supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, i164-i165    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807029790 ]

Redetermination of the Tutton's salt Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2

P. Ballirano, G. Belardi and F. Bosi

Abstract top

The crystal structure of dicaesium hexaaquacopper(II) bis[sulfate(VI)], Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2, has been redetermined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. In comparison with the previous refinement based on single-crystal neutron data [Shields & Kennard (1972). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1, 189-191], the results show an improved precision and benefit from inclusion of anisotropic displacement parameters for the non-H atoms. The structure is characterized by a mean Cu-O bond length of 2.094 Å. The [Cu(H2O)6] octahedron (\overline{1} symmetry) is strongly distorted because of the Jahn-Teller effect, with a calculated distortion parameter [Delta] of 0.0054. The Cs+ cation is ninefold coordinated by seven O atoms and two water molecules, with a mean Cs-O bond length of 3.238 Å.

Comment top

The title compound Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2 is a member of the isotypic series known as Tutton's salts. Their general formula is MI2[MII(H2O)6](XO4)2, where MI and MII are, respectively, a monovalent and a divalent cation and X is hexavalent S, Se or Cr. The structure of Tutton's salts consists of isolated [MII(H2O)6] octahedra and XO42− tetrahedra connected by the MI cation (Fig. 1). As a result sheets parallel to (100) are formed, interconnected via medium to weak hydrogen bonds originating from the aqua ligands of the MII cations to the acceptors of the sulfate groups.

The structure of the title compound has been previously determined by Shields & Kennard (1972) from single-crystal neutron data. However, the original data were characterized by large standard uncertainties of cell parameters and fractional coordinates. Moreover, no displacement parameters were reported. Because of the requirements of accurate structural data to rationalize the crystal chemistry of Tutton's salts, we decided to carry out a redetermination of the crystal structure of Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2 based on single-crystal X-ray data. The refined cell parameters and the cell volume differ significantly from the reference data [P21/a, a = 9.42 (1), b = 12.785 (9), c = 6.28 (1) Å, β = 105.9 (1) °, (Shields & Kennard, 1972)]. The sulfate group is slightly distorted and, similarly to all Tutton's salts, the S—O2 distance is smaller (1.463 (2) Å) than the remaining three S—O distances (1.474 (2)–1.484 (2) Å) because of bond-valence requirements. The mean Cu—O distance of the [Cu(H2O)6] octahedron is 2.094 Å. This value compares favourably with the range between 2.085 and 2.098 Å as reported for other MI2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2 salts (NH4: Cotton et al., 1993; K: Simmons et al., 2006; Rb: Ballirano & Belardi, 2007). The [Cu(H2O)6] octahedron is strongly distorted as a result of the Jahn-Teller effect. The calculated distortion parameter Δ, as defined by Brown & Shannon (1973), amounts to 0.0054. The Cs+ cation is coordinated by seven O atoms and two water molecules with a mean Cs—O distance of 3.238 Å. The refined hydrogen atom positions are not defined with high accuracy. However, after value normalization following the procedure given by Jeffrey & Lewis (1978) and Taylor & Kennard (1983), reasonable H···O distances in the range between 1.765 and 1.850 Å were obtained. Both O1 and O2 atoms are acceptors of a single hydrogen bond, whereas O3 and O4 are acceptors of two hydrogen bonds. As a result, a shortening of the distances H32···O1 and of S—O2 is observed.

Related literature top

For related structures of other MI2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2 salts, see: Cotton et al. (1993) (M = NH4); Simmons et al. (2006) (M = K); Ballirano & Belardi (2007) (M = Rb). The distortion of the [Cu(H2O)6] octahedron was calculated according to Brown & Shannon (1973). A reasonable hydrogen-bonding geometry was obtained after value normalization following the procedure described by Jeffrey & Lewis (1978) and Taylor & Kennard (1983).

Experimental top

The title compound has been prepared by dissolving Cs2SO4 (Carlo Erba, P·P·A.) and CuSO4.5H2O (Carlo Erba, P·P·A.) in double deionized water and subsequent slow evaporation of the solvent at 295 K. The obtained crystals, in equilibrium with the mother solution, were removed by filtration and dried at room temperature. The product consisted of platy blue crystals of Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2.

Refinement top

The structure was refined in the non-standard setting P21/a of space group P21/c for a better comparison with other Tutton's salts. After a few refinement cycles using neutral scattering factors, fully ionized for Cu and half ionized for O and neutral scattering factors for the remaining atoms were finally selected, leading to the lowest R agreement indices. The coordinates of the hydrogen atoms were refined freely using a common Uiso parameter of 0.05 Å2. The deepest hole and the highest peak are, respectively, 0.69 and 0.75 Å from atom Cs.

Computing details top

Data collection: XSCANS (Siemens, 1994); cell refinement: XSCANS; data reduction: XSCANS; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ATOMS (Dowty, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: PARST (Nardelli, 1982) and publCIF (Westrip, 2007).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The crystal structure of Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2 in polyhedral representation, projected along [001].
Dicaesium hexaaquacopper(II) bis[sulfate(VI)] top
Crystal data top
Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2F000 = 613.8
Mr = 629.61Non-standard setting of space group P21/c to adhere to reference data of other Tutton's salts
Monoclinic, P21/aDx = 2.864 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 2yabMo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.4383 (6) ÅCell parameters from 58 reflections
b = 12.7605 (12) Åθ = 4.0–22.5º
c = 6.3130 (6) ŵ = 6.76 mm1
β = 106.199 (7)ºT = 293 (2) K
V = 730.14 (11) Å3Plate, blue
Z = 20.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Siemens P4
diffractometer
Rint = 0.031
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeθmax = 35.0º
Monochromator: graphiteθmin = 2.8º
T = 293(2) Kh = 15→14
ω scansk = 0→20
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
l = 0→10
Tmin = 0.226, Tmax = 0.5843 standard reflections
3436 measured reflections every 47 reflections
3208 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
2728 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Only H-atom coordinates refined
Least-squares matrix: full  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0466P)2 + 0.5369P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.081Δρmax = 1.53 e Å3
S = 1.09Δρmin = 2.57 e Å3
3208 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
109 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.080 (2)
Crystal data top
Cs2[Cu(H2O)6](SO4)2V = 730.14 (11) Å3
Mr = 629.61Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/aMo Kα
a = 9.4383 (6) ŵ = 6.76 mm1
b = 12.7605 (12) ÅT = 293 (2) K
c = 6.3130 (6) Å0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
β = 106.199 (7)º
Data collection top
Siemens P4
diffractometer
2728 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.031
Tmin = 0.226, Tmax = 0.5843 standard reflections
3436 measured reflections every 47 reflections
3208 independent reflections intensity decay: 1%
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034109 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.081Only H-atom coordinates refined
S = 1.09Δρmax = 1.53 e Å3
3208 reflectionsΔρmin = 2.57 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R– factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu0.00000.00000.00000.01692 (10)
Cs0.11407 (2)0.354561 (15)0.35562 (3)0.02654 (8)
S0.37975 (7)0.14584 (5)0.73909 (10)0.01703 (11)
O10.3992 (3)0.24027 (18)0.6156 (4)0.0273 (4)
O20.5138 (3)0.0821 (2)0.7893 (5)0.0314 (5)
O30.2560 (2)0.08353 (19)0.6000 (3)0.0250 (4)
O40.3439 (3)0.1767 (2)0.9448 (4)0.0280 (4)
OW10.1450 (3)0.1085 (2)0.1577 (4)0.0252 (4)
OW20.1908 (3)0.1109 (2)0.0139 (4)0.0297 (5)
OW30.0002 (2)0.06342 (18)0.2836 (3)0.0205 (3)
H110.184 (7)0.093 (5)0.277 (11)0.050*
H120.199 (7)0.122 (5)0.094 (11)0.050*
H210.281 (7)0.099 (5)0.063 (10)0.050*
H220.181 (7)0.166 (5)0.017 (11)0.050*
H310.071 (7)0.051 (5)0.310 (11)0.050*
H320.034 (7)0.113 (5)0.308 (10)0.050*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu0.01750 (19)0.0183 (2)0.01490 (17)0.00407 (15)0.00436 (13)0.00055 (14)
Cs0.02807 (11)0.02663 (11)0.02645 (10)0.00196 (6)0.01012 (7)0.00193 (6)
S0.0157 (2)0.0182 (2)0.0169 (2)0.00196 (19)0.00399 (18)0.00030 (19)
O10.0344 (11)0.0214 (9)0.0283 (10)0.0026 (8)0.0124 (9)0.0051 (8)
O20.0188 (9)0.0314 (12)0.0407 (12)0.0036 (8)0.0031 (8)0.0038 (10)
O30.0203 (8)0.0315 (11)0.0219 (8)0.0090 (8)0.0039 (7)0.0048 (8)
O40.0334 (11)0.0330 (11)0.0197 (8)0.0064 (9)0.0112 (8)0.0049 (8)
OW10.0259 (10)0.0295 (11)0.0197 (8)0.0102 (8)0.0055 (7)0.0012 (7)
OW20.0231 (10)0.0280 (11)0.0390 (12)0.0030 (9)0.0101 (9)0.0051 (10)
OW30.0218 (9)0.0220 (9)0.0197 (8)0.0005 (7)0.0089 (7)0.0030 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Cu—OW31.965 (2)S—O11.474 (2)
Cu—OW3i1.965 (2)S—O31.482 (2)
Cu—OW12.005 (2)S—O41.484 (2)
Cu—OW1i2.005 (2)S—Csv3.7066 (7)
Cu—OW2i2.311 (2)S—Csvi3.7677 (7)
Cu—OW22.311 (2)S—Csvii3.9035 (8)
Cs—O13.098 (2)O1—Csv3.182 (2)
Cs—O4ii3.114 (2)O2—Csvi3.179 (3)
Cs—O3iii3.151 (3)O2—Csv3.239 (3)
Cs—O2iii3.179 (3)O2—Csvii3.528 (3)
Cs—O1iv3.182 (2)O3—Csvi3.151 (3)
Cs—OW2v3.233 (3)O4—Csvii3.114 (2)
Cs—O2iv3.239 (3)OW1—H110.77 (7)
Cs—OW13.422 (3)OW1—H120.76 (7)
Cs—O2ii3.528 (3)OW2—Csiv3.233 (3)
Cs—Siv3.7066 (7)OW2—H210.87 (7)
Cs—Siii3.7677 (7)OW2—H220.74 (6)
Cs—Sii3.9035 (8)OW3—H310.75 (7)
Cs—H113.47 (6)OW3—H320.70 (7)
S—O21.463 (2)
OW3—Cu—OW3i180.00 (17)O2iv—Cs—OW1127.78 (6)
OW3—Cu—OW190.34 (9)O1—Cs—O2ii126.34 (6)
OW3i—Cu—OW189.66 (9)O4ii—Cs—O2ii42.23 (6)
OW3—Cu—OW1i89.66 (9)O3iii—Cs—O2ii82.25 (6)
OW3i—Cu—OW1i90.34 (9)O2iii—Cs—O2ii61.70 (8)
OW1—Cu—OW1i180.00 (16)O1iv—Cs—O2ii125.49 (6)
OW3—Cu—OW2i88.94 (9)OW2v—Cs—O2ii48.26 (6)
OW3i—Cu—OW2i91.06 (9)O2iv—Cs—O2ii137.77 (8)
OW1—Cu—OW2i90.60 (10)OW1—Cs—O2ii82.32 (6)
OW1i—Cu—OW2i89.40 (10)O2—S—O1109.96 (15)
OW3—Cu—OW291.06 (9)O2—S—O3108.73 (15)
OW3i—Cu—OW288.94 (9)O1—S—O3108.61 (14)
OW1—Cu—OW289.40 (10)O2—S—O4110.66 (16)
OW1i—Cu—OW290.60 (10)O1—S—O4109.77 (14)
OW2i—Cu—OW2180.00 (17)O3—S—O4109.07 (13)
O1—Cs—O4ii140.29 (7)S—O1—Cs116.54 (12)
O1—Cs—O3iii97.49 (6)S—O1—Csv98.82 (11)
O4ii—Cs—O3iii113.63 (6)Cs—O1—Csv119.34 (7)
O1—Cs—O2iii141.84 (6)S—O2—Csvi102.10 (12)
O4ii—Cs—O2iii73.76 (6)S—O2—Csv96.71 (12)
O3iii—Cs—O2iii44.43 (6)Csvi—O2—Csv99.31 (8)
O1—Cs—O1iv97.59 (5)S—O2—Csvii93.62 (13)
O4ii—Cs—O1iv83.64 (6)Csvi—O2—Csvii118.30 (8)
O3iii—Cs—O1iv126.51 (6)Csv—O2—Csvii137.77 (8)
O2iii—Cs—O1iv104.49 (6)S—O3—Csvi102.83 (11)
O1—Cs—OW2v81.11 (6)S—O4—Csvii111.17 (13)
O4ii—Cs—OW2v87.04 (6)Cu—OW1—Cs134.36 (11)
O3iii—Cs—OW2v69.69 (6)Cu—OW1—H11113 (5)
O2iii—Cs—OW2v85.68 (7)Cs—OW1—H1187 (5)
O1iv—Cs—OW2v163.61 (6)Cu—OW1—H12112 (5)
O1—Cs—O2iv94.88 (6)Cs—OW1—H1297 (5)
O4ii—Cs—O2iv111.81 (6)H11—OW1—H12112 (6)
O3iii—Cs—O2iv83.77 (6)Cu—OW2—Csiv134.73 (10)
O2iii—Cs—O2iv80.69 (8)Cu—OW2—H21122 (4)
O1iv—Cs—O2iv43.99 (6)Csiv—OW2—H2175 (4)
OW2v—Cs—O2iv152.24 (6)Cu—OW2—H22114 (5)
O1—Cs—OW167.15 (6)Csiv—OW2—H22101 (5)
O4ii—Cs—OW173.24 (6)H21—OW2—H22101 (6)
O3iii—Cs—OW1144.36 (5)Cu—OW3—H31110 (5)
O2iii—Cs—OW1142.85 (6)Cu—OW3—H32117 (5)
O1iv—Cs—OW188.33 (6)H31—OW3—H32122 (7)
OW2v—Cs—OW176.06 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z; (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1; (iii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1; (iv) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z; (v) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z; (vi) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1; (vii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
OW1—H11···O30.77 (7)1.97 (7)2.714 (2)166 (7)
OW1—H12···O4viii0.75 (7)1.99 (7)2.738 (4)173 (7)
OW2—H21···O2ix0.87 (6)1.91 (7)2.777 (3)174 (7)
OW2—H22···O4ii0.74 (6)2.04 (6)2.779 (4)171 (6)
OW3—H31···O3x0.74 (7)2.02 (7)2.725 (3)155 (7)
OW3—H32···O1vi0.71 (7)1.99 (6)2.693 (3)171 (6)
Symmetry codes: (viii) x, y, z−1; (ix) x−1, y, z−1; (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1; (x) −x, −y, −z+1; (vi) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1.
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Cu—OW31.965 (2)Cs—OW2iv3.233 (3)
Cu—OW12.005 (2)Cs—O2iii3.239 (3)
Cu—OW22.311 (2)Cs—OW13.422 (3)
Cs—O13.098 (2)Cs—O2i3.528 (3)
Cs—O4i3.114 (2)S—O21.463 (2)
Cs—O3ii3.151 (3)S—O11.474 (2)
Cs—O2ii3.179 (3)S—O31.482 (2)
Cs—O1iii3.182 (2)S—O41.484 (2)
O2—S—O1109.96 (15)O2—S—O4110.66 (16)
O2—S—O3108.73 (15)O1—S—O4109.77 (14)
O1—S—O3108.61 (14)O3—S—O4109.07 (13)
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1; (ii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z; (iv) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
OW1—H11···O30.77 (7)1.97 (7)2.714 (2)166 (7)
OW1—H12···O4v0.75 (7)1.99 (7)2.738 (4)173 (7)
OW2—H21···O2vi0.87 (6)1.91 (7)2.777 (3)174 (7)
OW2—H22···O4i0.74 (6)2.04 (6)2.779 (4)171 (6)
OW3—H31···O3vii0.74 (7)2.02 (7)2.725 (3)155 (7)
OW3—H32···O1viii0.71 (7)1.99 (6)2.693 (3)171 (6)
Symmetry codes: (v) x, y, z−1; (vi) x−1, y, z−1; (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, z−1; (vii) −x, −y, −z+1; (viii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+1.
Acknowledgements top

This work received financial support from Universitá di Roma `La Sapienza'.

references
References top

Ballirano, P. & Belardi, G. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, i56–i58.

Brown, I. D. & Shannon, R. D. (1973). Acta Cryst. A29, 266–282.

Cotton, F. A., Daniels, L. M., Murillo, C. A. & Quesada, J. F. (1993). Inorg. Chem. 32, 4861–4867.

Dowty, E. (2003). ATOMS. Version 6.1. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA. http://www.shapesoftware.com.

Jeffrey, G. A. & Lewis, L. (1978). Carbohydr. Res. 60, 179–182.

Nardelli, M. (1982). PARST. University of Parma, Italy.

North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS86 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany. or SHELXS97?

Shields, K. G. & Kennard, C. H. L. (1972). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1, 189–191.

Siemens (1994). XSCANS. Version 2.1. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Simmons, C. J., Stratemeier, H., Hitchman, M. A. & Riley, M. J. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 1021–1031.

Taylor, R. & Kennard, O. (1983). Acta Cryst. B39, 133–138.

Westrip, S. P. (2007). PublCIF. In preparation.