Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The conformation of the N-H bond in the structure of the title compound, C8H4Cl5NO, is syn to the ortho-chloro substituent, similar to that observed in N-(2-chloro­phen­yl)acetamide, N-(2,4-dichloro­phen­yl)acetamide, 2,2,2-trichloro-N-(2-chloro­phen­yl)acetamide and N-(2-chloro­phen­yl)-2,2,2-trimethyl­acetamide. The bond parameters are similar to those in other acetanilides. The amide H atom is involved in two intra­molecular hydrogen bonds with the ortho ring Cl atom and one of the Cl atoms of the CCl3 group.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680703187X/bt2420sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680703187X/bt2420Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 657678

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 299 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.005 Å
  • R factor = 0.055
  • wR factor = 0.156
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.7

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.29 PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for C4 PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 5
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.286 Tmax scaled 0.057 Tmin scaled 0.026
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 3 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

In the present work, the structure of N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2,2,2- trichloroacetamide has been determined as part of a study in the direction of systematization of the crystal structures of N-aromatic amides (Gowda et al., 2000; 2007a, b, c, d). The conformation of the N—H bond is syn to the ortho-chloro substituent (Fig. 1), similar to that observed in N-(2-chlorophenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2007c), N-(2,4-DiChlorophenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2007d), N-(2-chlorophenyl)-2,2,2- trichloroacetamide (Gowda et al., 2000) and N-(2-chlorophenyl)- 2,2,2-trimethylacetamide (Gowda et al., 2007b). The geometric parameters are similar to those in other acetanilides (Gowda et al., 2000; 2007a, b, c, d). The amide H is involved in two intra-molecular hydrogen bonding with the ortho ring Cl atom and one of the Cl atoms of the CCl3 group (Fig. 1) (Fig. 2 & Table 1).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Gowda et al. (2000); Gowda, Kozisek et al. (2007); Gowda et al. (2007a,b,c); Pies et al. (1971); Shilpa & Gowda (2007).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared according to the literature method (Shilpa & Gowda, 2007). The purity of the compound was checked by determining its melting point. It was characterized by recording its infrared, NMR (Shilpa & Gowda, 2007) and NQR spectra (Pies et al., 1971). Single crystals of the title compound were obtained from a slow evaporation of its ethanolic solution (2 g in about 30 ml e thanol) and used for X-ray diffraction studies at room temperature.

Refinement top

The H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry using a riding model with N—H = 0.86 Å and C—H = 0.93 Å]. Uiso(H) values were set equal to 1.2 Ueq of the parent atom.

Structure description top

In the present work, the structure of N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2,2,2- trichloroacetamide has been determined as part of a study in the direction of systematization of the crystal structures of N-aromatic amides (Gowda et al., 2000; 2007a, b, c, d). The conformation of the N—H bond is syn to the ortho-chloro substituent (Fig. 1), similar to that observed in N-(2-chlorophenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2007c), N-(2,4-DiChlorophenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2007d), N-(2-chlorophenyl)-2,2,2- trichloroacetamide (Gowda et al., 2000) and N-(2-chlorophenyl)- 2,2,2-trimethylacetamide (Gowda et al., 2007b). The geometric parameters are similar to those in other acetanilides (Gowda et al., 2000; 2007a, b, c, d). The amide H is involved in two intra-molecular hydrogen bonding with the ortho ring Cl atom and one of the Cl atoms of the CCl3 group (Fig. 1) (Fig. 2 & Table 1).

For related literature, see: Gowda et al. (2000); Gowda, Kozisek et al. (2007); Gowda et al. (2007a,b,c); Pies et al. (1971); Shilpa & Gowda (2007).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4-PC (Enraf-Nonius, 1996); cell refinement: CAD-4-PC; data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound showing the atom labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Crystal packing of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
2,2,2-Trichloro-N-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)acetamide top
Crystal data top
C8H4Cl5NOF(000) = 1216
Mr = 307.37Dx = 1.807 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54180 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 14.306 (2) Åθ = 5.7–19.1°
b = 8.625 (2) ŵ = 11.47 mm1
c = 18.317 (4) ÅT = 299 K
V = 2260.1 (8) Å3Rod, colourless
Z = 80.40 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm
Data collection top
Enraf-Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1780 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.034
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 67.0°, θmin = 4.8°
ω/2θ scansh = 170
Absorption correction: psi-scan
(North et al., 1968)
k = 100
Tmin = 0.091, Tmax = 0.199l = 2121
3958 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
2017 independent reflections intensity decay: 1.0%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.156 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1016P)2 + 1.9543P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2017 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.61 e Å3
137 parametersΔρmin = 0.57 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0026 (3)
Crystal data top
C8H4Cl5NOV = 2260.1 (8) Å3
Mr = 307.37Z = 8
Orthorhombic, PbcaCu Kα radiation
a = 14.306 (2) ŵ = 11.47 mm1
b = 8.625 (2) ÅT = 299 K
c = 18.317 (4) Å0.40 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm
Data collection top
Enraf-Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1780 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: psi-scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.034
Tmin = 0.091, Tmax = 0.1993 standard reflections every 120 min
3958 measured reflections intensity decay: 1.0%
2017 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0550 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.156H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.61 e Å3
2017 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.57 e Å3
137 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C40.8787 (2)0.4639 (4)0.21953 (18)0.0379 (7)
C50.7991 (2)0.4206 (4)0.27435 (17)0.0363 (7)
C80.7702 (2)0.2521 (4)0.38080 (17)0.0376 (7)
C90.8146 (2)0.1638 (4)0.43387 (17)0.0411 (7)
C100.7655 (3)0.0913 (4)0.48874 (18)0.0455 (8)
H100.79610.03070.52330.055*
C110.6702 (3)0.1103 (4)0.49132 (17)0.0441 (8)
C120.6239 (2)0.1961 (5)0.4390 (2)0.0473 (8)
H120.55920.20640.44100.057*
C130.6742 (2)0.2669 (4)0.38368 (18)0.0444 (8)
H130.64310.32450.34830.053*
N70.8264 (2)0.3205 (4)0.32653 (15)0.0432 (7)
H7N0.88460.29550.32670.052*
O60.72271 (18)0.4723 (3)0.26554 (15)0.0549 (7)
Cl10.85165 (7)0.63777 (11)0.17582 (6)0.0615 (4)
Cl20.88387 (7)0.31299 (12)0.15463 (5)0.0555 (3)
Cl30.98924 (6)0.48027 (15)0.26205 (5)0.0634 (4)
Cl140.93496 (6)0.13974 (14)0.43103 (6)0.0628 (4)
Cl150.60865 (8)0.02480 (14)0.56195 (5)0.0654 (4)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C40.0413 (16)0.0405 (17)0.0317 (15)0.0016 (13)0.0019 (12)0.0003 (14)
