)
Br20.0753 (12)0.1119 (13)0.0676 (17)0.0000.0385 (16)0.000
Cl20.0753 (12)0.1119 (13)0.0676 (17)0.0000.0385 (16)0.000
Br30.0350 (12)0.0791 (11)0.0751 (19)0.0000.0030 (9)0.000
Cl30.0350 (12)0.0791 (11)0.0751 (19)0.0000.0030 (9)0.000
N10.031 (3)0.096 (5)0.072 (4)0.011 (4)0.002 (3)0.031 (4)
C10.057 (5)0.104 (6)0.075 (6)0.010 (5)0.009 (4)0.033 (5)
C20.025 (4)0.069 (5)0.076 (5)0.003 (3)0.008 (3)0.017 (4)
C30.041 (4)0.066 (5)0.070 (5)0.009 (4)0.004 (4)0.016 (4)
C40.049 (5)0.054 (4)0.063 (4)0.015 (4)0.004 (4)0.010 (4)
C50.047 (4)0.075 (5)0.070 (5)0.011 (4)0.004 (4)0.022 (4)
C60.087 (6)0.066 (5)0.073 (5)0.018 (5)0.008 (5)0.008 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Hg1—Cl22.37 (11)C1—H10.93
Hg1—Br12.41 (5)C2—C31.39
Hg1—Br1i2.41 (5)C2—H20.93
Hg1—Cl32.50 (3)C3—C41.39
Hg1—Br22.548 (3)C3—H30.93
Hg1—Cl1i2.571 (19)C4—C51.39
Hg1—Cl12.571 (19)C4—H40.93
Hg1—Br32.584 (3)C5—H50.93
N1—C11.39C6—C6ii1.476 (6)
N1—C51.39C6—H6A0.97
N1—C61.448 (6)C6—H6B0.97
C1—C21.39
Cl2—Hg1—Br1i101 (2)C1—N1—C5120.0
Cl2—Hg1—Br1101 (2)C1—N1—C6120.4 (4)
Br1i—Hg1—Br1119 (4)C5—N1—C6119.6 (4)
Cl2—Hg1—Cl3119 (3)N1—C1—C2120.0
Br1i—Hg1—Cl3109.1 (17)N1—C1—H1120.0
Br1—Hg1—Cl3109.1 (17)C2—C1—H1120.0
Br1i—Hg1—Br2104.4 (16)C3—C2—C1120.0
Br1—Hg1—Br2104.4 (16)C3—C2—H2120.0
Cl3—Hg1—Br2110.9 (6)C1—C2—H2120.0
Cl2—Hg1—Cl1i103.0 (16)C4—C3—C2120.0
Br1—Hg1—Cl1i115.7 (11)C4—C3—H3120.0
Cl3—Hg1—Cl1i109.7 (7)C2—C3—H3120.0
Br2—Hg1—Cl1i106.9 (6)C3—C4—C5120.0
Cl2—Hg1—Cl1103.0 (16)C3—C4—H4120.0
Br1i—Hg1—Cl1115.7 (11)C5—C4—H4120.0
Cl3—Hg1—Cl1109.7 (6)C4—C5—N1120.0
Br2—Hg1—Cl1106.9 (6)C4—C5—H5120.0
Cl1i—Hg1—Cl1112.7 (13)N1—C5—H5120.0
Cl2—Hg1—Br3129 (3)N1—C6—C6ii110.8 (6)
Br1i—Hg1—Br3104.6 (16)N1—C6—H6A109.5
Br1—Hg1—Br3104.6 (16)C6ii—C6—H6A109.5
Br2—Hg1—Br3121.16 (9)N1—C6—H6B109.5
Cl1i—Hg1—Br3104.7 (6)C6ii—C6—H6B109.5
Cl1—Hg1—Br3104.7 (6)H6A—C6—H6B108.1
C6—N1—C1—C2178.2 (3)C1—N1—C6—C6ii87.7 (9)
C6—N1—C5—C4178.2 (3)C5—N1—C6—C6ii94.1 (9)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+3/2, z; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.
Selected geometric parameters (Å) top
Hg1—Cl22.37 (11)Hg1—Br22.548 (3)
Hg1—Br12.41 (5)Hg1—Cl12.571 (19)
Hg1—Cl32.50 (3)Hg1—Br32.584 (3)
Acknowledgements top

The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 20671083), the Henan Province Excellent Young Foundation (grant No. 0612002800), Zhengzhou University and the University of Malaya for supporting this work. We thank Central China Normal University for the diffraction measurements.

references
References top

Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388.

Amami, M., van Smaalen, S., Palatinus, L., ben Salah, A., Helluy, X. & Sebald, A. (2002). Z. Kristallogr. 217, 532–541.

Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189–191.

Bruker (2004). SAINT (Version 6.45a) and SMART (Version 6.45a). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. [These programs do not have concurrent version numbers - please provide correct values]

Kamenar, B. & Nagl, A. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 1414–1417.

Pakhomov, V. I., Goryunov, A. V. & Ivanova-Korfini, I. N. (1991). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 36, 83–85.

Pickardt, J., Wiese, S. & Borowski, M. (2006). Z. Naturforsch. 61b, 935–941.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Westrip, S. P. (2007). publCIF. In preparation,

Xiao, X., Tao, Z., Ge, J.-Y. & Ma, P. H. (2006). Acta Chim. Sinica, 64, 131–138.