Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title compound, C4H8N4O2, which was synthesized by the reaction of lactic acid with hydrazine hydrate under solvent-free conditions, all bond lengths and angles are normal. In the crystal structure, inter­molecular O—H...N and N—H...O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into two-dimensional corrugated sheets parallel to the bc plane.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680704158X/cv2290sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S160053680704158X/cv2290Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 657951

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 298 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.039
  • wR factor = 0.106
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.0

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT066_ALERT_1_C Predicted and Reported Transmissions Identical . ? PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ?
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

In this paper, we present the title compound, 4-amino-3,5-bis(1-hydroxyethyl)-l,2,4-triazole, (I), synthesized through the condensation of lactic acid and hydrazine hydrate under solvent-free conditions.

In (I) (Fig. 1), all bond lengths and angles are normal and comparable to those observed in the complex [Cu(L)2] (HL=4-salicylideneamino-3,5-dimethanol-1,2,4-triazole) (Yi et al., 2004)

In the crystal, there exist typical intermolecular N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds (Table 1), which assemble the molecules into infinite two-dimensional sheets (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

In the complex [Cu(L)2] (HL=4-salicylideneamino-3,5-dimethanol-1,2,4-triazole) (Yi et al., 2004), all bond lengths and angles in L are comparable with those found in the title compound.

Experimental top

A mixture of lactic acid (1 mmol) and hydrazine hydrate (1.05 mmol) was well stirred at room temperature for 10 minutes. The crude compound was purified by silica gel column chromatography. Elemental analysis: calculated for C4H8N4O2: C 33.33, H 5.59, N 38.87%; found: C 33.38, H 5.52, N 38.75%.

Refinement top

The methylene H atoms were placed in idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with methylene C—H distances of 0.97 Å. The Uiso(H) values were set at 1.2Ueq(C). The hydroxy H atoms were placed in idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with O—H distances of 0.82 Å. The Uiso(H) values were set at 1.5 Ueq(O). The amino H atoms were placed in idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with N—H distances of 0.90 Å. The Uiso(H) values were set at 1.2 Ueq(N).

Structure description top

In this paper, we present the title compound, 4-amino-3,5-bis(1-hydroxyethyl)-l,2,4-triazole, (I), synthesized through the condensation of lactic acid and hydrazine hydrate under solvent-free conditions.

In (I) (Fig. 1), all bond lengths and angles are normal and comparable to those observed in the complex [Cu(L)2] (HL=4-salicylideneamino-3,5-dimethanol-1,2,4-triazole) (Yi et al., 2004)

In the crystal, there exist typical intermolecular N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds (Table 1), which assemble the molecules into infinite two-dimensional sheets (Fig. 2).

In the complex [Cu(L)2] (HL=4-salicylideneamino-3,5-dimethanol-1,2,4-triazole) (Yi et al., 2004), all bond lengths and angles in L are comparable with those found in the title compound.

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: SMART; data reduction: SAINT (Siemens, 1996); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP drawing of the title complex with atomic numbering scheme and thermal ellipsoids at 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A perspective view of the crystal packing of (I). Dashed lines denote intermolecular hydrogen bonds.
4-Amino-3,5-bis(1-hydroxyethyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole top
Crystal data top
C4H8N4O2Dx = 1.530 Mg m3
Mr = 144.14Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, PbcaCell parameters from 2134 reflections
a = 8.7936 (17) Åθ = 2.5–27.6°
b = 8.8609 (18) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
c = 16.058 (2) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1251.3 (4) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.54 × 0.47 × 0.40 mm
F(000) = 608
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1107 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube853 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.048
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 510
Tmin = 0.936, Tmax = 0.952k = 109
4961 measured reflectionsl = 1917
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.106 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.045P)2 + 0.8519P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1107 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
92 parametersΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.061 (4)
Crystal data top
C4H8N4O2V = 1251.3 (4) Å3
Mr = 144.14Z = 8
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation
a = 8.7936 (17) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
b = 8.8609 (18) ÅT = 298 K
c = 16.058 (2) Å0.54 × 0.47 × 0.40 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1107 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
853 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.936, Tmax = 0.952Rint = 0.048
4961 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0390 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.106H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.00Δρmax = 0.21 e Å3
1107 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
92 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.06178 (18)0.76742 (18)0.23561 (10)0.0344 (4)
N20.05790 (18)0.66499 (18)0.23983 (10)0.0349 (4)
N30.01255 (17)0.71644 (17)0.10961 (9)0.0307 (4)
N40.0336 (2)0.7147 (2)0.02318 (10)0.0443 (5)
H4A0.05990.80630.00370.053*
H4B0.05030.68240.00340.053*
O10.16445 (16)0.38730 (15)0.11444 (8)0.0402 (4)
H10.11960.35010.15420.060*
O20.13453 (18)1.04642 (15)0.10268 (8)0.0444 (5)
H20.09561.08360.14430.067*
C10.1008 (2)0.6365 (2)0.16332 (11)0.0307 (5)
C20.0871 (2)0.7968 (2)0.15687 (11)0.0304 (5)
C30.2228 (2)0.5305 (2)0.13717 (13)0.0385 (5)
H3A0.27710.57330.09020.046*
H3B0.29450.51820.18250.046*
C40.2009 (2)0.9057 (2)0.12349 (12)0.0378 (5)
H4C0.24820.86290.07430.045*
H4D0.27980.92150.16480.045*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0390 (9)0.0334 (9)0.0310 (9)0.0043 (7)0.0023 (7)0.0010 (7)
N20.0402 (10)0.0332 (9)0.0313 (9)0.0032 (8)0.0007 (7)0.0027 (7)
N30.0347 (9)0.0327 (9)0.0246 (8)0.0026 (7)0.0005 (6)0.0009 (7)
N40.0573 (12)0.0504 (11)0.0253 (9)0.0000 (9)0.0020 (8)0.0000 (8)
O10.0542 (9)0.0333 (8)0.0331 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0046 (6)0.0030 (6)
O20.0614 (10)0.0369 (9)0.0350 (8)0.0017 (7)0.0072 (7)0.0048 (6)
C10.0315 (10)0.0287 (10)0.0320 (10)0.0039 (8)0.0007 (8)0.0008 (8)
C20.0321 (10)0.0280 (10)0.0312 (10)0.0036 (8)0.0008 (8)0.0010 (8)
C30.0365 (11)0.0379 (11)0.0411 (11)0.0003 (9)0.0044 (9)0.0007 (9)
C40.0378 (11)0.0387 (11)0.0369 (11)0.0020 (9)0.0051 (9)0.0007 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C21.310 (2)O1—H10.8200
N1—N21.391 (2)O2—C41.417 (2)
N2—C11.310 (2)O2—H20.8200
N3—C11.359 (2)C1—C31.486 (3)
N3—C21.361 (2)C2—C41.489 (3)
N3—N41.400 (2)C3—H3A0.9700
N4—H4A0.9000C3—H3B0.9700
N4—H4B0.9000C4—H4C0.9700
O1—C31.417 (2)C4—H4D0.9700
C2—N1—N2107.79 (14)N1—C2—C4126.18 (17)
C1—N2—N1107.30 (15)N3—C2—C4124.81 (17)
C1—N3—C2106.64 (15)O1—C3—C1112.19 (16)
C1—N3—N4123.21 (16)O1—C3—H3A109.2
C2—N3—N4130.08 (16)C1—C3—H3A109.2
N3—N4—H4A111.6O1—C3—H3B109.2
N3—N4—H4B111.4C1—C3—H3B109.2
H4A—N4—H4B109.5H3A—C3—H3B107.9
C3—O1—H1109.5O2—C4—C2112.22 (16)
C4—O2—H2109.5O2—C4—H4C109.2
N2—C1—N3109.32 (16)C2—C4—H4C109.2
N2—C1—C3126.46 (17)O2—C4—H4D109.2
N3—C1—C3124.19 (17)C2—C4—H4D109.2
N1—C2—N3108.94 (16)H4C—C4—H4D107.9
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N2i0.822.022.820 (2)164
N4—H4B···O1ii0.902.142.955 (2)151
N4—H4A···O2iii0.902.253.058 (2)150
O1—H1···N1iv0.821.982.782 (2)165
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x, y+2, z; (iv) x, y1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC4H8N4O2
Mr144.14
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)8.7936 (17), 8.8609 (18), 16.058 (2)
V3)1251.3 (4)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.12
Crystal size (mm)0.54 × 0.47 × 0.40
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.936, 0.952
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4961, 1107, 853
Rint0.048
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.039, 0.106, 1.00
No. of reflections1107
No. of parameters92
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.21, 0.20

Computer programs: SMART (Siemens, 1996), SMART, SAINT (Siemens, 1996), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997a), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 1997b), SHELXTL.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N2i0.822.022.820 (2)164.0
N4—H4B···O1ii0.902.142.955 (2)150.9
N4—H4A···O2iii0.902.253.058 (2)149.6
O1—H1···N1iv0.821.982.782 (2)165.4
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x, y+2, z; (iv) x, y1/2, z+1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds