Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The relative configuration of the title compound, C9H16O5, has been firmly established by X-ray crystallographic analysis. The absolute configuration of this sugar was determined by the use of 2-C-methyl-D-ribono-1,4-lactone as the starting material. The structure exists as a hydrogen-bonded network, with each mol­ecule being a donor and an acceptor for two hydrogen bonds.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807031522/lh2446sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807031522/lh2446Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 657673

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 150 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.031
  • wR factor = 0.074
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 10.5

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 27.48 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1329 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1345 Completeness (_total/calc) 98.81% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 0 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.000 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present no PLAT791_ALERT_1_G Confirm the Absolute Configuration of C1 = . S PLAT791_ALERT_1_G Confirm the Absolute Configuration of C2 = . S PLAT791_ALERT_1_G Confirm the Absolute Configuration of C10 = . S
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 0 ALERT level C = Check and explain 4 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 3 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Singly branched sugars have been found in nature and their occurrence has prompted interest in their synthesis and biological evaluation (Chapleur & Chrétien, 1997). For example, 2-C-substituted mannose derivatives have been shown to have therapeutic potential (Mitchell et al., 2007). The Kiliani reaction of ketoses with cyanide (Hotchkiss et al., 2006, Soengas et al., 2005) and calcium oxide treatment of Amadori compounds have proved to be valuable routes towards branched sugars (Hotchkiss et al., 2006, 2007). In addition the Aldol reaction using formaldehyde and potassium carbonate can be used to introduce hydroxymethyl branches to sugars, for example in the synthesis of hamamalose (Ho, 1978) and apiose (Koos & Mosher, 1986).

Sugars containing more than one branch are very rare. Examples of sugars that contain two carbon branches include 2,4-dimethyl-3,4-O-isopropylidene-L-arabinono-1,5-lactone (Booth, Watkin et al., 2007) and various protected forms of 3,5-di-C-methyl-mannono and glucono lactone (Booth et al., 2007a, 2007b, 2007c). 2,3-C-Dimethyl-D-allono-1,4-lactone (Jones et al., 2007) is an example of a sugar with adjacent branching centres.

The crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 1) exists as a three dimensionally hydrogen bonded lattice with each molecule being both a donor and an acceptor for two hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Booth et al. (2007a,b,c); Booth, Best et al. (2007); Booth, Watkin et al. (2007); Chapleur & Chrétien (1997); Ho (1978); Hotchkiss et al. (2006, 2007); Jones et al. (2007); Koos & Mosher (1986); Mitchell et al. (2007); Soengas et al. (2005).

Experimental top

Protected 3-C-methyl-L-erythrose (Booth, Best et al., 2007) 2, derived from 2-C-methyl-D-ribono-1,4-lactone 1, was treated with potassium carbonate and an excess of formaldehyde (Fig. 3). This gave a single product 3, a mixture of anomers in solution, which was found to crystallize as the pure β form (Fig. 1). The title compound was recrystallized from methanol; m.p. 337–343 K; [α]D21 +66.2 (c, 1.34 in acetone).

Refinement top

In the absence of significant anomalous scattering, Friedel pairs were merged and the absolute configuration was assigned on the basis of the starting material.

The H atoms were all located in a difference map, but those attached to carbon atoms were repositioned geometrically. The H atoms were initially refined with soft restraints on the bond lengths and angles to regularize their geometry (C—H in the range 0.93–0.98, O—H = 0.82 Å) and Uiso(H) (in the range 1.2–1.5 times Ueq of the parent atom), after which the positions were refined with riding constraints.

Structure description top

Singly branched sugars have been found in nature and their occurrence has prompted interest in their synthesis and biological evaluation (Chapleur & Chrétien, 1997). For example, 2-C-substituted mannose derivatives have been shown to have therapeutic potential (Mitchell et al., 2007). The Kiliani reaction of ketoses with cyanide (Hotchkiss et al., 2006, Soengas et al., 2005) and calcium oxide treatment of Amadori compounds have proved to be valuable routes towards branched sugars (Hotchkiss et al., 2006, 2007). In addition the Aldol reaction using formaldehyde and potassium carbonate can be used to introduce hydroxymethyl branches to sugars, for example in the synthesis of hamamalose (Ho, 1978) and apiose (Koos & Mosher, 1986).

Sugars containing more than one branch are very rare. Examples of sugars that contain two carbon branches include 2,4-dimethyl-3,4-O-isopropylidene-L-arabinono-1,5-lactone (Booth, Watkin et al., 2007) and various protected forms of 3,5-di-C-methyl-mannono and glucono lactone (Booth et al., 2007a, 2007b, 2007c). 2,3-C-Dimethyl-D-allono-1,4-lactone (Jones et al., 2007) is an example of a sugar with adjacent branching centres.

The crystal structure of the title compound (Fig. 1) exists as a three dimensionally hydrogen bonded lattice with each molecule being both a donor and an acceptor for two hydrogen bonds (Fig. 2).

For related literature, see: Booth et al. (2007a,b,c); Booth, Best et al. (2007); Booth, Watkin et al. (2007); Chapleur & Chrétien (1997); Ho (1978); Hotchkiss et al. (2006, 2007); Jones et al. (2007); Koos & Mosher (1986); Mitchell et al. (2007); Soengas et al. (2005).

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2001); cell refinement: DENZO/SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO/SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003); molecular graphics: CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: CRYSTALS.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as spheres of arbitary radius.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing of the title compound projected along the a-axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. The reaction scheme.
2-C-Hydroxymethyl-2,3-O-isopropylidene-3-C-methyl- β-L-erythrose top
Crystal data top
C9H16O5F(000) = 440
Mr = 204.22Dx = 1.363 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 1304 reflections
a = 6.2840 (2) Åθ = 5–27°
b = 11.2043 (3) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 14.1345 (5) ÅT = 150 K
V = 995.18 (5) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 40.40 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
1174 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 5.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(DENZO/SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.89, Tmax = 0.98k = 1414
6798 measured reflectionsl = 1818
1329 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.074 w = 1/[σ2(F2) + (0.04P)2 + 0.26P],
where P = [max(Fo2,0) + 2Fc2]/3
S = 0.94(Δ/σ)max = 0.000331
1329 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
127 parametersΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
0 restraints
Crystal data top
C9H16O5V = 995.18 (5) Å3
Mr = 204.22Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 6.2840 (2) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 11.2043 (3) ÅT = 150 K
c = 14.1345 (5) Å0.40 × 0.15 × 0.15 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector
diffractometer
1329 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(DENZO/SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
1174 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.89, Tmax = 0.98Rint = 0.030
6798 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0310 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.074H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.94Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
1329 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
127 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.4004 (3)0.62732 (15)0.82157 (12)0.0170
C20.4011 (3)0.48976 (15)0.80312 (11)0.0175
O30.4963 (2)0.47844 (10)0.71058 (7)0.0207
C40.5033 (3)0.59116 (14)0.66416 (11)0.0192
O50.4968 (2)0.67791 (10)0.73859 (8)0.0190
C60.3161 (4)0.60448 (18)0.59812 (14)0.0310
C70.7142 (3)0.60183 (18)0.61403 (15)0.0297
C80.5634 (3)0.44334 (16)0.87399 (12)0.0220
O90.70020 (19)0.54266 (11)0.89385 (8)0.0226
C100.5609 (3)0.64203 (16)0.90340 (11)0.0194
O110.4474 (2)0.63675 (12)0.98858 (8)0.0255
C120.1885 (3)0.42543 (16)0.80539 (13)0.0238
C130.1860 (3)0.68450 (15)0.83936 (13)0.0203
O140.2049 (2)0.80853 (11)0.86261 (9)0.0251
H610.32620.68130.56280.0499*
H620.31330.53900.55060.0503*
H630.18520.60270.63560.0507*
H710.72020.68300.58470.0470*
H720.71850.53930.56260.0469*
H730.83040.59010.66100.0479*
H810.64400.37540.84550.0286*
H820.48690.41910.93300.0282*
H1010.64410.72030.89900.0242*
H1210.21470.33980.78990.0380*
H1220.09220.46100.75710.0387*
H1230.12190.43410.86840.0382*
H1310.09650.67640.77980.0269*
H1320.11120.64410.89180.0265*
H150.53660.64931.03300.0412*
H160.30950.83950.83190.0416*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0193 (8)0.0180 (8)0.0137 (8)0.0014 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0000 (6)
C20.0204 (8)0.0182 (8)0.0137 (7)0.0005 (7)0.0018 (7)0.0017 (7)
O30.0293 (7)0.0176 (6)0.0152 (5)0.0020 (6)0.0051 (6)0.0006 (4)
C40.0256 (8)0.0166 (8)0.0154 (7)0.0007 (8)0.0009 (8)0.0020 (6)
O50.0253 (6)0.0170 (5)0.0148 (5)0.0015 (6)0.0035 (5)0.0010 (4)
C60.0360 (11)0.0342 (11)0.0226 (9)0.0004 (10)0.0090 (10)0.0014 (9)
C70.0348 (11)0.0248 (10)0.0294 (10)0.0024 (9)0.0138 (9)0.0023 (8)
C80.0253 (9)0.0191 (8)0.0216 (9)0.0010 (8)0.0020 (8)0.0004 (7)
O90.0180 (6)0.0251 (6)0.0247 (6)0.0002 (6)0.0043 (6)0.0013 (5)
C100.0195 (8)0.0219 (8)0.0168 (8)0.0026 (8)0.0017 (7)0.0028 (7)
O110.0274 (7)0.0331 (7)0.0161 (6)0.0020 (6)0.0005 (5)0.0037 (5)
C120.0225 (9)0.0204 (8)0.0285 (9)0.0034 (8)0.0001 (8)0.0015 (8)
C130.0197 (8)0.0191 (8)0.0220 (8)0.0000 (7)0.0015 (7)0.0022 (7)
O140.0284 (7)0.0176 (6)0.0294 (7)0.0011 (6)0.0115 (6)0.0030 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.563 (2)C7—H730.996
C1—O51.437 (2)C8—O91.434 (2)
C1—C101.543 (2)C8—H810.999
C1—C131.513 (2)C8—H821.000
C2—O31.4439 (19)O9—C101.423 (2)
C2—C81.522 (2)C10—O111.400 (2)
C2—C121.518 (2)C10—H1011.023
O3—C41.4240 (19)O11—H150.854
C4—O51.4329 (19)C12—H1210.998
C4—C61.509 (3)C12—H1220.996
C4—C71.507 (3)C12—H1230.989
C6—H610.997C13—O141.433 (2)
C6—H620.996C13—H1311.017
C6—H630.978C13—H1320.987
C7—H711.001O14—H160.861
C7—H721.010
C2—C1—O5104.58 (13)H71—C7—H73111.6
C2—C1—C10103.22 (14)H72—C7—H73111.6
O5—C1—C10107.11 (13)C2—C8—O9105.41 (14)
C2—C1—C13116.58 (15)C2—C8—H81109.6
O5—C1—C13110.13 (14)O9—C8—H81111.5
C10—C1—C13114.34 (13)C2—C8—H82108.6
C1—C2—O3103.82 (13)O9—C8—H82109.6
C1—C2—C8103.23 (14)H81—C8—H82111.9
O3—C2—C8106.76 (14)C8—O9—C10104.90 (12)
C1—C2—C12117.54 (16)C1—C10—O9104.32 (13)
O3—C2—C12110.00 (14)C1—C10—O11107.89 (13)
C8—C2—C12114.44 (14)O9—C10—O11111.21 (14)
C2—O3—C4110.63 (12)C1—C10—H101112.3
O3—C4—O5105.21 (12)O9—C10—H101110.5
O3—C4—C6110.40 (15)O11—C10—H101110.4
O5—C4—C6111.41 (15)C10—O11—H15107.0
O3—C4—C7108.31 (15)C2—C12—H121107.9
O5—C4—C7108.43 (15)C2—C12—H122109.3
C6—C4—C7112.75 (14)H121—C12—H122109.6
C1—O5—C4110.11 (12)C2—C12—H123110.2
C4—C6—H61110.2H121—C12—H123111.2
C4—C6—H62111.0H122—C12—H123108.7
H61—C6—H62107.5C1—C13—O14112.02 (14)
C4—C6—H63108.6C1—C13—H131108.5
H61—C6—H63110.0O14—C13—H131108.8
H62—C6—H63109.6C1—C13—H132110.8
C4—C7—H71107.5O14—C13—H132108.1
C4—C7—H72107.9H131—C13—H132108.5
H71—C7—H72109.3C13—O14—H16109.8
C4—C7—H73108.8
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O11—H15···O14i0.851.882.724 (2)172
O14—H16···O3ii0.862.072.867 (2)154
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+2; (ii) x+1, y+1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H16O5
Mr204.22
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)6.2840 (2), 11.2043 (3), 14.1345 (5)
V3)995.18 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.15 × 0.15
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(DENZO/SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
Tmin, Tmax0.89, 0.98
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6798, 1329, 1174
Rint0.030
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.031, 0.074, 0.94
No. of reflections1329
No. of parameters127
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.23, 0.21

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 2001), DENZO/SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO/SCALEPACK, SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003), CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996), CRYSTALS.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O11—H15···O14i0.851.882.724 (2)172
O14—H16···O3ii0.862.072.867 (2)154
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+2; (ii) x+1, y+1/2, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds