supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, m2332    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807037865 ]

cis-Bis(2,2'-bipyridyl)dichloridoruthenium(II) dichloromethane solvate

M. Al-Noaimi and S. F. Haddad

Abstract top

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [RuCl2(C10H8N2)2]·CH2Cl2, the complex consists of two bidentate 2,2'-bipyridyl N-atom donors and two chloride ions coordinated to an RuII centre which lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis. Equivalent ligands are cis, each related by the twofold rotation. One dichloromethane solvent molecule per Ru complex is trapped in the crystal structure.

Comment top

The structure of the title compound, (I), is shown in Fig. 1. A l l bond lengths and angles are normal. The complex has been reported earlier in lower symmetry space groups as the hydrate in C2/c (Eggleston et al., 1985), as an acetone solvate in P21/n (Lackner et al., 2004), and as an I2 adduct in C2/c (Nag et al., 2006).

The structure of (I) displays distorted octahedral coordination to the metal cation, without any significant hydrogen bonding. The solvent molecule is free in the lattice and displays larger thermal displacements than seen in the Ru complex.

The 2,2'-bipyridyl ligand is planar. The five membered chelate ring is folded about the N1···N12 line with a dihedral angle between the plane of the ligand, and the N1/Ru1/N12 plane of 5.0 (2)°. The dihedral angle between the least square planes of the two fold rotation related 2,2'-bipyridyl ligands is 87.78°. The Cl1—Ru1—Cl1i [symmetry code: (i) −x, −y + 2, z] angle is 93.31 (5)°.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Eggleston et al. (1985); Lackner et al. (2004); Nag et al. (2006).

Experimental top

1.0 mmole ruthenium trichloride and 2.0 mmol 2,2'-dipyridyl were refluxed in absolute ethanol for 4 h followed with the addition of 11.8 mmol LiCl and further reflux for additional 1 h. The solvent was then removed by rotary evaporator and the crude product dissolved in dichloromethane, filtered and washed by water and reduced to 20 ml. Chromatography on alumina with 10:1 dichloromethane: methanol as eluent yielded 0.2 g of the neutral complex from the second dark-pink band. Suitable crystals of (I) were obtained upon recrystallization from dichloromethane and slow evapotation of solvent.

Refinement top

All H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H distances fixed at 0.93 Å (aromatic) and 0.97 Å (methylene) and with Uiso constrained to be 1.2Ueq of the carrier atom.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2006); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: XS in SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: XL in SHELXTL; molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: XCIF in SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound (I), with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
cis-Bis(2,2'-bipyridyl)dichloridoruthenium(II) dichloromethane solvate top
Crystal data top
[RuCl2(C10H8N2)2]·CH2Cl2F000 = 1136
Mr = 569.26Dx = 1.638 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Aba2Mo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: A 2 -2acCell parameters from 7381 reflections
a = 12.5658 (9) Åθ = 2.6–29.6º
b = 15.4595 (11) ŵ = 1.16 mm1
c = 11.8864 (9) ÅT = 298 (2) K
V = 2309.1 (3) Å3Plate, red
Z = 40.25 × 0.22 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Bruker/Siemens SMART APEX
diffractometer
2654 independent reflections
Monochromator: graphite2310 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 8.3 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.042
T = 298(2) Kθmax = 27.5º
ω scansθmin = 2.6º
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
h = 16→16
Tmin = 0.761, Tmax = 0.966k = 20→20
16972 measured reflectionsl = 15→15
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0344P)2 + 0.0898P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.064(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.49 e Å3
2654 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.28 e Å3
137 parametersExtinction correction: none
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1260 Freidel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.01 (5)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Crystal data top
[RuCl2(C10H8N2)2]·CH2Cl2V = 2309.1 (3) Å3
Mr = 569.26Z = 4
Orthorhombic, Aba2Mo Kα
a = 12.5658 (9) ŵ = 1.16 mm1
b = 15.4595 (11) ÅT = 298 (2) K
c = 11.8864 (9) Å0.25 × 0.22 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Bruker/Siemens SMART APEX
diffractometer
2654 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
2310 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.761, Tmax = 0.966Rint = 0.042
16972 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.064Δρmax = 0.49 e Å3
S = 1.04Δρmin = 0.28 e Å3
2654 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1260 Freidel pairs
137 parametersFlack parameter: 0.01 (5)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R– factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
C20.2168 (3)0.9265 (2)0.3118 (3)0.0486 (8)
H20.22400.97520.35720.058*
C30.2952 (3)0.8648 (3)0.3151 (4)0.0588 (10)
H30.35370.87150.36220.071*
C40.2863 (2)0.7930 (2)0.2481 (4)0.0594 (9)
H40.33870.75050.24850.071*
C50.1983 (3)0.7851 (2)0.1802 (3)0.0507 (9)
H50.19060.73680.13430.061*
C60.1209 (2)0.84917 (18)0.1803 (3)0.0361 (7)
C70.0243 (3)0.84691 (19)0.1115 (3)0.0369 (7)
C80.0016 (3)0.7830 (2)0.0331 (3)0.0488 (9)
H80.04870.73730.02250.059*
C90.0896 (3)0.7873 (2)0.0284 (3)0.0569 (9)
H90.10480.74510.08180.068*
C100.1594 (3)0.8549 (2)0.0110 (3)0.0505 (9)
H100.22240.85870.05190.061*
C110.1340 (3)0.9165 (2)0.0681 (3)0.0424 (7)
H110.18100.96210.07980.051*
C130.50001.00000.1365 (7)0.127 (5)
H13A0.54851.03180.08830.152*0.50
H13B0.45150.96820.08830.152*0.50
Cl10.07119 (7)1.09792 (5)0.38787 (7)0.0464 (2)
Cl20.57183 (12)0.92754 (9)0.21546 (12)0.1012 (5)
N10.13028 (16)0.91993 (13)0.2463 (3)0.0345 (5)
N120.0450 (2)0.91362 (16)0.1286 (2)0.0334 (6)
Ru10.00001.00000.24825 (6)0.02831 (8)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C20.0427 (18)0.0461 (19)0.057 (2)0.0029 (15)0.0107 (17)0.0032 (16)
C30.0386 (18)0.065 (2)0.072 (3)0.0103 (17)0.0118 (18)0.010 (2)
C40.0447 (17)0.0552 (19)0.078 (2)0.0240 (15)0.004 (3)0.008 (3)
C50.050 (2)0.0377 (17)0.064 (2)0.0135 (15)0.0081 (18)0.0020 (16)
C60.0382 (16)0.0276 (14)0.0424 (17)0.0005 (12)0.0058 (13)0.0014 (13)
C70.0469 (18)0.0267 (15)0.0372 (16)0.0018 (12)0.0049 (13)0.0023 (13)
C80.061 (2)0.0390 (19)0.0468 (19)0.0030 (16)0.0043 (17)0.0140 (16)
C90.069 (2)0.054 (2)0.048 (2)0.0087 (18)0.0080 (19)0.0144 (17)
C100.052 (2)0.056 (2)0.0440 (19)0.0116 (17)0.0157 (17)0.0007 (17)
C110.0425 (17)0.0387 (17)0.0460 (18)0.0010 (14)0.0048 (14)0.0035 (14)
C130.190 (11)0.130 (8)0.061 (5)0.101 (7)0.0000.000
Cl10.0544 (5)0.0369 (4)0.0479 (4)0.0043 (4)0.0010 (4)0.0102 (4)
Cl20.1190 (12)0.0895 (8)0.0952 (11)0.0280 (8)0.0265 (8)0.0055 (8)
N10.0339 (11)0.0295 (10)0.0403 (12)0.0028 (8)0.0011 (15)0.0003 (14)
N120.0352 (13)0.0269 (14)0.0380 (14)0.0006 (11)0.0017 (12)0.0019 (11)
Ru10.03049 (13)0.02159 (12)0.03284 (14)0.00206 (12)0.0000.000
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
C2—N11.342 (4)C9—H90.9300
C2—C31.372 (5)C10—C111.376 (5)
C2—H20.9300C10—H100.9300
C3—C41.370 (6)C11—N121.330 (4)
C3—H30.9300C11—H110.9300
C4—C51.374 (5)C13—Cl2i1.718 (5)
C4—H40.9300C13—Cl21.718 (5)
C5—C61.388 (4)C13—H13A0.9700
C5—H50.9300C13—H13B0.9700
C6—N11.351 (4)Cl1—Ru12.4179 (9)
C6—C71.464 (4)N1—Ru12.052 (2)
C7—N121.365 (4)N12—Ru12.031 (3)
C7—C81.388 (5)Ru1—N12ii2.031 (3)
C8—C91.362 (5)Ru1—N1ii2.052 (2)
C8—H80.9300Ru1—Cl1ii2.4179 (9)
C9—C101.379 (5)
N1—C2—C3123.0 (3)C10—C11—H11118.6
N1—C2—H2118.5Cl2i—C13—Cl2113.7 (5)
C3—C2—H2118.5Cl2i—C13—H13A108.8
C4—C3—C2119.3 (3)Cl2—C13—H13A108.8
C4—C3—H3120.4Cl2i—C13—H13B108.8
C2—C3—H3120.4Cl2—C13—H13B108.8
C3—C4—C5118.6 (3)H13A—C13—H13B107.7
C3—C4—H4120.7C2—N1—C6117.9 (3)
C5—C4—H4120.7C2—N1—Ru1126.4 (2)
C4—C5—C6120.0 (3)C6—N1—Ru1115.21 (19)
C4—C5—H5120.0C11—N12—C7118.8 (3)
C6—C5—H5120.0C11—N12—Ru1126.2 (2)
N1—C6—C5121.2 (3)C7—N12—Ru1115.0 (2)
N1—C6—C7114.5 (2)N12—Ru1—N12ii91.08 (15)
C5—C6—C7124.3 (3)N12—Ru1—N179.47 (11)
N12—C7—C8120.4 (3)N12ii—Ru1—N199.59 (11)
N12—C7—C6115.3 (3)N12—Ru1—N1ii99.59 (11)
C8—C7—C6124.2 (3)N12ii—Ru1—N1ii79.47 (11)
C9—C8—C7119.9 (3)N1—Ru1—N1ii178.68 (19)
C9—C8—H8120.0N12—Ru1—Cl1174.38 (8)
C7—C8—H8120.0N12ii—Ru1—Cl188.07 (7)
C8—C9—C10119.5 (3)N1—Ru1—Cl195.19 (8)
C8—C9—H9120.3N1ii—Ru1—Cl185.72 (8)
C10—C9—H9120.3N12—Ru1—Cl1ii88.07 (7)
C11—C10—C9118.6 (3)N12ii—Ru1—Cl1ii174.38 (8)
C11—C10—H10120.7N1—Ru1—Cl1ii85.72 (8)
C9—C10—H10120.7N1ii—Ru1—Cl1ii95.19 (8)
N12—C11—C10122.8 (3)Cl1—Ru1—Cl1ii93.31 (5)
N12—C11—H11118.6
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+2, z; (ii) −x, −y+2, z.
Acknowledgements top

This work was supported in part by the Deanship of Academic Research, University of Jordan. Thanks are also due to Brendan Twamley, University Research Office, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.

references
References top

Bruker (2003). XS, XL, XP and XCIF in SHELXTL. Version 6.14. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Bruker (2004). SADABS. Version 2004/1. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Bruker (2006). SMART (Version 5.632) and SAINT-Plus (Version 7.23a). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Eggleston, D. S., Goldsby, K. A., Hodgson, D. J. & Meyer, T. J. (1985). Inorg. Chem. 24, 4573–?.

Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.

Lackner, W., Schmid, R., Kirchner, K. & Merieter, K. (2004). Private communication to the Cambridge Structural Database (deposition number CCDC 231460). CCDC, Union Road, Cambridge, England.

Nag, S., Drew, M. G. B. & Datta, D. (2006). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 9, 310–312.