Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The title compound, [Cu(NCS)2(C3H10N2)], synthesized from the reaction of propane-1,3-diamine, ammonium thio­cyanate and copper acetate monohydrate in anhydrous methanol solution, is a mononuclear copper(II) complex which lies on a mirror plane. The CuII ion is four-coordinated by the two N atoms of the propane-1,3-diamine ligand and by two N atoms from two thio­cyanate ligands, forming a square-planar geometry. The propane-1,3-diamine ligand is disordered over four orientations, two symmetry-independent and two related by mirror symmetry, each with an occupancy of 0.25. The refinement results indicate inversion twinning.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039645/ci2424sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039645/ci2424Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 660112

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 295 K
  • Mean [sigma](N-C) = 0.005 Å
  • Disorder in main residue
  • R factor = 0.023
  • wR factor = 0.066
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 13.3

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C STRVA01_ALERT_4_C Flack test results are ambiguous. From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack 0.500 From the CIF: _refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack_su 0.020 PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.92 PLAT076_ALERT_1_C Occupancy 0.50 less than 1.0 for Sp.pos . H3B PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for C5 PLAT301_ALERT_3_C Main Residue Disorder ......................... 14.00 Perc. PLAT720_ALERT_4_C Number of Unusual/Non-Standard Label(s) ........ 6
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.924 Tmax scaled 0.513 Tmin scaled 0.467 REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 27.48 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1287 Count of symmetry unique reflns 692 Completeness (_total/calc) 185.98% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 595 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.860 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT033_ALERT_2_G Flack Parameter Value Deviates 2 * su from zero. 0.50 PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 63
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 6 ALERT level C = Check and explain 4 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 4 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Recently, we have reported the crystal structures of a few Schiff base metal complexes (You, Han et al., 2006; You, Wang & Han, 2006; You & Niu, 2006). As an extension of the work on the structural characterization of such complexes, the title copper(II) complex is reported here.

The complex is a mononuclear copper(II) complex, which lies on a mirror plane. The CuII ion is four-coordinated by two N atoms of the propane-1,3-diamine ligand and by two N atoms from two thiocyanate ligands, forming a square planar geometry (Table 1). The coordination bond lengths are within normal ranges and comparable to the values observed in other copper(II) complexes reported by us recently (You & Zhu, 2004; You et al., 2004; Ye & You, 2007).

Related literature top

For related structures, see: Ye & You (2007); You et al. (2004); You, Han et al. (2006); You, Wang & Han (2006); You & Niu (2006); You & Zhu (2004).

Experimental top

All the reagents used were of commercial grade and used without further purification. Propane-1,3-diamine (0.1 mmol, 7.4 mg), ammonium thiocyanate (0.2 mmol, 15.2 mg) and copper acetate monohydrate (0.1 mmol, 20.0 mg) were mixed in an anhydrous methanol solution (10 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min to give a clear blue solution. After keeping the solution in air for a week, blue block-shaped crystals were formed.

Refinement top

All non-hydrogen atoms except the C atoms of the 1,3-propanediamine ligand lie on a mirror plane. The 1,3-propanediamine ligand is disordered over four orientations, two symmetry independent and two related by mirror symmetry, each with an occupancy of 0.25. The N—C bond distances were restrained to 1.45 (1) Å and the C–C distances to 1.54 (1) Å. The 1,3-related N···C distances were restrained to 2.35 (1) Å and the 1,3-related C···C distances to 2.51 (1) Å. Additionally, the displacement parameters of the primed atoms were set to those of the unprimed ones; the anisotropic displacement parameters of the entire ligand were restrained to be nearly isotropic. C– and N-bound H atoms were generated geometrically (C–H = 0.97 and N–H = 0.86 Å), and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation. The refined Flack parameter of 0.50 (2) indicates that the crystal is an inversion twin.

Structure description top

Recently, we have reported the crystal structures of a few Schiff base metal complexes (You, Han et al., 2006; You, Wang & Han, 2006; You & Niu, 2006). As an extension of the work on the structural characterization of such complexes, the title copper(II) complex is reported here.

The complex is a mononuclear copper(II) complex, which lies on a mirror plane. The CuII ion is four-coordinated by two N atoms of the propane-1,3-diamine ligand and by two N atoms from two thiocyanate ligands, forming a square planar geometry (Table 1). The coordination bond lengths are within normal ranges and comparable to the values observed in other copper(II) complexes reported by us recently (You & Zhu, 2004; You et al., 2004; Ye & You, 2007).

For related structures, see: Ye & You (2007); You et al. (2004); You, Han et al. (2006); You, Wang & Han (2006); You & Niu (2006); You & Zhu (2004).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of the title compound, showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids and the atom-numbering scheme. Only one of the four disorder components is shown.
(1,3-Propanediamine-κ2N,N')bis(thiocyanato-κN)χopper(II) top
Crystal data top
[Cu(NCS)2(C3H10N2)]F(000) = 516
Mr = 253.83Dx = 1.633 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Cmc21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: C 2c -2Cell parameters from 4527 reflections
a = 5.9505 (17) Åθ = 2.7–27.5°
b = 20.478 (6) ŵ = 2.47 mm1
c = 8.475 (2) ÅT = 295 K
V = 1032.7 (5) Å3Block, blue
Z = 40.32 × 0.30 × 0.27 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1000 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1287 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1264 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.020
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 77
Tmin = 0.505, Tmax = 0.555k = 2626
4393 measured reflectionsl = 1111
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0479P)2 + 0.1407P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.066(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
1287 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.36 e Å3
97 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
63 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.010 (1)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 593 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapAbsolute structure parameter: 0.50 (2)
Crystal data top
[Cu(NCS)2(C3H10N2)]V = 1032.7 (5) Å3
Mr = 253.83Z = 4
Orthorhombic, Cmc21Mo Kα radiation
a = 5.9505 (17) ŵ = 2.47 mm1
b = 20.478 (6) ÅT = 295 K
c = 8.475 (2) Å0.32 × 0.30 × 0.27 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1000 CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1287 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
1264 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.505, Tmax = 0.555Rint = 0.020
4393 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.066Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
S = 1.04Δρmin = 0.36 e Å3
1287 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 593 Friedel pairs
97 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.50 (2)
63 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Cu10.50000.701275 (15)0.50000.04011 (15)
S10.50000.80305 (4)0.0035 (2)0.0479 (2)
S20.50000.92135 (5)0.6725 (2)0.0766 (4)
N30.50000.72640 (19)0.2739 (4)0.0501 (7)
N40.50000.79405 (14)0.5584 (5)0.0516 (8)
C40.50000.75676 (17)0.1619 (4)0.0404 (7)
C50.50000.84648 (18)0.6040 (5)0.0481 (8)
N10.50000.67852 (16)0.7296 (4)0.0495 (7)
H110.62420.69400.76560.059*0.25
H120.39530.70210.77030.059*0.25
H130.56560.71000.77860.059*0.25
H140.36230.67830.76030.059*0.25
N20.50000.60769 (14)0.4330 (4)0.0529 (9)
H210.37210.60050.38900.064*0.25
H220.59990.60400.36030.064*0.25
H230.36160.59640.42240.064*0.25
H240.55870.60650.34030.064*0.25
C10.477 (2)0.6158 (3)0.8026 (9)0.052 (2)0.25
H1A0.37150.61910.88960.063*0.25
H1B0.62090.60250.84530.063*0.25
C20.396 (2)0.5649 (4)0.6890 (11)0.072 (3)0.25
H2A0.24580.57700.65440.086*0.25
H2B0.38260.52390.74530.086*0.25
C30.539 (3)0.5537 (6)0.5448 (12)0.064 (3)0.25
H3A0.69600.55210.57430.077*0.25
H3B0.50000.51250.49590.077*0.50
C1'0.6032 (17)0.6171 (4)0.7849 (11)0.052 (2)0.25
H1'10.57510.61110.89670.063*0.25
H1'20.76440.61810.76800.063*0.25
C2'0.497 (4)0.5609 (4)0.6903 (10)0.072 (3)0.25
H2'10.33770.56900.67670.086*0.25
H2'20.51470.52020.74760.086*0.25
C3'0.611 (3)0.5552 (6)0.5270 (12)0.064 (3)0.25
H3'10.77170.56260.53480.077*0.25
H3'20.58480.51260.48070.077*0.25
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0494 (2)0.0383 (2)0.0327 (2)0.0000.0000.00364 (17)
S10.0423 (4)0.0641 (5)0.0374 (4)0.0000.0000.0121 (5)
S20.0979 (8)0.0411 (5)0.0909 (9)0.0000.0000.0032 (5)
N30.0439 (15)0.065 (2)0.0419 (17)0.0000.0000.0092 (15)
N40.0581 (19)0.0427 (15)0.0541 (17)0.0000.0000.0009 (12)
C40.0317 (13)0.0519 (19)0.0375 (16)0.0000.0000.0009 (14)
C50.0492 (16)0.0446 (17)0.0506 (19)0.0000.0000.0086 (16)
N10.0533 (16)0.0577 (19)0.0374 (16)0.000 (11)0.000 (11)0.0062 (14)
N20.068 (2)0.0428 (16)0.0475 (17)0.007 (7)0.017 (6)0.0033 (15)
C10.059 (7)0.055 (3)0.042 (3)0.002 (4)0.000 (4)0.012 (2)
C20.077 (7)0.062 (3)0.077 (4)0.025 (5)0.010 (5)0.021 (3)
C30.078 (8)0.044 (2)0.072 (5)0.001 (4)0.001 (4)0.000 (2)
N1'0.0533 (16)0.0577 (19)0.0374 (16)0.000 (11)0.000 (11)0.0062 (14)
N2'0.068 (2)0.0428 (16)0.0475 (17)0.007 (7)0.017 (6)0.0033 (15)
C1'0.059 (7)0.055 (3)0.042 (3)0.002 (4)0.000 (4)0.012 (2)
C2'0.077 (7)0.062 (3)0.077 (4)0.025 (5)0.010 (5)0.021 (3)
C3'0.078 (8)0.044 (2)0.072 (5)0.001 (4)0.001 (4)0.000 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N41.963 (3)C1—H1A0.97
Cu1—N31.984 (3)C1—H1B0.97
Cu1—N21.999 (3)C2—C31.507 (9)
Cu1—N12.001 (3)C2—H2A0.97
S1—C41.644 (4)C2—H2B0.97
S2—C51.639 (4)C3—H3A0.97
N3—C41.134 (5)C3—H3B0.97
N4—C51.141 (5)C1'—C2'1.537 (10)
N1—C11.432 (7)C1'—H1'10.97
N1—H110.86C1'—H1'20.97
N1—H120.86C2'—C3'1.545 (10)
N2—C31.473 (9)C2'—H2'10.97
N2—H210.86C2'—H2'20.97
N2—H220.86C3'—H3'10.97
C1—C21.499 (9)C3'—H3'20.97
N4—Cu1—N389.57 (16)C2—C1—H1B109.2
N4—Cu1—N2178.10 (16)H1A—C1—H1B107.9
N3—Cu1—N288.53 (15)C1—C2—C3116.4 (8)
N4—Cu1—N188.87 (16)C1—C2—H2A108.2
N3—Cu1—N1178.44 (16)C3—C2—H2A108.2
N2—Cu1—N193.03 (14)C1—C2—H2B108.2
C4—N3—Cu1161.8 (4)C3—C2—H2B108.2
C5—N4—Cu1174.8 (4)H2A—C2—H2B107.3
N3—C4—S1178.0 (4)N2—C3—C2108.6 (7)
N4—C5—S2179.1 (4)N2—C3—H3A110.0
C1—N1—Cu1129.0 (4)C2—C3—H3A110.0
C1—N1—H11105.0N2—C3—H3B110.0
Cu1—N1—H11105.0C2—C3—H3B110.0
C1—N1—H12105.0H3A—C3—H3B108.3
Cu1—N1—H12105.0C2'—C1'—H1'1110.2
H11—N1—H12105.9C2'—C1'—H1'2110.2
C3—N2—Cu1122.4 (5)H1'1—C1'—H1'2108.5
C3—N2—H21106.7C1'—C2'—C3'110.1 (10)
Cu1—N2—H21106.7C1'—C2'—H2'1109.6
C3—N2—H22106.7C3'—C2'—H2'1109.6
Cu1—N2—H22106.7C1'—C2'—H2'2109.6
H21—N2—H22106.6C3'—C2'—H2'2109.6
N1—C1—C2112.1 (6)H2'1—C2'—H2'2108.2
N1—C1—H1A109.2C2'—C3'—H3'1111.1
C2—C1—H1A109.2C2'—C3'—H3'2111.1
N1—C1—H1B109.2H3'1—C3'—H3'2109.1
N4—Cu1—N3—C40N1—Cu1—N2—C310.6 (7)
N2—Cu1—N3—C4180Cu1—N1—C1—C213.6 (13)
N4—Cu1—N1—C1172.9 (7)N1—C1—C2—C358.3 (14)
N2—Cu1—N1—C17.1 (7)Cu1—N2—C3—C246.8 (12)
N3—Cu1—N2—C3169.4 (7)C1—C2—C3—N276.4 (13)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Cu(NCS)2(C3H10N2)]
Mr253.83
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Cmc21
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)5.9505 (17), 20.478 (6), 8.475 (2)
V3)1032.7 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.47
Crystal size (mm)0.32 × 0.30 × 0.27
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART 1000 CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.505, 0.555
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4393, 1287, 1264
Rint0.020
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.023, 0.066, 1.04
No. of reflections1287
No. of parameters97
No. of restraints63
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.34, 0.36
Absolute structureFlack (1983), 593 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.50 (2)

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b).

Selected geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N41.963 (3)Cu1—N21.999 (3)
Cu1—N31.984 (3)Cu1—N12.001 (3)
N4—Cu1—N389.57 (16)N4—Cu1—N188.87 (16)
N4—Cu1—N2178.10 (16)N3—Cu1—N1178.44 (16)
N3—Cu1—N288.53 (15)N2—Cu1—N193.03 (14)
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds