supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, m2126    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807033272 ]

trans-Bis[2-(2-bromobenzamido)-1,3-oxazoline(1-)-[kappa]2N1,O]copper(II)

Y.-W. Chang and J.-J. Yang

Abstract top

In the mononuclear title complex, [Cu(C10H8BrN2O2)2], the Cu atom, which lies on a centre of symmetry, is in a square-planar geometry defined by a trans-N2O2 donor set.

Comment top

Oxazolines are important structural entities in natural products, can be used as protecting groups for carboxylic acids, and, as well, can be used as building blocks in organic synthesis (Wipf et al., 1992). In addition, oxazolines have been proven to powerful in transition metal-catalyzed organic synthesis (Paintner et al., 2005; Kato et al., 2004). Despite this interest, there are only two relevant structures that have been reported (Zhang et al., 2003; Jiang et al., 2006a,b). In order to extend the work on these complexes, the title mononuclear copper(II) complex, (I), is described herein.

The 2-bromo-N-(4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)benzamide anion serves as a bidentate ligand and ligates the Cu atom through the carbonyl-O2 and oxazoline-N1 atoms. The Cu atom, which lies a centre of inversion, adopts a square planar geometry within a trans-N2O2 donor set.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Douglass & Dains (1934); Jiang et al. (2006a, 2006b); Kato et al. (2004); Paintner et al. (2005); Wipf & Miller (1992); Zhang et al. (2003).

Experimental top

1-(2-Bromobenzoyl)-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)thiourea was prepared according to literature (Douglass & Dains, 1934). This compound (2 mmol, 0.61 g) was dissolved in acetonitrile (20 ml). Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (2 mmol, 0.22 g) and pyridine (0.02 mmol, 0.16 g), were added and the mixture was stirred for 12 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford desired 2-bromo-N-(4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)benzamide (yield 83%). To an ethanol solution (20 ml) of 2-bromo-N-(4,5-dihydrooxazol-2-yl)benzamide (1 mmol, 0.27 g) was added an ethanol solution (10 ml) of cupric(II) nitrate trihydrate (0.5 mmol, 0.12 g) with stirring. Black block-shaped crystals were formed at the bottom of the vessel upon slow evaporation of the solvent. The crystals were isolated, washed three times with ethanol and dried in a vacuum desiccator (yield 90%). Elemental analysis found: C 40.10, H 2.68, N 9.39%; C20H16Br2CuN4O4 requires: C 40.05, H 2.69.0, N 9.37%.

Refinement top

The H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with C—H distances = 0.93–0.97 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of the title compound, (I), showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom-numbering scheme. Unlabelled atoms are related to labelled atoms by 1 - x, -y, 2 - z.
trans-Bis[2-(2-bromobenzamido)-1,3-oxazoline(1-)-κ2N1,O]copper(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cu(C10H8BrN2O2)2]F(000) = 1180
Mr = 599.73Dx = 1.955 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 4720 reflections
a = 11.4637 (9) Åθ = 2.2–27.6°
b = 11.9265 (9) ŵ = 5.03 mm1
c = 14.9016 (12) ÅT = 291 K
V = 2037.4 (3) Å3Block, blue
Z = 40.27 × 0.20 × 0.16 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2006 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube1580 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.059
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
h = 1414
Tmin = 0.31, Tmax = 0.45k = 1214
10306 measured reflectionsl = 1813
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.105H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0539P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2006 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
142 parametersΔρmax = 0.45 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.65 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Cu(C10H8BrN2O2)2]V = 2037.4 (3) Å3
Mr = 599.73Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation
a = 11.4637 (9) ŵ = 5.03 mm1
b = 11.9265 (9) ÅT = 291 K
c = 14.9016 (12) Å0.27 × 0.20 × 0.16 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2006 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
1580 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.31, Tmax = 0.45Rint = 0.059
10306 measured reflectionsθmax = 26.0°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.105Δρmax = 0.45 e Å3
S = 1.08Δρmin = 0.65 e Å3
2006 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
142 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.55307 (4)0.37304 (4)0.91935 (4)0.04221 (18)
C10.6284 (4)0.1319 (4)1.1432 (4)0.0517 (15)
H1A0.59700.20101.11880.062*
H1B0.58430.11131.19620.062*
C20.7570 (4)0.1433 (4)1.1642 (4)0.0394 (11)
H2A0.76950.15111.22830.047*
H2B0.79000.20791.13400.047*
C30.7293 (4)0.0068 (3)1.0760 (3)0.0273 (8)
C40.7008 (4)0.1421 (3)0.9690 (3)0.0285 (9)
C50.7599 (4)0.2323 (3)0.9150 (3)0.0284 (9)
C60.7067 (4)0.3302 (4)0.8842 (3)0.0315 (9)
C70.7635 (4)0.4066 (4)0.8315 (3)0.0395 (11)
H70.72560.47130.81250.047*
C80.8791 (5)0.3862 (5)0.8064 (4)0.0469 (13)
H80.91850.43710.77000.056*
C90.9347 (4)0.2900 (5)0.8359 (4)0.0457 (12)
H91.01150.27570.81950.055*
C100.8756 (4)0.2159 (4)0.8896 (3)0.0356 (10)
H100.91430.15210.90980.043*
Cu0.50000.00001.00000.0329 (2)
N10.6269 (3)0.0407 (3)1.0754 (3)0.0360 (9)
N20.7688 (3)0.0945 (3)1.0295 (3)0.0322 (8)
O10.8085 (3)0.0406 (3)1.1313 (2)0.0365 (7)
O20.5968 (3)0.1175 (2)0.9485 (2)0.0373 (8)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0329 (3)0.0295 (3)0.0642 (4)0.00341 (19)0.0062 (2)0.0014 (2)
C10.035 (3)0.048 (3)0.073 (4)0.013 (2)0.015 (3)0.030 (3)
C20.037 (3)0.028 (2)0.053 (3)0.0020 (18)0.007 (2)0.008 (2)
C30.0254 (19)0.026 (2)0.031 (2)0.0027 (17)0.0070 (16)0.0004 (17)
C40.023 (2)0.0236 (19)0.039 (2)0.0005 (16)0.0003 (18)0.0049 (16)
C50.026 (2)0.027 (2)0.033 (2)0.0025 (16)0.0076 (18)0.0024 (16)
C60.029 (2)0.028 (2)0.037 (2)0.0023 (17)0.0001 (19)0.0004 (18)
C70.037 (2)0.027 (2)0.055 (3)0.0020 (19)0.001 (2)0.013 (2)
C80.037 (3)0.052 (3)0.052 (3)0.011 (2)0.010 (2)0.010 (2)
C90.028 (2)0.057 (3)0.052 (3)0.001 (2)0.002 (2)0.012 (3)
C100.025 (2)0.032 (2)0.050 (3)0.0009 (17)0.0042 (19)0.0025 (19)
Cu0.0224 (3)0.0276 (4)0.0486 (5)0.0066 (3)0.0093 (3)0.0110 (3)
N10.0219 (18)0.0317 (19)0.054 (3)0.0098 (15)0.0098 (16)0.0111 (18)
N20.0247 (18)0.0276 (17)0.044 (2)0.0064 (15)0.0043 (16)0.0052 (16)
O10.0267 (15)0.0387 (16)0.0442 (18)0.0036 (13)0.0134 (14)0.0090 (14)
O20.0254 (16)0.0268 (16)0.060 (2)0.0065 (12)0.0076 (15)0.0156 (14)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Br1—C61.907 (4)C5—C101.393 (6)
C1—N11.484 (6)C5—C61.395 (6)
C1—C21.513 (6)C6—C71.368 (6)
C1—H1A0.9700C7—C81.399 (7)
C1—H1B0.9700C7—H70.9300
C2—O11.446 (5)C8—C91.385 (8)
C2—H2A0.9700C8—H80.9300
C2—H2B0.9700C9—C101.371 (7)
C3—N11.304 (6)C9—H90.9300
C3—N21.333 (5)C10—H100.9300
C3—O11.350 (5)Cu—N1i1.901 (4)
C4—O21.265 (5)Cu—N11.901 (4)
C4—N21.319 (5)Cu—O21.945 (3)
C4—C51.504 (6)Cu—O2i1.945 (3)
N1—C1—C2102.6 (4)C6—C7—C8119.3 (5)
N1—C1—H1A111.2C6—C7—H7120.4
C2—C1—H1A111.2C8—C7—H7120.4
N1—C1—H1B111.2C9—C8—C7119.7 (5)
C2—C1—H1B111.2C9—C8—H8120.2
H1A—C1—H1B109.2C7—C8—H8120.2
O1—C2—C1104.6 (4)C10—C9—C8119.5 (4)
O1—C2—H2A110.8C10—C9—H9120.2
C1—C2—H2A110.8C8—C9—H9120.2
O1—C2—H2B110.8C9—C10—C5122.6 (4)
C1—C2—H2B110.8C9—C10—H10118.7
H2A—C2—H2B108.9C5—C10—H10118.7
N1—C3—N2130.0 (4)N1i—Cu—N1180.000 (1)
N1—C3—O1115.3 (4)N1i—Cu—O291.11 (15)
N2—C3—O1114.7 (4)N1—Cu—O288.89 (15)
O2—C4—N2128.4 (4)N1i—Cu—O2i88.89 (15)
O2—C4—C5117.4 (4)N1—Cu—O2i91.11 (15)
N2—C4—C5114.0 (4)O2—Cu—O2i180.00 (12)
C10—C5—C6116.4 (4)C3—N1—C1107.7 (4)
C10—C5—C4118.3 (4)C3—N1—Cu125.5 (3)
C6—C5—C4125.3 (4)C1—N1—Cu126.8 (3)
C7—C6—C5122.5 (4)C4—N2—C3119.5 (4)
C7—C6—Br1114.7 (3)C3—O1—C2106.7 (3)
C5—C6—Br1122.6 (3)C4—O2—Cu127.6 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+2.
Acknowledgements top

The authors thank Hezuo Minorities Teachers' College for financial support.

references
References top

Bruker (2000). SMART (Version 5.618), SAINT (Version 6.02), SADABS (Version 2.03) and SHELXTL (Version 6.10). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Douglass, I. B. & Dains, F. B. (1934). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56, 719–721.

Jiang, J. L., Duan, C. X., Bai, J. F. & Pan, Y. (2006a). Anal. Sci. 22, x153–x154.

Jiang, J. L., Duan, C. X., Li, Y. Z., Bai, J. F. & Pan, Y. (2006b). Anal. Sci. 22, x119–x120.

Kato, T., Marubayashi, K., Takizawa, S. & Sasai, H. (2004). Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 15, 3693–3697.

Paintner, F. F., Allmendinger, L., Bauschke, G. & Klemann, P. (2005). Org. Lett. 7, 1423–1426.

Wipf, P. & Miller, C. P. (1992). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10975–10977.

Zhang, Y. M., Xian, L., Wei, T. B. & Yu, K. B. (2003). J. Chem. Res. pp. 798–799 [Is journal J. Chem. Res. (S) ?]