C50.0360 (15)0.0407 (15)0.0323 (15)0.0028 (13)0.0027 (12)0.0064 (13)
C80.0427 (16)0.0431 (16)0.0269 (14)0.0022 (13)0.0021 (12)0.0029 (13)
C90.0388 (16)0.0503 (18)0.0343 (16)0.0006 (14)0.0053 (12)0.0033 (14)
C100.056 (2)0.0504 (18)0.0299 (16)0.0004 (16)0.0030 (14)0.0018 (14)
C110.0546 (19)0.0504 (18)0.0273 (15)0.0053 (15)0.0073 (13)0.0009 (14)
C120.0396 (16)0.055 (2)0.047 (2)0.0009 (15)0.0063 (14)0.0037 (17)
C130.0449 (16)0.0541 (19)0.0341 (15)0.0038 (15)0.0027 (13)0.0058 (15)
N70.0348 (13)0.0548 (17)0.0400 (15)0.0028 (12)0.0055 (11)0.0101 (13)
O60.0440 (14)0.0669 (17)0.0539 (16)0.0076 (12)0.0069 (11)0.0172 (13)
Cl10.0623 (6)0.0503 (6)0.0718 (7)0.0066 (4)0.0147 (5)0.0210 (5)
Cl20.0710 (6)0.0582 (6)0.0373 (5)0.0051 (4)0.0075 (4)0.0117 (4)
Cl30.0425 (5)0.0980 (8)0.0499 (6)0.0173 (5)0.0058 (4)0.0079 (5)
Cl140.0406 (5)0.0869 (8)0.0610 (6)0.0034 (4)0.0072 (4)0.0154 (5)
Cl150.0772 (7)0.0718 (7)0.0473 (6)0.0046 (5)0.0198 (4)0.0156 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C4—C51.564 (4)C9—Cl141.735 (3)
C4—Cl11.744 (3)C10—C111.374 (5)
C4—Cl21.764 (3)C10—H100.9300
C4—Cl31.769 (3)C11—C121.379 (5)
C5—O61.190 (4)C11—Cl151.730 (3)
C5—N71.347 (4)C12—C131.385 (5)
C8—C131.381 (5)C12—H120.9300
C8—C91.389 (5)C13—H130.9300
C8—N71.408 (4)N7—H7N0.8600
C9—C101.377 (5)
C5—C4—Cl1109.8 (2)C11—C10—C9118.5 (3)
C5—C4—Cl2106.7 (2)C11—C10—H10120.7
Cl1—C4—Cl2109.54 (18)C9—C10—H10120.7
C5—C4—Cl3112.8 (2)C10—C11—C12121.1 (3)
Cl1—C4—Cl3109.38 (18)C10—C11—Cl15118.7 (3)
Cl2—C4—Cl3108.55 (18)C12—C11—Cl15120.2 (3)
O6—C5—N7127.1 (3)C11—C12—C13119.7 (3)
O6—C5—C4119.5 (3)C11—C12—H12120.1
N7—C5—C4113.4 (3)C13—C12—H12120.1
C13—C8—C9118.6 (3)C8—C13—C12120.3 (3)
C13—C8—N7123.8 (3)C8—C13—H13119.9
C9—C8—N7117.6 (3)C12—C13—H13119.9
C10—C9—C8121.8 (3)C5—N7—C8127.1 (3)
C10—C9—Cl14118.3 (3)C5—N7—H7N116.4
C8—C9—Cl14119.9 (3)C8—N7—H7N116.4
Cl1—C4—C5—O623.0 (4)C9—C10—C11—C122.0 (6)
Cl2—C4—C5—O695.6 (3)C9—C10—C11—Cl15177.8 (3)
Cl3—C4—C5—O6145.3 (3)C10—C11—C12—C131.2 (6)
Cl1—C4—C5—N7159.3 (2)Cl15—C11—C12—C13178.6 (3)
Cl2—C4—C5—N782.1 (3)C9—C8—C13—C120.7 (5)
Cl3—C4—C5—N737.0 (3)N7—C8—C13—C12179.9 (3)
C13—C8—C9—C100.0 (5)C11—C12—C13—C80.2 (6)
N7—C8—C9—C10179.4 (3)O6—C5—N7—C81.7 (6)
C13—C8—C9—Cl14178.8 (3)C4—C5—N7—C8175.7 (3)
N7—C8—C9—Cl140.6 (4)C13—C8—N7—C57.0 (5)
C8—C9—C10—C111.4 (5)C9—C8—N7—C5173.7 (3)
Cl14—C9—C10—C11179.8 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N7—H7N···Cl30.862.492.953 (3)115
N7—H7N···Cl140.862.442.916 (3)115

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H4Cl5NO
Mr307.37
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)299
a, b, c (Å)14.306 (2), 8.625 (2), 18.317 (4)
V3)2260.1 (8)
Z8
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)11.47
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.25 × 0.25
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf-Nonius CAD-4
Absorption correctionPsi-scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.091, 0.199
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3958, 2017, 1780
Rint0.034
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.597
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.055, 0.156, 1.04
No. of reflections2017
No. of parameters137
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.61, 0.57

Computer programs: CAD-4-PC (Enraf-Nonius, 1996), CAD-4-PC, REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N7—H7N···Cl30.862.492.953 (3)114.8
N7—H7N···Cl140.862.442.916 (3)115.2
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds