Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, C5H6O3, the ring adopts a slightly distorted envelope conformation. Adjacent mol­ecules are linked via weak C—H...O contacts. Two phase transitions at temperatures of 154/183 and 172/192 K are observed for the title compound in a differential scanning calorimetry experiment; these occur below the structure determination temperature of 240 K.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807032977/bx2098sup1.cif
Contains datablock I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807032977/bx2098Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 657714

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 240 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.041
  • wR factor = 0.116
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 10.6

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT180_ALERT_3_C Check Cell Rounding: # of Values Ending with 0 = 3
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 28.45 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 774 Count of symmetry unique reflns 816 Completeness (_total/calc) 94.85% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 0 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.000 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present no
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The title compound (I) (Fig. 1) and some of its derivatives are commonly used as reagents in the organic synthesis (Freer et al., 1988; Takahashi et al., 2004). Several papers concerning the crystal state studies of glutaric anhydride derivatives, as 3-phenyl-1-oxacyclohexane-2,6-dione or β-chloroglutaric acid anhydride are available in the literature (Koer et al., 1972; Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot, 1982), but surprisingly the crystal structure of the glutaric anhydride has not been determined yet.

This paper reports the crystal state studies of the glutaric anhydride. Compound I crystallizes in the i>P212121 space group with one independent molecule in the asymmetric unit.

The C1=O3 and C5=O2 bond lengths of 1.197 (3) Å and 1.188 (3) Å, respectively, remain in good agreement with those C=O bond lengths observed in related compounds crystal structures (Koer et al., 1972; Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot, 1982; Qian et al., 2006). The differences in the C=O bonds lengths existing between discussed structures are similar to those observed for two independent molecules of β-chloroglutaric acid anhydride (Koer et al., 1972) and can be justified by the different intermolecular interactions, present in the crystal network. The C1—O1—C3 angle of 124.5 (2)° remains also in agreement with the numerous literature data (Koer et al., 1972; Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot, 1982; Bertolasi et al., 1997; Qian et al., 2006). The six-membered ring of glutaric anhydride molecule adopts nearly envelope conformation, what is confirmed by the values of puckering parameters: q2 = 0.375 (2) Å, q3 = 0.251 (2) Å and ψ2= 174.5 (4)° (Cremer & Pople, 1975) for the O1/C1/C2/C3/C4/C5 ring atom sequence. The O1, C1, C2, C4 and C5 atoms are coplanar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0188), and C3 carbon is deviated from the plane defined by above atoms by -0.625 (4) Å.

In glutaric anhydride crystal structure no hydrogen bonds are observed. Only very weak interactions as C—H···O contacts between adjacent molecules can be recognized (Table 2). Molecular packing (Fig. 2), which exists in the glutaric anhydride crystals can explain the low value of the melting point.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Bertolasi et al. (1997); Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot (1982); Cremer & Pople (1975); Freer et al. (1988); Koer et al. (1972); Qian et al. (2006); Stefanowicz (2006); Takahashi et al. (2004).

For related literature, see: Burnett & Johnson (1996); Farrugia (1997).

Experimental top

The title compound was obtained (Stefanowicz, 2006) by the dehydratation of the glutaric acid in the acetic anhydride solution. The glutaric acid (30 g; 0,227 mol) was added to the 25 ml of the acetic anhydride. Obtained mixture was heated slowly until the boiling point was reached, and then refluxed for 15 minutes. Later the solvent was removed in a vacuo. Treatment of the obtained oil residue with naphthyl ether (200 ml) and later washing with the n-hexane resulted in the single crystals suitable for X-ray measurements. Glutaric anhydride undergoes the phase transitions, what was confirmed by the DSC technique. DSC studies on (I) disclosed two closely laying phase transitions at 154/183 K (cooling-heating) and 172/192 K. These phase transitions characterized by a significant temperature hysteresis may be classified as discontinuous ones. They are accompanied by a relatively small entropy effects: ΔS = 0.36 J/(mol K) and 0.20 J/(mol K).

Refinement top

The structure was solved by direct methods with using SHELXS97. The H atoms were placed in the idealized positions as riding on their parent atoms with distances of 0.98 Å with Uiso(H) values of 1.2Ueq(C). Although the molecule is achiral, the structure possesses a polar axis. The absence of atoms, which possess the atomic number higher than silicon causes that no anomoulus dispersion is observed. The Flack [(1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881] parameter is meanigless in this case. The absolute direction of the polar axis was assigned arbitrarily and the Friedel pairs were merged before the final refinement.

Structure description top

The title compound (I) (Fig. 1) and some of its derivatives are commonly used as reagents in the organic synthesis (Freer et al., 1988; Takahashi et al., 2004). Several papers concerning the crystal state studies of glutaric anhydride derivatives, as 3-phenyl-1-oxacyclohexane-2,6-dione or β-chloroglutaric acid anhydride are available in the literature (Koer et al., 1972; Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot, 1982), but surprisingly the crystal structure of the glutaric anhydride has not been determined yet.

This paper reports the crystal state studies of the glutaric anhydride. Compound I crystallizes in the i>P212121 space group with one independent molecule in the asymmetric unit.

The C1=O3 and C5=O2 bond lengths of 1.197 (3) Å and 1.188 (3) Å, respectively, remain in good agreement with those C=O bond lengths observed in related compounds crystal structures (Koer et al., 1972; Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot, 1982; Qian et al., 2006). The differences in the C=O bonds lengths existing between discussed structures are similar to those observed for two independent molecules of β-chloroglutaric acid anhydride (Koer et al., 1972) and can be justified by the different intermolecular interactions, present in the crystal network. The C1—O1—C3 angle of 124.5 (2)° remains also in agreement with the numerous literature data (Koer et al., 1972; Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot, 1982; Bertolasi et al., 1997; Qian et al., 2006). The six-membered ring of glutaric anhydride molecule adopts nearly envelope conformation, what is confirmed by the values of puckering parameters: q2 = 0.375 (2) Å, q3 = 0.251 (2) Å and ψ2= 174.5 (4)° (Cremer & Pople, 1975) for the O1/C1/C2/C3/C4/C5 ring atom sequence. The O1, C1, C2, C4 and C5 atoms are coplanar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0188), and C3 carbon is deviated from the plane defined by above atoms by -0.625 (4) Å.

In glutaric anhydride crystal structure no hydrogen bonds are observed. Only very weak interactions as C—H···O contacts between adjacent molecules can be recognized (Table 2). Molecular packing (Fig. 2), which exists in the glutaric anhydride crystals can explain the low value of the melting point.

For related literature, see: Bertolasi et al. (1997); Bocelli & Grenier-Loustalot (1982); Cremer & Pople (1975); Freer et al. (1988); Koer et al. (1972); Qian et al. (2006); Stefanowicz (2006); Takahashi et al. (2004).

For related literature, see: Burnett & Johnson (1996); Farrugia (1997).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2003); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003) and XP (Bruker, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP atom numbering scheme of I. The thermal ellipsoides were drawn at 20% probability.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The view of the packing of I, viewed along the a axis. Atom O2 is at (1 - x,-1/2 + y,3/2 - z).
Oxacyclohexane-2,6-dione top
Crystal data top
C5H6O3F(000) = 240
Mr = 114.10Dx = 1.413 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 668 reflections
a = 5.410 (4) Åθ = 3.1–28.5°
b = 7.520 (6) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 13.180 (8) ÅT = 240 K
V = 536.2 (7) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 40.53 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm
Data collection top
KUMA KM-4 CCD κ-geometry
diffractometer
668 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.034
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 28.5°, θmin = 3.1°
ω and φ scansh = 75
3600 measured reflectionsk = 910
774 independent reflectionsl = 1716
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.116H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0681P)2 + 0.0184P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
774 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
73 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.11 e Å3
Crystal data top
C5H6O3V = 536.2 (7) Å3
Mr = 114.10Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 5.410 (4) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
b = 7.520 (6) ÅT = 240 K
c = 13.180 (8) Å0.53 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm
Data collection top
KUMA KM-4 CCD κ-geometry
diffractometer
668 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
3600 measured reflectionsRint = 0.034
774 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0410 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.116H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14Δρmax = 0.22 e Å3
774 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.11 e Å3
73 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.5092 (2)0.6331 (2)0.60650 (11)0.0495 (4)
C10.5835 (4)0.5529 (3)0.51710 (16)0.0471 (5)
O30.4401 (3)0.5620 (2)0.44814 (12)0.0712 (6)
C20.8311 (4)0.4690 (3)0.51408 (16)0.0504 (5)
H2A0.95120.55520.48800.060*
H2B0.82700.36810.46710.060*
C50.6538 (4)0.6438 (3)0.69384 (16)0.0517 (5)
O20.5715 (4)0.7309 (3)0.76100 (13)0.0813 (7)
C40.8970 (4)0.5521 (3)0.69368 (16)0.0530 (5)
H4A0.92730.50260.76130.064*
H4B1.02690.63980.67990.064*
C30.9151 (4)0.4048 (3)0.61660 (17)0.0545 (6)
H3A1.08650.36340.61220.065*
H3B0.81210.30440.63810.065*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0396 (7)0.0576 (9)0.0512 (8)0.0085 (7)0.0013 (6)0.0010 (7)
C10.0472 (10)0.0467 (10)0.0475 (10)0.0027 (10)0.0023 (9)0.0008 (9)
O30.0670 (11)0.0888 (13)0.0577 (10)0.0057 (11)0.0200 (9)0.0027 (9)
C20.0518 (12)0.0504 (11)0.0489 (11)0.0006 (10)0.0030 (10)0.0099 (10)
C50.0465 (10)0.0605 (13)0.0479 (11)0.0054 (10)0.0058 (10)0.0034 (11)
O20.0701 (12)0.1111 (15)0.0627 (11)0.0210 (12)0.0087 (10)0.0317 (11)
C40.0471 (11)0.0664 (13)0.0455 (10)0.0088 (11)0.0034 (9)0.0005 (11)
C30.0493 (11)0.0535 (12)0.0606 (12)0.0103 (10)0.0033 (11)0.0022 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.383 (3)C5—O21.188 (3)
O1—C51.394 (3)C5—C41.485 (3)
C1—O31.197 (3)C4—C31.506 (3)
C1—C21.481 (3)C4—H4A0.9800
C2—C31.505 (3)C4—H4B0.9800
C2—H2A0.9800C3—H3A0.9800
C2—H2B0.9800C3—H3B0.9800
C1—O1—C5124.43 (15)C5—C4—C3113.55 (18)
O3—C1—O1115.69 (19)C5—C4—H4A108.9
O3—C1—C2126.2 (2)C3—C4—H4A108.9
O1—C1—C2118.13 (17)C5—C4—H4B108.9
C1—C2—C3112.67 (19)C3—C4—H4B108.9
C1—C2—H2A109.1H4A—C4—H4B107.7
C3—C2—H2A109.1C2—C3—C4110.50 (18)
C1—C2—H2B109.1C2—C3—H3A109.6
C3—C2—H2B109.1C4—C3—H3A109.6
H2A—C2—H2B107.8C2—C3—H3B109.6
O2—C5—O1115.9 (2)C4—C3—H3B109.6
O2—C5—C4126.1 (2)H3A—C3—H3B108.1
O1—C5—C4117.99 (18)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3B···O2i0.982.533.353 (4)142
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC5H6O3
Mr114.10
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)240
a, b, c (Å)5.410 (4), 7.520 (6), 13.180 (8)
V3)536.2 (7)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.12
Crystal size (mm)0.53 × 0.15 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerKUMA KM-4 CCD κ-geometry
diffractometer
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3600, 774, 668
Rint0.034
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.670
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.041, 0.116, 1.14
No. of reflections774
No. of parameters73
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.22, 0.11

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2003), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003), CrysAlis RED, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), PLATON (Spek, 2003) and XP (Bruker, 1999), SHELXL97.

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—O31.197 (3)C5—O21.188 (3)
C1—O1—C5124.43 (15)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3B···O2i0.982.533.353 (4)142
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y1/2, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds