Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, m2205 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807035209 ]
2-trans-di-4-pyridylethylene-
2N:N')(
2-fumarato-
2O:O')zinc(II)]In the title compound, [Zn(C4H2O4)(C12H10N2)], the ZnII atom lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. The ZnII ions are bridged by fumarate and trans-di-4-pyridylethylene to form a porous triply interpenetrated diamond-like metal-organic framework.
The title compound was synthesized by a hydrothermal reaction of Zn(NO3)2.6H2O, fumaric acid and trans-di-4-pyridylethylene (1:1:1 mole ratio) in DMF at 100 °C. Small, colorless crystals of the title compound formed and were collected in 38% yield.
All the hydrogen atoms were found in a difference Fourier map and refined isotropically.
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker 2004); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
| [Zn(C4H2O4)(C12H10N2)] | F(000) = 736 |
| Mr = 361.67 | Dx = 0.941 Mg m−3 |
| Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cell parameters from 8809 reflections |
| a = 8.8488 (8) Å | θ = 2.4–32.0° |
| b = 21.5285 (19) Å | µ = 0.98 mm−1 |
| c = 13.5042 (11) Å | T = 173 K |
| β = 97.144 (4)° | Block, colourless |
| V = 2552.6 (4) Å3 | 0.30 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm |
| Z = 4 |
| Bruker X8 APEX II diffractometer | 5175 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 4435 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| graphite | Rint = 0.031 |
| Detector resolution: 18 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 34.2°, θmin = 1.9° |
| φ and ω scans | h = −13→13 |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) | k = −33→33 |
| Tmin = 0.759, Tmax = 0.909 | l = −18→21 |
| 25652 measured reflections |
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| wR(F2) = 0.073 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| S = 1.09 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0404P)2 + 0.1113P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 5175 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| 106 parameters | Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 |
| 0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.53 e Å−3 |
| [Zn(C4H2O4)(C12H10N2)] | V = 2552.6 (4) Å3 |
| Mr = 361.67 | Z = 4 |
| Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
| a = 8.8488 (8) Å | µ = 0.98 mm−1 |
| b = 21.5285 (19) Å | T = 173 K |
| c = 13.5042 (11) Å | 0.30 × 0.15 × 0.10 mm |
| β = 97.144 (4)° |
| Bruker X8 APEX II diffractometer | 5175 independent reflections |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004) | 4435 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Tmin = 0.759, Tmax = 0.909 | Rint = 0.031 |
| 25652 measured reflections | θmax = 34.2° |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| wR(F2) = 0.073 | Δρmax = 0.31 e Å−3 |
| S = 1.09 | Δρmin = −0.53 e Å−3 |
| 5175 reflections | Absolute structure: ? |
| 106 parameters | Flack parameter: ? |
| 0 restraints | Rogers parameter: ? |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. Due to a complete solvent area disorder data were treated with the SQUEEZE routine of the PLATON software package (van der Sluis & Spek, 1990). The calculated density is for the MOF only and does not include the solvent. |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Zn1 | 0.0000 | 0.147618 (6) | 0.2500 | 0.01800 (5) | |
| O1 | −0.10470 (8) | 0.20659 (3) | 0.15521 (5) | 0.02760 (14) | |
| O2 | −0.21011 (10) | 0.12225 (4) | 0.07903 (6) | 0.03675 (18) | |
| N1 | 0.14390 (8) | 0.09472 (4) | 0.18136 (6) | 0.02206 (14) | |
| C1 | 0.28693 (11) | 0.11406 (5) | 0.17539 (8) | 0.02768 (19) | |
| H1A | 0.3217 | 0.1509 | 0.2096 | 0.033* | |
| C2 | 0.38538 (11) | 0.08249 (5) | 0.12157 (8) | 0.0313 (2) | |
| H2A | 0.4852 | 0.0980 | 0.1184 | 0.038* | |
| C3 | 0.33737 (10) | 0.02748 (5) | 0.07150 (7) | 0.02544 (18) | |
| C4 | 0.19073 (11) | 0.00652 (5) | 0.08083 (8) | 0.0301 (2) | |
| H4A | 0.1550 | −0.0314 | 0.0504 | 0.036* | |
| C5 | 0.09708 (11) | 0.04145 (5) | 0.13489 (8) | 0.02801 (19) | |
| H5A | −0.0035 | 0.0272 | 0.1392 | 0.034* | |
| C6 | 0.43108 (11) | −0.00836 (5) | 0.00942 (8) | 0.0300 (2) | |
| H6A | 0.3902 | −0.0460 | −0.0191 | 0.036* | |
| C7 | −0.18907 (11) | 0.17920 (4) | 0.08416 (7) | 0.02391 (17) | |
| C8 | −0.26287 (11) | 0.22001 (5) | 0.00310 (7) | 0.02724 (18) | |
| H8A | −0.3330 | 0.2015 | −0.0474 | 0.033* |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Zn1 | 0.01940 (7) | 0.01775 (7) | 0.01692 (7) | 0.000 | 0.00252 (5) | 0.000 |
| O1 | 0.0334 (3) | 0.0235 (3) | 0.0233 (3) | 0.0000 (3) | −0.0070 (3) | 0.0022 (2) |
| O2 | 0.0468 (5) | 0.0218 (4) | 0.0378 (4) | −0.0040 (3) | −0.0099 (3) | 0.0017 (3) |
| N1 | 0.0205 (3) | 0.0232 (4) | 0.0229 (3) | −0.0019 (3) | 0.0045 (3) | −0.0043 (3) |
| C1 | 0.0230 (4) | 0.0275 (5) | 0.0334 (5) | −0.0056 (3) | 0.0071 (3) | −0.0111 (4) |
| C2 | 0.0229 (4) | 0.0340 (5) | 0.0383 (5) | −0.0071 (4) | 0.0094 (4) | −0.0129 (4) |
| C3 | 0.0214 (4) | 0.0253 (4) | 0.0304 (4) | −0.0030 (3) | 0.0064 (3) | −0.0071 (3) |
| C4 | 0.0263 (4) | 0.0266 (5) | 0.0391 (5) | −0.0059 (4) | 0.0112 (4) | −0.0122 (4) |
| C5 | 0.0225 (4) | 0.0271 (5) | 0.0357 (5) | −0.0049 (3) | 0.0089 (4) | −0.0085 (4) |
| C6 | 0.0255 (4) | 0.0291 (5) | 0.0365 (5) | −0.0036 (4) | 0.0079 (4) | −0.0130 (4) |
| C7 | 0.0260 (4) | 0.0232 (4) | 0.0215 (4) | 0.0001 (3) | −0.0009 (3) | 0.0022 (3) |
| C8 | 0.0302 (4) | 0.0272 (5) | 0.0218 (4) | −0.0003 (4) | −0.0068 (3) | 0.0002 (3) |
| Zn1—O1i | 1.9529 (7) | C2—H2A | 0.9500 |
| Zn1—O1 | 1.9529 (7) | C3—C4 | 1.3941 (13) |
| Zn1—N1i | 2.0177 (8) | C3—C6 | 1.4693 (13) |
| Zn1—N1 | 2.0177 (8) | C4—C5 | 1.3913 (13) |
| O1—C7 | 1.2837 (11) | C4—H4A | 0.9500 |
| O2—C7 | 1.2406 (13) | C5—H5A | 0.9500 |
| N1—C1 | 1.3444 (11) | C6—C6ii | 1.3264 (19) |
| N1—C5 | 1.3475 (12) | C6—H6A | 0.9500 |
| C1—C2 | 1.3808 (13) | C7—C8 | 1.4895 (13) |
| C1—H1A | 0.9500 | C8—C8iii | 1.316 (2) |
| C2—C3 | 1.4031 (14) | C8—H8A | 0.9500 |
| O1i—Zn1—O1 | 98.89 (4) | C4—C3—C6 | 118.63 (8) |
| O1i—Zn1—N1i | 109.93 (3) | C2—C3—C6 | 124.04 (8) |
| O1—Zn1—N1i | 113.14 (3) | C5—C4—C3 | 119.62 (9) |
| O1i—Zn1—N1 | 113.14 (3) | C5—C4—H4A | 120.2 |
| O1—Zn1—N1 | 109.93 (3) | C3—C4—H4A | 120.2 |
| N1i—Zn1—N1 | 111.27 (5) | N1—C5—C4 | 122.39 (8) |
| C7—O1—Zn1 | 112.06 (6) | N1—C5—H5A | 118.8 |
| C1—N1—C5 | 118.22 (8) | C4—C5—H5A | 118.8 |
| C1—N1—Zn1 | 120.35 (6) | C6ii—C6—C3 | 124.37 (12) |
| C5—N1—Zn1 | 121.28 (6) | C6ii—C6—H6A | 117.8 |
| N1—C1—C2 | 122.64 (9) | C3—C6—H6A | 117.8 |
| N1—C1—H1A | 118.7 | O2—C7—O1 | 124.40 (8) |
| C2—C1—H1A | 118.7 | O2—C7—C8 | 119.53 (8) |
| C1—C2—C3 | 119.74 (9) | O1—C7—C8 | 116.06 (8) |
| C1—C2—H2A | 120.1 | C8iii—C8—C7 | 124.20 (11) |
| C3—C2—H2A | 120.1 | C8iii—C8—H8A | 117.9 |
| C4—C3—C2 | 117.33 (8) | C7—C8—H8A | 117.9 |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z; (iii) −x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z. |
This research was supported by the China Pharmaceutical University (J—YX), the University of Texas–Pan American through a faculty research council award to BC, and in part by a Welch Foundation grant (BG-0017) to the Department of Chemistry.
Bruker (2000). SHELXTL. Version 6.14. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Bruker (2004). APEX2, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Chen, B., Liang, C., Yang, J., Contreras, D. S., Clancy, Y. L., Lobkovsky, E. B., Yaghi, O. M. & Dai, S. (2006). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 1390–1393.
Chun, H., Dybtsev, D. N., Kim, H. & Kim, K. (2005). Chem. Eur. J. 11, 3521–3529.
Eddaoudi, M., Moler, D. B., Li, H., Chen, B., Reineke, T. M., O'Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. (2001). Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 319–330.
Janiak, C. (2003). Dalton Trans. pp. 2781–2804.
Kitagawa, S., Kitaura, R. & Noro, S. (2004). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 2334–2375.
Ma, B.-Q., Mulfort, K. L. & Hupp, J. T. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 4912–4914.
Rather, B. & Zaworotko, M. J. (2003). Chem. Commun. pp. 830–831.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Sluis, P. van der & Spek, A. L. (1990). Acta Cryst. A46, 194–201.
Yaghi, O. M., O'Keeffe, M., Ockwig, N. W., Chae, H. K., Eddaoudi, M. & Kim, J. (2003). Nature (London), 423, 705–714.
Porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) self-assembled by the coordination of suitable metal ions/clusters with organic building blocks are of great interest for their potential applications in gas storage, separation, molecular recognition, magnetism and catalysis (Eddaoudi et al., 2001; Kitagawa et al., 2004; Yaghi et al., 2003; Janiak, 2003). Recently we have been interested in the construction of porous MOFs by making use of mixed organic linkers (Rather & Zaworotko, 2003; Chun et al., 2005; Ma et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006). The title compound is one such MOF constructed from ZnII and the organic linkers fumarato and trans-di-4-pyridylethylene.
A small portion of the extended framework of (I) is shown in Fig. 1. Atom Zn1 is in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. These ZnII ions are bridged by fumarato and trans-di-4-pyridylethylene to form a porous triply-interpenetrated metal-organic framework with a diamond-like structure (Fig. 2).