Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The structure of the title organic–inorganic hybrid material, C8H12N+·NO3, results mainly from electrostatic inter­actions and bifurcated N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Organic 2,6-xylidinium cations and inorganic nitrate anions inter­act to form a three-dimensional hydrogen-bond network.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807025408/dn2181sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807025408/dn2181Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 654885

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.037
  • wR factor = 0.112
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.9

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for N1
Alert level G PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Hybrid compounds are widely investigated due to their special relevance in fundamental sciences and in several applied fields such as biomolecular sciences, catalysis and nonlinear optics (Xiao et al., 2005, Yuan et al., 2006). These materials are generally rich in hydrogen bonds which are considered as the most effective tool for constructing sophisticated assemblies from discrete ionic or molecular building blocks due to its strength and directionality (Wang & Zhang, 2006). In this paper, we report the synthesis and structure of a new organic nitrate. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of the title compounds shows that the asymmetric unit corresponds to the formula unit (I) which is made of one NO3- anion and one 2,6-xylidinium cation (Fig. 1). As well as electrostatic and van der Walls forces, two types of hydrogen bonds (Table 1) participate to define the crystal packing. The first one, N–H···O bonds links ammonium groups and nitrate anions into infinite layers propagating in the (b, c) plane (Fig. 2, Table 1). The second H-bonds type, C–H···O bonds, identified by PLATON (Spek, 2003), connects the successive layers to form a three-dimensional network (Fig. 3, Table 1). It is noteworthy that two hydrogen atoms of the NH3 groups form bifurcated hydrogen bonds with the nitrate oxygen atoms. Bond lengths and angles observed in this structure agree well with those reported for nitrate or xylidinium compounds (Hemissi et al., 2001, Perpétuo & Janczak, 2004).

Related literature top

For general background, see: Xiao et al. (2005); Yuan et al. (2006); Wang & Zhang (2006). For related structures, see: Hemissi et al. (2001); Perpétuo & Janczak (2004).

For related literature, see: Spek (2003).

Experimental top

An ethanolic 2,6-xylidinium solution (5 mmol, in 5 ml) was added to an aqueous HNO3 solution (0.5 M, 10 ml). The obtained solution is evaporated during several days in ambient condition until the formation of single crystals of the title compound (I).

Refinement top

All H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding on their parent atoms, [N–H = 0.89, C–H =0.96 Å (CH3 ) with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq and C–H =0.96 Å (Ar–H), with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq]

Structure description top

Hybrid compounds are widely investigated due to their special relevance in fundamental sciences and in several applied fields such as biomolecular sciences, catalysis and nonlinear optics (Xiao et al., 2005, Yuan et al., 2006). These materials are generally rich in hydrogen bonds which are considered as the most effective tool for constructing sophisticated assemblies from discrete ionic or molecular building blocks due to its strength and directionality (Wang & Zhang, 2006). In this paper, we report the synthesis and structure of a new organic nitrate. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of the title compounds shows that the asymmetric unit corresponds to the formula unit (I) which is made of one NO3- anion and one 2,6-xylidinium cation (Fig. 1). As well as electrostatic and van der Walls forces, two types of hydrogen bonds (Table 1) participate to define the crystal packing. The first one, N–H···O bonds links ammonium groups and nitrate anions into infinite layers propagating in the (b, c) plane (Fig. 2, Table 1). The second H-bonds type, C–H···O bonds, identified by PLATON (Spek, 2003), connects the successive layers to form a three-dimensional network (Fig. 3, Table 1). It is noteworthy that two hydrogen atoms of the NH3 groups form bifurcated hydrogen bonds with the nitrate oxygen atoms. Bond lengths and angles observed in this structure agree well with those reported for nitrate or xylidinium compounds (Hemissi et al., 2001, Perpétuo & Janczak, 2004).

For general background, see: Xiao et al. (2005); Yuan et al. (2006); Wang & Zhang (2006). For related structures, see: Hemissi et al. (2001); Perpétuo & Janczak (2004).

For related literature, see: Spek (2003).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994); cell refinement: CAD-4 EXPRESS; data reduction: XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) view of (I) with atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms are drawn at the 30% probability level·H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii. N—H···O hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Detail of a part of (011) hydrogen-bonded layer of NO3- anion and ammonium groups in (I), with H-bonds indicated by dashed lines.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Projection of (I) along b axis.
2,6-Xylidinium nitrate top
Crystal data top
C8H12N+·NO3F(000) = 392
Mr = 184.20Dx = 1.367 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 7.891 (2) Åθ = 8.3–9.7°
b = 8.328 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 13.628 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 91.47 (2)°Parallelepiped, colourless
V = 895.2 (4) Å30.20 × 0.19 × 0.17 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius TurboCAD-4
diffractometer
Rint = 0.018
Radiation source: X-ray tubeθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Graphite monochromatorh = 99
non–profiled ω scansk = 09
3131 measured reflectionsl = 1616
1568 independent reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
1181 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: 5%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.112 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0537P)2 + 0.2838P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max = 0.005
1568 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
122 parametersΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.014 (3)
Crystal data top
C8H12N+·NO3V = 895.2 (4) Å3
Mr = 184.20Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 7.891 (2) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 8.328 (3) ÅT = 293 K
c = 13.628 (2) Å0.20 × 0.19 × 0.17 mm
β = 91.47 (2)°
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius TurboCAD-4
diffractometer
Rint = 0.018
3131 measured reflections2 standard reflections every 120 min
1568 independent reflections intensity decay: 5%
1181 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0370 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.112H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.17 e Å3
1568 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
122 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.05197 (19)0.23434 (19)0.13088 (12)0.0375 (4)
O10.01610 (19)0.19181 (19)0.20863 (10)0.0535 (4)
O20.0066 (2)0.16522 (19)0.05302 (10)0.0548 (4)
O30.1585 (2)0.3402 (2)0.13256 (13)0.0701 (5)
N20.16555 (19)0.37350 (19)0.36594 (11)0.0379 (4)
C10.3441 (2)0.3220 (2)0.37321 (12)0.0318 (4)
C20.4727 (2)0.4356 (2)0.37051 (12)0.0366 (5)
C30.6386 (3)0.3782 (3)0.37620 (14)0.0465 (5)
C40.6726 (3)0.2168 (3)0.38574 (15)0.0465 (5)
C50.5416 (2)0.1077 (3)0.38996 (13)0.0418 (5)
C60.3738 (2)0.1575 (2)0.38346 (12)0.0341 (4)
C70.4382 (3)0.6136 (3)0.36478 (15)0.0487 (5)
C80.2319 (3)0.0377 (2)0.38770 (16)0.0466 (5)
H2A0.16090.47930.35690.057*
H2B0.11380.34820.42110.057*
H2C0.11420.32410.31550.057*
H30.72820.45050.37350.056*
H40.78430.18120.38940.056*
H50.56600.00100.39730.050*
H7A0.37970.64710.42220.073*
H7B0.36930.63630.30740.073*
H7C0.54360.67060.36110.073*
H8A0.27800.06780.39830.070*
H8B0.16770.03950.32690.070*
H8C0.15920.06470.44070.070*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0347 (8)0.0315 (9)0.0462 (10)0.0017 (7)0.0007 (7)0.0007 (7)
O10.0636 (10)0.0570 (10)0.0401 (8)0.0097 (8)0.0044 (7)0.0044 (7)
O20.0665 (10)0.0575 (10)0.0406 (8)0.0133 (8)0.0043 (7)0.0105 (7)
O30.0585 (10)0.0629 (11)0.0889 (13)0.0317 (9)0.0005 (8)0.0011 (9)
N20.0408 (9)0.0321 (9)0.0406 (8)0.0074 (7)0.0005 (7)0.0025 (7)
C10.0351 (9)0.0334 (10)0.0268 (8)0.0049 (8)0.0003 (7)0.0013 (7)
C20.0457 (12)0.0355 (11)0.0285 (9)0.0019 (8)0.0010 (7)0.0000 (8)
C30.0408 (11)0.0530 (13)0.0456 (11)0.0093 (10)0.0021 (9)0.0011 (10)
C40.0355 (11)0.0572 (14)0.0470 (12)0.0085 (10)0.0015 (8)0.0018 (10)
C50.0473 (12)0.0388 (11)0.0393 (10)0.0132 (10)0.0006 (8)0.0007 (9)
C60.0397 (10)0.0318 (10)0.0307 (9)0.0043 (8)0.0005 (7)0.0014 (7)
C80.0510 (13)0.0319 (11)0.0565 (12)0.0003 (9)0.0046 (9)0.0006 (9)
C70.0655 (14)0.0348 (11)0.0457 (11)0.0052 (11)0.0014 (10)0.0026 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—N11.251 (2)C6—C81.502 (3)
O2—N11.251 (2)C1—C21.389 (3)
N1—O31.218 (2)C2—C71.508 (3)
N2—C11.473 (2)C8—H8A0.9600
N2—H2A0.8900C8—H8B0.9600
N2—H2B0.8900C8—H8C0.9600
N2—H2C0.8900C4—C51.379 (3)
C3—C41.376 (3)C4—H40.9300
C3—C21.394 (3)C5—H50.9300
C3—H30.9300C7—H7A0.9600
C6—C51.388 (3)C7—H7B0.9600
C6—C11.396 (3)C7—H7C0.9600
O3—N1—O1120.00 (17)C3—C2—C7120.52 (19)
O3—N1—O2122.10 (17)C6—C8—H8A109.5
O1—N1—O2117.90 (16)C6—C8—H8B109.5
C1—N2—H2A109.5H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C1—N2—H2B109.5C6—C8—H8C109.5
H2A—N2—H2B109.5H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C1—N2—H2C109.5H8B—C8—H8C109.5
H2A—N2—H2C109.5C3—C4—C5120.22 (19)
H2B—N2—H2C109.5C3—C4—H4119.9
C4—C3—C2121.37 (19)C5—C4—H4119.9
C4—C3—H3119.3C4—C5—C6121.0 (2)
C2—C3—H3119.3C4—C5—H5119.5
C5—C6—C1117.22 (18)C6—C5—H5119.5
C5—C6—C8120.64 (18)C2—C7—H7A109.5
C1—C6—C8122.14 (17)C2—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C1—C6123.39 (17)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C1—N2119.84 (17)C2—C7—H7C109.5
C6—C1—N2116.77 (16)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—C3116.78 (18)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—C7122.68 (18)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···O1i0.892.283.064 (2)147
N2—H2A···O2i0.892.403.007 (2)126
N2—H2B···O2ii0.892.012.888 (2)169
N2—H2C···O10.892.082.964 (2)174
N2—H2C···O30.892.533.192 (3)132
C5—H5···O3iii0.932.593.270 (3)131
C8—H8B···O10.962.493.345 (3)149
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x+1, y1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H12N+·NO3
Mr184.20
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)7.891 (2), 8.328 (3), 13.628 (2)
β (°) 91.47 (2)
V3)895.2 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.19 × 0.17
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius TurboCAD-4
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3131, 1568, 1181
Rint0.018
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.594
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.037, 0.112, 1.06
No. of reflections1568
No. of parameters122
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.17, 0.16

Computer programs: CAD-4 EXPRESS (Enraf–Nonius, 1994), CAD-4 EXPRESS, XCAD4 (Harms & Wocadlo, 1995), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···O1i0.89002.28003.064 (2)147.00
N2—H2A···O2i0.89002.40003.007 (2)126.00
N2—H2B···O2ii0.89002.01002.888 (2)169.00
N2—H2C···O10.89002.08002.964 (2)174.00
N2—H2C···O30.89002.53003.192 (3)132.00
C5—H5···O3iii0.93002.59003.270 (3)131.00
C8—H8B···O10.96002.49003.345 (3)149.00
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x+1, y1/2, z+1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds